This close to a federal election will Turnbull & Co organise a whitewashing of any Australian Public Service Commission Code of Conduct finding relating to John Richard Lloyd?
The outgoing public
service commissioner John Lloyd is being investigated for an alleged breach of
the public service code of conduct, in what Labor has called an “unprecedented”
move.
At a supplementary
session on Thursday, the finance and public administration committee chair,
James Paterson, tabled letters showing that the acting merit protection
commissioner, Mark Davidson, had announced he intended to conduct an inquiry
into Lloyd’s conduct.
The 14 June letter from
Davidson said he would investigate an “allegation of a breach of the Australian
public service code of conduct”.
Asked why he is being
investigated, Lloyd told the committee he would take the question on notice and
said he did not want to prejudice the investigation but did not claim public
interest immunity.
He told the committee he
resigned after consulting his family after a long working life and denied any
government member had sought or canvassed his resignation.
Davidson told the
committee there was “no power to continue the inquiry” after Lloyd ceases to be
commissioner on 8 August….
At an October estimates
session Lloyd was asked about his contact with the IPA, including an email in
which he attached a document that he said “highlights some of the more generous
agreement provisions applying to APS employees”.
At that hearing Lloyd
defended his link to the group, rejecting the allegation that giving the
information amounted to special access because the information was publicly
available in public service enterprise agreements.
In May it was revealed
Lloyd had complained about scrutiny of his links to the IPA, writing to the
IPA’s executive director, John Roskam, referring to “more publicity for the IPA
including page 1 of the Canberra Times thanks to ALP questioning”.
Mr Lloyd was a controversial appointee from the moment Tony Abbott gave him the job. Although he is a career bureaucrat, he has long been associated with conservative politics; many of his senior promotions were the result of Coalition governments appointing him directly. As John Howard's building industry watchdog, he took an unashamedly hard line against unions. In his current role, he questioned long-held public service tenets, particularly security of employment, and openly opposed freedom of information law.
The head of the public servants' union, Nadine Flood, is hardly an objective observer. Nonetheless, the tone of her extraordinary farewell to Mr Lloyd, who will resign in August, is a sign of his impact on public administration. Ms Flood said Mr Lloyd had debased his office, misled a Senate inquiry, repeatedly attacked the public service, "used his position to promote his ideological preoccupations" and was unfit for the job.....
...it is deeply worrying that acting merit protection commissioner Mark Davidson took so long to deal with the complaint. The possibility now exists that the ensuing investigation might not conclude before Mr Lloyd leaves his job, by when the investigation, if it is still ongoing, would need to be cancelled.
He later took the
question on notice and said he was not the subject of any current inquiries.
The department of the
prime minister and cabinet had rejected freedom-of-information requests asking
for emails between Lloyd and the IPA, on the grounds that releasing the emails
“could reasonably be expected to prejudice the conduct of an investigation of a
breach, or possible breach, of the law”.
John Lloyd, the public
service commissioner, has announced his resignation just days after a Senate
estimates grilling that questioned his independence…
He later took the
question on notice and said he was not the subject of any current inquiries.
The department of the
prime minister and cabinet had rejected freedom-of-information requests asking
for emails between Lloyd and the IPA, on the grounds that releasing the emails
“could reasonably be expected to prejudice the conduct of an investigation of a
breach, or possible breach, of the law”.