Tuesday 24 December 2013

A cry for help from the north Queensland coast


Members of the coalition government joining the queue outside the office of Christopher Pyne, Education Minister and Leader of the House, to seek remedial lessons are advised to take a ticket to ensure they maintain their place in the queue.

Another MP joining the queue is George Christensen (Liberal National), the Member for Dawson.






Other government MPs in the queue include Teresa Gambaro, Kelly O'Dwyer and Mal Brough.

Evidence of Mr Christensen's need for help is provided in his entry, dated 19 November 2013, in the register of members'  interests.

A Christmas Memo to the Far Right


It has long been an Australian right wing brag that when the Howard Government left office there was no public debt on the national books.

So it was most amusing to read Messrs Hockey (Treasurer) and Cormann’s (Finance Minister) December 2013 Mid-Year Economic And Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) document which clearly states: The total face value of CGS on issue has varied significantly over time. In level terms, the largest decrease since 1970-71 occurred between 1996-97 and 2006-07, when the face value of CGS on issue roughly halved from $111.1 billion to $53.3 billion.

Commonwealth Government Securities (CGS) are of course the mechanism by which a federal government borrows money and it seems that Howard, Costello & Co left office owing at least $53.2 billion net or $58.2 billion in total.

Journalists becoming a dwindling band

 

Australian Newspaper History Group December 2013 Newsletter:

The number of journalists and other writers in Australia fell by 16 per cent in the year to August as traditional media organisations slashed staff numbers, according to the latest jobs report by consultancy Economic and Market Development Advisors (Australian, 4 November 2013). Staff numbers in public relations also fell “as this sub-sector experienced a fairly dismal year”, the report said. The media and marketing sector employed 291,000 people in the year, including about 23,500 journalists and writers, 19,300 public relations people, 131,000 sales and marketing managers and another 51,000 sales and marketing professionals. “This sector is one that is most responsive to the state of the economy and as the economy and business confidence improves, jobs growth is anticipated to return,” the report said. The number of journalists and writers was still historically high, having risen 19 per cent over the past 15 years, said EMDA director Michael Emerson.

Over the same period, the number of PR operatives had grown 79 per cent. The Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance estimated that in the past 18 months 1500 journalist jobs had been cut by major media outlets and over the past six years the number of newsroom staff had halved. It estimated there were now fewer than 9000 working journalists in Australia. The union estimated that “well over” 500 jobs were cut at News Corp Australia in calendar 2012, although the company refused to comment on that figure, as well as about 400 at Fairfax Media and 100 at Ten Network.

Defending The ABC: the more things change the more things stay the same


THE CURRENT POLITICAL CLIMATE

The Australian 22 May 2013, p.2:

TONY Abbott will face growing pressure from within his party to privatise the ABC and SBS to deal with perceptions of anti-Liberal bias and to retire debt.
The Victorian Liberal Party will debate this weekend a motion calling for a review of public broadcasting in Australia with the view of either partial or total privatisation.
The party's policy-forming conference will debate the move at the same time as the Opposition Leader attends the gathering in Melbourne and prepares to fight the federal election.
Communications Minister Stephen Conroy said yesterday the motion came after the opposition had failed to guarantee funding for public broadcasting.
"If Malcolm Turnbull has any credibility, he should immediately rule out this extreme position and recommit the Coalition to keeping the national broadcasters in public hands," he said.
Institute of Public Affairs research fellow Julie Novak said the Liberal Party should go further than the motion and not hold a review, arguing there was enough evidence to back a sell-off. She said the transformation of digital media meant there was no need to fund a broadcaster, because of the explosion in competition.
The Liberal Party will debate whether the ABC and SBS infrastructure should be sold off as part of a Coalition government's bid to cut debt. The motion cites the fact the ABC and SBS compete with "a wide range of private media outlets" and that public ownership is counter to Coalition policy.....


DEFENDING THE ABC THEN

The Age 27 May 1970:



The Sun-Herald 31 May 1998, p60:

RICHARD Alston appears to have made little progress in his renewed effort last week to create a more docile ABC, but there is no doubt the Government and its big business supporters will keep trying.....
Not only was he busy last week telling the ABC how to rein in its producers and journalists, he also announced a crackdown on "smutty" radio and TV.
He wanted, he said, to prevent "an electronic version of Sodom and Gomorrah". This would be simply funny if presented from some pulpit in a backward country town, but coming from the man responsible for all our communications it is a bit frightening.
The Government of which Senator Alston is a leading member obviously sees itself as a kind of nanny charged with protecting Australians from too much contact with that tainted world overseas.
The deeper agenda, of course, is that the less we are exposed to naughty or subversive foreign ideas the more we will appreciate the ultra-conservative values of a wise and all-knowing Coalition......

DEFENDING THE ABC NOW

The Queensland Times 19 September 2013, p. 12:

WHEN it comes to our national broadcaster, the Australia Broadcasting Corporation (ABC), my adoration knows no bounds.
Normally not one to slavishly hero-worship any sort of entity, I'm completely besotted with our ABC.
Conceding that I'm probably in the minority of TV watchers and that commercial channels hold the lion's share of the national audience, I nevertheless spring to the advertisement-free channel's defence.
The government we elected on September 7 is known to be business-friendly.
If something doesn't make a buck then it's more than likely to be on the chopping block of any budget cuts.
Please, please, Mr Abbott (incoming prime minister), keep your funds-slashing hands off the ABC. We ABC devotees are fiercely protective of our beloved national institution.
The thought of switching to any other channel (except occasionally SBS when it's showing something other than sex scenes) is too horrible to contemplate.
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983 specifies the role of the ABC as a statutory authority with programming and operational independence from the government.
Trouble is, the government provides the cash that keeps the ABC on air.
In the 2013-14 Budget, the previous government handed the ABC an additional $30million over three years to meet the growing demand for its digital services.
The ABC was also allocated $69.4 million over four years from 2012-13 to expand its news and current affairs services.
If the government funding isn't tampered with for 2013-14, the ABC will collect $1.05 billion - a small price to pay.
It's estimated that an average of 13.8 million Australians watch ABC television each week.
Those individuals, like the Friends of the ABC, expect to listen to a media organisation that's free of government influence, commercial sponsorship and advertising.
Let's keep it that way.

Crikey 27 November, 2013:



Twitter 11 December 2013:









The Guardian 21 December 2013:

For weeks News Corp papers have been running a barrage of opinion pieces, often several on a single day, alleging a lack of diversity in the opinions available at the ABC.
The generally agreed thesis advanced by these opinion writers – most of whom live in Sydney and Melbourne – is that too many ABC opinion-makers live in Sydney and Melbourne, and that this contributes to their “green-left” worldview.
This “green-left” worldview, News Corp writers contend, contributes to “biased” reporting and political interviewing on the ABC and infuses its wider programming as well, including – according to Piers Akerman at least – the “weird feminism” evident in Peppa Pig and the “left sludge” he hears when he tunes in the Triple J. (Does Akerman really tune into Triple J?)
Bias is, by definition, in the eye of the beholder, but to my eye it’s more evident when I tune in to, say, Ray Hadley and hear him ask “questions” like this one during a conversation with prime minister Tony Abbott about how to handle the Palmer United party when the new Senate sits from next July:
“... and you’re going to have to be even better than you were at the beginning of the election. You won’t be taking my advice and saying listen Clive, stick it up your jumper. You’ll have to be even more diplomatic than you were in Indonesia.”
The attacks on you are astonishing. Have they forced you to change your media strategy, which until a week or two ago was to say little and let your deeds speak for themselves?”
The ABC’s critics argue that the public broadcaster has a particular responsibility to show even-handedness because it is funded by the taxpayer, and the ABC agrees.
In his recent address to the national press club, ABC chairman Jim Spigelman responded to the allegations of editorial bias with a new system of external audits, starting with an analysis of the impartiality of all radio interviews with the-then prime minister and opposition leader during the 2013 election campaign.
“I do not accept that [bias] is systematic, but I do accept that it sometimes occurs,” he said, noting the complaints were usually about programs that represented less than 1% of the corporation’s program hours, but which “happen … to interest the political class most”.
You’d think the ABC’s critics would have been pleased with this response to their complaints, but if you thought that, you’d be misunderstanding the real reason for their attacks....
In other words, as the ABC sought to address the criticisms about bias, the underlying concerns of its critics became more transparent – that the ABC is a taxpayer-funded competitor to their own commercial activities in an increasingly difficult media market, and that over time this could mean the ABC gains influence as they lose it....
I’m happy to pay my 10 cents a day for so much of what the ABC does,...... 
FROM THE TRENCHES........

The Sydney Morning Herald 15 December 2013:

It's a grim Christmas here in the ABC trenches. Ordnance whistles overhead, and the whine of the air-raid sirens has become a normal feature of daily life.
One minute it's Miranda Devine strafing Behind The News. The next, it's a devastating artillery assault centring on the fact that Kerry O'Brien was paid - PAID! - to do his interviews with Paul Keating.
And our wartime ears are already normalising The Australian's loud editorials fulminating about the evils of subsidised broadcasters. (In The Australian's defence, these editorials need to be loud. Otherwise, how could they be heard over the terrible cries of the hacks from the News tabloids, toiling below decks to generate sufficient cash for their unprofitable national sibling to keep a small band of readers relentlessly apprised of the ABC's failings?)
But on Friday, News Corp's Piers Akerman opened up a radical new front. He got The Pig involved.
The column started as a perfectly ordinary light-to-medium ABC-gumming on the usual theme of organisational leftist propaganda and generalised wickedness. But then, this: "Even the cartoon character Peppa Pig pushes a weird feminist line that would be closer to the hearts of Labor's Handbag Hit Squad than the preschool audience it is aimed at."
This is a serious allegation. Of all the programs watched on the ABC's iView platform, Peppa Pig is the most popular by a long straw. Between January and November this year, the show was watched 25 million times. That is correct, 25 million times; impressive, even when you factor in the possibility that several million of those might have been Mr Akerman, monitoring the cartoon piglet round the clock for signs of latent man-hate.....

If Liberal-Nationals wingnuts would stop baying for ABC blood long enough to think, they might realize that this email (below) clearly demonstrates that no government of the day is immune from paranoia about our national broadcaster and its journalists and that political parties across the spectrum are capable of reacting badly to perceived public criticism.

So they need stop blaming the national broadcaster for their own collective inability to face legitimate questioning concerning political decisions.


Quote of the Year 2013


I've sat on this for so long it is tearing me apart and I've decided to go public.
Because of that, my family was forced to sell the family home to pay for treatment for my father while we tried unsuccessfully to get compensation in the courts (the delaying proceedings meant my father died in my arms before the case was heard). Our finances were depleted (I'm still in debt after 10 years), and he died suffering and in pain due to Abbot's policies when our money ran out. [http://www.reddit.com/user/fistman,2013]

*Text spelling corrected for reading ease

Monday 23 December 2013

A cry for help from Queensland's Sunshine Coast


Mal Brough (Liberal), the Member for Fisher, is another member of the coalition government who's in need of remedial lessons. Brough will have to get in the queue outside the office of his colleague Christopher Pyne, Education Minister and Leader of the House, and seek  help.












Others in the queue include Kelly O'Dwyer, the Member for Higgins, and Teresa Gambaro, the Member for Brisbane.

Evidence of Mr Brough's need for help is provided in his entry, dated 26 November 2013,  in the register of members' interests.

As Abbott Government members prepare for Christmas Day's good food and wine, sitting atop their fat weekly salary and entitlement packages, they won't be remembering the disasters they've caused in the last three months



The Abbott Government may be able to shrug off any thought of the growing number of problems their wingnut approach to governing has caused. Many thousands of ordinary Australians won’t have that luxury.

So out of touch is his government that apparently Prime Minister Abbott believes he has done Australia a favour by hastening GM Holden out the door.

ABC News 18 December 2013:

Holden announced last week that it would stop making cars in Australia by 2017 due to a "perfect storm" of poor economic conditions.
Its decision will put 2,900 people out of work - 1,600 from the manufacturing plant in South Australia and 1,300 in Victoria.
Mr Abbott has conceded that some workers will have difficulty finding new jobs.
"Some of them will find it difficult, but many of them will probably be liberated to pursue new opportunities and to get on with their lives," he said. [my red bolding]


However, the Abbott Government is not supplying all of this funding and neither will the fund have the automotive industry, or South Australia and Victoria, as its only focus.

Abbott expects Victoria and South Australia to contribute $12 million each to his federal fund and GM Holden a further $20 million.

Though why he expects Holden to pay tens of millions of dollars on top of the severance/
redundancy packages it negotiates with its workers, Abbott does not explain.

Nor does he explain why workers should find being without employment in 2017 a liberating event.

Those employed in the automotive industry and their families have a different perspective.

Stock Journal 13 December 2013:

My father made headrests. For 30 years, his job was to build and design tools – metal punches and gauges within a machine – that would be used in the mass production of parts for Toyota, Holden and Ford.
A headrest begins as a drawing. It was my father's job to interpret those drawings; to transform the engineer's dream into reality.
My dad could tell when a drawing, and the subsequent tool he would be required to create, was a millimetre out. Foreign companies with hundreds of highly qualified experts would pay the price for not listening to my father.
Down the line, thousands of component parts would be recalled because that millimetre mistake meant it fitted poorly into another component manufactured somewhere else. Hundreds of thousands of dollars, the time and energy of many men and women, wasted.
It was a regular thing for my dad to be called after hours and on weekends about a mass production emergency. The tool would return to him, and he would painstakingly repair it, sometimes completely rewriting the drawings. His job required great precision and skill. He had no university degree; no flash title.
My dad was blue-collar to the core. Every day, he put on a sky blue three-quarter length coat made of stiff cotton over his clothes. He did this to protect himself from the curls of steel that spat out from the grinding machines. He always looked like a scientist to me. I didn't realise the colour of his collar classed him in any way or would make politicians think his work less meaningful and more disposable.
Australia needs cars. This is a vast land, criss-crossed by roads instead of train lines. Hundreds of thousands of Australian lives, stories like my father's, are connected to the production of them. Every journey from A to B, from design to vehicle testing, is underpinned by a family like mine.
Dollars can't create headrests. People do. When economists write about the future of the car industry in Australia, they rarely focus on the stories of people. It's all about the bottom line.
Taking into account the impact on people of losing car manufacturing in Australia is not sentimental. Nor is it complicated. Investment in car manufacturing is a simple public policy choice.
We can choose for Australia to make cars by supporting the industry to pay our people decent, humane wages, so that motor vehicles continue to be manufactured on our continent. We can keep hundreds of thousands of people in employment and small, Australian-owned businesses afloat and skills, like my father's, onshore.

Or, we can choose to walk away, and gift some other country with the people and profit of an entire industry. We can blame the rise of China and India for an oversupply of cheap labour and give away our artistry as automotive workers; skills we have spent a century building up........


Holden announced yesterday that some of the very best jobs in Australia will be cut, including many of our engineering members.

Thursday, 12 December 2013
                                                          
As these members would tell you, this isn't just a crisis in manufacturing, it's a crisis in engineering. 

Over recent days I and our members at Holden have been making the point to governments through the media that they have let us down.

We have been warning the governments for months that this was on the cards.

In fact we predicted this very scenario in December two years ago.

And just two months ago we organised for 350 engineers to write to the Napthine Government and explain how they feared they were about to lose their jobs.

Since then Professional Engineers Australia spent countless hours working to prevent what appears was inevitable.

Governments were warned multiple times yet the Abbott, Napthine and Weatherill governments just simply weren't able to sort it out.  

Now it looks like up to 90 per cent of the 500 engineers who work at Holden will lose their jobs.

Of course, this is just the start of the problem. Highly skilled jobs will no doubt be shed from component manufacturers where we also have many engineering members. On top of that other suppliers and businesses that our members use every day will be affected in some way in all parts of the Australian economy.

Some commentators have even speculated that this could lead to an economic recession – particularly in Victoria and South Australia.

Right now what this country needs is leadership.

Now that this has happened we need Canberra to do some work and tell us what the future of this country is for our highly skilled engineers.

By the end of the summer I would hope that the Abbott Government will have come up with a comprehensive industry plan that maps out how the government will help the Australian economy continue to grow and where the new jobs will come from.

Governments have failed us this week and I hope they would now do the hard work required to set a new direction, or they risk failing us again.

It beggars belief that these job cuts were announced so close to Christmas – putting uncertainty in the heart of many families who would otherwise have been focussed on celebrating together.

But the fallout from this will not just impact on people's summer breaks, there will be many months of ambiguity, anxiety and difficult decisions for many of our members.

And as you would expect Professionals Australia will be working hard to help our members through these difficult times.  

We will help them get the packages they deserve, we will be helping them get the retaining they need for a bright new future and we will be helping them find great new jobs.

It is worth pointing out that we have not given up on Holden retaining a significant portion of their engineering capacity and we will be talking to Holden management about this in the coming days.

Chris Walton
CEO
Professionals Australia