Wednesday 21 November 2007

In case of fire, break glass and vote Greens

In an effort to keep-it-simple-stupid the media rarely presents an Australian national electoral race as anything but a battle between two giants, and the Liberal Party will never call attention to the fact that it is not strong enough to govern without its mini-me Nationals.
 
Of course the major parties have been quite successful in convincing us all that this two-horse race call is all but ordained from on high. The reality of power and how it is exercised does lend some weight to this view.
 
However, other aspects of reality are also valid. Right now we voters can use not only our personal primary vote but also our preferences to strengthen or weaken the major parties' hold over our lives and futures.
 
So if you are fearful of another three years under an increasing right-wing Coalition government; if you worry that a Labor government might fall into complacency over issues like the economy, foreign policy, social justice or climate change; remember that there are still two parliamentary parties out there with track records and experience in the Senate - The Greens and the Australian Democrats.
 
So on 24 November if you are still consumed by fiery doubt, remember that breaking from the herd might be a better option - and vote for The Greens on the Senate ballot paper.
 
The Greens:
The Australian Democrats:

Exclusive Brethren - serial offenders, yet again!

The ever-so-exclusive Exclusive Brethren has made yet another underhand attempt to influence Australian politics. This group, whose access to the PM and government ministers is way out of proportion to that of similarly sized lobby groups, has decided its pay back time in Tasmania and is targeting the Greens in general, but Senator Bob Brown in particular.

The Sydney Morning Herald (November 21) http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/sect-back-in-fray-with-blast-at-greens/2007/11/20/1195321782667.html
reports the religious sect has dramatically intervened in the federal election campaign with a letter sent "To the citizens of Tasmania" warning about the "anti-development and immoral policies" of the Greens leader, Bob Brown.

The letter refers readers to a number of websites, including an anonymous, US-registered blog at www.greenswatch.com. This site makes wild accusations about the Greens. It would have readers believe the Greens started the 2004 race riots on Palm Island. And, get this, the site reckons the Greens are have been plotting to infiltrate the Exclusive Brethren.

Senator Brown's response: "I think the church's members are pouring hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars into this campaign … and under the Government's new electoral laws, an individual can put in $100,000 around the country without any disclosure being made."

Not unexpectedly, the Brethren denied any input from the Liberal Party.

The Howard Government hasn't even lost the election yet, but the Coalition is already openly planning how to dismantle any incoming Labor government

Well we all knew that the far-right would be bitter and twisted losers. This is now confirmed by the Coalition's threat to take thirteen Labor candidates to court sequentially, if these candidates are elected to the 42nd Commonwealth Parliament under a Labor government.
News.com.au yesterday:
 
Both the Liberal Party and the Nationals should be careful what they wish for. There are enough grey areas in Section 44 of the Australian Constitution and other related sections to catch some of its own first time candidates if they are also elected. The Nationals candidate for Page, Chris Gulaptis, is a perfect example because he is a Clarence Valley shire councillor who has been active in this role since writs were called, nominations closed and the political campaign commenced.
 
Nor should the Coalition rely on the High Court (because that's where all this would eventually end up if the numerous allegations were acted upon) being a tame participant in any move to subvert the known intent of the Australian electorate in such a manner. Especially as the Coalition has semaphored its motives.
 
One has to suspect that the Howard Government's threat is a last ditch attempt to scare voters away from Labor, rather than a genuine concern about the eligibility for election of some candidates.
During its previous terms in office the Howard Government had ample opportunity to attempt the clarification of current ambiguity surrounding candidate eligibility criteria and it did virtually nothing.
 
Australian Constitution and Section 44:
Australian Electoral Commission advice to candidates:

Campaign Day 38

My senses have been bombarded by a desperate Nationals ad on TV over these last few days.
Apparently The Greens and Labor are in an evil alliance to release hordes of drug addicts onto the street to kill our primary school children with dirty needles.
The Nats seem to believe that voters in the bush are simple nongs who will believe any old nonsense that is thrown at them.
What's their next ad to be - Greens and Labor in despicable plot to kidnap our working dogs?