Thursday 4 July 2019

And the answer is ...


Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson

Most of yesterday's information was obtained from  Jason Steger's "If Boris Johnson fails in his bid to become British PM, he has a fall-back plan", which appeared in Spectrum (The Sydney Morning Herald, June 29-30). Thanks Jason!

Who is this person?


He/she

 * was born in New York

 * delivered the keynote address at a Melbourne Writers Festival

 * has written fiction

 * has written biography

 * has written about history

 * has been known to shoot 'self in the foot

 * has been a big city's mayor

 * says writing romantic fiction could be on his/her agenda

 * hopes to get a big promotion in the very near future

* is not backward in coming forward

* was given Alexander or Alexandra as his/her first given name

* might use the pen name Rosie M. Banks for future books
 

Think you know?

The answer will be revealed tomorrow.

Credits:
1. Thanks to my mate Elwyn for giving a heads up on this.
2. The source for the information contained in this quiz will be provided tomorrow.

Wednesday 3 July 2019

Well, wouldn't you know it!


Yesterday the Reserve Bank of Australia cut the cash rate from 1.25% to 1%. However, the Commonwealth Bank, The National Australia Bank and Westpac announced they will not be passing on the full benefit of the interest cut rate to all of their home loan customers. Meanwhile, ANZ Bank said it will pass on the cut in full.

Let's go back to June when the RBA cut the cash rate from 1.5% to 1.25%. The Commonwealth Bank, the National Bank and Westpac passed on the full cut but the ANZ Bank didn't.


Who's having a lend of who?

This observer reckons the Big Four are having a lend of us all. 


Tuesday 2 July 2019

Ginger

It's been quite a while since Ginger last made an appearance on NCV so let's see what he was up to on the first day of the new financial year.













Ginger's fans can keep an eye on him here on a daily basis.

Credit: GoComics

Monday 1 July 2019

Road rage is no joke

Rohiman Haroon wrote this piece  for Malaysia's The New Strait Times.

It's not too difficult to apply the story to Australia. When reading its references to "Malaysia", think "Australia".


At a corporate dinner some years ago, stand-up comedian Harith Iskander made a humorous observation that Malaysian drivers had the habit of displaying a menacing look to their fellow drivers when the latter did something wrong in the way they drove

Yes, that menacing, disgusting look by the angry driver right after the car driver in front made a mistake, like hogging the road or failing to signal when turning into a junction.

The driver would usually drive past by you and make an angry face, wearing that somewhat Angry Bird look with pointed eyebrows and shaking his head in disbelief at you as if he wanted to know who the imbecile was.
...

Generally, Malaysian drivers do not like being honked at, tailgated and blinded by high beams. If you are a patient and civil driver, you’d give way to the oncoming car from behind. But if you are one of those who do not like being pushed over on the road, your average Malaysian drivers’ response would be to honk back, tailgate the driver and blind the car in front with high beams.

If you drive on the road today, you’d notice Malaysian motorists tend to make endless mistakes. Not signaling when turning into a junction, weaving in and out of traffic, running traffic lights and signs, using mobile phones while driving and even hogging the road below the allowed speed limit of 110kph on highways are just a few of the mistakes that you can observe on a daily basis.

But the worst is when incidents of road rage culminate in road bullying and assaults that result in injuries and deaths of either drivers.

We have seen a lot of these horrifying incidents captured on videos that went viral over the past years. I do not wish to dwell on those horrendous incidents, which have been said and written about in volumes on social media platforms, in newspapers and social forums.

But I want to stress the “small” mistakes we commit that could cause our fellow drivers to lose their cool

Admittedly, I have made plenty of mistakes while driving.

In an incident not too long ago, as I was sending my children to school in the morning and turning into a junction, I saw a four-wheel drive coming from behind fast, zigzagging past the traffic, and incessantly giving other vehicles high headlight beams.

As the vehicle drove past, I was shocked to find that a woman was in the driver’s seat. She rolled down the window, drove past and shouted at the top of her lungs: “Pakcik, lesen kopi ke? Apasal tak bagi signal?

I was angry at first, wanting to violently respond, but I knew I made a mistake by not signaling. I rolled the window and showed my hand with open palm, gesturing an apology.

Nowadays, Malaysian women drive fast and furious, don’t they? Not just men any more. Aggressive driving, especially weaving through traffic, is the norm on our roads every day.

In another incident, I was given the middle finger not just by the driver, but by his supposedly young passenger son as well. “Bapa borek, anak rintik” (like father, like son); that’s what a Malay proverb says.

It was my mistake for changing lanes quite abruptly into the right side of the road, although I gave the indicating light.

Nonetheless, this car came from behind so fast that it hit on the brake so suddenly it screeched to a halt. It almost hit my car when the driver gave me the stern, menacing look as he overtook my car.
I was about to show my hands to gesticulate an apology, but the driver and his young passenger gave me the finger. Naturally, I wanted to give chase and gestured the driver with my own middle finger, but I kept my cool. It would have only made things uglier if I had done it.

I just couldn’t understand how a young boy, probably in his teens, could do such a thing. It ruined my day.

According to a Malaysian Institute of Road Safety research conducted two years ago, out of the total 13.3 million registered drivers in Malaysia, 2.4 million lose their temper on the road. It means two out of 10 people drive while fuming.

This is the reason why I made a point to want to be patient, be civil and remember to recite prayers when I start my car every time. The ugly side of me, however, reminds me to anticipate the worst.

I’d anticipate that other drivers on the road today are not in their right mind as they carry with them so much baggage in their lives. They could have had arguments with their wives that morning, anticipated a really bad day with piles of work and horrible bosses, afraid of arriving late to work or just missed breakfast.

Saturday 29 June 2019

Helium balloons on Clarence Valley Council land and facilities are "busted"


Yes, that's right! This week Clarence Valley Council voted to develop a policy on prohibiting the use and sale of helium balloons on Council managed land and facilities.

The Daily Examiner's Tim Howard wrote this piece for Friday's edition of the paper.


Helium filled balloons might be on the way out on council land in the Clarence Valley, but they’ll still have a place in the region’s tourism literature.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Clarence Valley councillors voted to develop a policy to allow council to ban the sale and release of helium filled balloons from its land. But when it came to the next item of business, a motion calling for the removal of the flying balloons-inspired Clarence Valley tourism logo, they baulked.

Faced with a report inspired by the council’s Climate Change Advisory Committee calling for a complete ban on all balloons on council’s land and facilities, Greens Cr Greg Clancy put up a compromise motion.

His motion called for council to develop a policy to ban helium-filled balloons, investigate the implication of the ban on other council policies and come up with a draft awareness campaign about the environmental impacts of balloons.

His motion also called for the erection of signs at council cemeteries to indicate balloons were banned.

A group of councillors: Mayor Jim Simmons and Crs Andrew Baker, Richie Williamson and Arthur Lysaught argued hard against the proposal.

But they met a passionate response from an equally determined group in Crs Clancy, Karen Toms and Peter Ellem.

After almost an hour of debate, their arguments about the dangers to the environment swayed two extra votes from Crs Debrah Novak and Jason Kingsley.

The next item up for discussion was a report reviewing council logos.

Cr Toms took exception to the Valley’s tourism logo, a bunch of coloured circles she said represented a cluster of flying balloons.

To the frustration of several councillors, the ensuing 25 minutes of debate resulted in a re-run of arguments in the previous item.

Cr Toms argued because the previous motion looked for a policy to ban balloons, it was a good time to follow through by removing the logo.

But Cr Kingsley could not be swayed this time and his vote against the proposal to remove the logo decided the matter in the negative.

 Below is a copy of CVC's resolution on Tuesday, June 25, 2019. It can also be seen at page 82 of Council's minutes here.




Credits:  
1. The Daily Examiner for the image "Green light for balloon policy" and the text penned by its senior reporter Tim Howard
2. Clarence Valley Council for the Image of "Council Resolution".