Sunday, 1 January 2012

Another Australian mining company fails to understand what community consultation really means - with tragic consequences* *WARNING: Graphic Images


It is not only Australian-registered corporations like Andrew Twiggy Forrest's Fortescue Metals Group or Chinese-owned Anchor Resources which make a mockery of the concept of community consultation.

Recently another mining corporation (described last year as Australia's 60th largest gold company by market capitalisation) went a step further in Indonesia......

This is what a publicly listed mining exploration company, Arc Exploration, formerly Austindo Resources Corporation N.L., told the Australian Stock Exchange on 4 October 2011 concerning the proposed open pit gold mine at Bima and its current plans to conduct further exploratory test drilling in the 250sq.km mining tenement project it 95% owns and manages:


Again on 29 November 2011:

Snapshot of opening paragraphs in Exploration Recommences at Bima

Not quite one month later on 24 December 2011 JATAM - the Mining Advocacy Network reported:

Residents reported to The National Human Rights Commission, which then conducted an investigation on April 2011. On November 2011, The National Human Rights Commission issued a recommendation No. 2.784/K/PMT/XI/2011 for The Regent of Bima, The West Nusa Tenggara Chief of Police, and The Director of PT. SMN. The National Human Rights Commission recommended The Regent of Bima to improve the information system and publicize mining activities; started from exploration to exploitation, and also to suspend the activities of PT. SMN while waiting for the conduciveness of society’s social life. The West Nusa Tenggara Chief of Police was asked to take coordinative and communicative steps with all elements of government and community leaders to prevent horizontal conflicts in Bima. The National Human Rights Commission urged the warranty for residents’ freedom of speech or aspiration (demonstration) in accordance with statutory provisions, and to avoid repressive measures by using weapons with live ammunition in securing rallies.

On 26 December 2011 ABC News reported in the article Indonesian police fire on gold mine protesters:

Video has emerged showing Indonesian police firing on protesters who were demonstrating against a planned Australian-owned gold mine.
Two people were killed and 10 others injured in the incident in the town of Bima on the island of Sumbawa, east of Bali.
The confrontation occurred on Saturday when nearly 1,000 villagers refused to end a week-long blockade of a local port.
Police were ordered to fire directly into the crowd.
Later they can be seen dragging and beating one of the injured protesters.
The group was trying to block the construction of a gold mine, owned by Indonesia's PT Sumber Mineral Nusantara and Australian company Arc Exploration….

Arc Exploration's Board of Directors; investment consultant and former banker Bruce James Watson (Non Exec. Chairman), UK & Indonesia-based mining geologist John Charles Carlile (Managing Director), Indonesian Rich List nominee and businessman George Santosa Tahija (Non Exec. Director), lawyer and mining industry advisor Robert Moyse Willcocks (Non Exec. Director), Indonesian businessman Cahyono Halim (CFO), lawyer Andrew John Cooke (Comp. Secretary) and its Top Twenty Shareholders, might like to explain the company’s extensive consultation process (in partnership with PT. Sumber Mineral Nusantara [SMN] which according to de.indymedia.org has as its Managing Director John Carlile and as its Company Secretary Andrew Cooke).

This extensive consultation resulted in a thousand-strong demonstration and at least three dead at the hands of the civil authority including Arief Rachman, 18, and Syaiful,17 (both allegedly pictured below).


Indonesian police are not admitting to these shootings, however investigations are ongoing.

According to The Australian on 28 December 2011; Indonesia's National Commission on Human Rights is investigating the clash on Christmas Eve at the site of the Arc Exploration project at Bima near the port city of Sape.

The Jakarta Globe had previously noted the connection between another mining company associated with an Arc Exploration director and an alleged $14 million annual payment to Indonesian police for what might be assumed by a reasonable person as being some form of extraordinary 'protection'. In February last year the company involved denied there was any graft involved in these payments.

By 28 December 2011 the Chairman of the Indonesian Human Rights Commission was characterising Arc Exploration's assurances regarding local community support as ill-founded and, raising the possibility that Arc Exploration had paid local police to act as corporate enforcers.

At the same time Australian Greens Senator Chrisitne Milne was saying; Arc employed John Carlile as managing director because of his experience with Newcrest Mining operating in Indonesia.....Newcrest admitted in 2004 it had paid Indonesian security forces to manage its site in Indonesia. Newcrest was registered as an Australian corporation in 1980.
This business relationship with paramilitary police appears to have existed in 2003 and possibly earlier. Various online sources mention payments of $35,000 U.S. dollars a year to a 65-man strong contingent of the Mobile Brigade.

Using  Brimob police against protesters with lethal force was endorsed and possibly encouraged by then Australian Foreign Minister Alexander Downer and the Howard Government according to various media reports at the time.

On 28 December 2011 Arc Exploration gave a brief statement to the Australian Stock Exchange concerning the recent violent events at Bima. However, like the past and present business interests of its board, this does not necessarily create confidence under closer scrutiny.

A further short clarification was issued later on the same day.

One has to wonder why anyone would invest in this mining company.

It will come as no surprise to concerned residents and community groups on the NSW North Coast - opposing the proposed antimony mine in the Clarence River catchment area - to find that Anchor Resources Managing Director, Ian Price, was listed in 2003 by Austock Research as Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Arc Exploration when it traded as Austindo Resources Corporation N.L. He apparently held this position from 18 November 2002 to 31 July 2006, serving alongside Messrs. Watson, Tahija and Carlile and Cooke.

Nor will communities in Northern NSW battling the high-handed methods of the coal seam gas industry be astonished to learn that until 7 June 2011 Bruce Watson and Robert Willcocks were respectively Non-executive Director and Non-executive Chairman of Orion Petroleum Pty Ltd which currently holds an interest along with Santos-owned Eastern Star Gas in exploration licenses in the Goondiwindi, Kurrabooma, &  Maules Creek areas and, in its own right in the Whalan Creek, Willaroo, Moree and Gwydir districts.

That the Australian mining industry contains complex business relationships is obvious; that this country may be used as a corporate flag of convenience so that foreign nationals can take advantage of tax law favourable to their overseas mining interests is suspected; that certain superannuation schemes may be growing on the back of corporate bullying of small farming communities is a distinct possibility; nevertheless the idea that mining business culture has become so debased as to ignore human rights and civilised behaviour comes as something of a shock.

With communities in rural and regional New South Wales under so much pressure from mining interests and their political supporters, it may be wise to remember the absence of ethics which appears to be festering within both multinational and national corporations these days.


Photographs from no2mininginpalawan.com
Video from YouTube

UPDATE

The Jakarta Post report on 1 January 2012:

Energy and Mineral Resources Minister Jero Wacik said on Friday he had requested West Nusa Tenggara administration to scrap the mining permit of PT Sumber Mineral Nusantara (SMN) after two people died last week during an anti-mining protest. Jero said the province’s governor would order Bima regent, Ferry Zulkarnain, to revoke the permit, which was first issued in 2008 to explore gold in the regency......

Herald-Sun on 28 January 2012:

INDONESIA on Saturday revoked a gold mining exploration permit granted to an Australian miner after a series of violent protests against the project left two people dead last month, reports said.
The decision came after thousands of people on Thursday demonstrated in the city of Bima on Sumbawa Island, east of Bali, with government buildings set ablaze.
''We decided to revoke permanently the permit for the sake of security stability here,'' Bima district head Ferry Zulkarnain told local television station MetroTV.....

New peril ahead for Gillard and Abbott in 2012?


A bloke called Chris McCracken from Parkes in New South Wales has registered JULIAR.ORG until 25th February 2012, but mightn’t renew his right to this domain name since he hasn’t posted a thing on the home webpage after what seems to have been his Day One on 3rd March last year and it
looks pretty well unsellable.
Do a Google search and you still bring up over a quarter of a million mentions of the term juLIAR a rather juvenile attempt to insult the Aussie Prime Minister. Of course that number’s complicated by the fact that Juliar is a legitimate surname for quite a few people with an internet presence.
But if Julia Gillard thought 2012 might begin to see that pejorative term quietly disappear she may have to think again, because once the .xxx adult content domains went on sale in December 2011 the existence of an as yet unregistered Juliar.xxx  came to light.
As well as the fact that JuliaGillard.xxx has been purchased by an unknown individual.
Then again, Opposition Leader Tony Abbott may have snapped up .com and .com.au, but tonyabbott.xxx is still for sale. So the bottom feeders can really go for it and we may see both senior pollies become reluctant p0rn 'hosts' before Federal Parliament begins the new year.

Happy New Year 2012 from North Coast Voices

To all our friends and readers
including those who stumbled upon
North Coast Voices
for the first time in 2011

Graphic from Google Images

Sunday, 25 December 2011

*****Happy Festive Season To All In 2011*****

North Coast Voices
wishes everyone
a happy festive season

Keep safe and well during the holidays

We will be back from our annual break
on 1 January 2012

Saturday, 24 December 2011

Is the Japanese whaling fleet overfishing the Antarctic?


On July 25, 2007 a The Sydney Morning Herald article stated :

In June 2011 the International Whaling Commission (IWC) REPORT OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 2011 addressed the issue of declining Minke Whale stocks in the Antarctic:

WHALE STOCKS……..
Two different methods for estimating Antarctic minke whale abundance from these data have been developed in recent years (see below) and although they gave different estimates of abundance, both were consistent in showing an appreciable decline in estimated circumpolar abundance between CPII and CPIII……..
It is clear from Table 5 that while circumpolar Antarctic minke whale abundance estimates have declined during the period from CPII to CPIII, there are substantial differences in relative changes between Areas, with only relatively moderate increases or declines in some Areas, but appreciable declines in others (Table 6). No significant decline is seen in Areas III, IV and VI, whilst estimated abundance is substantially lower in CPIII for Areas I, II and V. Areas II and V encompass the Weddell and Ross Seas
As noted above, large declines in estimates of Antarctic minke whale abundance occurred in Areas I, II and V (there were no statistically significant changes in the other three Areas). The Committee agrees that these declines do indeed reflect genuine changes in abundance in the open-water areas surveyed that need to be explained. Such changes may be due to changes in distribution or reflect a true decline (or some combination of both)……
There are two classes of explanation for possible true declines in abundance. The first, quantitative approach involves the population dynamics statistical catch-at-age analyses (SCAA) from Area III East to VI West, which can potentially account for the changes in overall abundance in terms of variations over time in mortality and recruitment (note that this may explain how but not why changes occurred). The second, less quantitative approach involves attempts to identify mechanisms whereby mortality and recruitment may have changed (e.g. ecosystem effects, interspecies competition, climate changes, etc.).

It may be time to reflect on the fact that one of the management areas identified in the IWC report as experiencing an agreed marked decline in minke whale numbers is also one of those areas in which Japan’s whale fleet has actively hunted these whales, for at least twelve austral summer seasons during its approximately twenty-three year history of Antarctic commercial whaling conducted under the guise of scientific research.

During that time Japanese research documents show that the fleet has consistently taken both lactating and pregnant minke females.

Click on image to enlarge

The Government of Japan’s whaling fleet is heading towards its Southern Ocean killing grounds as I write.

During the 2011/12 season the inappropriately named Institute of Cetacean Research will sponsor so-called ‘lethal research’ on as many as 930 minke whales and possibly a handful of fin whales and even humpbacks according to Japan Times Online on 11 December 2011. The IWC's own documents clearly indicate that the whaling fleet again intends to operate in one of the management areas showing significant minke whale decline.

It's Christmas Eve and for a little while longer the world is a wonderful place

 
Let's try to keep in that way....

http://youtu.be/B8WHKRzkCOY

A recap of the Hon. Anthony John Abbott's year that was....



No no  no NO! no never no nay No nooooo  won’t no NO-NO-NO no not no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no No no no no nada no no no no no no no no no no no no Nah-nah-nah-nah-nah! no no no no no no no-go no no no no no no no no no no no no no nei no no no no no no no non no no no no no no  no no no no no nein no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no No no no no no-no no no no no not no no no no no nyet no no no no no no no no no neva eva eva eva eva eva NO.......................................................... quoth Tony

Friday, 23 December 2011

Why all the fuss about an eBay scam? Ask Australia's DoD what a real scam looks like


Is that a gun in your pocket?

The Sydney Morning Herald of 20 December 2011 made me quietly smile when Asher Moses breathlessly told readers that it was an Unhappy Christmas: $1120 for an empty box through eBay with Australian eBay customers lured by ultra-bargain priced TV sets and other electronics have shelled out thousands of dollars only to receive empty boxes in the mail.

Asher may be too young to remember that during the Viet Nam War Australian Defence Force personnel (were confidently rumoured at the time) to have opened carefully packaged boxes, which were supposed to contain an advanced weaponry component - only to find that each and every box merely contained a photocopied schematic of the very expensive item.

The Commonwealth Dept. of Defence, as procurer of these mythical components, was so embarrassed that its gullibility was hidden by creative internal accounting and never saw the light of day.

Now that was a $$$$$$$ scam!

One of the other perils of rock fishing - FEAR



Many a keen fisherman will sympathise with The Daily Examiner’s editor over this salty experience he shared with the world last Tuesday:
“FISHING is supposed to be a relaxing activity, one where you can forget about the stresses of life, simply absorb the surroundings and be taken to another place.
It normally is for me, but not so on Sunday.
A friend and I headed to Woody Head to do a spot of bream fishing off the rocks. With not much happening on the fishing front, I decided to try another spot, but in the process managed to slip and put a small cut on the back of my leg on some oysters. There was a steady trickle of blood for the rest of the morning as the salty water stopped the wound from drying out.
As the tide rose we moved again, this time well away from the surf zone but where there was a collection of serious rocks and hazards. I lost a good deal of bait as I made my way out. I placed myself on a rock that had about half a square metre of surface above the water line and cast out. Small waves gently rose above the rock and up my calf muscles, keeping the wound wet and a drop or two of blood entering the water.
After about five minutes on the rock I looked down to see a wobbegong shark more than a metre long swimming beneath my feet, within a minute there was another, then another, then another.
I'm not sure I saw them all, but there were at least four, probably five, sharks milling around my feet.
They were so keen on what I was doing, they kept putting their heads onto the rock from which I was fishing.
This was disturbing.
I thought that in time they would pass. They didn't.
My only passage back to the mainland was by wading through the rock-filled water that was sometimes chest deep.
It wasn't a pleasant thought.
I know they are protected, but I stomped on the heads of a couple as they came onto the rocks and hit another couple with the butt of my rod. They would swim away for a few metres, then return.
I eventually decided to try to scare as many away as possible and take my chances through the rocks. I did and grabbed a few more bumps and grazes on the rocks on the way back, but thankfully the sharks left me alone.
I've seen what they can do to people when they latch onto someone.
My daughter told me last week one of the things on her bucket list was to swim with sharks. I'm going to cross that one off mine.”


Thursday, 22 December 2011

'Steve' Gulaptis MP, fifth columnist?


Surfing the web I came across this little pearl from the mouth of the then Maclean Shire Mayor, now the NSW North Coast’s very own MP for Page, ‘Steve’ Gulaptis – which leads me to wonder if he joined the O’Farrell Coalition Government just so that he could help eradicate it?
ABC North Coast Radio live interview on 11th May 2002

Coal seam gas miners won't be putting any presents under the Chrissie tree


Royalties paid by coal seam gas miners in NSW are next to nothing so, as Janet Cavanaugh writes in today's Daily Examiner, don't hold your breath waiting for funds from those sources to amount to anything worth talking about.

Don't expect it any time soon
For those expecting Metgasco's royalties to fund the Pacific Highway upgrade, the second Grafton bridge or a 24-hour police station in Casino (DEX, December 17 "CSG could co-exist: Metgasco") - don't expect it any time soon.
The NSW Government's assistance to encourage the industry includes a five-year holiday on paying royalties for each and every well, and then discounted royalties for a further five years. In contrast, coal seam gas royalties in Queensland are a flat 10% each year.
Peak production of wells often occurs in the first few years of a well's life, with production dropping off significantly after that. In 2010, the total paid to the NSW Government in coal seam gas royalties was only $462,000.
Does Metgasco seriously think this can fund anything more than a fraction of the bureaucracy which is meant to regulate the industry?
Janet Cavanaugh, Whiporie

Source: Letters, The Daily Examiner, 22/12/11

Don't laugh, this is a true story


A 10-years-old sheep on a farm on the Isle of Wight has been fitted with false teeth. The plastic teeth were fitted last week and in seven days the sheep put on 20lb.

That gem appeared in today's Daily Examiner but it wasn't a recent news item. It happened 50 years ago. Regular Examiner readers appreciate the work of Chris Nield who compiles "Backward Glances: Extracts from The Daily Examiner 50 years ago today".

In other 'old' news reported in the Examiner today:

* Sir Earle Christmas Page, former Australian Prime Minister died in Sydney to-day. Lady Page and close relatives were at his bedside constantly as he fought for his life. [Well, truth be known, Sir Earle died on 20 December.]

Footnote: The Australian Dictionary of Biography states that Sir Earle's first wife, Ethel, predeceased him. Ethel died in 1958 and on 20 July 1959 Sir Earle married his secretary Jean Thomas at St Paul's Cathedral. Sir Earle fought his last election in December 1961. Suffering from cancer, he hardly appeared in the electorate and died in Sydney on 20 December, not knowing that he had lost his seat after forty-two year.

Before you get too comfortable.......


From Monash University’s Indigenous Human Rights and History Vol 1(1) [Occasional Papers Series Editors: Lynette Russell, Melissa Castan] comes Genocide in Australia: By Accident or Design? by Colin Tatz – giving us all something to think about as 2011 ends:

There was no pendulum before the 1970s. That there was no desire, let alone a need, to look was partly because Australians regard themselves as quintessential democrats and decent colonists, ‘genuinely benevolent’ as Hancock would say, convinced that Australian-ness [by birth or even by naturalisation] is a natural immunity to bad or homicidal, let alone genocidal, behaviour. When Australia reluctantly ratified the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (hereafter, Genocide Convention or GC)3 in June 1949, a bipartisan parliament was aghast that Australia should be associated with a Genocide Convention Bill. Liberal MP Archie Cameron declared that ‘no one in his right senses believes that the Commonwealth of Australia will be called before the bar of public opinion, if there is such a thing, and asked to answer for any of the things which are enumerated in this convention.’ Labor MP Leslie Haylen was adamant that ‘the horrible crime of genocide is unthinkable in Australia … that we detest all forms of genocide and desire to remove them arises from the fact that we are a moral people. The fact that we have a clean record allows us to take such an attitude...’ (Hansard 1949: 1871–6).

Their indignation and belief in an unblemished record notwithstanding, Australia’s behaviour is now before the bar of public opinion and inevitably on the international conference table; it is increasingly illustrated in museums and film documentaries; it is taught in a small but growing number of university courses and in most high school syllabuses; and published in newspapers, books, annotated bibliographies, genocide studies journals and websites abroad and at home. The Australian case now appears in anthologies like Century of Genocide: Eyewitness Accounts and Critical Views.4 Genocide in Australia is now thinkable and thought about — here and abroad.

That the Aboriginal experience doesn’t look like, sound like or feel like Auschwitz is a quite proper conclusion — but genocide is not restricted to that heinous chapter of the twentieth century. Despite the many differences between the Australian and other cases, the evidence on the destruction of Aboriginal societies is strong enough to fall clearly within the scope of the crime defined in international law……..