Showing posts sorted by date for query nbn. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query nbn. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Friday 19 July 2019
Elwyn is spittin’ chips
Took a call from my mate Elwyn and he was, to put it super mildly, seething, red-hot furious.
Elwyn, who is a something of a quiz champion, leaves others at the Table of Knowledge at our local watering hole for dead. He watches any and all quiz shows on TV.
Elwyn credits his interest in quizzes to his mother who participated, with some success, on the radio program The Quiz Kids hosted by John Dease.
And why is Elwyn so stroppy? NBN TV has been showing repeats of Millionaire Hot Seat.
Elwyn does have a good sense of humour. He was in stitches when he told me a contestant on Hot Seat this week said they hoped to go to France in June-July for FIFA’s Women’s World Cup of Football in France.
Elwyn took no comfort when I told him ABC TV did an “NBN” on Wednesday night and repeated last week's Shaun Micallef's Mad as Hell.
Footnote: The contestant didn’t win and go to France for the WWC of Football despite having a second “attempt”.
Tuesday 23 April 2019
Australian PM Scott Morrison acting as an IPA stooge on the 2019 election campaign trail
The hard-right
lobby group the Institute of Public
Affairs (IPA) told the Liberal Party of Australia to jump to it……..
IPA, on 12 April 2019, the day after the
federal election date was set:
20 POLICIES TO FIX AUSTRALIA
15
policies the Coalition should implement but will not and 5 policies they should
not implement but will
John Roskam, Executive Director and Daniel
Wild, Director of Research PARLIAMENTARY RESEARCH BRIEF A research note from
the Institute of Public Affairs distributed to all Australian parliamentarians
12 April 2019
For more information
contact Daniel Wild, Director of Research at dwild@ipa.org.au
15 policies the
Coalition should implement but will not
1. Remove all references
to race in the Constitution Martin Luther King, Jr stated “I have a dream that
my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be
judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character.” But
Australia’s Constitution currently divides Australians by race. Section 25 of
the Australian Constitution, titled “Provision as to races disqualified from
voting’, while today redundant remains an affront to Australians’ sense of
egalitarianism. Similarly, Section 51(xxvi) of the Australian Constitution
gives the Commonwealth government the power to make laws on the basis of race.All
Australians are equal and should be treated as equal before the law. Therefore,
both provisions should be discarded and references to race in the Constitution
must be erased.
2. Repeal Section 18C of
the Racial Discrimination Act (1975) Free speech is inextricably linked to the
Australian way of life. Australians should be able to enjoy and participate in
open and unfettered discussion about issues of import to the future of our
democracy and our nation. Section 18C stops this from happening. It is an
unconscionable and egregious limitation on the free speech rights of all
Australians and must be abolished.
3. Withdraw from the
Paris Climate Agreement The Paris Climate Agreement will increase the cost of
electricity production by at least $52 billion by 2030 without making any
noticeable difference to the environment. The four largest greenhouse gas
emitters in absolute terms are not in the Paris Agreement (the United States)
or their emissions are not constrained by the Paris Agreement (China and India)
or are not on target to meet their obligations under the Paris Agreement (the
European Union). It is not in Australia’s national interest to remain party to
the Agreement.
4. Implement a flat
income tax Australia’s income tax system punishes success and discourages
upward economic mobility. Its interaction with the welfare system also creates
welfare traps through high effective marginal tax rates which keeps too many
Australians poor and trapped in a poverty cycle. To reduce poverty, expand economic
opportunity, promote equality, all Australians should face the same income tax
rate.
5. Reduce the corporate
tax rate to below 20 per cent, in line with competitor nations The top marginal
company tax rate in Australia of 30 per cent is the third highest in the
developed world, and well above the OECD average of 24 per cent and competitor
nations such as the United States (21 per cent), the United Kingdom (17 per
cent from 2020), and Singapore (17 per cent). Australia’s high corporate tax
rate is a key reason why business investment is just 11.5 per cent of GDP,
which is lower than the rate that prevailed during the Whitlam years.
6. Appointment of High
Court Justices to be rotated between the six states and the Commonwealth The
Commonwealth Government is too big, powerful, and interventionist, and state
governments have too small of a role in the operation of Australia’s
federation. A key reason for this is that the Commonwealth alone is responsible
for appointing Justices to the High Court of Australia. This has unsurprisingly
led to the appointment of Judges who favour an expansion of Commonwealth power
at the expense of state governments. To correct this imbalance, state
governments should play a central role in appointing High Court Justices.
7. Double the size of
the House of Representatives, and halve the size of the Ministry Canberra is
too detached and removed from the concerns of mainstream Australia.
This is
partly a reflection of the size of individual electorates. Almost every Federal
electorate contains more than 100,000 voters. This is too many. To get
government closer to the people there should be a larger number of electorates
with fewer voters, resulting in each voter having a louder voice. In addition,
the number of Members of Parliament who are a part of the Ministry at any point
in time has grown rapidly over the past two decades. Appointing members to the
Ministry, the Outer Ministry, and as Assistant Ministers is a deliberate
strategy to silence debate and reduce the influence of backbenchers. For
Australia’s democracy to become more robust as in the United Kingdom and the
United States, the number of Members of Parliament in the Ministry, Outer
Ministry, and as Assistant Ministers should be reduced from 41 to 20.
8. Privatise the ABC In
a free society the government should not own and operate its own media company.
The media market in Australia is highly competitive. Online platforms have
transformed and disrupted traditional approaches to media. Consumers have never
had more choice about where to source their news and opinions on current
affairs. Moreover, the ABC is unremittingly bias. Its staff are five times more
likely to vote for the Greens compared to the general population. The ABC is
beyond reform. New leaders will not fix the problem, regardless of their
experience or intention. The ABC must be privatised.
9. Re-introduce the debt
ceiling Gross government debt is currently $546 billion, all of which must be
paid back by today’s young Australians via higher future taxes. One approach
policy-makers can take to reduce government debt, or at least reduce its
growth, is to re-introduce the debt ceiling. A debt-ceiling places a limit on
how much the Australian government can borrow. Raising the debt ceiling
requires an Act of Parliament, which ensures the issue will be debated and
receive the public attention it deserves. A debt ceiling was implemented by the
Rudd government in 2007 and it was set at $75 billion. With the support of the
Greens, the Abbott government with Joe Hockey as Treasurer abolished the debt
ceiling in 2013 as debt approached $300 billion.
10. Hold a Royal
Commission into the Bureau of Meteorology’s tampering with temperature and
climate data The Bureau of Meteorology appears to have tampered with
temperature and climate data and to have re-written history to make it appear
as if the temperature is higher than it actually is, and that is has risen
faster than it actually has. Australians deserve to know the truth about their
public institutions. The only way to find the truth about potential temperature
data manipulation is to hold a Royal Commission into the Bureau of
Meteorology’s activities.
11. Abolish compulsory
superannuation Compulsory superannuation is a tax on workers’ wages which is
coercively redistributed to the Unions. Australian workers should be free to
decide how much of their own income they are willing to defer until retirement,
and how much they need in the present to spend on items such as housing,
education, and health care. For more information contact Daniel Wild, Director
of Research at dwild@ipa.org.au
12. Abolish the
Renewable Energy Target and end all subsidies to wind, solar, and
hydro-electricity generators Subsidies to renewable energy generation in
Australia are expected to reach $60 billion by 2030. The Renewable Energy
Target at the Commonwealth level, as well as state-based targets, have been the
main contributors to this subsidy blow-out. Because renewables are
uncompetitive, expensive, and unreliable, Australia’s electricity prices have
increased by 120 per cent over the past decade – around double the rate of
inflation. This has a disproportionate effect on the lowest income earners who
spend a higher portion of their income on energy than others. Moreover, this
cost comes at no noticeable benefit to the environment. For example, over the
period of 2001 (when the RET was first implemented by the Howard government) to
2014, the RET resulted in 0.005 per cent fewer carbon emissions globally from
human sources which in turn account for just three per cent of total
emissions.
13. Introduce a
one-in-two-out approach to reduce red tape Red tape is the single biggest
impediment to business investment, job creation, and economic opportunity in
Australia. Each year red tape reduces economic output by $176 billion, which is
equivalent to 10 per cent of GDP.12 This cost represents all of the jobs which
are never created, the wages which never rise, the businesses never started,
and the dreams which go unfulfilled because of red tape. Governments should cut
red tape by repealing two laws for every new law introduced.
14. Repeal the Fair Work
Act The Fair Work Act denies hundreds and thousands of Australians the dignity
of work. There are currently 1.7 million Australians who are either unemployed
or unable to work the number of hours they want. This is largely due to the
Fair Work Act which prevents employers and employees from reaching mutually
beneficial employment agreements. The Fair Work Act is too complicated and
broken to reform. It must be repealed in full. 15. Legalise nuclear power in
Australia Australia has 30 per cent of the world’s uranium deposits, some of
which we export to the rest of the world for power generation. Yet we forbid
ourselves from using nuclear power for domestic energy generation. Meanwhile,
Australia has the fourth highest electricity prices in the world. Section
140A(1) of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999)
states there is to be “no approval for certain nuclear installations” including
“a nuclear power plant”. These four words – “a nuclear power plant” – should be
removed from the Section to legalise the development of a nuclear power plant
in Australia. For more information
contact Daniel Wild, Director of Research at dwild@ipa.org.au
5 policies the
Coalition should not implement but will
1. Do not hold a
Referendum to divide Australians by race The proposal to establish the
Constitutional recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders Peoples
would irrevocably undermine national unity and is a regressive throwback to the
days when race played a central role in Australia’s Constitution. Similarly,
the proposal to establish a separate entity in the Constitution to be ‘The
Voice’ of Indigenous Australians is divisive and false - all Australians are
represented by the Commonwealth parliament and are equal before the law. Race
has no place in Australia’s Constitution.
2. Do not raise taxes
Australia is a high tax nation and workers and families pay too much tax. Over
the past decade real taxes per capita have risen by 11 per cent. According to
the Reserve Bank of Australia, over the past year taxes paid by households
increased by around 8 per cent, more than double the rate of growth in
household income.15 This means more money is going to the government and less
money can be spent on household essentials such as housing, child care, and
education. The Coalition should not raise taxes, and ideally should reduce
taxes.
3. Do not raise spending
The true cause of high and rising taxes is high and rising spending. Every
dollar of spending must be paid back with higher taxes, either today or in the
future via the accumulation of debt which is a tax on the next generation of
Australians. Government spending has increased from 23.1 per cent of GDP at the
end of the Howard-era to 24.6 per cent today (not including off-Budget expenses
and liabilities such as the NBN).16 In absolute terms spending has increased by
approximately 80 per cent, which is the equivalent to 6 per cent per year.17
This is well above the average rate of inflation of around 2 per cent per year.
4. Do not proceed with
Snowy 2.0 The Snowy Hydro 2.0 project will be remembered alongside the NBN as a
costly, ineffective, outdated, and inefficient bureaucratic program which won’t
solve the underlying public policy problem of high and rising electricity
prices and unreliable supply. The project will cost at least $4.5 billion, it
won’t become operational until at least 2024-25, and it will be a net energy
user, meaning it will be a drain on the energy grid. Instead, governments
should provide policy settings which allow for the development of reliable and
cost-effective coal-fired power generation.
5. Do not introduce new
anti-discrimination laws In the context of the Religious Freedom Review, it has
been suggested that new anti-discrimination laws be introduced to protect
freedom of religion. However, adding new restrictions through religious
antidiscrimination laws would constitute a significant threat to the freedom of
conscience of all Australians. Freedom, whether exercised for a religious
purpose or not, should only be limited where the exercise of that freedom
impacts another person’s freedom or peaceful use and enjoyment of their own
property. The only way to sufficiently protect religious freedom is to remove
laws that currently place restrictions on religious thought and practice.
Prime
Minister Scott Morrison asked how high he should jump, then realised he had
exposed the pathway he preferred if the party won at the 18 May 2019 federal
election and quickly dissembled………
The
Canberra Times,
18 April 2019:
Prime Minister Scott
Morrison says he has no plans to reverse a ban on nuclear energy, despite
earlier saying he was open to the industry if it could "pay its way".
"It's not, not on
the agenda ... but it's got to be self-sustaining," he told Tasmania Talks
LAFM on Thursday.
"I'm not going to
roll out tens of billions of dollars in subsidies, that's not the future for
energy efficiencies."
Labor's environment
spokesman Tony Burke took the chance to remind Mr Morrison nuclear power is
against the law.
"It is
extraordinary that Scott Morrison is now contemplating changing the law to
allow nuclear power stations in Australia," he said.
Mr Burke said Jervis
Bay, Townsville, Bribie Island and Mackay have all been flagged as locations
for nuclear power.
"Where is Morrison
proposing to put his nuclear power plants? Which coastal community is under
threat?"
But the prime minister
later on Thursday took to Twitter to step away from his earlier comment.
"This is not our
policy and we have no plans to change that," he tweeted.
Labels:
IPA,
Liberal Party of Australia
Thursday 26 July 2018
Proof positive that money buys government policy?
Liberal MP for Warringah and soon to be Australian prime minister, Tony Abbott, in April 2012 at the Institute of Public Affairs 70th Anniversary celebration promised:
“I want to assure you
that the Coalition will indeed repeal the carbon tax, abolish the Department of
Climate Change, abolish the Clean Energy Fund. We will repeal Section 18C of
the Racial Discrimination Act, at least in its current form. We will abolish
new health and environmental bureaucracies. We will deliver $1 billion in red
tape savings every year. We will develop northern Australia. We will repeal the
mining tax. We will create a one stop shop for environmental approvals. We will
privatise Medibank Private. We will trim the public service and we will stop
throwing good money after bad on the NBN. So, ladies and gentlemen, that is a
big “yes” to many of the 75 specific policies you urged upon me…”
The Sydney MorningHerald on the subject of the IPA, 7 April 2016:
Four months from
election and the people scratch their heads. Why, again, are we destroying the
Reef for some billionaire Indian coalminer? Why fund private schools and
de-fund public ones? Above all, how did Australia go from a country where the
poor occasionally stole the goose from the common to one where the rich are
consistently rewarded for stealing the common from the goose? The answer, at
least in part, appears to be the IPA.
The IPA has three member
senators, David Leyonhjelm, Bob Day and James Paterson, and a fourth-in-waiting
with ex-human rights commissioner Tim Wilson running in the lower house. It
also has several state MPs and members with regular media gigs – like IPA
senior fellow Chris Berg (The Drum and Fairfax) and board member Janet
Albrechtsen, whose recent column in The Ozpuffed Paterson and Wilson as
"outstanding warrior[s] for the freedom cause". They all talk a lot
about warriors – which is also what Abbott called Credlin.
But the IPA's real power
is the charisma of wealth. At its 70th birthday gala dinner in 2013, Rupert
Murdoch gave the keynote. NewsCorp's Andrew Bolt was MC and opposition
leader Tony Abbott called the IPA "freedom's discerning friend". Gina
Rinehart, George Pell, George Brandis and Alan Jones were guests…..
Still, the IPA then
seemed like harmless cranks. Now it seems they're all but writing government
policy. Even that's not bad in itself. The wealthy are allowed their clubs, and
governments must get ideas from somewhere. But when the private interest of Big
Money consistently presents as public interest, it's time to worry. Big time.
We've heard much lately
of illegal developer funding, which caused the NSW Electoral Commission to
withhold $4.4 million from the NSW Liberals. But developers aren't the only
group who might seek influence, and brown paper bags are not the only vehicle.
The IPA has long
insisted NGOs should be transparent, but it's notoriously secretive about its
own sources of money. (Executive director John Roskam says its donors get
intimidated). But revealed sources include all the bad boys of Big
International Money: media, oil, tobacco, genetics, energy and forestry. Who
benefits from IPA policy? They do.
In 2012, the IPA
published "Seventy-Five
Radical Ideas to Transform Australia". I haven't done the math, but
I'd say over a third are now law or seriously discussed.
DeSmog reporting on the IPA, 17 July 2018:
Australia’s richest person,
mining magnate Gina Rinehart, has been revealed as a key funder of the right
wing think tank the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) – a major pusher of
climate science denial.
Rinehart’s company,
Hancock Prospecting Proprietary Ltd (HPPL), donated $2.3m to
the IPA in 2016 and $2.2m in 2017, according to disclosures made to
the New South Wales Supreme Court.
As part of a
long-running legal dispute over the use of company funds, Gina Rinehart’s
daughter Bianca had served a subpoena to access documents that would have shed
light on the two donations from HPPL to the IPA.
The IPA is an
influential right wing think tank with close ties to Australia’s governing
Liberal Party. IPA fellows regularly appear in the media. The
payments suggest that more than a third of the IPA’s income in 2016 and
2017 was from HPPL – majority-owned privately by Gina Rinehart.
According to Forbes,
Rinehart was the seventh richest woman in the world in 2017 and Australia’s
richest person, with current wealth estimated
to be $17.6 billion.
The IPA is a
registered charity but is not legally required to disclose its funders and has
declined to reveal them in recent years, citing concerns that donors could
be “intimidated”.
According to the court judgement, Bianca’s solicitors had been
provided with a schedule of “donations and sponsorships”
from HPPL where it was disclosed, the judgement said,
“that HPPL paid or provided amounts to IPA in a total of
$2.3 million for the 2016 financial year and $2.2 million in the 2017 financial year.”
The donations also raise
questions about the way the IPA has disclosed the nature of
its revenues.
The IPA's 2017 annual report declared $6.1m of income but
said that “86 per cent” had come from individuals. HPPL’s $2.2m donation
constituted more than a third of the IPA’s income that year.
In 2016, the IPA reported that 91 per cent of donations
were from individuals, but that year HPPL’s $2.3m donation constituted
almost half the IPA's income of $4.96m that year.
Labels:
funding,
IPA,
political rort
Friday 15 June 2018
What I learnt about NBN Co this week
It is easy to lose track of what federal government-owned NBN Co is up to these days, so I did a quick search of mainstream media reports and the company website. This is what I found.
In the nine months up to 31 March 2018 NBN Co listed $1,413 million in revenue, up from $665 million for the same period last year. Nevertheless it appears the company is operating at a loss.
NBN Co’s CEO
earns est. $3.62 million per annum — approximately six times more than Prime Minister Malcolm
Turnbull.
Million-dollar
salary packages are paid to another four top executives.
More than 480
of NBN Co’s staff are on $200,000-plus salaries and 120 earn more
than $300,000.
NBN Co
paid $66 million in bonuses to its staff last financial year.
In February
and March 2018 the company’s three top executives spent almost $40,000 on
business-class flights and accommodation during a trip to Spain to attend a
conference.
Although NBN plans are advertised with speeds such as 25Mbps or 50Mbps, performance on fixed wireless drops in the evening and the CEO has stated that "We don't have the money to invest in this to take it above 6Mbps” – which means that many customers cannot get a decent image when streaming videos or live entertainment.
NBN Co has
fobbed off customers 80,000 times since July last year – nine per cent of
all scheduled appointments.
There were at
least 42,510 formal complaints made about NBN services from January to December
2017.
More than one
third of NBN users wish it had never happened, according to new research by finder.com.au released
on 8 June 2018. Only 43 per cent of respondents still on an ADSL or cable
Internet connection said they were looking forward to switching to NBN.
The basic NBN service is being redefined and entry-level retail prices for NBN broadband are set to rise.
Labels:
#TurnbullGovernmentFAIL,
information technology,
Internet,
NBN
Tuesday 8 May 2018
Ballina not happy with second-rate NBN installation plans
The
Northern Star,
4 May 2018:
BALLINA'S deputy mayor
is calling on residents to speak out against about the NBNCo's plans to deliver
"second class technology" to local residents.
Cr Keith Williams said
he had been contacted by residents in East Ballina, Skennars Head and Lennox
Head to say they would be getting "inferior" fibre to the node NBN
connections.
But he said fibre to the
kerb should be the minimum installation standard across the shire.
"We know that fibre
to the node places more reliance on the copper network, limits potential speeds
and is more expensive to upgrade," Cr Williams said.
"This places a real
limit on the economic potential of the area, not just now, but potentially for
years to come.
"It makes no sense
whatsoever when you consider that all these areas are close to the coast and
more exposed to the effects of salt water.
"This is precisely
the areas where you want less reliance on copper."
Cr Williams said failure
to oppose NBN rollout plans now, risked leaving residents in these areas with a
second class NBN.
"NBN Co have
insisted this is not second class technology, being essentially the same
technology as fibre to the kerb," he said.
"In this they are
correct, but they avoid the central point.
"The greater
reliance on the old copper network means it is a second rate service, slower,
more prone to dropouts and more expensive to upgrade.
"From my enquiries
to date it seems there is no formal mechanism to seek a review of the NBN Co
rollout plans.
"The only way these
things change is by community pressure and adverse publicity.
"I'm asking
everyone in the area to go to the NBN website, check what the rollout plans are
for your house and if it says Fibre to the Node, let NBN Co know that it just
isn't good enough.
"You deserve
better."
Sunday 6 May 2018
Problems with the Murray-Darling Basin plan just keep mounting and the NSW Northern Rivers needs to make sure these problems don't become ours
When it comes to the Murray-Darling Basin river systems there is never any really good news - we go from reports of town water shortages, pictures of permanently dry river beds and allegations of widespread water theft to the possibility of a fundamental legal
error in the master plan circa 2012.
The
Guardian, 2
May 2018:
One of Australia’s
foremost lawyers has issued an extraordinary warning that the Murray-Darling
basin plan is likely to be unlawful because the authority overseeing it made a
fundamental legal error when it set the original 2,750-gigalitre water recovery
target in 2012.
Bret Walker QC, who
chairs the South Australian royal
commission into the Murray-Darling basin plan, issued the warning
in a
second issues paper. He also spelled out the far-reaching implications of
the plan being unlawful.
Not only does it mean
that the original water recovery target of 2,750GL was likely to have been set
too low to deliver the environmental goal of the Water Act and
could be challenged in court, but it also means that amendments to the plan now
being debated by the Senate are likely to be invalid as well.
These include a
plan to trim 70GL from the northern basin water recovery targets and a suite
of projects, known as the sustainable
diversion limit adjustment projects, which would be funded in lieu of recovering
605GL in the southern basin.
Both are being strongly
criticised by scientists and environmentalists because they believe that they
further undercut the environmental outcomes of the plan.
The Murray-Darling
Basin Authority (MDBA) says it has relied on the best available
science in recommending the changes.
The new uncertainty over
the validity of the amendments will make it difficult for crossbenchers to
support them as the Coalition government has urged.
Walker has provided a
roadmap for environmental groups or an individual affected to challenge the
plan in court.
At the heart of his
advice is his view that the Water Act directs the MDBA to ensure environmental
outcomes are achieved when it set the environmentally sustainable level of take
(ESLT) from the river system. This is the flipside of setting the water
recovery target.
But instead of
considering the environmental outcomes only, the MDBA applied a triple bottom
line approach, giving equal weight to social and economic impacts of water
recovery.
“The MDBA also appears
to have approached the word ‘compromise’ in the definition of ESLT in a manner
involving compromise between environmental, social and economic outcomes rather
than in relation to the concept of ‘endangering’ or ‘putting in danger’
environmental criteria such as key environmental assets, and key ecosystem
functions,” the SA royal commission said.
“The commissioner is inclined to take the view
that this approach to the word ‘compromise’ in s4 of the Water Act is not
maintainable, or alternatively that he is presently unable to see how it is
maintainable,” the paper says.
“There is also evidence
that recovering an amount of water for the environment of 2,750GL does not, as
a matter of fact, represent an ESLT in accordance with the definition of that
term under the Water Act.”
Walker pointed to
numerous reports, including a 2011 CSIRO report which said modelling based on a
2,800GL recovery target “does not meet several of the specified hydrological
and ecological targets”.
There is also evidence
that the MDBA received legal advice on more than one occasion, consistent with
the commissioner’s concerns.
The issue of
water sustainability in the Murray-Darling Basin affects not just those living
in the basin and the economies of the four states this large river system runs
through – it also affects the bottom line of the national economy and those
east coast regions which will be pressured to dam and divert water to the Basin
if its rivers continue to collapse.
One such
region is the Northern Rivers of New South Wales and in particular the Clarence
River catchment area and the Clarence Valley Local Government Area.
Almost every
year for the past two decades there have been calls to dam and divert the
Clarence River – either north into south-east Queensland or west over the
ranges into the NSW section of the Murray Darling Basin.
The latest
call came last month on 18 April from Toowoomba Regional Council in south-east Queensland:
The response came on 24 April via NBN News and it was a firm NO:
NO TO CLARENCE WATER DIVERSION via @nbnnews https://t.co/w6DcTaIt4M— no_filter_Yamba (@no_filter_Yamba) May 1, 2018
However, because
communities in the Murray-Darling Basin have for generations refused to face
the fact that they are living beyond the limits of long-term water
sustainability and successive federal governments have mismanaged water policy
and policy implementation, such calls will continue.
These calls for water from other catchments to be piped into the Basin or into SE Queensland are not based on scientific evidence or sound economic principles.
They are based on an emotional response to fact that politicians and local communities looking at environmental degradation and water shortages on a daily basis are still afraid to admit that they no longer have the amount of river and groundwater needed to maintain their way of life and, are wanting some form of primitive magic to occur.
These calls for water from other catchments to be piped into the Basin or into SE Queensland are not based on scientific evidence or sound economic principles.
They are based on an emotional response to fact that politicians and local communities looking at environmental degradation and water shortages on a daily basis are still afraid to admit that they no longer have the amount of river and groundwater needed to maintain their way of life and, are wanting some form of primitive magic to occur.
The Clarence
River system is the most attractive first option for those would-be water
raiders, but experience has shown the Northern Rivers region that once a formal
investigation is announced all our major rivers on the NSW North Coast become
vulnerable as the terms of reference are wide.
The next National General Assembly of Local
Government (NGA) runs from 7-20
June 2018.
If Toowoombah
Regional Council’s motion is placed on the assembly agenda it is highly likely
that a number of councils in the Murray-Darling Basin will announce their support of the proposal.
Northern Rivers
communities need to watch this NGA closely.
Thursday 26 April 2018
Well hoorah, NBN Co is to roll out its inbuilt obsolescence across Yamba commencing in June 2018
It has been
reported in local media that NBN Co
will be commencing the Yamba rollout
of its allegedly high speed broadband in June 2018, with Maclean and Grafton rollouts
to commence in January 2019.
This news is
quite frankly underwhelming.
Whatever
information NBN Co was giving out obviously didn’t include the type of
connection that was on offer, as this important point was not mentioned by
journalists and there is contradictory information on the company's website.
These three urban
areas in the Clarence Valley are yet to hear if households and businesses are
being offered fibre-to-the-curb, fibre-to-the-node or fixed wireless.
Because it is
certain that the best option fibre-to-the-premises isn’t on offer to regional second cousins of the big metropolitan areas.
Personally I
will carefully refuse to look at any construction works taking place in Yamba
come June, July and August.
The sight of
all those water-filled trenches will be too depressing.
Who starts extensive
in-ground construction in winter at the low-lying, high water table mouth of a floodplain, I ask you?
* Image from Hakuri Sad Party
Wednesday 18 April 2018
Australian Minister for Communications and longstanding member of the far-right pressure group the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) is up in arms because Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman tells some home truths
On Tuesday 17 April the Telecommunication Industry Ombudsman (TIO) sent out the media
release in this post.
That same day the Australian Minister for
Communications and longstanding member of the far-right pressure group the Institute
of Public Affairs (IPA), Liberal Senator
for Victoria Mitch Fifield, came out fighting after the TIO report showed: complaints
about services delivered over the NBN surged by 204% in the second half of
2017, compared with the same period a year earlier…. Fifield said the way the
information regarding the 22,827 complaints about services delivered over the
NBN was presented in the TIO report, released Tuesday, “could give the
impression that responsibility for this figure rests with NBN Co”.
It looks suspiciously like the Minister is now approaching a scheduled review of telecommunications consumer protections and the complaints process with a view to quash an inconvenient truth – that transfers to the version of the National
Broadband Network (NBN) cobbled together by Tony Abbott and MalcolmTurnbull are a dismal failure for far too many Australian businesses and households.
Telecommunication
Industry Ombudsman (TIO), media
release, 17 April 2018:
Report highlights
increase in complaints about landline, mobile and internet services
Australian residential
consumers and small businesses made 84,914 complaints to the Telecommunications
Industry Ombudsman in the last six months of 2017 (1 July 2017 to 31 December
2017). In this period, complaints about landline, mobile and internet services,
increased by 28.7 per cent compared to the same six month period in 2016.
Publishing the
Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman’s Six Monthly Update today (Tuesday 17
April, 2018), Ombudsman Judi Jones said “The telecommunications industry in
Australia continues to experience significant change. An increasing range of
products and services are being offered to consumers, expectations for the
quality of phone and internet services are high, and the rollout of the
National Broadband Network is changing the way we use telecommunications
services.
“However, consumers
still seem to be facing the same problems, particularly with their bills and
the customer service they receive. Confidence in services being updated or
transferred reliably, faulty equipment, and poor service quality were also
recorded as key issues. Additionally, the wider issues relating to phone or
internet problems such as debt management are concerning.”
Jones added, “Complaints
about services delivered over the National Broadband Network continued to
increase compared to the same six month period in 2016. This indicates the
consumer experience is still not meeting expectations for all. Recent changes
to regulation and an increase in our powers to resolve complaints are positive
steps that will help improve the consumer experience.”
Highlights for the
period 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2017 include:
* 84,914 total
complaints were received
* 74,729 complaints (88
per cent) were from residential consumers
* 9,947 complaints (11.7
per cent) were from small businesses
Landline, mobile,
internet, multiple services and property
Complaints for the
period increased 28.7 per cent compared to the same six month period in 2016.
* 9,447 complaints (11.1
per cent) were recorded about landline phone services
* 24,923 complaints
(29.4 per cent) were recorded about mobile phone services
* 23,785 complaints (28
per cent) were recorded about internet services
* 26,112 complaints
(30.8 per cent) were recorded about multiple services*
* 647 complaints (0.8
per cent) were recorded about property*
* Charges and fees,
unsatisfactory response from the provider (provider response), and poor service
quality were the most common issues.
Small Businesses
Between 1 July and 31
December 2017 complaints from small businesses increased 15.6 per cent to 9,947
compared to the same period in 2016.
* Complaints from Small
Businesses accounted for 11.7 per cent of total complaints for the period
* 2,178 complaints (21.9
per cent) were recorded about landline phone services
* 2,074 complaints (20.9
per cent) were recorded about mobile phone services
* 1,716 complaints (17.3
per cent) were recorded about internet services
* 3,937 complaints (39.6
per cent) were recorded about multiple services*
* 42 complaints (0.4 per
cent) were recorded about property
* The
main issues affecting small businesses were charges and fees, unsatisfactory
response from the provider (provider response), and no service.
Complaints by State
All states and territories
in Australia saw a growth in complaints in the last six months of 2017 compared
to the same period in 2016.
Queensland recorded the
highest growth in complaints, an increase of 39.3 per cent, followed by Western
Australia with 36.5 per cent.
Complaints by state (in
alphabetical order) are as follows:
* Australian Capital
Territory made 1,184 complaints, an increase of 11 per cent
* New South Wales made
26,914 complaints, an increase of 27.9 per cent
* Northern Territory
made 504 complaints, an increase of 20 per cent
* Queensland made 16,418
complaints, an increase of 39.3 per cent
* South Australia made
6,552 complaints, an increase of 22.7 per cent
* Tasmania made 1,614
complaints, an increase of 33.1 per cent
* Victoria made 23,954
complaints, an increase of 30.5 per cent
* Western Australia made
7,381 complaints, an increase of 36.5 per cent
* The main issues
affecting Australian states and territories were charges and fees,
unsatisfactory response from the provider (provider response), and poor service
quality
Services delivered over
the National Broadband Network
Complaints about
services delivered over the National Broadband Network increased 203.9 per cent
to 22,827 on the same period in 2016.
* 14,055 complaints were
recorded about service quality
* 8,757 complaints were
recorded about delays in establishing a connection
* The
main issues affecting residential consumers and small businesses were
unsatisfactory response from the provider (provider response), poor service
quality, and connecting a service (connection/changing provider)
NOTES TO EDITORS
*From 1 July 2017, the
Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman changed the recording of complaints.
There are now five complaint service categories: landline phone services,
mobile phone services, internet services, multiple services (where the consumer
is complaining about more than one phone or internet issue), or a complaint
about damage or access to property. The changes mean data will more accurately
reflect the description of complaints given by residential consumers and small
businesses. The changes also make it easier to see the issues facing
the telecommunication industry, helping providers improve the delivery of phone
and internet services. Trend analysis will build over time from the start of
this reporting period.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)