It would appear that the Clarence Valley may be less than whole-heartedly enthusiastic about the NSW Berejiklian Coaltion Government's plans for the Port of Yamba.
Cruisin’ for a bruisin’
ONCE again dollar-sign gazes are cast in the direction of the pristine Clarence River estuary.
The Future Transport 2056 strategy announced by the NSW Government yesterday is considering Coffs and Yamba as potential ports for international cruise ships.
But I think the suggestion of a cruise ship terminal at Yamba could turn into a shipwreck before the idea ever sets sail.
It harks back to the ‘Eastgate Port’ proposal being pushed by developers which has ruffled feathers of residents, activist groups and politicians alike.
There are plenty of obstructions standing in the way of such a large scale development in the Clarence River.
Heavy dredging will be required to navigate the Yamba Bar, which happened to be the subject of a landmark native title claim for the Yaegl people in August.
Then where to build? The mind boggles when looking at aerial photographs of the Yamba estuary. To upgrade the current marina it’s difficult to imagine Hickey Island and Dart Island escaping impact.
Creating a gimmick stopover for lavish spenders would undoubtedly provide a significant economic boost for the region, but would also redefine Yamba as a tourist destination. And something tells me we like Yamba just the way it is, thank you very much.
WHILE massive industrial harbours dominate major river mouths throughout the developed world, forever and a day the Clarence River has managed to resist such a human-induced transformation and maintain its pristine beauty.
The river delta provided many a natural barrier for early explorers of the coastline, and no doubt helps explain the low population of the region compared to other, more accessible major river systems.
Just take a look down the coast at Newcastle to see coal loaders, ships and warehouses flood the landscape of its vast river delta system.
We’ve grown used to shunning large-scale port developments. We’ve come to expect environmental priorities will win the day. Some cling onto this inertia with hope, others find it a frustrating impediment to progress.
This week the NSW Government broached the idea of an international terminal at Yamba.
Many confidently declare that such a project will never get off the ground. Such statements are either naive or a prophetic summation of the strong will of the people of the Clarence because you can bet your bottom dollar developers from across the seas are admiring the untapped potential of such a destination – for industry, tourism or whatever makes a quick buck.
25 October 2017 David Whitby Getting a boat of that size in the Clarence would be a HUGE problem due to the lack of water depth at several places leading to the Goodwood wharf. Then there would be a traffic problem through to the Highway, not to mention the lack of facilities ....or NO facilities at the Goodwood wharf. Just another pipe dream.
29 October 2017 Bill Robb The blokes dreaming, there's not a chance as the reef at the entrance to the clarence is too high. If you dont mind dredging or blowing the reef down to size, then it could happen! Good luck with that environmental impact statement. Coffs would be the only engineering option available. The Jetty harbour would need some major work at the entrance and dredging of the harbour, not to mention fixing up the rest of the place. Plus I live in Coffs, so of course I am going to be biased.
31 October 2017 Michelle Argent I'm deeply sceptical about the whole thing particularly in light of Chris Gulaptis' media comment that Goodwood Island (Yamba Port) could not be used because it was used for live cattle exports. It is not but that is part of Euen's megaport insane proposal. Makes me think this is a softly softly approach to step 1 - get dredging done and navigate negotiations with our local aboriginal elders regarding the reef
2 November 2017 Karen von Ahlefeldt Fully agree
1 November 2017 Lloyd Palmer They would have to discharge ballast before the bar crossing, that will include anything tropical exotic and nasty
1 November 2017 Peter Lowry What Berejiklian as well ?
1 November 2017 Lloyd Palmer Whatever that is it sounds nasty
1 November 2017 Billy Walker And to mention the most significant site, the Dirrangan Reef which is sacred to the Yaegl Traditional Owners and the wider Aboriginal communities on the North Coast of NSW
2 November Billy Walker The Yaegl Traditional Owners have protection orders for the protection of the reef, known to the Yaegl people as Durrarngan reef, regardless of any proposals we must be notified under the Native Title Act, this also applies to any further dredging in and around the mouth of the river
3 November 2017 Matty Carlin Maybe I'm way out of the loop, but WHY would you think there would be such a push for a cruise ship terminal?
Seriously.
There's no transport options.
Nothing overly touristy to see or stay at.
Next to no infrastructure.
Yamba cannot be expanded on due to swamp, river & National Park.
So many things.
A terminal is a place of passenger exchange, or somewhere to get off to do touristy things.
I honestly can't envision it becoming a feasible and logical process.
If anything I think it would be great for the area to expand on the Slipway to encourage some vessels to use it for repairs, etc. Would bring in jobs and external income to the area which is what is lacking.
4 November 2017 Michelle Argent Another excellent commentary on this issue on northcoastvoices.blogspot.com in 3/11 blog. We are going to have to be very alert. Write to the Minister as recommended in this blog.
4 November 2017 Colin Beeby When you look at the mouth of the Clarence and then a shot of a cruise ship, you have to laugh. Then look at the mayor and Govt.members talking about a conjunction and fall over laughing.
4 November 2017 Peter Appleton Matthew I could be wrong but I believe ships of similar draught have worked the Clarence over the years without impacting on the reef or the need for extra dredging etc.
5 November 2017 Sebastian Rooks I am of the same opinion, however we need to be certain that this is not an opening salvo to get shipping in.
The way they have gone about this is alarming.
5 November 2017 Colin Ogilvie Could you supply dates and details of such visits ?
5 November 2017 Peter Appleton No Colin but someone mentioned it on another forum. The ships mentioned were The Island Trader (Yamba Trader), The Avondale, The Vili and The Kuri Pearl. I don't really know any more than that or if there were any issues with them.
5 November 2017 Matty Carlin The Island Trader is half that size.
5 November 2017 Kate Maclaren Nooo! That would be tragic!
5 November 2017 Michelle Argent What the bureaucrats don 't or won't understand is that people flock here precisely because the clarence coast is natural and not too touristy. Crass cruise ships of this type are the very thing that are not wanted. Write to your local member and the Minister for Infrastructure and be heard otherwise the punters and lobbyists will win out!
6 November 2017 Matthew Smith Liz Mercy-Bushell the whole community needs to stand up on this it could be the thin edge of the wedge
Valley Watch is alarmed to read the joint media release from Ministers Melinda Pavey (Roads, Maritime and Freight) and Andrew Constance (Transport and Infrastructure) and Member for Coffs Harbour Andrew Fraser which states unequivocally “In October 2018, the Cruise Ship Caledonian Sky plans to stop off at Yamba as part of the Australian Coastal Odyssey”.
Talk about being treated like mushrooms! They claim it is part of the Future Transport 2056 strategy, but this “strategy” hasn’t yet been presented to the community of Yamba, and when the Future Transport team does come in late November, its mobile van will visit Grafton and Coffs Harbour. But will it come to Yamba, the area most affected? Apparently not.
There are just too many unanswered questions. Cruise ships like these use their auxiliary diesel motors non-stop when they are moored to provide lighting, air conditioning and heating.
That means diesel fumes wafting over Yamba and Iluka all day and night. In May last year P&O was reportedly fined $15,000 by the NSW Environment Protection Authority for exceeding its diesel emissions limits.
They generate dangerous wastes and produce sewage, grey water and solid waste which are stored on board. Just one accidental discharge could do irreparable damage to our estuary, our fishing industry and our reputation. And accidents do happen.
There needs to be careful, painstaking consideration of all aspects of this proposal before our parliamentarians and councillors agree. Instead we seem to have a reckless, off-the-cuff endorsement of a potentially dangerous project.
Ros Woodward
President
November 2, 2017
Cruisin’ for an eco
bruisin’
BY NOW most Daily
Examiner readers will have heard about the Berejiklian Government announcement
that the Port of Yamba is being considered as a “small cruise ship”
destination and possible site for a cruise terminal.
Such ships currently
operating in Australian waters can be as big as 5000 tons with a carrying
capacity of more than 800 passengers.
What some people may not
realise, that even before any completed investigation or genuine community
consultation, the Minister for Roads, Maritime and Freight Melinda Pavey has
announced that the first small cruise ship will arrive in
October next year.
Her office reportedly
identified that ship as the Caledonian Sky, which is a 26-year-old, 90.6m
long vessel with 4200 gross tonnage, a beam width of 15.2m, maximum draft of 4m
and a carrying capacity of up to 114 passengers.
This is the same cruise ship which
caused irreversible damage to a candidate UNESCO World Heritage Site pristine
reef system off Indonesian Papua in March this year, and the London-based
cruise operator has reportedly been fined £350 million by the Indonesian
Government.
Such accidents are
relatively common among small cruise ships as official maritime
incident reports between 2008-2017 mention repeated groundings, collisions with
wharfs and breakwaters, in port onboard fires and accidental contaminated
water/fuel discharges. Norovirus-infected passengers have also been reported on
small cruise ships and excessive air emissions found on
inspection by authorities.
This is not the only
information Minister Pavey was not broadcasting to the Lower Clarence.
What the Berejiklian
Government is also not telling Clarence Valley residents is that along with
Eden and Coffs Harbour, the Port of Yamba is to be designated a
“multipurpose port” which will ideally include “commercial shipping, cruise
shipping and Defence facilities”.
Apparently this generic
vision for NSW regional ports will likely translate in the environmentally
sensitive Clarence River estuary into an estimated 20km of capital and
development river dredging, a possible multi-storied cruise ship terminal
with parking for 400 cars, 20 coaches, eight trucks and 20 taxis as well as a
new commercial shipping wharf capable of berthing freighters up to 300m long carrying
“liquids, timber, coal, iron ore...”.
Locals might remember
that this is the same ship length as one class of super freighters mentioned in
that private proposal to turn Yamba into an industrialised mega port.
When considering this
State Government preferred style of coastal development, the words loss of
environmental and cultural values, increased traffic generation, industrial
level noise, congestion and waste management immediately spring to mind.
One wonders if Clarence
Valley Council and the Yamba Chamber of Commerce will be as
enthusiastic about those cruise ship plans once they realise
that these ships are merely the thin end of the wedge that NSW Nationals and
Sydney-centric Liberals hope to drive into a Lower Clarence community resolved to keep the estuary clean, green and seafood productive.
Judith M Melville, Yamba
