Thursday 18 June 2009
Did the editor's dog eat his homework?
How does one account for the Comment in today's Daily Examiner by its editor Peter Chapman?
In a piece titled Banks law unto themselves Chapman has simply reproduced, word-for-word, a media statement released by Senator Steve Fielding.
Okay, let's give Chapman some credit. He acknowledged it was Fielding's work and to make things easier for his readers he turned one paragraph that consisted of two sentences into two one-sentence paragraphs.
Perhaps the editor's dog ate his homework and when it came time to hand up his copy for today's paper he had nothing.
Let's hope other journos at The Daily Examiner don't follow Chapman's lead and simply rehash media statements.
Oh, by the way, Fielding's media statement can be read here.
In a piece titled Banks law unto themselves Chapman has simply reproduced, word-for-word, a media statement released by Senator Steve Fielding.
Okay, let's give Chapman some credit. He acknowledged it was Fielding's work and to make things easier for his readers he turned one paragraph that consisted of two sentences into two one-sentence paragraphs.
Perhaps the editor's dog ate his homework and when it came time to hand up his copy for today's paper he had nothing.
Let's hope other journos at The Daily Examiner don't follow Chapman's lead and simply rehash media statements.
Oh, by the way, Fielding's media statement can be read here.
Labels:
APN,
media,
newspaper,
The Daily Examiner
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment