Mr. Baker also implied that he does not belong to any interest group - yet last year the Maclean Chamber of Commerce successfully nominated him as its preferred delegate on Clarence Valley Council's Business Rate Review Advisory Committee.
Andrew Baker: My consideration of any issue that requires a decision from me will commence with an open mind and NO pre-commitment to applicant or interested person/group.
Q3: If you undertake to oppose such water diversion/extraction or mining will you publicly oppose any political party policy which supports it, even to the point of repudiating the policies of a party of which you are a member?
Andrew Baker: Not really applicable as I have no undertaking to give in advance of proper consideration. I have no party membership. I have no interest group to answer to so my considerations will always be open-minded to the best of my ability.
Q4: Do you accept that human-induced global warming and subsequent climate change is real?
Andrew Baker: I accept that a great fear of these issues is real. I’m still waiting for my great fear of the similarly frightening Y2K Bug to subside before I adopt any new fears.
Q5: Are you willing to adopt realistic, long-term mitigation or adaptation measures to support Clarence Valley communities in the face of increased severe weather events, continuous coastal/estuary erosion and possible loss of agricultural productivity?
Andrew Baker: The political temptation is to answer with some nice-sounding motherhood statement testifying to my overwhelming love of all motherhood questions. However, my answer is; I will consider, to the best of my ability, any specific proposal for mitigation or adaption measures on the merits of the proposal. My consideration will include at least receiving advice of the likely cost, likely benefit, ability of the residents and ratepayers (or others) to pay, and the risks of doing or not doing the proposal.
Q6: Will you give an undertaking to resist any move by the NSW Government to subject the Clarence Valley to yet another forced amalgamation in order to form an even larger local government area not centred within the valley?
Andrew Baker: I am unimpressed with the benefits of the most recent amalgamation. While I am aware of some benefits from that amalgamation, the Clarence Valley has yet to have Council leadership capable of ensuring the financial efficiencies and Increased levels of management professionalism so willingly held up as great benefits prior to the amalgamated Council. For now, I am opposed to further amalgamation but not to the extent of denying an future possibility it the right circumstances.
Q7: Can you assure Clarence Valley residents and ratepayers that as a councillor you will never meet privately with any representative or agent of a land/property developer, mining corporation or energy company or give a general/specific undertaking that you will look favourably on their proposals or will further their consultation or negotiations with any tier of government, other businesses or communities in Northern NSW?
2 comments:
OMG! Baker doesn't understand the reason the Y2K Bug didn't cause universal havoc was that there was a global government & industry response which saw 99.9% of all digital systems protected against that particulat systems failure by December 1999.
Only a very limited number of the smallest and most obscure software programs reverted back to 1900 and became dysfunctional.
Thanks NCV and Andrew Baler; Mr Baker for answering Ms Melville's questions and NCV for publishing Mr Baker's answers. I hope all candidates come out and provide their responses to the questions.
Having conveyed by thanks I'll now provide a confession. At this stage Mr Baker is the last of the candidates I would want as one of my elected representatives - his interests are Bakercentric, not community-oriented. I call on all other would-be-Councillors to rise to the challenge and let voters know what their stance is on the very important matters presented in M Melville's questions.
Post a Comment