Wednesday, 10 August 2011

Cupcake Day for the RSPCA on Monday 15 August 2011


This year the RSPCA has joined forces with Everyday Hero so that you can create your very own Cupcake Day 2011 online fundraising page to raise vital funds for the RSPCA and all creatures great and small! From here you can create your own RSPCA Cupcake Day online fundraising page to raise funds from the sale of your tasty treats.
Your online fundraising page is simple to setup and in just a matter of minutes you'll be able to email your friends, family and colleagues to ask for their support.

Cupcake Day for the RSPCA is the biggest bakeoff in the Southern Hemisphere and involves Cupcake Cooks around Australia baking cupcakes and hosting a Cupcake Party to raise vital funds for the RSPCA. Last year Cupcake Cooks around Australia joined forces to bake thousands of scrumptious cupcakes to help support the services of the RSPCA.
ital funds for the RSPCA. Last year Cupcake Cooks around Australia joinedands f scrumptious cupcakes to help support the services of the RSPCA. 
Find out more here.

When Google 'Autocomplete' Goes Bad


Tuesday, 9 August 2011

Need to acquire some antiques in a hurry?


Not a problem. Simply contact this business in Newrybar in northern NSW. The business is very conveniently located just a short distance to the west of the Pacific Highway about 20km north of Ballina.

What a difference having a genuine national fiscal policy makes


Now before we all give into any international media-inspired hysteria and cry the sky is falling, here is Australia’s sovereign credit rating according to Standard and Poor’s (S&P) as of 5 August 2011:

Commonwealth of Australia
Sovereign local currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)  
AAA/Stable/A-1+
Sovereign foreign currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)
AAA/Stable/A-1+
Transfer and convertibility assessment  
AAA

The Commonwealth of Australia has retained an excellent Triple A credit rating from Standard and Poor's (as well as from Moody’s and Fitch) for the last eight years - for which successive federal governments of different political persuasions can take credit.


In 2011 its public debt as a percentage of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is running in the vicinity of 23 per cent, the current account deficit is around 2.5 per cent of GDP and total combined public, corporate and private individual foreign debt only resulted in a 3.9 per cent net income deficit as a percentage of GDP in the March 2011 Quarter - according to the figures I can find.


Just as importantly, one of the nation's major Asian trading partners China continues to see Australia as "stable" and gives a domestic currency credit rating of AAA and a foreign currency credit rating of AA+ at a time when Dangong Global Credit Rating has downgraded 
America's rating to "negative" and the official Xinhua news agency is stating; China, the largest creditor of the world's sole superpower, has every right now to demand the United States to address its structural debt problems and ensure the safety of China's dollar assets.

Now compare that brief fiscal thumbnail with the recent credit rating history for the USA, courtesy of a Democrat Government incapable of dominating the Congress and a Republican Party which has lost its way.


Standard and Poor’s release on 18 April 2011:

We have affirmed our 'AAA/A-1+' sovereign credit ratings on the United States of America.
The economy of the U.S. is flexible and highly diversified, the country's effective monetary policies have supported output growth while containing inflationary pressures, and a consistent global preference for the U.S. dollar over all other currencies gives the country unique external liquidity.
Because the U.S. has, relative to its 'AAA' peers, what we consider to be very large budget deficits and rising government indebtedness and the path to addressing these is not clear to us, we have revised our outlook on the long-term rating to negative from stable.
We believe there is a material risk that U.S. policymakers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium- and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013; if an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation is not begun by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer 'AAA' sovereigns.

Standard and Poor’s release on 5 August 2011:

We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term rating.
We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from CreditWatch negative.
The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics.
More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policy making and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011.
Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon.
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case….


We have taken the ratings off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years.....

United States of America
Sovereign local currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)  
AA+/Negative/A-1+
Sovereign foreign currency ratings (LT/Outlook/ST)
AA+/Negative/A-1+
Transfer and convertibility assessment  
AAA


According to The Australian on 5 August 2011; Australian 3-year government bond prices posted their biggest one-day rise since 1991 as investors rushed en masse to the safety of risk-free assets.
















At 12pm (AEST) 6 August 2011 the Australian dollar was trading at 104.91 US cents....down from $US1.0665 late yesterday and off a 30-year high of $US1.1080 last week.  By 8 August the dollar was at 1.0343 US. 

On 5 August 2011 NASDAQ placed this recently high currency rate into perspective with this statement; the latest ascent comes about three months after the Australian dollar last hit a 30-year high. The initial push higher that started in June of 2010 came as a continuing mining boom and a series of interest rate hikes from Australia's central bank that began in October 2009 lifted the currency more than 30% against the U.S. dollar in a year.

According to the Herald-Sun the Australian stock market fell by 4 per cent on 5 August and at close of business yesterday the ASX All Ords and S&P/ASX200 graphs were not catastophic:



Placing that fall within an historical context is this ASX All Ordinaries (XAO) Index chart 1988 - 2011 graph:


Even the International Monetary Fund doesn't consider the Australian economy an overtly risky proposition. So the next time either the Opposition Shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey, unidentified Liberal/National sources or elements in the Murdoch press  attempt to slyly suggest that Australia's economy is inevitably on the way to the poor house without drastic regime change - yawn loudly and turn aside.

The only thing Australia has to fear at this point in time is the contagion of fear itself and perhaps being overly irritated by the silly political point scoring of conservative politicians and big business lobbyists alike.

Chip Le Grand creates a climate change sob story



The Australian published a s-s-s-so-sob story:

IT is not easy watching one of your reporters get done over by Media Watch. Particularly when you have worked with the bloke for the best part of 20 years and not once had reason to question his journalistic integrity. But there was something about last Monday night's mauling of Stuart Rintoul more troubling still.
Rintoul has done some great work over the past month examining the vexed issues of sea rise projections and the response of coastal councils to the risk of future inundation.
He exposed ludicrous planning laws stifling development at Port Albert, a fishing village on Victoria's Bass Coast. Those laws are currently being torn up by the Baillieu government.
He brought to national attention research by NSW researcher Phil Watson showing that sea levels around Australia over the past 100 years haven't risen as quickly as scientists would have expected them to as a result of global warming.
For the first story he received the gratitude of a frustrated coastal community. For the second story he was pilloried, first in obscure, left-leaning blogs and finally on national television, for misrepresenting scientific research for "partisan political" purposes….[my emphasis]

Take a well-deserved bow Deltoid (then and now) – as well as every other blog (including NCV here) who commented on Rintoul’s ‘opinion’ piece before Media Watch administered the coup de grâce on 1 August 2011.

Anonymous zaps Syrian Ministry of Defence on 8th August 2011

Monday, 8 August 2011

Twas the night before e-Census and all though the town.....


There were hundreds of fur kids* refusing to be left out.


Click on images to enbiggin

* Fur Kids - beloved companion animals (more usually dogs and cats) that are considered part of the family unit.

Please note that no census form was killed or injured in creating this post.

News Limited needs to get its own house in order before it starts throwing sh*t at Fairfax


In its rush to publish Mark Day's piece criticising Fairfax The Oz overlooked its own imperfections. Not a good look!

Source: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/opinion/sale-junks-asset-thet-could-drive-future-of-fairfax/story-e6frg9tf-1226110417155

NSW North Coast gets a big tick from Lonely Planet

Lonely Planet has just released its latest guidebook, East Coast Australia Travel Guide, and the NSW North Coast gets what could be termed a rave review:

Nowhere on the East Coast conjures up the beach-cum-nature-cum-good times quite like Byron Bay. Its unique mix of leisure and energy is infectious and those who visit seldom go home complaining – if they go home at all.
But if Byron is the heartbeat, the surrounding hinterland (with its green hills and national parks) and north coast (stretching north to Tweed Heads and south almost to Port Macquarie) are the blood that keeps it pumping. Byron might bring them here, but it’s the breathtaking vistas, endless white sands and blue-hued breaks that tempt travellers further afield to little coastal towns like Yamba and Crescent Head. And when the sand between your toes starts getting up your nose, national parks are scattered amid the rich deltas of mighty rivers; and villages like Bangalow and Bellingen, with sublime food and organic produce, tempt both alternative-lifestylers and city slickers. This really is the good life.

Those of us who live here know how lucky we are. Still, it is pleasing to see our own views reflected back in word pictures such as these:

Filling your days and nights in exciting Byron Bay….Enjoying the artful village charms of Bellingen…. Losing yourself on the untrodden beaches near Wooli….Exploring hinterland villages, including the Channon….Finding treasures in markets like the one at Nimbin….Taking in the fauna and flora of ancient Gondwana rainforests in the far north hinterland….Surfing with dolphins at Pippi’s beach in Yamba….Dining in one of a huddle of fabulous restaurants in tiny Bangalow….Eating fresh shucked oysters on the beach in Crescent Head….Getting your fill of the beautiful Clarence River in a beer garden in Ulmarra.

Twitter in 2011 - so how much is genuine?


Leaving aside those Twitter accounts obviously set up to satirize pollies of all hues, the rich and infamous or big business; it seems that a more sinister type of fakery is rearing its ugly noggin………
“The office of a former Nebraska Senator working for the American Petroleum Institute appears to have set up more than a dozen fake Twitter accounts to promote the KeystoneXL tar sands pipeline.”

While over at FederalBizOpps the U.S. Government is advertising for someone to develop suitable software, then teach it how to detect upcoming issues on Twitter or other social media and show it how to employ semi or fully automated "counter messaging" techniques.

Sunday, 7 August 2011

DOE V RUMSFELD 2011: a sweet smell of karma is in the air


According to a Government Accountability Project media release on 3 August 2011:

In this challenge to the conditions of and procedures used in detaining an American citizen at a United States military compound in Iraq, Plaintiff John Doe sues former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, other high-ranking United States government officials, and several unidentified United States officials and agents. He alleges multiple constitutional violations in his seizure and detention…..

Doe also sues Defendants Janet Napolitano, Secretary of the United States Department of Homeland Security, Robert S. Mueller III, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Alan Bersin, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, and John Morton, Assistant Secretary of the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in their official capacities, to secure the return of the property seized upon his detention and for alleged violations of his right to travel.

Finally, Doe brings claims against unidentified officers or agents of the United States, alleging:
(1) false arrest,
(2) unlawful detention and conditions of confinement,
(3) torturous and unlawful interrogation,
(4) denial of the right to counsel and the right to confront adverse witnesses,
(5) denial of the right to present witnesses and to have exculpatory evidence disclosed,
(6) denial of access to courts and to petition,
(7) blacklisting, and
(8) conspiracy……

The Court finds, however, that Doe had a constitutional right to be free from conduct and conditions of confinement that shock the conscience, that such right was clearly established at the time of Rumsfeld's conduct, and that Doe has pleaded factual allegations sufficient to support a claim that Rumsfeld's conduct violated this clearly-established right. Accordingly, Rumsfeld’s qualified immunity defense to Doe’s substantive due process claim fails…..

The Court thus finds, under the circumstances alleged, that a reasonable federal official would have understood conscience-shocking physical and psychological mistreatment—including temperature, sleep, food, and light manipulation—of a United States citizen detainee to violate the detainee’s constitutional right to substantive due process. Accordingly, Rumsfeld is not entitled to qualified immunity from Doe’s substantive due process claim…..

..the Court DENIES Rumsfeld’s motion to dismiss Doe’s substantive due process claim. The Court GRANTS Defendant Rumsfeld’s motion to dismiss Doe’s procedural due process and access to courts claims.
The Court further GRANTS the government’s motion to dismiss Doe’s return of seized property claim; the Court permits Doe leave to amend his complaint if he can plead, in good faith, factual allegations supporting a reasonable inference that the government’s refusal to return his property was a “final agency action.”
Finally, the Court DENIES the government’s motion for a more definite statement of Doe’s right to travel claim.

Free EDO seminar on gas exploration and production, 6-8pm 11 August 2011 at Casino RSM Club



FREE EDO Northern Rivers Seminar: Gas exploration and production

Three companies are currently exploring for coal seam and conventional gas in the Clarence Moreton Basin , which covers much of the Northern Rivers. Metgasco Limited already has approval for a gas-fired power station near Casino and is currently seeking planning approval for a gas pipeline from Casino over the Border Ranges to Ipswich . Red Sky Energy also recently announced coal seam and conventional gas discoveries between Casino and Grafton, and is intending to seek approval for a small power station in the area.
Various environmental and legal concerns have been raised about gas exploration and production by affected communities. EDO Northern Rivers is holding a public seminar to provide information about what is happening in the region; discuss the potential environmental impacts; explain the approval processes involved; and inform the community about their legal rights. Speakers will be from the EDO , Metgasco and the National Toxics Network.
Where : Casino RSM Club, 162 Canterbury St
When : 6-8 pm Thursday 11 August 2011
No need to book .
For more information, please contact Mark Byrne, EDO Northern Rivers Education Officer, (02) 6621 1113 or email.

Saturday, 6 August 2011

Beer prices SLASHED in Yamba


How do they do it?

A Yamba hotel advertised that it was having a cheap grog night last night, Friday night, between 8.30pm and 10.00pm. Beer was going to be extra cheap because drinkers wouldn't have to pay GST on their beverages. However, that's only part of the story because drinkers at the hotel last night also didn't have to pay the carbon tax, the mining tax or the luxury tax.


North Coast Voices contacted the hotel yesterday and sought details about the "special offer". The hotel said that a schooner of beer which usually goes for about $4.50 would be discounted by 40%, resulting in a price of $2.50 ... (we won't discuss their mathematical skills here, that might be a subject for another day).
Hmmmm, wonder which authority will investigate operations at the hotel? Do we start with federal government authorities, state government authorities on local government authorities?