Friday, 9 November 2007

Campaign Day 26

Don't know what was worse. Watching Howard trying to drape himself in the Australian flag when not apologising for the interest rate rise. Or listening to Costello's convoluted arguments which started out with the promise to keep interests rates lower than the other mob, inflation down, employment high, and then moved to an explanation that low unemployment causes inflationary pressures which in turn drive up interest rate rises.
Talk about a bob each way!

Thursday, 8 November 2007

JW Howard - aka the practising perfectionist

How's Honest John's form?

When things are AOK he laps up all the glory, but when events are not as he'd prefer he runs for cover.

"Rising interest rates?" asks Honest John.

"Don't blame me or my government," he says.

Better still, according to Honest John, the best way to address economic events that don't go according to plan is to do a "Reg Gasnier" (sorry, Reg, you shouldn't have to have your name associated with this flea, but your side step in Rugby League is legendary) and side step them.

Sounds a bit like avoiding dog droppings on the footpath doesn't it?

To read more about Honest John's efforts, which was "part regret, part explanation, part defence and part attack" go to
http://blogs.abc.net.au/thepollvault/2007/11/the-press-confe.html

Federal Election 2007: Opinion on climate change may decide who is the next Prime Minister

"Voters gave great importance to climate change in their choice of Prime Minister and rate Kevin Rudd and Peter Garrett more highly on their seriousness in tackling climate change.
  • Seven out of 10 voters (69%) in nine selected marginal seats believe climate change will have either a 'very important' or 'important' influence on their choice of Prime Minister. This includes one quarter (27%) who rated it as 'very important' and a further 42% who saw it as 'important'
  • 43% said Mr Garrett was 'very serious' about taking action to address climate change compared to 28% for Mr Rudd, 11% for Mr Howard, 7% for Mr Turnbull and 6% for Mr Costello."
The Climate Institute survey of marginal seats:
Full Australian Research Group November 2007 report with tables:
 

John Howard you are a bl**dy liar!

I took a peek at the news online just now and saw this News.com.au headline - "Tax cuts erase rate rise pain: PM".
 
John Howard is quoted: "PEOPLE are getting more money back from the Coalition's tax cuts than they are spending on mortgage increases, Prime Minister John Howard has said.
Rejecting the idea that the tax cuts were fuelling the inflation which prompted yesterday's interest rate rise, Mr Howard today said home buyers had come out ahead under the Coalition.
He said the average family received about $80 a month from last year's tax cuts and would have $120 a month under proposed cuts from next year."
 
Leaving aside the fact that the $80 is gone to previous rate rises and the $120 is still out there in the Never-Never somewhere; banks, investors and businesses are going to pass costs rising from interest rate increases onto their clients and customers.
 
So low income people on the North Coast who do not get these tax breaks will be paying more for a wide range of goods and services. Ordinary households and families with mortgages which have already pared their budgets and abandoned any luxury spending will really feel the pinch of these flow-on effects.
 
Nothing the Coalition has offered during this election campaign will compensate for this, especially as the current rate rise is only the first in what might be a long string of Reserve Bank efforts to dampen inflationary trends.
 
The Prime Minister may point to external factors in an effort to assign blame, but this is only partly true. His own profligate spending on election sweeteners (combined with past budget giveaways to shore up his position) are also to blame.
 
So don't tell the North Coast that we will feel no pain. We know it's a bl**dy lie!