“THE disgraced former member for Clarence Steve Cansdell told ABC North Coast he would probably never have confessed to his crime if a whistle blower hadn't drawn attention to it.”
{The Daily Examiner, 23rd November 2011}
Sunday 27 November 2011
Saturday 26 November 2011
Clarence MP Christopher Gulaptis's first day on the job
Extracts from Hansard, NSW Legislative Assembly, Friday 25 November 2011
ELECTORATE DISTRICT OF CLARENCE
Election of Christopher Gulaptis
The SPEAKER: I inform the House that my writ issued on 28 October 2011 in accordance with section 70 of the Parliamentary Electorates and Elections Act 1912 for the election of a member to serve in the Legislative Assembly for the electoral district of Clarence in place of Steven Rhett Cansdell, resigned, has been returned with a certificate endorsed by the Electoral Commissioner advising of the election of Christopher Gulaptis to serve as the member for the electoral district of Clarence.
PLEDGE OF LOYALTY
Mr Christopher Gulaptis took and subscribed the pledge of loyalty and signed the roll.
>
>
>
QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE
Mr CHRISTOPHER GULAPTIS: My question is addressed to the Deputy Premier. ... How has the Government delivered for regional New South Wales this year, and related matters?
Mr ANDREW STONER: That is ... a very good question—the first of many—from the new member for Clarence. Welcome to New South Wales Parliament.
>
>
>
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
STATE AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
Membership
Mr BRAD HAZZARD (Wakehurst—Minister for Planning and Infrastructure, and Minister Assisting the Premier on Infrastructure NSW) [3.19 p.m.]: I move:
- That: (1) Christopher Gulaptis be appointed to serve on the Legislative Assembly Committee on Economic Development in place of Andrew Robert Gee, discharged.
Motion agreed to.
While we were sleeping Norway took a big step towards a sustainable future
Cetaceans
Cetaceans evolved from land mammals approximately 50 million years ago. While thoroughly adapted to sea life, they retain some traces of their evolutionary past. Cetaceans bear live young and feed them milk, investing heavily in the upbringing and development of each offspring. Cetaceans live long, mature late, reproduce slowly and engage in complex social relationships. They are capable advanced activities including echolocation and long-distance communication, which provide them with sophisticated tools to perceive and understand their environment. A complex respiratory system allows them to spend long stretches under water, but they must surface regularly to breath air.
The spectacular leaps of whales and dolphins above the water’s surface, as well as the sounds some species use to communicate and function underwater, fascinate humans. In many communities, there are significant cultural connections between cetaceans and humans. [CMS website]
The 10th Convention on Migratory Species (COP10) has been meeting in Bergen, Norway between 20-25 November 2011 with little fanfare in the Australian media.
The Migratory Wildlife Network has representatives attending the convention and reports that Norway removed its reservation to the CMS Appendix listing of a number of cetacean and shark species. This whaling nation’s reservation still remain on some cetaceans, but this step forward can only be seen in a positive light.
Background:
Review of Article IV Agreements already concluded: Pacific Cetaceans
Photograph found at Google Images
Photograph found at Google Images
A plumber and an electrician walked into a bar and......
Maud Up the Street sent me this ROFL from The Daily Examiner’s letters to the editor printed on 22nd November, in which the institution of monogamous state-sanctioned marriage suddenly becomes something of an immutable law of nature. Wonder what the writer would call the practices of polygamy and ritual marriage to a god?
Time to face facts
WITH the ALP Federal Conference due in December, where the definition of marriage is to be considered, it is time to face facts.
Let us consider two trades people - one a plumber, one an electrician. Both are qualified, but their purpose and functions are different. Therefore, a plumber will never call himself an electrician. The end results of the work of these two people are totally foreign to each other. The argument in favour of equal pay for women correctly states when a woman is performing the same functions in her employment as a man she is entitled to the same - that is equal salary status.
Times change, as do dress fashions, entertainment, working conditions and so on, but nature itself keeps some things unchangeable. From time immemorial marriage has been the exclusive union of a man and a woman and for simple basic reasons.
(a) The bodies of the female and the male complement each other, and thus the "fruit" of this complementary is the new life of offspring. That is the nature and function of marriage.
(b) This union between a man and a woman and which is the object of a solemn public vow to live together, for better or for worse, is known as marriage.
(c) So granted, that is what the word marriage means. It is not possible that it means something else because a "friendship" same-sex union is an agreed arrangement between two males or between two females (eg to sleep together, to live together, to share assets and benefits etc). An "arrangement" is all it can be in comparison to the man and woman marital bond. The "comparison" reveals the difference that while marriage and same-sex unions are both ways individuals may choose to live, their natures and outcomes are worlds apart, as are the plumbers and the electricians.
There is no valid objection to same-sex unions being given a title specific to that type of union, but to call it a marriage would contradict the very notion of a word expressing the precise intention of what it means.
That is elementary intelligence. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
By absolute contrast, marriage is that union whereby a man and a woman bind themselves together in a solemn public vow, and is directed to bringing forth a new generation of children.
It is this "end" that differentiates the marital bond from all others. For this reason the term "marriage equality" advocated by the gay community and the Greens, is a contradiction of our human faculty to think, to reason and to recognise the truth of fact.
PETER J YOUNG
Greta
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
