MDBA understatement of the year!

Even a bad situation can elicit a laugh or two as Mike Taylor demonstrates with this classic understatement reported by Aunty ABC last week:"But Victorian farmers in Shepparton believe diverting water from the Clarence is still an option. "I think the Murray Darling Basin Commission has done a marvellous job of identifying the needs of the environment. I was just wondering if you could give it a little bit of attention to the needs of irrigators by redirecting some of the big flows of water that run straight into the sea every year like on the Clarence River in NSW and redirect them through a tunnel and through to the darling river and supply a new stream of income water to the whole pool in the environment rather than cutting back all the time. We need more water and there's thousands and thousands of gigalitres of water that just run straight into the sea in this country." Murray Darling Basin Authority Chair Mike Taylor told the Shepparton meeting this week, it's not on the agenda."First of all I'm going to do two things here. I'm going to explain what our brief is which is to deal with the water that's in the Murray Darling Basin so we don't actually get to look at those alternatives. The second bit I am going to say though about taking water from the Clarence, having talked to many people who operate on the Clarence, they're not actually keen on diverting the water across the Great Dividing Range."
Too bluidy right we're not keen!

No comment required ... the picture says it all

Source: The Readers Panel SMH 16/10/10

That effin b@stard Tony Burke!

Federal Water Minister Tony Burke thinks he's playing cute by not ruling out damming the Clarence River and piping water across the Great Dividing Range into the Murray Darling Basin.
Does he really think that the Clarence Valley mob are so stupid that they don't know he'd pander to the Independents on just about anything if it meant that Labor could stay on top of the muck heap?
It's as plain as a pikestaff that wannabe water vandal Tony Windsor is going after NSW coastal rivers and that the Clarence heads his wish list.
This is going to be a trying time for the Labor Member for Page Janelle Saffin as she pits herself against the big boys in her party and vested interests in the Basin.
As for the Coalition - even though they probably hold the most federal seats along the Murray Darling they can sit back and let Windsor and the irrigators do all the political biting and tearing at the Gillard Government without having to show their hand until the House votes on the final version of the Basin Plan.

Journalist Rodney Stevens writing in The Daily Examiner on 16th of October:
"FEDERAL Water Minister Tony Burke has not ruled out diverting Clarence River water as a solution to irrigation problems in the Murray Darling basin.
Facing severe backlash from irate farmers about the proposed reduction in irrigation allocations at public consultation meetings held by the Murray Darling Basin Authority this week, Mr Burke said he would not discount any options as solutions to help revive Australia's 'food bowl'.
"The consultation is real and I'm not going to play the game of ruling things in or out," he said.
"Lots of options will be put on the table in the next few months and I don't want people to hesitate from putting ideas on the table."
Mr Burke hinted the enormousness of the engineering involved in a diversion may save the Clarence River.
"Certainly in the past, projects like this have not been considered as practical as other options," he said.
Outraged at the suggestion of any potential for diversion by Minister Burke, Federal Member for Page Janelle Saffin said she would fight to see that the Clarence remained untouched.
"I will stand by my community. Not one drop goes from the Clarence," she said.
Ms Saffin said she would be raising the issue of any potential diversion in parliament next week.
"They can all rack off. I will make that clear next week," she said."

Water raiders begin to grab control of Murray Darling Basin Plan debate?

From A Clarence Valley Protest earlier this morning:

One has to wonder if the Gillard Government has lost control of the Murray Darling Basin Plan guidelines debate or whether the Murray-Darling Basin Authority has ceded control of its community consultation process and, what this might mean for NSW North Coast Rivers which are often seen by primary industry as a preferred alternative to curtailment of water rights/cuts in annual allocations.

One well-known would be water raider, Federal Independent MP for New England Tony Windsor is to chair the parliamentary inquiry into social and economic impacts of any proposed basin plan.

This is Mr. Windsor in a 2007 media release:

Mr. Windsor said he was also keen to see the possible diversion of the Clarence River examined under the new policy.
"The ideal site to divert the Clarence to is the New England Electorate...."

The Murray Darling Association is to chair two community forums in Broken Hill and Menindee on 19 and 20 October 2010.

In 2009 this association at its national conference and annual general meeting endorsed these motions:

13.2 Clarence River Region 2
For many years, Region 2 has been raising the issue of a feasibility study to dam part of theClarence River and divert some of the water inland to the Murray-Darling Basin to help alleviatewater shortages. The Federal Government has made it quite clear that it will not support any suchproject but the NSW Government has not been as clear on the issue. Some years ago, theAssociation supported a feasibility study into the idea.
RECOMMENDATION: That the NSW Government be asked to respond directly tocommunity requests over the years that part of the Clarence River be dammed to minimise flood damage and to divert some of the water inland to the Murray-Darling Basin.

13.3 Clarence River diversion Region 6
This proposed diversion of the Clarence River was first discussed in the 1930s. The FraserGovernment allocated $4 million to fund a feasibility study into the scheme. The HawkeGovernment discontinued this. The proposal, if feasible, would involve the construction of aheadwater dam on the Clarence River, with a 22km tunnel under the Gibralta Ranges in NorthernNSW. This tunnel would emerge on the Murray-Darling Basin side of the ranges and feed intothe Beardy River, then the McIntyre River and, ultimately into the Basin. The Gibralta Ranges aresituated in one of the highest rainfall areas in Australia. Benefits of the scheme include:• The dams would have storage capacity approaching that of the Snowy MountainsScheme.• The capacity of the headwater storage would provide flood control to the Clarence Valley.• The diversion would only require 24% of the total maximum storage volumes of water toprovide similar volumes of water to the Basin as the Snowy Mountains Scheme.• The generation of hydro-electricity is another major benefit.This motion is not a request to build the scheme, but to revisit it in the context of recent climaticevents and over-allocations in the Murray Darling Basin.
RECOMMENDATION: That the MDA requests the Federal Government, as a matter of urgency, to commission a report on the Clarence River Diversion Proposal relative to water flows through the Murray-Darling system and to make that report widely available.

Australia gets bad report card from WWF in 2010

10 national biocapacities in 2007:

Ten countries alone accounted for over 60% of the Earth's biocapacity

(Global Footprint Network, 2010)

The World Wildlife Fund has released its 2010 Living Planet Report.

Australia does not fare well in the report's latest global assessment.
With an enviously high national biocapacity* Australians remain profligate in how they consume vital resources and the nation's ecological footprint is disproportionate to its population size.

Of 152 countries ranked in order of their destruction of the world's natural resources, Australia is eighth, behind nations such as the United Arab Emirates, the US and Canada - performing much worse than countries including China and the United Kingdom.

A disturbing fact that for which all of us (including those Murray-Darling Basin communities currently agitating over water rights) should reserve some serious thinking time.

*Biocapacity refers to the capacity of a given biologically productive area to generate an on-going supply of renewable resources and to absorb its spillover wastes.
Unsustainability occurs if the area’s ecological footprint exceeds its biocapacity.
Source: GreenFacts

Water is a precious commodity in Siem Reap, Cambodia

Cambodia's Angkor Wat has almost 2 million visitors a year. The visitors, many of whom stay in 5-star accommodation in the nearby city of Siem Reap, are putting increasing pressure on the scarce water resource.

The plush tourist resorts with fairways of lawns soak up the area's valuable water supply and are in stark contrast to the homes and the lives of the locals of Siem Reap.

Water is a precious commodity in Siem Reap, particularly during the dry season, when tourist numbers are highest. And the population of the city, barely five kilometres from Angkor Wat, has doubled in a little more than a decade to about 200,000.

Water is sucked from groundwater under the city of Siem Reap and as a consequence the stability of Angkor Wat, a centuries-old World Heritage-listed landmark, is under threat.

Local authorities have expressed concerns that thousands of illegal private pumps have been sunk across the city, pulling millions of litres of water from the ground each day.

However, the very survival of the local community is dependent upon a clean and reliable water supply.

Locals living in Siem Reap's hinterland include thousands who are lake dwellers - they live permanently in building along the banks of the lake of Tonle Sap or on the lake itself. For them, clean fresh water is a major problem. Communal pumps, where they are available, are often some distance from the homes.

On a recent visit to Cambodia this writer did not stay in 5-star accommodation.

Credit: SMH