Showing posts with label Morrison Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morrison Government. Show all posts
Tuesday 2 April 2019
Morrison Government still refusing to tackle rising greenhouse gas emissions
The
Guardian, 31 March 2019:
Cuts to carbon emissions
from vehicle efficiency standards have been left out of government projections
for meeting Australia’s Paris climate commitments, indicating the policy has
been shelved.
The office of the
transport minister, Michael McCormack, said the government had not made a
decision on “how or when” standards to cut carbon pollution from vehicles might
be implemented.
After almost five years
of submissions a spokesman said the government “is not going to rush into a
regulatory solution” with regards to vehicle emissions.
New data shows
Australia’s emissions from transport are soaring and projected to be 82% higher
in 2030 than they were in 1990.
Australia lags behind
the rest of the world in setting vehicle efficiency standards, with most
countries in the OECD adopting policies to reduce emissions and improve the
efficiency of cars.
The ministerial forum on
vehicle emissions was set up under the Turnbull government in 2015, and
stakeholders are frustrated at the lack of progress.
Fact sheets produced by
the government that set out how it intends to reach Australia’s emissions
reduction targets under the Paris agreement suggest any policy on vehicle
emissions standards has been abandoned.
In 2015, the government
produced a
graph indicating it expected to achieve cuts of about 100m tonnes
between 2020 and 2030 through vehicle emissions standards.
The government’s latest
climate package contains no mention of this, and projects only about
10m tonnes of abatement through an electric vehicle strategy, with no reference
to vehicle emissions standards....
Thursday 14 March 2019
Did Morrison & Co send your chance of getting a decent pay rise up in smoke?
“Brace yourselves Australia — everyday things are
about to cost more, and your chance of a pay rise has gone up in smoke” [News
Corp Journalist David Ross writing
in news,com,au, 8 March 2019]
Well it had
to happen. After five and a half years of an
Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison Coalition Government the nation has reached what
is known as a per capita recession.
This hasn’t
occurred since the Howard Government’s last full year in power.
Almost sixty per
cent of Australia’s Gross Domestic Product comes from consumer spending and
five and a half years of deliberate wage suppression by both the federal
government and the business sector means the majority of consumers have little
to spend.
The economy
has been markedly slowing under Scott Morrison’s economic policies, first as
federal treasurer then as prime minister.
Annual growth
has now fallen to just 2.3 per cent according to the Reserve Bank.
This slowing
has a cascade effect.
Labels:
economy,
government policy,
Morrison Government,
wages
Tuesday 26 February 2019
Sad statistics are generated by Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison's war on the poor & vulnerable
Liberal MP for Cook Scott John Morrison has been a
Cabinet Minister since 18.9.2013, was Minister for Social Services from
23.12.2014 to 21.9.2015, then Treasurer from 21.9.2015 to 26.8.2018 and now Prime
Minister of Australia since 24.8.2018 – these are the sad statistics he leaves
in his wake.
The Australian, 21 February 2019:
As Department of Human
Services secretary Renee Leon faced heated questioning about the controversial
“robodebt” program — which averages reported income and generates debts to
current and former welfare recipients — she said it is not known whether people
have taken their own lives due to the program.
“There is not an
elevated death rate among the cohort who have received a debt notice. It’s not
to say we are not troubled that people die,” Ms Leon said…
Greens Senator Rachel
Siewert said the numbers are particularly troubling because 663 people out of
the 2030 had “vulnerability indicators” attached.
Of the 2,030 people who died after receiving a Centrelink
Online
Compliance Intervention letter (‘robodebt’ ) which was generated sometime
between July 2016 to October 2018:
102 were aged
16-25 years;
327 were aged
26-35 years;
347 were aged
36-45 years;
466 were aged
46-55 years;
536 were aged
56-65 years;
251 were aged
66-80 years; and
1 was aged 81-100
years.
By gender 637 of these welfare recipients were Female and 1,393 Male.
“If death rates remained
similar throughout the period July 2016 - October 2018 ... approximately 6% of
all deaths of 16-35 year olds in Australia occurred for people who were subject
to Centrelink #robodebt compliance.” [Dr Ben Eltham on Twitter,
22 February 2019]
BACKGROUND
Gilbert Sullivan QC weiting in the Herald
Sun, 21 February 2019:
The Model Litigant
Policy of the Commonwealth is a direction issued by the Attorney-General under
the Judiciary Act.
The claims reported to
have been made by Centrelink are said to target 1.5 million people and aim to
claw back $4.6 billion in what are alleged to be overpayments of welfare.
The claims date back to
2010 and Centrelink demands the repayment of what it alleges to be overpayments
caused by the understatement of income; but it knows very well that it is
unable to prove these claims.
Centrelink has destroyed
its records and is entirely dependent on information obtained from the
Australian Taxation Office. It divides the gross annual income obtained in this
way by 26 to calculate what it terms an “apportioned actual income”.
It then proceeds to claim
the difference between the fortnightly income declared by the payee and the
apportioned actual income as an understatement by the recipient which it then
claims as a debt.
It is only by sighting
pay-slips or bank statements that the accuracy of the declared fortnightly
income can be verified. Centrelink’s claims rest on it proving that the
fortnightly income was falsely declared.
It can only succeed if
it can prove this on the balance of probabilities. The ATO information on its
own is worthless and needs a point of comparison in the form of contemporaneous
records. Annual income does not translate into fortnightly income.
The absurdity of this
methodology is obvious.
A full-time student in
2010 on a youth allowance may well have had a part-time job to support their
studies. Some weeks they may have earned, say $150, other weeks nothing.
They may have entered
the work force full-time in the last two months of the financial year and
earned say, $8000.
Dividing the yearly
income by 26 cannot establish a dishonest understatement for the weeks the
student earned $150 or nothing. Without the contemporary records, no
understatement can be proved.
This methodology is in
breach of model litigant obligations in a number of respects.
First, the mathematical
basis underpinning it is invalid and known to be so by Centrelink; and the
maintenance of a claim known to be invalid is a fundamental breach of the
obligation to act as a model litigant.
Second, to imagine that
casual employees retain pay slips from 2010 is ludicrous; many of the employers
from that time no longer exist and it is inconceivable that anyone can produce
pay-slips.
Further, while some bank
records are obtainable, they are archived and expensive to obtain. Placing the
onus on a recipient to procure bank statements is yet a further breach of model
litigant obligations.
There is no reason why
Centrelink could not obtain these records by subpoena or otherwise.
Furthermore, the actions of Centrelink reverse the onus of proof which, of
itself, is a breach of model litigant obligations.
MammaMia, 21 February 2019:
“It was demeaning,
embarrassing, and if it wasn’t for my son… I considered suicide.”
“It was dehumanising. I
had only lost my husband months before… I was grieving.”
These two sentences
represent how two women, from two different walks of life, in separate states
felt – when they received a Centrelink
debt notice.
Or more exactly what
happened when they tried to deal with the fallout of a
Centrelink debt notice……
The Centrelink letters
are sent out through an automated system. In the old system, it equated to
about 20,000 a year, but thanks to a new system in 2016 – it’s generating
20,000 letters a week.
Gabriella* received one
of those letters just last year.
She received it when she
was trying to come to terms with the death of her husband who had died in a
boating accident a few months before.
She was left with two
young children trying to work out how to move on with life.
She had never received
anything from Centrelink, she hadn’t needed to. But Centrelink had sent her
$13,000 in weekly increments, and they wanted their money back.
“The stress… I was
already dealing with enough… I knew I didn’t owe them money,” she told Mamamia.
Turns out Centrelink had
been sending her money that she hadn’t applied for – which had been bouncing
back for months.
“I made a phone call
first, they realised they’d made a mistake. But she [the person on the phone]
couldn’t fix it.”
She was given a
different number.
“I spent hours on the
telephone waiting for them to answer [to help]. It’s impossible to get
through,” explained Gabriella.
So instead, she was
forced to take a day off work and go into the Centrelink office itself.
“She looked at me like I
was lying,” Gabriella told Mamamia, of the moment she explained her
story – yet again.
Gabriella is most
frustrated at the time and effort she had to put in to fix this wrong. A wrong
that was made by an automated letter, and which cost her a days’ wage, and
almost cost her $13,000.
“I am grieving, but I am
pretty stable… my head is pretty OK. But there are people who get these letters
and they are not OK,” said a teary Gabriella.
“I am actually in the
mental health industry, so I am probably more equipped than a lot at noticing
triggers in myself. But what if I wasn’t?
“My situation never
should have happened, if there had been a human being looking at my account
they would have realised it was bouncing back.”
“It was dismay. It was a
shock to the system. It is scaremongering, they don’t explain anything, and
it’s very… dehumanising,” she said of her experience..........
Tuesday 12 February 2019
The lies Liberals tell on the subject of aged care
The
Australian, 7
February 2019:
Aged Care Minister Ken
Wyatt was handed a departmental briefing report showing the “winners and
losers” from the Coalition’s $2 billion savings drive in the aged-care sector
shortly after Scott Morrison announced a royal commission and denied funding
cuts.
Documents obtained by
The Australian under Freedom of Information laws show the proportion of
“losers” almost tripled to 53 per cent following the budget savings revealed in
late 2015.
In the three-year period
to 2018, aged-care services that had been classified as “winners” almost halved
to 47 per cent, according to the brief sent to Mr Wyatt.
A series of “hot issue
briefs, question time briefs and general briefs” sent to Mr Wyatt last year
acknowledged the budget hit to the Aged Care Funding Instrument — which is the
basic taxpayer care subsidy paid to all nursing homes — together with
“increasing cost pressures will be putting pressure on the sector”.
Mr Wyatt was also made
aware of reports of “cut backs to staffing”. At a press conference announcing
the royal commission into aged care in September, the Prime Minister was questioned about two cuts to the
ACFI in the 2015 mid-year economic update and the 2016 budget but denied any
had been made.
“No, no, the Labor Party said that. I don’t accept that,”
he said.
Two days later, a question time brief prepared for Mr Wyatt offered advice on
what to say if asked about funding cuts to ACFI.
The ministerial brief
also contains a breakdown of funding changes by domain, revealing that average
annual taxpayer subsidies per resident increased by just $400 between 2016-17
and 2017-18 despite the growing frailty and complexity of Australians as they
enter residential aged care older than ever before.
For the first time,
funding for the two areas that provide extra boosts for nursing home residents
with significant behavioural problems and complex healthcare requirements went
backwards by $300 a person.
The peak body for
aged-care providers, ahead of the April 2 budget, has urged the Coalition to
include an additional payment of almost $700 million each year.
“This estimate reflects
a range of factors, including the value of foregone indexation (through ACFI),”
Leading Age Services Australia (LASA) says in its pre-budget submission, seen
by The Australian. “This is approximately a 5.2 per cent increase in
residential care funding in 2019-20, noting that this is difficult to calculate
as forward estimates for residential and home care are no longer separately
reported.” LASA said it considered the money to be a “down payment” and a
notably larger funding boost might be needed following the findings of the
royal commission.” The commission, which is due to release its interim report
in October and the final version by the end of April 2020, has already
highlighted the widespread industry practice of “doping” nursing home
residents, which doctors, nurses and consumer groups attribute to overworked
staff. [my yellow highlighting]
Wednesday 6 February 2019
Less than 15 weeks out from a federal election and the Morrison Government continues to pile on the debt
According to
the Australian
Office of Financial Management as of 1 February 2019 the Australian Government’s gross public debt stood at est. $540.82
billion – up from $277.34 billion on
30 September 2013.
So in the
space of 5 years and 4 months the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison Government increased
the nation’s gross public debt by est. $263.48 billion.
That represents a rough average of over $4 billion borrowed from domestic and foreign sources for each month the Liberal-Nationals Coalition has been in office.
On Monday 4 February 2019
the Morrison Government will borrow another $400 million (not to be repaid till 2028) and on Wednesday 6 February another $900 million (not to be repaid till 2030) - $1.3 billion over three days.
Heaven only
knows how much more debt Morrison & Co will pile on before the May 2019 federal
election.
According to
Stephen Koukoulas voters can add that additional $1.3 billion to this 28-year debt
repayment schedule for just 29 per cent of the total public debt Abbott, Turnbull
and Morrison racked up to date:
$19.0 billion - Nov 2029
$12.0 billion - May 2030
$13.9 billion - Apr 2033
$6.95 billion - Jun 2035
$12.0 billion - Apr 2037
$8.0 billion - Jun 2039
$3.6 billion - May 2041
$13.0 billion - Mar 2047
How old will you,
your children or grandchildren be before this debt is paid off?
Labels:
debt,
elections 2019,
Morrison Government,
public
Wednesday 16 January 2019
Another thing for NSW voters to remember as they cast their ballot in the 2019 state and federal elections
The Shenhua Group appear to have first approached the NSW O'Farrell Liberal-Nationals Coalition Government in 2011-2012 concerning its plans to mine for coal on the Liverpool Plains, a significant NSW foodbowl.
This particular state government was the subject of not one but two investigations by the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) - Operations Spicer (2014) and Credo (2014).
After he was found to have misled the independent commission Premier O'Farrell resigned as Premier in April 2014 and as Liberal MP for Ku-ring-gai in March 2015. Similarly the then NSW Minister for Resources and Energy, Minister for the Central Coast, Special Minister of State and Liberal MP for Terrigal Chris Hartcher resigned as government minister in December 2013 after he was named in ICAC hearings and left the parliament in March 2015.
On 28 January
2015 the NSW Minister for Planning and Liberal MP for Goulburn Pru Goward granted development consent
for a subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned Shenhua Group, Shenhua Watermark Coal Pty Ltd, to create and operate an open cut mine on the Liverpool Plains.
On 4 July 2015 then Australian Minister for the Environment and
Liberal MP for Flinders Greg Hunt ticked off on the Abbott Government's environmental approval for Shenhua Watermark Coal to proceed with its mining operation.
Glaringly obvious environmental risks associated with large-scale mining in the region and vocal local community opposition had led to a downsizing of the potential mine site, for which the NSW Berejiklian Liberal-Nationals Coalition Government paid the Shenhua Group $262 million in compensation.
ABC News, 31 July 2015, projected new mine boundaries |
However, in July 2018 the Berejiklian Government renewed Shenhua’s mining exploration licence.
Given that on the successive watches of the O'Farrell, Baird and Berejiklian governments instances of mismanagement and/or corrupt conduct in relation to water sustainability, mining leases and the environment have been reported one would think that an abundance of caution would be exercised.
Instead we now learn
that that Shenhua Watermark Coal has been allowed to vary development consent
conditions for the open cut mine on the edge of the flood plain and, it is looking increasingly like pro coal, former mining industry lawyer, current Australian Minister for
the Environment and Liberal MP for Durack, Melissa
Price, will wave through these variations on behalf of the Morrison
Liberal-Nationals Coalition Government.
Thereby placing even more pressure on the already stressed
surface and underground water resources of the state.
The Liverpool Plains are said to be a significant groundwater source in the New South Wales section of the Murray-Darling Basin.
The Liverpool Plains are said to be a significant groundwater source in the New South Wales section of the Murray-Darling Basin.
Lock The Gate
Alliance, 8
January 2019:
The NSW Government has
allowed mining company Shenhua to alter its development approval for the
controversial Watermark open cut coal mine in the Liverpool Plains, near
Gunnedah, which will enable work on site to begin without key management plans
being approved.
Despite the NSW deal,
Shenhua is still not able to commence work under the Federal environmental
approval until two important management plans, including the crucial Water
Management Plan, have been approved by the Federal Government.
Now local farmers are afraid that the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, may be about to follow the NSW Government lead and vary the approval to allow Shenhua to start pre-construction for their mine without the management plans that were promised.
Liverpool Plains farmer John Hamparsum said, “We’re disgusted that the NSW Government has capitulated to Shenhua yet again, and amended the development consent to let them start pre-construction work without the crucial Water Management Plan in place.
"They have repeatedly stated that the best science would apply to this mine before any work was done, and now they’ve thrown that out the window.
"We’re calling on the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, and New England MP, Barnaby Joyce to now step up and promise that not a sod will be turned on this mine until the full Water Management Plan has been developed and reviewed by independent scientists.
"This mine represents a massive threat to our water resources and our capacity to feed Australia, and if the National Party has any respect for agriculture they need to act now and deliver on their promise that the best science will be applied.
"We won’t accept creeping development of this mine and weakening of the conditions that were put in place to protect our precious groundwater," he said.
Lock the Gate Alliance spokesperson Georgina Woods said, "It’s been four years since the NSW and Federal Governments approved Shenhua’s Watermark coal mine on the Liverpool Plains and there are still no management plans in place.
"Instead of upholding the conditions of Shenhua’s approval, the NSW Government has watered them down so that Shenhua can start work without these crucial plans in place.
"The community has a long memory and will not accept Governments changing the rules to the benefit of foreign-owned mining giants over local farmers," she said.
The former Federal Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, made a strong commitment that a Water Management Plan for the project would not be approved unless the Independent Expert Scientific Committee was satisfied with it.
The amended NSW approval can be accessed here.
Now local farmers are afraid that the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, may be about to follow the NSW Government lead and vary the approval to allow Shenhua to start pre-construction for their mine without the management plans that were promised.
Liverpool Plains farmer John Hamparsum said, “We’re disgusted that the NSW Government has capitulated to Shenhua yet again, and amended the development consent to let them start pre-construction work without the crucial Water Management Plan in place.
"They have repeatedly stated that the best science would apply to this mine before any work was done, and now they’ve thrown that out the window.
"We’re calling on the Federal Environment Minister, Melissa Price, and New England MP, Barnaby Joyce to now step up and promise that not a sod will be turned on this mine until the full Water Management Plan has been developed and reviewed by independent scientists.
"This mine represents a massive threat to our water resources and our capacity to feed Australia, and if the National Party has any respect for agriculture they need to act now and deliver on their promise that the best science will be applied.
"We won’t accept creeping development of this mine and weakening of the conditions that were put in place to protect our precious groundwater," he said.
Lock the Gate Alliance spokesperson Georgina Woods said, "It’s been four years since the NSW and Federal Governments approved Shenhua’s Watermark coal mine on the Liverpool Plains and there are still no management plans in place.
"Instead of upholding the conditions of Shenhua’s approval, the NSW Government has watered them down so that Shenhua can start work without these crucial plans in place.
"The community has a long memory and will not accept Governments changing the rules to the benefit of foreign-owned mining giants over local farmers," she said.
The former Federal Environment Minister, Greg Hunt, made a strong commitment that a Water Management Plan for the project would not be approved unless the Independent Expert Scientific Committee was satisfied with it.
The amended NSW approval can be accessed here.
A legal perspective on the issues surrounding water management by Dr Emma Carmody, Senior Policy and Law Reform Solicitor, EDO NSW and Legal Advisor, Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands, is included in the December 2018 issue of Law Society Journal, Managing our scarce water resources: recent developments in the Murray-Darling Basin.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)