The Cement Industry Federation was part of a consortium of industry groups including the Minerals Council of Australia, Australasian Railway Association, Australian Chamber of Commerce, Manufacturing Australia, the Australian Logistics Council, and Gas Energy Australia that rejected the proposed levy....
Showing posts with label Morrison Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Morrison Government. Show all posts
Thursday 28 May 2020
Morrison Government's political backers have spoken and plans for biosecurity levy are abandoned
ABC
News,
20
May 2020:
After
more than a year of lobbying by cement, minerals and freight industry
groups, the Federal Government has abandoned a promise that would
raise hundreds of millions of dollars to protect Australian farmers
from pests and diseases.
In
2018, Federal Agriculture Minister David Littleproud announced the
Government would raise $325 million over three years through a
biosecurity levy.
The
Budget outlined a proposed $10.02 biosecurity charge per 20-foot
container, and a $1 per tonne levy on bulk imports coming via the sea
to be imposed from July 1, 2019, with the funds raised used to detect
and screen for exotic pests and diseases.
The
2019 Budget saw that deadline postponed until September 2019, but
legislation for the levy was never introduced.
In
a statement on Wednesday, the Department of Agriculture Water and
Environment said the levy could not be implemented without
significant impacts on industry and proposed levy payers.
"A
levy will not be progressed and this decision will not impact on the
overall biosecurity budget," it said.
The
statement thanked the industry working group that consulted on the
levy, and said the decision had been made "in consideration of
the impact of drought, bushfires and COVID-19 on the economy"….
The Cement Industry Federation was part of a consortium of industry groups including the Minerals Council of Australia, Australasian Railway Association, Australian Chamber of Commerce, Manufacturing Australia, the Australian Logistics Council, and Gas Energy Australia that rejected the proposed levy....
The
levy on freight was first proposed by a review of Australia's
biosecurity services in 2017, which found widespread agreement that
biosecurity was underfunded in Australia.
The
decision not to introduce the levy comes as Australian farmers face
uncertain trading conditions following years of drought and recent
pest incursions, which could cost industry hundreds of millions of
dollars.
This
year alone, Australian farmers have found new worrying detections of
the fall armyworm and banana-destroying Panama disease, while
Queensland prawn farmers expected to lose millions to an outbreak of
white spot disease.
Meanwhile,
the pork industry still fears it could experience an outbreak of the
pig-killing African Swine Fever.
The
disease spread through Asia, wiped out a quarter of the world's pig
population and was recently detected in Papua New Guinea.
If
it were to reach Australia, the pork industry estimates it could cost
the Australian economy $2 billion.
National
Farmers' Federation chief executive Tony Mahar said the decision to
axe the levy was a "blow to Australia's farmers".
"The
uncertainty this levy proposal has created — particularly given the
current circumstances — is a poor look for government," Mr
Mahar said.
The
Department of Agriculture Water and Environment did not make a
spokesperson available, but said Australia's biosecurity systems
underpinned $60 billion in agricultural production, $49 billion in
agricultural exports and $42 billion in inbound tourism.
Mr
Littleproud's office has been contacted for comment.
Friday 22 May 2020
Australian casual employees regularly working full-time hours win paid leave, carer & compassionate leave in Federal Court ruling - Morrison Government threatens to change law to strip new rights away
"All members of the Court have also found that Mr Rossato was not a casual FTM under the 2012 EA, noting that the circumstances of his employment could not be distinguished in a material way from those of Skene. All members of the Court have found that WorkPac is not entitled to restitution of the casual loading which it claimed was included in the hourly rate it had paid to Mr Rossato. The members of the Court have found that there was no relevant mistake, and no failure of consideration such as would support restitutionary relief. All members of the Court have found that WorkPac is not entitled to bring into account the payments of remuneration that it had made to Mr Rossato on the basis that he was a casual employee. That is because the purposes of the payments of remuneration did not have a close correlation to the entitlements that Mr Rossato seeks. All members of the Court have found that WorkPac’s reliance on reg 2.03A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) was misplaced. By subregulation (d), the regulation can apply only when the person makes a claim to be paid an amount in lieu of one or more of the relevant NES entitlements. That is not this case as Mr Rossato seeks payment of the NES entitlements, not payments in lieu." [Workpac v Rossato, May 2020]
Yahoo!
Finance,
21 May 2020:
Casual
employees working full-time hours will be entitled to paid leave,
setting back employers around $8 billion in back-pay claims, after a
landmark ruling by the Federal Court on Wednesday.
The
decision means regular, ongoing casuals will be able to access paid
annual leave, paid personal/carer’s leave and paid compassionate
leave, and employers cannot claim that 25 per cent pay loadings
offset those entitlements.
The
ruling in Workpac v Rossato has effectively pulled the pin on the
‘permanent casual’ work model, and means any regular work that is
permanent in nature is not genuinely casual, and therefore attracts
the same entitlements as permanent staff.
“This
is a fantastic decision that puts an end to the ‘permanent casual’
rort that has become a scourge in the coal mining industry and across
the workforce,” the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and
Energy Union national president Tony Maher said.
“It’s
a decision that passes the pub test on what it means to be a casual
and is consistent with community expectations that casual work is
irregular and intermittent.”
Maher
called on employers to “stop the nonsense”, and start treating
casual employees on permanent hours as if they were permanent.
“When
a job is full-time, regular and on-going, it is permanent and
deserves the security and entitlements that come with permanent
work,” Maher said.
“Our
union has worked hard to clarify the law with this decision and we
will now be fighting to restore rights and lost pay for casual labour
hire workers across the coal mining industry who have been illegally
ripped off.”…….
Industrial
relations minister Christian Porter said the decision would have
“immediate practical implications for the bottom line of many
Australians businesses at a time when so many have taken a huge hit
from the Covid-19 pandemic”.
In
fact, employers estimate between 1.6 and 2.2 million casuals will be
affected, with a back-pay bill of around $8 billion looming.
Porter
also flagged a potential appeal….
"Given
the potential for this decision to further weaken the economy at a
time when so many Australians have lost their jobs, it may also be
necessary to consider legislative options."
See Summary of WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84 (20 May 2020) for further details.
Thursday 21 May 2020
Morrison Government expects to be forced to refund est. $555.6 million unlawfully taken from at least 449,500 Centrelink clients
Photograph: The Guardian graphic, 27 March 2020
In July 2016 the federal Coaltion Government began
to issue income
compliance notices
based on automated data
matching.
At
the time the then Minister for Social Social Services Scott Morrison
expected to clawback an est. $1.7 billion dollars over
five years from
individuals who were, or had been in the past, receiving a
Centrelink pension,
benefit or allowance.
By
2019 at least
570,000 of those
over 600,000
income
compliance notices were
considered to be
unlawful.
As were Australian
Taxation Office garnishee notices associated with these alleged debts.
Refunding
these wrongfully raised debts would see at least $555.6
million
returned to Centrelink clients.
A
class
action on behalf of victims of the unlawful ‘robodebt’ scheme
has
been commenced by
Gordon Legal.
Becoming
a member of a class action does not expose a ‘robodebt’ recipient
to any additional legal liability with regard to the alleged debt.
However,
the Morrison Government is possibly
hoping
many victims will not realise this and sign the Centrelink “Opt
Out Notice – Federal Court of Australia – ‘Robodebt’(Social
Security Debt Collection) Class Action (VID1252/2019)”
notices
it is currently sending out.
Gordon
Legal has outlined
possible court dates:
On
6 March 2020 the Honourable Mr Justice Murphy of the Federal Court
ordered that the parties hold a mediation prior to 19 June 2020. This
is an opportunity for the matter to be resolved with the consent of
both parties.
Justice
Murphy also ordered that, if the matter does not settle at mediation,
a trial will begin in the Federal Court on 20 July 2020 (or if that
date is not available, on 21 September 2020).
Services
Australia (formerly
the Dept. of Social Services-Centrelink) despite its denials continues to raise alleged
debts and send out notices.
While
the very unhappy Morrison Government probably hoping
to discourage future class actions is
also
pushing
ahead with a parliamentary inquiry into the class action industry,
including the profits made by litigation funders that bankroll claims
on behalf of Australians.
The
Guardian, 18 May 2020:
Hundreds
of thousands of Australians affected by the government’s robodebt
scheme will receive notices from Centrelink about an upcoming class
action under orders from the federal court.
Guardian
Australia last month revealed
secret government advice showing the commonwealth hopes to settle
the case and has privately admitted more than 400,000 welfare debts
were unlawfully issued under the scandal-ridden “income compliance
program”.
But
the parties are yet to reach a settlement, setting up a potential
trial as early as July where law firm Gordon Legal will seek interest
and compensation as well as the repayment of debts unlawfully claimed
by the government.
Under
court orders issued in March, the government has been told to
identify all potential class action members and send out notices via
MyGov or by post about the upcoming court challenge by 25 May.
More
than 12,000 people have registered with the firm, but under
Australian law people identified as members of the “class” are
considered part of the action unless they “opt-out”, which would
allow them to pursue their own individual claim.
Labor’s
government services spokesman, Bill Shorten, said the government
should “settle this case immediately, restore public confidence in
Centrelink by allowing the court to be the independent umpire, and
pay the victims back their money as well as interest”.
“This
would allow the hundreds of Centrelink workers working on limiting
the government’s robodebt exposure to be moved back to the
frontlines of helping their fellow Australians with their social
security needs in this time of national challenge,” he told
Guardian Australia.
Since
July 2015, more than 600,000 debt notices had been sent out under the
scheme, which the government conceded was unlawful in federal court
in November, while thousands more received letters demanding they
prove they were not overpaid by Centrelink.
Some
debt recipients had their tax returns seized over the debts, while
others were also forced to pay a 10% “recovery fee” on top of the
alleged debt.
Gordon
Legal believes the case would represent one of the largest class
actions in Australian history.
Late
last week, the government declined to answer several written
questions about the robodebt scheme, successfully applying for public
interest immunity in the Senate.
Services
Australia declined to answer how many debts had been issued using the
unlawful “income averaging” method or whether it would repay
victims, including debts recovered from deceased estates.
“This
question relates to a court case that is currently before the federal
court of Australia,” the agency said. “Services Australia will
abide by any decision of the court.”
But
a ministerial submission to cabinet, leaked to the Guardian, revealed
the government hopes to settle the case and that Services Australia
expects to “administer 449,500 refunds determined under the
programme”, worth $555.6m.
The
robodebt class action notices come as the government pushes ahead
with plans for an inquiry into class actions in Australia.
Porter
last week claimed a “lack of regulation governing the booming
litigation funding industry is leading to poor justice outcomes”.
But
Labor has argued the inquiry is a response to Gordon Legal’s class
action against the robodebt scheme.
If
the parties do not reach a settlement, a trial is expected between
July and September.
The
government’s legal advice shows it expects to lose the class action
under Gordon Legal’s claim of “unjust enrichment”, although it
believes the compensation claim is less likely to be successful.
“This
is likely to result in the commonwealth being ordered to repay debts
within a timeframe set by the Court, and to pay interest and legal
costs,” the advice said.
Court
documents show the number of potential victims expanded in March
after the government withdrew an earlier claim that people receiving
Carer Payment were not subjected to the scheme.
The
government has conceded in court that debts that relied on income
averaging were invalidly raised, but claims it should not have to pay
compensation because it does not hold a common law duty of care to
welfare recipients…...
Wednesday 20 May 2020
Australian Minister for Home Affairs Peter Dutton makes a grab for even more surveillance powers
Crikey,
15 May 2020:
The
government’s proposed scheme to enable foreign intelligence
services to spy on Australians will enable Australia’s intelligence
agencies to circumvent measures designed to protect journalists from
unfettered pursuit of their sources.
Labor’s
Mark Dreyfus yesterday exposed the loophole, with Home Affairs
officials left unable and unwilling to explain why their minister
Peter Dutton was proposing a runaround on existing procedures
designed to protect journalists’ sources.
The
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (International Production
Orders) Bill 2020 will to pave the way for agreements between
Australia and the United States, and other “like-minded countries”,
for the direct accessing of surveillance information, including
real-time wiretapping, by intelligence agencies from both counterpart
countries. In Australia, such requests would be signed off by members
of the Security Division of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
(AAT), which is heavily stacked with former Coalition MPs and
staffers.
In
hearings before the intelligence and security committee yesterday,
shadow attorney-general Dreyfus asked Dutton’s bureaucrats why
existing protections around accessing the metadata of journalists
were not part of the proposed process.
When
the Abbott government introduced mass surveillance laws in 2015, the
mainstream media belatedly realised that journalists’ phone and IT
records would be easily accessed by intelligence and law enforcement
agencies under “data retention” laws. In response, a “Journalist
Information Warrant” (JIW) process was hastily put together that
would require agencies to apply for a special warrant, with more
stringent thresholds and procedural safeguards, like a Public
Interest Advocate, if agencies wanted to obtain data relating to a
journalist’s sources.
No
such safeguard exists under the International Production Orders (IPO)
process, meaning that if a journalist’s data was held by a US
company — such as Google, Apple, Facebook or Microsoft — it could
be obtained by ASIO or the Australian Federal Police (AFP) from those
companies through an IPO without a Journalist Information Warrant,
unlike information held by a local company such as Telstra.
“Are
you able to tell us why an Australian journalists whose telecoms data
is held by a US carrier should have fewer protections than an
Australian journalist whose telecoms data is held in Australia?”
Dreyfus asked Home Affairs bureaucrats…..
Dreyfus
pressed further. The Journalist Information Warrant process was not
replicated in this bill, was it, he asked.
“It
is not replicated,” Warnes had to admit, before insisting an AAT
authorisation was enough protection.
Dreyfus
went further. “The Journalist Information Warrant process has a
public interests monitor provided. There is no such public interest
monitor provided in the authorisation process that is provided under
this bill is there?”
“That’s
correct,” the bureaucrat admitted.
“So
it’s not the same level of protection for journalists whose data is
held by a US carrier. It’s a lesser level of protection isn’t
it?” said Dreyfus.
“Different
considerations at play, yes,” Warnes , humiliated, had to admit.
Dreyfus
also pointed out that the Journalist Information Warrant process had
additional criteria that had to be considered in granting warrants.
They weren’t in the IPO scheme, were they?
“That’s
correct,” Warnes said.
“So
why should an Australian journalist whose telecoms data is held by a
US carrier have fewer protections than an Australian journalist whose
telecoms data is held in Australia?”
“I
don’t have anything further to add,” Warnes said.
Dreyfus
told him to come back to the committee with a better explanation for
why the loophole was being pursued by the government…..
Monday 18 May 2020
Unemployment in Australia in March to May 2020
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics Labor Force, Australia, April 2020, there were 832,500 unemployed persons at the end of April based on original data, which resulted in an unemployment rate of 6.3%.
That was a rise of 63,800 unemployed persons since the end of March 2020.
A number which could have been much higher if it were not that those registered to receive JobKeeper subsidised wage payments are considered employed - even those with no active job to go to.
On 14 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of 6.2% and the Treasurer stated that 594,000 people had lost their jobs since COVID-19 public health restrictions began to affect businesses.
However, both Morrison and Frydenberg fail to point out that those 594,000 newly unemployed are in addition to the est. 238,500 already unemployed persons.
Even with JobKeeper payments now keeping unemployment figures down by an est. 3.3 to 5.5 million people Treasury expects that the unemployment rate will rise to around 10% by end of June 2020.
According to a Senate estimates hearing on 30 April 2020, an est. 400,000 more people are expected to lose their jobs by September, at which time the unemployment rate is predicted to be around 13%.
September is of course the month indicated by Morrison as the period in which he intends to start rolling back enhanced unemployment benefits - a month in which the Dept. of Social Services expects 1.7 million people to be receiving the Jobseeker payment.
According to the Morrison Government it expects to have returned 850,000 people to employment by the time all the public health restrictions have been lifted.
If in around four months time as many as 7.2 million Australians are expected to be either unemployed or in uncertain employment because their jobs depend on government subsidied wages, one wonders why the Morrison Government is boasting of so low a figure - less than 12% of that 7.2 million.
Labels:
COVID-19,
economy,
Jobkeeper program,
jobs,
Jobseeker,
Morrison Government,
pandemic,
unemployment
Sunday 17 May 2020
Thanks a lot Scott Morrison & all those Lib-Nat goons who piled on China once he opened his mouth. The NSW Northern Rivers really appreciates the loss of trade
In mid-April 2020 Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton and Minister for Foreign Affairs Marise Payne decided that the middle of a global pandemic and, with a domestic economy in freefall, was a good time to antagonise our biggest trading partner.
It didn't take long for National Party backbenchers to join these three Liberal Party ministers and mainstream media reported the situation thus.......
"But given clear evidence that China is deeply unhappy with Australia’s aggressive calls for an inquiry, in a way that it sees as Australia teaming up with the Trump administration to point the blame at China, the foreign exchange markets are making up their own minds on the prospects of Australia being on the brink of a serious deterioration of ties with our largest trading partner." [The Australian, 13 May 2020]
"Mr Morrison said Australia could not rule out that the virus escaped from a Wuhan lab, but “the most likely (origin) has been in a wildlife wet market”." [The Australian, 6 May 2020]
"..it was immediately clear that the purpose of the Australian "initiative" was not to conduct a review of benefit to the whole world, but to engage in political warfare with the Chinese state, using failures of organisation and leadership as a stick with which to beat the state. This was underlined by the way in which the first Australian public mention of the need for such an inquiry, along with some words about "accountability and transparency'', came from Peter Dutton, otherwise in a witness protection program avoiding any transparency or accountability for Commonwealth failures to screen several thousand passengers and crew from cruise ships. Marise Payne took the idea further, if with every appearance of playing to a pre-prepared script several days later, before Morrison took extra steps to make the proposals unacceptable to the Chinese by advocating the equivalent of weapons inspectors battering down doors to catch those with secrets to hide."
"Scott Morrison insists it would be "absolutely nonsense" to suggest the coronavirus started anywhere other than China. The prime minister is pushing ahead with calls for a global inquiry into the origins of the deadly disease despite diplomatic blowback from the Chinese government. "I don't think anybody is in any fantasy land about where it started - it started in China," he told 2GB radio on Friday. "What the world over needs to know - and there's a lot of support for this - is how did it start and what are the lessons to be learned." [AAP Bulletin Wire, 1 May 2020]
"The Morrison Government is leading the international call for an independent review of the COVID-19 crisis to determine the origin of the virus and if more could have been done to slow its spread." [The Mercury, 20 April 2020]
Morrison, Dutton, Payne & Co got the column inches and media attention they craved, but it is rural and regional areas like the NSW Northern Rivers which are bearing the brunt of their total lack of a genuinely diplomatic approach to China on the issue.....
The Daily Examiner, 15 May 2020:
Casino’s Northern Cooperative Meat Company is one of the four Australian abattoirs that China imposed an import ban on this week.
The black-listing of the three Queensland and one NSW red meat abattoirs is believed to be a “trade war tactic” from Beijing as trade tensions between Australia and Chine rise. There are fears the bans from China come after Prime Minister Scott Morrison called for an independent investigation into the coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak.
Northern Cooperative Meat Company chief executive Simon Stahl revealed the ban on imports relates directly to labelling and product description non-compliances.
Mr Stahl was uncertain of the short or long term financial impacts to the business, but revealed NCMC production imports ranged from 15 to 25 per cent.
“It’s too early to tell you about the financial impacts, I couldn’t put a figure on it at this point in time, could be a week, could be a month,” he said. “I’m always optimistic we can satisfy the authorities.....
Food Leaders Australia general manager Bruce McConnel said it was unknown yet whether the bans were because of a breach of protocol or an act of political retribution.
“The technical reasons have not been made available,” Mr McConnel said. “We’re not sure whether there has been a breach of protocol or if it’s pure political retaliation.
“We’re awaiting details on how to alleviate tensions. “It’s not catastrophic, but it is a real issue that needs to be sorted out.”
Mr McConnel said the banning of the Northern Co-operative Meat Company at Casino was a major concern for smaller beef producers, who use that meatworks to sell to China.
“The government need to get sorted how real are the technical aspects of this and how much is political tension around the relationship with China,” he said....
Tuesday 28 April 2020
Morrison Government's new virus contact tracing app
On the evening of Sunday 26 April 2020 the Morrison Coalition Government released its COVID-19 contact tracing app "COVIDSafe" for download and installation on mobile phones by the Australia public.
The stated intention for the release of this app is to widely surveil the Australian population with the aim of tracing persons who have been in contact with confirmed COVID-19 cases.
This release did not come after the promised full disclosure of the app source code. Indeed this source code if or when it is finally released will be a redacted version.
It did not come backed by a full legislative framework which had been scrutinised by the Australian Parliament.
It came with a ministerial determination which had been published at one minute before midnight on Saturday 25 April 2020 and a one page website containing two download links, a link to "Privacy policy" and another to "Help topics".
It also came after the unannounced release of the promised Privacy Impact Assessment sometime on 25 April 2020.
Despite being assured that no federal agency can access data collected by COVIDSafe, one federal agency the Digital Transformation Agency has official permission to access data in certain situations.
To effectively use the app on a mobile phone Bluetooth has to be activated and some phones will be required to run the app in the foreground, others may find it can be run in the background. Recharging may have to happen more often and some existing phone functions may not always perform well.
Every mobile phone user with this app "will receive daily notifications to ensure the COVIDSafe app is running".
Once installed the app can be automatically updated (including with additional app functions) without notification to the user, unless automatic updates have been blocked on Google Play or Apple App Store.
It is up to each citizen and permanent resident to make their own decision concerning the downloading of this app as use of the app is voluntary.
UPDATE
Despite the Morrison Government insisting that "the COVIDSafe app does not collect your location", according to Google Play this app has GPS and network based functions so a mobile phone's precise location can be identified.
Sunday 19 April 2020
What Morrison Government's recent changes to industrial relations law may mean for workers
On Thurday 16 April 2020 Australian Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Liberal MP for Pearce Christian Porter announced changes to the Fair Work Regulations in relation to the negotiation of workplace agreements.
According to Fair Work Australia the new regulations are "in place initially for 6 months" and are allegedly meant to assist businesses to remain solvent during the COVID-19 pandemic.
However, workers are likely to be severely disadvantaged because any changes to working conditions or rates of pay made under these new rules are permanent and can only be altered during the next formal application to vary the enterprise agreement - which can be up to four years away.
Are you on an enterprise agreement? You need to know this. Your employer can now give you 24hours notice to vote to change your agreement. What should you do? pic.twitter.com/ioI3TItgoP— Sally McManus (@sallymcmanus) April 16, 2020
Monday 30 March 2020
Parliamentary oversight of the the Australian Government ceased on 23 March 2020
At
19:07pm on the 23 March 2020 the House of Representatives divided for a
vote changing the House sittings schedule for 2020.
The
vote was 48 Ayes to 37 Noes. [Hansard,
23 March 2020, p.85]
This
change left Australia with no sitting federal parliament
from day's end on 23 March
until
11 August 2020.
The
vote to end parliamentary oversight of government went thus:
Image:
@LeVoyageurOz
The Greens and Labor lost this vote.
Scott Morrison and his hard right allies, including the Institute of Public Affairs, cannot fail to be pleased with this extension of unfettered political power.
“The reason the opposition believes that we shouldn't make that decision today is that, as everyone is acknowledging, we don't know where we will be in May or June, and the presumption should be that the parliament will sit. The presumption should be that we will meet if it is possible for us to sit, because, during this period, during a time of crisis, is when the Australian public needs us to sit. I will be more than surprised if we can go from now until August and find that the legislation we put through the parliament today is all the nation needs for Australia to handle this pandemic, all the nation needs to deal with the crisis of unemployment and recession that we'll be facing. That means we will need to sit, so we shouldn't pretend that we won't. It also means during this period the government will be compelled in the interests of the nation to make some decisions of great magnitude. That will happen. We know that will happen; that's part of the story behind the supply bills that have just passed. To have decisions of that magnitude being made without the parliament convening and without there being a question time and an opportunity for people representing the different corners of Australia to hold the government to account is an unwise course for us to take.” [Tony Burke, MP for Watson & Manager of Opposition Business, in House of Representatives Hansard, 23 March 2020]
Scott Morrison and his hard right allies, including the Institute of Public Affairs, cannot fail to be pleased with this extension of unfettered political power.
“The reason the opposition believes that we shouldn't make that decision today is that, as everyone is acknowledging, we don't know where we will be in May or June, and the presumption should be that the parliament will sit. The presumption should be that we will meet if it is possible for us to sit, because, during this period, during a time of crisis, is when the Australian public needs us to sit. I will be more than surprised if we can go from now until August and find that the legislation we put through the parliament today is all the nation needs for Australia to handle this pandemic, all the nation needs to deal with the crisis of unemployment and recession that we'll be facing. That means we will need to sit, so we shouldn't pretend that we won't. It also means during this period the government will be compelled in the interests of the nation to make some decisions of great magnitude. That will happen. We know that will happen; that's part of the story behind the supply bills that have just passed. To have decisions of that magnitude being made without the parliament convening and without there being a question time and an opportunity for people representing the different corners of Australia to hold the government to account is an unwise course for us to take.” [Tony Burke, MP for Watson & Manager of Opposition Business, in House of Representatives Hansard, 23 March 2020]
Sunday 8 March 2020
The Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre to close because the Morrison Government refuses to consider funding it further
In 2015 the Abbott Coalition Government changed guidelines for government-industry-community cooperative research centres.
This change was implemented by the federal Department of Industry and Science.
At the time the 2015/2016 Federal budget planned to cut $26.8 million of CRC funding (over four years).
In spite of the original budget cut less than two years into its existence, the
Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre (BNHCRC) went on to do sterling work in cooperation with federal and state governments, industry, non-government organisations and international bodies.
This was Australian Prime Minister on 7 February 2020 according to the
BNHCRC website:
CRC Chair Dr Katherine Woodthorpe, Prime Minister Scott Morrison, CRC Research Director Dr John Bates and Minister for Industry, Science and Technology Karen Andrews. |
Prime Minister Scott Morrison invited the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC to Parliament House to discuss current and future contributions of research to the bushfire response and recovery.
CRC Chair Dr Katherine Woodthorpe and Acting CEO and Research Director Dr John Bates met with Prime Minister Morrison and the Minister for Industry, Science and Technology Karen Andrews on 5 February to talk about building a bushfire-resilient Australia.
After the meeting Prime Minister Morrison posted the above picture on his Facebook page, saying:
“Today Minister Karen Andrews and I also met with the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC to discuss their important work to assist with the bushfire response and improve preparedness for future fire seasons. We talked about making a more bushfire-resilient Australia and how it can support the proposed Royal Commission.”
The CRC was invited to discuss how it could support the Royal Commission using its research knowledge and expertise, and through the Inquiries and Reviews database that catalogues over 300 inquiries and reviews of emergencies and disasters caused by natural hazards across all jurisdictions in Australia between 1886 and 2017. The database captures the findings of previous royal commissions and other bushfire inquiries.
What Scott Morrison was well aware of, and most ordinary voters hadn't realised, was that the 2015 change to those guidelines meant that the Bushfire and Natural Hazards Cooperative Research Centre would cease to receive federal government funding as of 30 June 2021 and inevitably will have to close its doors.
On the heels of a devastating 2019-2020 bushfires season, marked by mega wildfires burning across millions of hectares, this Senate Estimates hearing (below) is how the Australian public became widely aware that one of the supports enabling emergency services to fight such fires was being withdrawn.
On 2 January 2020 The Australian reported that the Insurance Council of Australia had urged the federal government to commit to keep funding this key bushfire research organisation.The full evidence of the Gov saying there is no more funding for the bushfire CRC, unless it finds something itself, can be seen here: https://t.co/j0yvxKZkeg Australia needs public good research like what the Bushfire CRC does.— Kim Carr (@SenKimCarr) March 4, 2020
This call seems to have had no effect on Scott Morrison and his government - it appears that he is still intent on burning Australia back to nothing but bare barren earth.
Monday 2 March 2020
The Morrison Government is still not managing to present itself in a good light in 2020
Dissatisfaction with the Morrison Government appears to be widespread....
In
November 2019 there were fears
Tweed Heads could lose hundreds of jobs if Centrelink moves three of
its offices to the Gold Coast.
The
offices were identified as a
national call centre, service centre and administrative centre.
At
the time Centrelink
denied it was moving out of the region.
But
less than three months later, on
22 Februrary 2020, Centrelink announced it was indeed closing its
Tweed Heads office.
Branches
at Newcastle and Newport in New South Wales and Mornington in
Victoria will also close their doors.
This
news
was reported
as far away
as
the UK:
Some
offices will be replaced with a so-called 'agency' or kiosk that will
be staffed by one person.
Each
day more than 66,000 people walk into Centrelink offices around the
country.
This
is being dwarfed by the amount of people who access government
services online, with half a million people logging into the MyGov
website each day.
Former
opposition leader Bill Shorten has claimed the closing of some
Centrelink locations is a move by the government to cover costs in
other areas at the expense of citizens.
'This
government's more interested in band aiding a dodgy budget surplus
and it's going to do it by shafting everyday Centrelink users,' Mr
Shorten said.
Services
Australia, which oversees Centrelink, said in its annual report that
it is trying to 'maximise the benefits of digital capabilities while
reducing the costs of administering payments'…..
In
Mornington, Mayor Sam Hearn told 9
News
that he is furious.
He says 35,000 people in the area could be worse off when the local
branch closes at the end of the next month. Mr Hearn is now urging
Prime Minister Scott Morrison to intervene.
Given
Mornington is in Australian Minister for Health, Minister Assisting
the Prime Minister for the Public Service and Cabinet &
Liberal MP for Flinders Greg
Hunt’s
electorate, the mayor’s fury may yet
be
translated into action by his local member who appears to have been
as much in the dark about these closure as everyone else.
However,
the residents of Tweed Heads and environs have little chance of their
dismay registering with Prime Minister
&
Liberal MP for Cook,
‘Scotty
From Marketing’
Morrison, as
Tweed
Heads is in a federal electorate which has been held by the same
Labor MP for the last fifteen
years and six federal elections.
The Daily Examiner,
22 February 2020:
DAVE
and Jan Binskin are in quarantine in “a sh-thole” in Darwin.
After being evacuated from the Diamond Princess cruise ship where two
people died and 620 people tested positive for coronavirus, the
Casino couple and 170 other Australians are in another 14 days’
quarantine in a mining compound.
They
were on the ship in Japan when the Australian Government notified
them they could return to Australia, but face further quarantine.
The
conditions at the compound are terrible, Mr Binskin said. “Morrison
conned us. They didn't prepare for us and the people opposite us
didn't even have water for six hours,” he said.
Their
quarantine sounds more like a prison.
“They
locked us into an area with double fences around us and then decided
it was a fire risk and took down the fences,” he said.
The
Binskins were excited to be going back to Australia, he said, but
conditions were worse than on the boat.
They
have single beds, the room is unclean, the TVs don’t work and
they’re not allowed to have alcohol, Mr Binskin said.
“We
were told they didn't want the old people drinking and falling over,”
he said.
“We
can’t use the pool, we don't even have a garbage bin and some
people don’t even have bed linen.” The couple tested negative for
coronavirus.
“The
government has forgotten about us,” Mr Binskin said in a flat
voice. With nothing to do in the compound, Mr Binskin said his wife
Jan liked knitting and providing her with wool and needles would
help.
“It’s
against human rights,” he said.
Had
they disembarked in Japan they would have been free to leave, but
were told they would be looked after in Australia.
“They
didn’t prepare for us,” Mr Binskin said…...
He
said many people at the compound had received letters from their
local member of parliament.“We’ve heard nothing from Kevin Hogan
(Member for Page),” Mr Binskin said.
ABC
News,
23
February 2020:
The
Country Women's Association (CWA) has slammed the Federal Government
over its drought assistance, describing the latest funding
announcement as "disappointing, infuriating, insulting and
disrespectful".
But
the CWA said despite repeatedly seeking more federal funding for its
drought programs since September, it only learned of the voucher
announcement on Wednesday evening.
"It
was a total disregard, it's disrespectful ... it would have been nice
to have been consulted," national president Tanya Cameron said.
"It's
very disappointing. It's actually infuriating. It's very annoying.
I'm really quite angry.
"It's
quite insulting and it's disrespectful to an organisation that has
been around as long as ours has."
The
CWA has written to the Government to say it will not be participating
in the outreach program as it is currently proposed.
It
said its state branches did not support the process of administering
$500 vouchers at public events, such as barbecues or roadshows, as
they understood the Government intended.
"We've
explained to the Federal Government on a number of occasions very
clearly why, for NSW, the vouchers don't work," CWA NSW chief
executive Danica Leys said.
"I
don't think the provision of assistance in this way should be tied to
having to attend an event to get it."
In
New South Wales, the CWA has distributed more than $16 million of
drought aid in recent years, directly depositing funding in the
recipients' bank accounts.
"People
are given the dignity and respect to make the decision they need to
make," Ms Leys said of the CWA system.
"Obviously
someone in the federal bureaucracy thinks they know better how to get
it out.
"If
they know how to get it out, then they should perhaps think about
doing it themselves before verballing us and telling us that they're
partnering with us.
Ms
Ley said there were many questions around the logistics of how people
would get the vouchers.
"We
absolutely support further investment into drought-affected
communities, and vouchers can be helpful for some people, but a $500
voucher at the outset is quite minimal in nature," she said.
"That
is not what is needed ... not to sound ungrateful, but more than that
is needed."……
Labels:
Centrelink,
CWA,
drought,
government funding,
Morrison Government
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)