Snapshot taken from Prime Minister Abbott’s St. Patrick’s Day 2015 message
For a man who flaunts his Catholic credentials and frequently presents himself in a posture reminiscent of a 1950s parish priest in the pulpit, Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott doesn’t have a genuine Christian bone in his body.
If he did his government wouldn’t currently have a bill before the Senate which again seeks to limit an unknown number of individuals, within a group of up to 10,000 workers, to just 50 per cent of the back wages owed to them due to discriminatory employment practices allowed under the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool (BSWAT) scheme:
Abbott is pursuing this in the face of a decision by the Australian Human Rights Commission and a Federal Court judgement (upheld by the High Court) which found that these workers had been discriminated against with regard to wages paid.
He obviously intends to compound this discrimination by including that paltry offer in the bill.
What is occurring in Canberra is setting off alarm bells among families and carers, some of whom are hitting out at the Abbott Government's lack of consultation regarding the proposed legislation and at almost every group making submissions to the Fair Work Commission in Equal Remuneration Case 2013-14.
PARENTS OF
PEOPLE WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY ARE FEARLESS
– NOT FRIGHTENED
Statement by Mary Lou Carter, Secretary of
Carers Alliance:
“Many
of our members are parents of adult children with intellectual disability
employed in Australia’s Disability Enterprises (previously called ‘sheltered
workshops’), our families send out a call to the Senate to respect our family
members’ right of choice – the most basic of human rights – and support the
passage of the BSWAT Payment Bill through the Upper House.
“We
are fearless – not frightened – when it comes to protecting the jobs of our
sons and daughters with intellectual disability.”
Ms
Carter, who has been attending the current Fair Work Commission discussions
into the process of designing a new instrument for wage assessment for
Disability Enterprise employees, said the Courts are an unsatisfactory tool for
fashioning public policy.
“The
legal system is such that only lawyers and government-funded disability rights
activists know the rules. Our family members are expected to just play along.
That’s a whole new world for parents trying to protect their children’s right
of choice.
“More
importantly, some 9,998 workers with intellectual disability have had no say
about either this BSWAT Payment Bill now before the Senate, or the forced
imposition of an alternative Supported Wage assessment tool by the end of
April. Forcing services to use a wage
tool that would cause closure due to financial insolvency would mean some 70%
of those people could soon be unemployed. Then they would have no employment
income and have to pay for day services – if they could get them - or be forced
to stay at home in the care of their families.
“Parents
know exactly what’s at stake if their adult children with intellectual
disabilities lose their jobs in Disability Enterprises. It’s not just about the
money, it’s the loss of dignity that work provides. It’s the poverty, the loss
of social interaction with their peers, the loss of their sense of achievement
and inclusion as valued members of their community, the loss of their
self-esteem and pride.
“It’s
about the denial of their right of choice -
1. The
right to choose whether they take any compensation – to which they might be
entitled - by opting out of a class action in which they were included by legal
artifice, without consent or consultation; and
2.
To
choose to continue working in their current jobs, earning a fair wage
consistent with their capacity. If the actions of the ideologues force
closures, then our workers cannot choose what no longer exists, because more
time is needed to develop an alternative wage tool.
”Many
people currently working in Disability Enterprises contend these choices have
been denied them because of actions unilaterally taken by funded rights
activists, the lawyers and the unions, without any reference to the major
stakeholders: the workers with an intellectual disability themselves, their
parents, families and carers.
“You
would have to be there at the Fair Work Commission hearings, witnessing the
ideological fight by funded advocates, lawyers and unionists, to feel how
family members are depicted. If some of the workers now employed in Disability
Enterprises can work in open employment, that’s great for them. But the
majority cannot, and neither they nor their jobs should be demeaned, disparaged
or jeopardised in this way.
“Families
of Australians with significant intellectual disabilities are deeply frustrated
by a system that can mount an argument based on rights, and yet, in the course
of that argument deny the basic right of choice to our nation’s most vulnerable
workers.
“These
are our children, our family members. We are frustrated by the process, and
lack of it, but we are fearless – not frightened – when fighting to protect our
ADE’s. We know the value of jobs for these workers, especially when so many
able-bodied workers cannot get jobs.
“We
don’t talk about disability; we live it.”
BACKGROUND
Wage
Justice Campaign…….
17
February 2015: Update on Variation of Supported Employment Services
Award
United Voice, Health
Services Union and National Peak Disability and Advocacy Organisations —
Communique, Tuesday, 17 February 2015 Variation of Supported Employment
Servces award.
On 23rd December 2013, United Voice and the Health Services Union made a
joint application to the Fair Work Commission to vary the Supported Employment
Services Award 2010.This Award covers employees with disability working in Australian
Disability Enterprises (ADEs, formerly known as Sheltered Workshops). The application was made following the decision by the Full Federal Court
in Nojin v Commonwealth which found that the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool
used to determine wages unfairly discriminated against workers with
intellectual disability. The application also seeks to deal with the
extent to which other Wage Assessment Tools listed in the Award are discriminatory
against workers with disabilities.
On 20 June 2014 the full bench of the Fair Work Commission decided that in an
effort to find a solution that there be a Conference of the parties led by
Deputy President Booth. There has been a series of meetings held at the
Fair Work Commission since 1 September 2014. Conference proceedings are
conducted as a confidential process and without prejudice basis.
On 16 February 2015 the parties agreed to conduct a study using the Supported
Wage System with modification in a sample of ADEs. This will consider the
impact of using historical productivity data on the productivity wage
assessment rates of workers with disability. The parties will discuss the
results of this study at the next scheduled meeting on Monday 27 April 2015.
UPDATE
During the
caretaker period of the last election campaign the department of social
services applied to the Human Rights Commission for a three-year exemption from
the Disability Discrimination Act to give it time to develop a new, fair
assessment tool. It was granted a single year, which expires in April.
Guardian
Australia understands a new assessment tool is not yet ready, and the
government is likely to have to ask the commission for more time. The decision
would be taken by the full commission.
Innes, who
was still a commissioner when last year’s decision was made, said “that
decision set out a course of action the government needed to take ... I have
not seen evidence they have done that, so I would have thought it would be
difficult for them to argue that they should get a further extension.”
Innes said if
the government did not get an extension, workers with disabilities could lodge
complaints and possibly seek damages.
But Dr Ken
Baker, the chief executive of National Disability Services said one year was
always an unreasonable timeframe.
“A new tool
is being developed under the guidance of the Fair Work Commission, and the
government has provided money to develop and implement it, but it is
technically challenging and it takes time,” he said.
He said about
one third of disability organisations had already moved to different payment
schemes. But if the commission did not grant the commonwealth an extension,
many organisations would be in contravention of the act.
At the same
time, the government has failed to pass legislation which offers employees with
disabilities half the backpay to which they might be entitled, on the condition
that they shun legal action designed to recover the full amount.
No comments:
Post a Comment