2010 Election Campaign Day 23 - I declare National Mark Latham Day!

The Australian : Shades of that aggressive Latham-Howard handshake

I always knew Mark Latham was a rabbit and this piece in Saturday's Granny Herald only confirms it:

"Mr Latham, who is producing a segment for the Nine Network's 60 Minutes program, approached Ms Gillard and asked why Labor had complained to the network about his presence.

A smiling Ms Gillard responded: "I don't know anything about that, Mark.

"If you want to work for Channel Nine, that's a matter for you."

Mr Latham then suggested his one-time Labor ally speak out against former prime minister Kevin Rudd for trying to sabotage her campaign.

"Have a dig at him," he told her.

But Ms Gillard merely laughed and wished him well with his journalistic endeavours.

An ALP spokesman later denied the party had made any complaint to the Nine Network.

The Nine Network had not responded to inquiries as to whether a complaint was made."

And like the bunny that he is, Latham (whose real beef was that Gillard had refused his interview request) deserves to find himself in the nation's stewpot garnished with onions and a fistful of parsley.

A few steel traps along the campaign trail should do the trick!

Wondering if you may now be able to vote on 21 August? See this Statement from the Australian Electoral Commission on High Court Decision

Wondering if yesterday's High Court of Australia judgment means that you can now vote even if you missed the 19 July close of rolls deadline?

This 6 August 2010 AEC media release explains the position:

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) acknowledges today's High Court decision that allows additional eligible voters to now be entitled to vote in the 2010 federal election. Voters affected are those who submitted correctly completed claims for enrolment after 8pm on Monday 19 July but before 8pm on Monday 26 July.
The AEC will process these additional enrolment claims in coming days and attempt to contact all electors concerned to advise they are entitled to vote and how to obtain further assistance if needed.
The voter lists, used in polling places to mark off those who have voted, for the 2010 election have already been printed and distributed, so it is too late to include these voters on these lists.
This means that voters affected by today's decision who attend a polling place on election day (or early voting centre) will have to cast a declaration vote and provide an accepted form of evidence of identity. The AEC therefore urges those electors to carry their driver's licence or other accepted form of identity with them when voting to easily meet these requirements (list below).
The AEC will provide further advice once it has studied the full detail of the High Court's decision.

Acceptable documents
01 Australian driver licence
02 Birth Certificate, or an extract (must be Australian and issued at least 5 years ago)
03 Certificate of Australian citizenship
04 Concession Card from Centrelink (must be current)
05 Concession Card from the Department of Veterans' Affairs (must be current)
06 Credit or bank account card (must be current)
07 Defence force, Australian discharge document
08 Divorce documents from the Family Court of Australia
09 Employee identification card (must be current with a photograph and signature)
10 Firearm's licence (must be current with a photograph and signature)
11 Justice of the Peace appointment document (must be Australian)
12 Marriage Certificate (must be registered in Australia)
13 Medicare card
14 Passport (must be Australian and current)
15 Proof of age card issued by, or under the authority of, a state or territory government
16 Security guard/crowd control licence (must be current)
17 Student identification card (must be current with a photograph)
Note: Provisional New Citizens must provide their Certificate of Australian citizenship.

Media contact
Phil Diak
Director, Media and Communication Strategy
Canberra
02 6271 4415 0413 452 539

Moggy Musings [Archived material from Boy the Wonder Cat]

A terrible cruelty musing: Snowy, a 19-month-old domestic longhair from Bankstown NSW was restrained with tape and set alight in July 2010 by a person or persons unknown. The RSPCA is calling for anyone with information to come forward - contact the RSPCA on 02 9770-7555 or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

A tartan musing: Congrats to Super Sally the Blue Heeler for winning the best dressed dog competition at Maclean's International Tartan Day celebrations on 3 July 2010. Only a brave mutt can wear that much tartan!

A Bananabending Moggies musing: While handsome felines like myself can get lifetime registration in this state for a standard fee ($15 if your hoomin slave is a pensioner), my poor cousins living in Queensland are at the mercy of each local council and no-one's mentioning a lifetime rego fee - just incredible annual charges which come into effect by the end of 2010. Queensland moggies unite - picket your council office until lifetime registration is the norm!

A Rex's pleased musing: Rex's rebarked that although he knows most of Yamba's walls, telegraph posts and similar spots he is (for different reasons) tickled pink about this new site: iGo2 Yamba which gave him a mention.

A Rexie Rulz! musing: Rex the German Shepherd is till beating his hoomins when it comes to Bill's clues about who's hitting the shebert instead of the ball at Yamba Golf Club. Rex reckons Bill only gets one 'starr' for his latest effort.

A not so cryptic musing: Bill was trying a little Poirot-style clue when he laid this down in a local golfing gossip column in early June 2010 - "Let's be frank, if you try to outfox the fuzz it could well be all over for you." Sorry Bill. Rex the German Shepherd had nailed the buggy driver before his master had even finished reading Putts & Pars. Even if he suffers from the disadvantage of not being a moggy, Rex is a very smart dog!

A Margaret McKenna musing: My little canine friend Veronica Lake tells me that one of the furry kids she plays with was looking over her papa's shoulder and read this bit of a letter from the Grafton accountant currently passing herself off as a shire councillor - I represent US and am insulted you think I may represent McDonalds. (and that is US not U.S.) Still laffing....

A Million Paws musing: The 16th Annual RSPCA Million Paws Walk is being held across Australia today Sunday 16 May 2010 and is THE big day out for animal lovers. Well done to my many furry friends as they try for a new Australian record!

A way too much information musing: Word round the catsnip patch is that a certain NSW North Coast councillor used a local government committee meeting to not-so-subtly brag about his sexual prowess - eeewww!

2010 Election Campaign Day 22 - A Nobel Laureate trumps a Rhodes Scholar

 

Nobel Laureate and respected economist Joseph Stiglitz reckons the Rudd Labor Government got it right with its fast-acting economic stimulus policy during the Global Financial Crisis according to Aunty ABC:

 

"One of the world's top economists says the fiscal stimulus package delivered in Australia during the global financial crisis was among the best designed in the world.

A report today found there are some valid concerns about the poor value for money on the school spending part of the package.

However, Nobel Prize laureate and Professor at New York's Columbia University Joseph Stiglitz says there will always be some waste with such programs.

He says that is preferable to the waste of human and capital resources that would have resulted if there was no stimulus.

"You were lucky to have, probably, the best designed stimulus package of any of the countries, advanced industrial countries, both in size and in design, timing and how it was spent - and I think it served Australia well," he said."

A hand which definitely beats a Rhodes Scholar who probably hasn't opened a book on economics in half a lifetime.

High Court judgment bitchslaps Abbott

In 2006 an arrogant John Winston Howard and an increasingly despotic Coalition Government passed legislation limiting an Australian citizen's right to vote by closing the Commonwealth electoral roll on the same day election writs were issued.

This was Tony Abbott (then a Howard Goverment minister and Leader of the House) back in 2006 on the subject:
Another of the accusations hurled at us by the Leader of the Opposition was the ludicrous suggestion that we are in some way stripping young people of their right to vote.

In June 2010 the Rudd-Gillard Government attempted to introduce legislation which would rollback sections of electoral law to a pre-Howard era when citizens' rights were intact.

In that same June Tony Abbott's Coalition voted against the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Close of Rolls and Other Measures) Bill 2010 in the Lower House and seems to have sent the bill to limbo in the Upper House.

This is what Liberal MP and Shadow Treasurer Joe Hockey had to say concerning the Labor Government's 2010 bill:

The amendments in this bill that relate to the closing of rolls seven days after the writs are issued will be opposed by the coalition. The previous government, in line with longstanding policy, moved to protect the integrity of the roll and prevent fraudulent enrolments by reducing the time period between the calling of an election and the closing of rolls. The closure of the rolls seven days after the issue of a writ is a significant threat to the integrity of the electoral roll.

This is what Liberal MP Andrew Robb later parroted:
On the close of rolls, the fundamental point is this: the closure of the rolls seven days after the issue of a writ is a significant threat to the integrity of the electoral roll. The previous coalition government, in line with longstanding policy, moved to protect the integrity of the roll and prevent fraudulent enrolments by reducing the time period between the calling of an election and the close of the rolls.

While Liberal MP Cory Bernardi chimed in with:
I consider the closure of the rolls seven days after the issue of a writ to be a threat to the very integrity of the electoral roll.

However, many ordinary Australians did not agree with that neo-con bloc and today the GetUp! challenge of those Howard electoral law amendments was successful and Abbott received the considered rebuff he deserved from the full bench of the High Court.

Media Release - Manager, Public Information, High Court of Australia:

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

6 August 2010

ROWE & ANOR v ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER & ANOR

On 26 July 2010, proceedings were commenced in the Melbourne Registry of the Court seeking a declaration that certain provisions of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Cth) effecting cut-off dates for consideration of applications for enrolment and transfers of enrolment as an elector are invalid. One of those provisions, s 102(4), prevents the Electoral Commissioner from considering claims for enrolment lodged after 8 pm on the date of the issue of writs for an election for the House of Representatives or the Senate until after the close of polling. Another provision, s 102( 4AA), prevents consideration of claims for transfer of enrolment from one divisional roll to another from 8 pm on the date of the close of the rolls for an election until after the close of polling. A third provision, s 155, provides that the rolls close on the third working day after the date of the writs.

The challenged provisions had been introduced into the Commonwealth Electoral Act by the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Electoral Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2006 (Cth) ("the Amendment Act").

The application for the declaration and for writs of mandamus was referred to the Full Court by Justice Hayne on 29 July 2010 and argument on the application was heard by the Full Court on 4 and 5 August 2010. The application was amended at the hearing so that the declaration sought related to the validity of some other provisions of the Amendment Act.

Today the Court by majority declared that provisions of the Amendment Act which introduced the challenged provisions into the Commonwealth Electoral Act are invalid. The declaration also covered certain consequential amendments made by the Amendment Act including other provisions effecting cut-off dates relating to the enrolment of persons living outside Australia (s 94A(4)(a» and itinerant electors (s 96(4», and the eligibility of spouses, de facto partners or children of eligible overseas electors for enrolment (s 95(4».

The orders of the Court were:

1. Declare that Items 20, 24, 28, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45 and 52 of Sched 1 to the Electoral and Referendum Amendment (Electoral Integrity and Other Measures) Act 2006 (Cth) are invalid.

2. The second defendant to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the Further Amended Application for an Order to Show Cause.

The Court will publish its reasons for decision at a later date.

• This statement is not intended to be a substitute for the reasons of the High Court or to be used in any later consideration of the Court's reasons.

* Bitchslap: To slap someone (particularly but not necessarily female) who is being rude or nasty, perhaps screaming a lot (i.e., being a bitch). The idea is to get them to calm down and behave. It doesn't necessarily mean you really hit the person; there is such a thing as a verbal bitchslap OR The literal and/or metaphoric slapping or whacking someone in order to knock some sense into them.

Abbott and his Amazing Technicolour PLP Coat

First the Opposition Leader Tony Abbott announced that, if elected to government on 21 August, he would introduce a paid parental leave scheme which was very different from the Gillard Government scheme which commences next January.

His scheme would provide mothers with 26 weeks paid parental leave, at full replacement wage (up to a maximum salary of $150,000 per annum) or the Federal Minimum Wage, whichever is greater and, include superannuation contributions.
All of this to be paid by a 1.7 per cent levy on business with annual taxable incomes in excess of $5 million.

Well, the scheme entrenches income inequality (because not every woman will have $1,500 to $2,000 or so in the weekly take-home pay packet) but it probably passed muster with many voters because the taxpayer was not paying these wages. But wait.......

Now we find out that the scheme will be funded by a 1.5 per cent levy on business (offset by a 1.5 per cent company tax cut) and, an estimated $100 million annually from taxpayers will supplement public service 26 week paid parental leave - all starting on 1 July 2012.

Still, what's a hundred million between friends. Think of the dear babies. But wait there's more......

The levy on business is designed to cut out and all paid parental leave under his scheme will be funded from the Budget by 1 July 2013 according to Abbott.

Er, now doesn't that look suspiciously like Abbott's paid parental leave scheme will always be fully funded by the taxpayer after that first year?

How do you feel about paying some women over a thousand dollars a week (plus super contributions) to stay home with their babies, while your own children or grandchildren do without essential services/infrastructure in rural and regional Australia?

They are passionate about their politics in regional Australia [Part Two]

From The Daily Examiner letters to the editor on 2 August 2010:

Roll on, poll

LIKE many other Australians, August 21, can't come soon enough for mine; not only because watching the election campaign play out is like following a perverse, B-grade comedy of errors, but also because we will finally see an end to Fred Perring's daily banal bleatings on the minutiae of the subject.

As if vague interpretation of Julia Gillard's body language and last week's bizarre comparison of Gillard to an ageing bovine weren't enough, his inane commentary plunged to all-new depths of absurdity in his letter of Thursday, July 29 in which he draws the reader's attention to the 'seeds' of Marxist socialism somehow lodged in Ms Gillard's DNA (I remain unsure whether this is a mixed metaphor or an actual scientific claim).

By definition, protecting the rights of the worker underpins the ideology of the Labor Party, so it stands to reason that its representatives would cite successful historical figures from the international labour movement, Nye Bevan for example, as inspiration.

To use the parlance of our times: D'oh!

Based on his repeated warnings, Mr Perring seems to think that we need to be vigilant against reds under the bed, despite the fact that communism was pretty much discredited decades ago, if not before, then certainly by the time of the epic and spectacular failure of the USSR, a fact of which Ms Gillard is no doubt aware.

Judging by her performance as a Member of Parliament and Prime Minister so far, perhaps a more accurate reflection of her views, she appears to be somewhat pragmatic and realistic about the practicality of establishing a new Communist paradise for the 21st century, even for a former student socialist.

It's a pity that Mr Perring is allowing quantity to take precedence over quality; perhaps if he saved the most insightful of his observations for a weekly tirade they would be of more interest and amusement, not to mention equally at home in the editorial pages of Quadrant.


FELICITY WATSON
South Grafton