Monday 5 November 2007

Culture of secrecy and censorship in Howard's Australia - 5 November 2007

Extract from an assessment of the "Independent Audit of the State of Free Speech in Australia" by Perth Now  today.
"Secrecy
There are 335 Australian Acts of Parliament which have specific secrecy provisions. Under these laws, information from government departments can be withheld from the public for no other reason than that the Act allows for secrecy. (See Annexure A, Chapter 5).----------Public servants who reveal certain information under these Acts can be prosecuted. In some cases information cannot even be revealed to a court or tribunal."
Perth Now:
 
Joint statement in response to the Independent Audit of Free Speech in Australia
The Moss Report
Australia's Right to Know, the media coalition formed in May 2007, today released the independent report on free speech prepared by Irene Moss who chaired an audit of the limitations on free speech in Australia over the past five months.
A joint statement by the heads of the coalition in response to the report.
"The Moss Report is a comprehensive, independent, compelling and deeply troubling study of the limitations on free speech that now confront all Australians.
It confirms that Australians are not allowed to know enough about how governments at all levels of our society function and how their courts dispense justice.
Without this information, Australians are hampered in their ability to make properly informed judgements about government policy, legislation or the effectiveness of courts.
The report confirms our suspicions that there is a serious slide into censorship and secrecy in government and by the judiciary in Australia.
Based on the findings, governments and the judiciary must lift their game. It is not possible to have a government or judicial system that is accountable to its people unless it is also transparent and fully accountable for its processes and decisions.
Then will Australian people be properly free to make up their own minds about the processes and decisions that affect them. To do this, they need information. 
We believe it's time for legislative reform, but also for clear leadership in government and the courts to bring about a change in culture that will make our public institutions more open, transparent and accountable.
In Australia we cherish the freedom to tell it as it is. We are overwhelmingly a free and democratic nation in terms of civil rights.
Our freedom of speech is as important as parliamentary democracy and the rule of law in guaranteeing the freedom and rights of all Australians.
But this report shows we must be vigilant about protecting those rights and freedoms and that in some areas they have been eroded.
When we commission the audit we were dismayed that Australia ranks behind other democracies like New Zealand, the UK and Canada when it comes to the level of information citizens can get.
This is not acceptable.  We should be second to none.

Today, we have to ask again: why is it that the people of these countries can be trusted with information that Australian governments and courts don't want us to know?
We stress that this is not a party political issue. As the Moss Report shows, the deterioration has been gradual and has occurred under governments of all stripes at both State and Federal levels, over many years.
It is time for a full and vigorous public debate on the findings. The Moss Report will be widely available to the Australian public, who we believe are largely unaware of how much they are not allowed to know.
We consulted with Mrs Moss on her Terms of Reference and provided her team with access to information and the necessary administrative resources to conduct the audit. However, as Mrs Moss has confirmed, we did not seek to influence the team or direct the outcomes of the audit.
As a new, independent study, it is therefore a highly valuable basis for renewed public interest in the issues and further consultation with decision makers about the need for reform.
The media coalition has already begun consultations with state and federal governments, the judiciary and our public service, to urge them to be more forthcoming with information that is relevant and important to the public they serve.
We thank the many journalists, academics and law firms that made submissions and conducted research for the audit and the general public who came forward.
The debate about free speech is not a self indulgent attempt by media proprietors to argue for reforms that will benefit the media. Freedom of the press is a baseline for free speech in the community generally.
We accept that freedom comes with responsibility and must be balanced against other values our society upholds, such as public safety, the right to privacy and the right to a fair trial.
We do not want open slather to report everything and anything.
As the Moss Report says, the media has a vital role in the mass dissemination of information that is in the public interest, and as a watchdog for that information.
Irene Moss and her team have done a tremendous job and we thank them for their valuable contribution to our understanding of these vitally important public issues. 
 
Executive Summary of the Independent Audit of the State of Free Speech in Australia:
News.com.au story:
Right to Know blog:

Nationals flunked preselection test in Page

Speaking on ABC North Coast Radio this morning (Monday 5 November), political commentator Mungo McCallum said the National Party flunked the preselection test when deciding on its candidates in the northern NSW electorates of Richmond and Page. He said it was a case of the 'wrong candidate in the wrong electorate'.

MCCallum said that as a result of forces associated with retiring MP for Page, Ian Causley, the Nationals have Chris Gulaptis as their candidate in Page after Gulaptis defeated Dr Sue Page for the Nat's preselection.

MCCallum reckons Dr Page, who subsequently stood for and won Nat's preselection for Richmond, has no hope of beating the incumbent, Labor's Justine Elliot, but would have comfortably secured Page for the Nats.

As for newcomer Gulaptis, who relied heavily on Causley's forces to get him across the line and get the guernsey at preselection, McCallum is not so sure and reckons the Nats overall did themselves no favours in going for Gulaptis who has little or no recognition factor in the northern part of the electorate.

Will Ian Causley's forces be responsible for the Nat's losing Page again?

Howard Government told to 'pull up socks" on environment

"The Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) says both major political parties need to improve their commitment to environmental issues.
The ACF has been rating the policy announcements of all federal political parties on the issues of water and climate change.
The election environment score card has the Coalition and Labor both polling well behind the Greens and the Democrats.
Foundation executive director Don Henry says Labor's renewable energy target is a step in the right direction, but both parties could do more to combat climate change.
"The Coalition's climate score is very low. We'd like to see them really pull up their socks, it's important for the future of the country," he said.
"There's quite a bit Labor can still do in climate and water as well that we really need for the country."
ABC News today:
 
This brief media piece says it all. Both major parties can do better, however Labor leads the Coalition in its response to climate change.
The Greens deserve kudos for sticking to their guns on climate change issues and Australia may be doing itself a favour if it voted for a strong Greens presence in the Senate to keep the major parties on track.

Chris Gulaptis clutching at straws after televised ad leaves him exposed

Nationals candidate for Page, Chris Gulaptis was quick off the mark to try and repair the damage done by a televised advertisement, which exposed his efforts as a Clarence Valley shire councillor to force council staff into John Howard's WorkChoices regime.
 
Chris offered this little gem on ABC radio this morning - ethanol production would not cause grain prices to rise because extra grain could be grown, and if it wasn't used for food or stockfeed then it would be sold to make ethanol fuel.
 
Don't you just love it? Even a first-year economics student would be able to shoot this simplistic reasoning down in flames.
 
This Nationals candidate should stick to what he knows best - property development.
 
A little bit on the domestic and international ethanol market:
The Age:
Australian Lot Feeders Association:
Planet Ark:
Agriculture Online:

Campaign Day 22

I hear the pundits are saying that voters won't blame John Howard for any interest rate rise this week.
Well I'm a voter and I'm acutely aware that before Howard lit the flame of this incredible round of election promises with big money attached, the Reserve Bank warned that promises of this kind would cause inflationary pressure.
So yeah - I will blame a Prime Minister more intent on getting re-elected than on managing the economy.

Sunday 4 November 2007

Labor promises to keep Medicare Private

There will be smiles on the faces of a number of retirees on the NSW North Coast after Federal Labor promised to reverse the Howard Government's decision to sell-off Medicare Private.
They will be pleased that their equity in this medical insurance company will not be going down the plug hole if Rudd wins government.
Definitely nothing 'me too' about this promise.
News.com.au article today:

The Prime Minister is looking tired

Well it had to happen. With the blogosphere taking note of John Howard's every shoulder twitch or eye shift and occasionally commenting on his obvious ill health, someone was bound to come up with a diagnosis.
Possible TIA or small stroke has now firmed into early Parkinson's Disease.
 
The Prime Minister's health status is the real elephant in the room during this federal election campaign and it is an animal that mainstream media is trying its best to ignore.
 
This issue may be one of the reasons why opinion polls are stubbornly refusing to significantly shift in the Coalition's favour - Howard is considered a health risk. Voters have been watching the Prime Minister's pronounced variability in cognitive function and may be quietly deciding that he is no longer up to the job.
 
The Daily Telegraph on polls and campaign:

Campaign Day 21

Still recovering from the rude shock delivered by ABC TV last night.
Just before 8.30pm I was abducted by a ponderous Liberal Party election advert and cruelly waterboarded with alternating doses of JoHo and Capt'n Smirk.
Come on Aunty, be fair - if I'd been in the mood for advertising I would've been watching one of the commercial channels.
If John Howard wants more air time he should have accepted the offer of another televised debate.