Showing posts with label Australian politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Australian politics. Show all posts

Sunday, 26 January 2025

The Burning Question in 2025 is: will Australian society & the national economy survive Peter Dutton 2.0 aka #TrumpNotSoLite's fierce ambition to lead an ultraconservative, 'aniti-woke' federal government for the next 4 years?


Leader of the Opposition and Liberal MP for Dickson Peter Craig Dutton is on the record as admiring Donald John Trump and even seems to be looking forward to working with him should the Liberal-Nationals Coalition win government at the forthcoming federal general election - indeed he claims that a number of his close colleagues are well connected with members of the Trump Administration.


This is Peter Dutton opining to the mainstream media since 20 January 2025.



The Nightly, 24 January 2025:


Opposition leader Peter Dutton has argued that young men are ‘fed up’ with feeling ostracised and are sick of being treated like ogres.


He believes push-back on “woke” practices, such as being overlooked for jobs under affirmative action policies, was gaining momentum, and the decline of “wokeism” would be accelerated after the election of Donald Trump as US president.....


Speaking on Mark Bouris’ Straight Talk podcast, Mr Dutton said in the US and elsewhere young males felt “disenfranchised and ostracised”.


They’re saying, ‘Well, hang on, I have nothing but respect for women, and I would never treat my female friends differently than my male friends’,” he said.


But I’m being told that I’m some sort of ogre, or I have some belief structure which is true to that, which I know is, is, you know, what I hold in my heart.


I think there’s just a point where people are fed up and they are pushing back and saying, ‘well, why am I being overlooked at work for a job, you know, three jobs running when I’ve got, you know, a partner at home, and she’s decided to stay at home with three young kids, and I want a promotion at work so that I can help pay the bills at home’ and so I think all of that has morphed.”


The Saturday Paper, 25 January 2025:


They’re excited by Trump’: Dutton’s inclusion strategy


Amid the “revolution” of Donald Trump’s return to the White House is one cause that has caught the Coalition’s eye: the dismantling of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts....


One Liberal MP expects this tone will have some influence on the Coalition in Australia’s election campaign. “They’re excited by Trump. They will try and use mechanisms from his playbook here. And they do it already, right?”


Dutton has championed what he describes as “anti-woke” issues since his first term as a backbencher. I think there is going to be a new revolution that comes with the Trump administration in relation to a lot of the woke issues that might be fashionable in universities and at the ABC,” Dutton told a sympathetic Sharri Markson on Sky News this week.


They just aren’t cutting it around kitchen tables at the moment, where people can’t pay their bills under the Albanese cost-of-living crisis.”


In her Sky News interview, Markson was one of the few journalists to raise with Dutton the executive order signed by Trump recognising only “two sexes, male and female”.


In her Sky News interview, Markson was one of the few journalists to raise with Dutton the executive order signed by Trump recognising only “two sexes, male and female”.


He responded that people are “sick of being ostracised and vilified”, but he did not engage on the question of gender. Rather, the opposition leader shifted to Indigenous recognition.


On Thursday, Coalition deputy leader David Littleproud was less guarded, telling Sky News the issue of gender needed to be reconsidered in Australia. “It doesn’t need to get emotional…” he said. “It comes back to respecting that biological basis that we can’t get away from when we’re born.”....


Nationwide News, 22 January 2025:


Had enough’: Peter Dutton predicts anti-woke revolution for Australia


Peter Dutton has declared he would be the better PM to deal with US President Donald Trump amid a worldwide political revolution as voters decide they have had enough of the “woke” agenda.


But despite hinting he could ride the wave of the Trump victory all the way to the Lodge, Mr Dutton declined to expressly dump the Coalition’s current commitment to the Paris agreement on climate change.....


Mr Dutton has recently declared he will not display two flags at official press conferences if elected.


We’re not going to have reconciliation when we have people living under three different flags,’’ Mr Dutton said.


We have one national flag, and that’s incredibly important.”....


The Guardian, 25 January 2025:


Peter Dutton has announced a long-awaited shadow ministerial shake-up before this year’s federal election, appointing former immigration minister David Coleman to the foreign affairs role....Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, took on the new government efficiency platform, which echoed the new US Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), led by Elon Musk.


Given that it appears that Dutton is more than flirting with the idea of emulating Donald Trump's election campaign and some of his divisive policies perhaps it would be sensible to take a closer look at the 47th US President aka Trump 2.0 in the year of 2025.


Donald J. Trump has been the 47th US President for seven days now and during this period he has signed at least fifty-seven Executive Orders, with forty-six signed on the day of his inauguration.


20 January 2025 immediately after the inauguration ceremony on first day of the presidential term


On that first day Donald Trump signed at least 45 Presidential Actions/Executive Orders.


One of note was Granting Pardons And Commutation Of Sentences For Certain Offenses Relating To The Events At Or Near The United States Capitol On January 6, 2021 which saw an est. 1,500 persons, previously with a conviction against their names for violence and/or conspiracy in relation to the violent insurrection in Washington DC during 6 January 2021, pardoned. With those still serving prison sentences released and those still before the courts having their cases immediately dismissed.


There was also Executive Order "ProtectingThe Meaning And Value Of American Citizenship" which sought to remove the right to citizenship going forward for those children born to non-citizen parents whether those parents were in the United States lawfully or unlawfully.


Also amongst these orders were presidential actions withdrawing from the World Health Organisation, dismantling environmental protections, opening untouched areas up to mining exploration, rolling back climate change mitigation measures & regulations and denying the rights of women to reproductive choice and reasserting the position that all living persons remain the biological gender assigned to then at birth with this position to be adopted by all federal agencies and employees.


In addition Trump issued Executive Order "Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions". These rescissions cover Orders and Actions during the entire Biden presidency from noon 20.01.21 to noon 20.01.25.


Included in this rollback is:


> Executive Order 13989 of January 20, 2021 (Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch Personnel), thereby making it legal for members of both Houses in the 119th US Congress to accept gifts & inducements (eg. 'golden parachutes') from lobbyists and interested third parties.


> Executive Order 14009 of January 28, 2021 (Strengthening Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act)

> Executive Order 14070 of April 5, 2022 (Continuing To Strengthen Americans’ Access to Affordable, Quality Health Coverage) and

> Executive Order 14087 of October 14, 2022 (Lowering Prescription Drug Costs for Americans) which means that a) medical insurance became inaccessible to potentially millions of American citizens and b) prescription drugs just became very expensive again and in practice inaccessible to the poor, vulnerable and to many with chronic life-threatening conditions.


Public Citizen, Inc., American Federation Of Government Employees and State Democracy Defenders Fund filed CivilCase 1:25-cv-00164 bringing an action seeking declaratory, injunctive, and mandamus relief against Defendants Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as president of the United States, and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), an agency of the United States, to ensure that the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) complies with the requirements established by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C.§§ 1001 et seq


The Trump State Department implements a landmark "One Flag Policy" barring U.S. outposts at home and abroad from flying any other flag but the Stars and Stripes, effectively blocks U.S. embassies and outposts from flying Pride and Black Lives Matter flags.


21 January 2025 the second day and first full day of the current presidential term


The Episcopalian 14th Bishop of Washington speaking directly to the president from the pulpit of St. John’s, Lafayette Square during the official thanksgiving church service, said the following:


Let me make one final plea, Mr. President. Millions have put there trust in you. And, as you told the nation yesterday, you have felt the providential hand of a loving God.

In the name of our God, I ask you to have mercy upon the people in our country who are scared now.

There are gay, lesbian and transgender children in Democratic, Republican and Independent families, some who fear for their lives.

And the people, the people who pick our crops and clean our office buildings, who labor in poultry farms and meatpacking plants, who wash the dishes after we eat in restaurants and work the night shifts in hospitals. They may not be citizens or have the proper documentation, but the vast majority of immigrants are not criminals. They pay taxes, and are good neighbors. They are faithful members of our churches and mosques, synagogues, madaras, and temples. I ask you to have mercy, Mr. President, on those in our communities whose children fear that their parents will be taken away, and that you help those who are fleeing war zones and persecution in their own lands, to find compassion and welcome here. Our God teaches us that we are to be merciful to the stranger for we were all once strangers in this land.


Truth Social post





Excerpt from Trump's first US press conference during the question and answer segment when he was asked about the wildfire federal disaster relief funding called into question by the intent of the 20 January presidential memorandum Putting People over Fish: Stopping Radical Environmentalism to Provide Water to Southern California.



The State of New Jersey, Commonwealth of

Massachusetts, State of California, State of ColoradoState of Connecticut, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Hawai‘I, State of Maine, State of Maryland, Attorney General Dana Nessel for the People of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of Nevada, State of New Mexico, State of New York, State of North Carolina, State Of Rhode Island, State of Vermont, State of Wisconsin and City and County of San Francisco, filed Case No. 1:25-cv-10139 bringing an action to protect their states, localities, and residents from the President’s flagrantly unlawful attempt to strip hundreds of thousands American-born children of their citizenship based on their parentage.


The States of Washington, Arizona, Illinois, and Oregon filed Case 2:25-cv-00127-JCC bringing an action to protect the States—including their public agencies, public programs, public fiscs, and state residents—against the illegal actions of the President and federal government that purport to unilaterally strip United States citizens of their citizenship. Seeking an emergency temporary restraining order.


Note: This brings the total of state entities opposing the contents of one executive order issued by President Trump in court to twenty-five.


22 January 2025 the third day of the presidential term


In response to the Executive Order of 20 January 2025 "Granting Pardons And Commutation Of Sentences For Certain Offenses Relating To The Events At Or Near The United States Capitol On January 6, 2021", three US District Court judges asserted the independence of the Court. The first in Criminal Action No. 21-00073 (BAH) by not going beyond what established law required. In her reasons stating; No “national injustice” occurred here, just as no outcome-determinative election fraud occurred in the 2020 presidential election. No “process of national reconciliation” can begin when poor losers, whose preferred candidate loses an election, are glorified for disrupting a constitutionally mandated proceeding in Congress and doing so with impunity. That merely raises the dangerous specter of future lawless conduct by other poor losers and undermines the rule of law. Yet, this presidential pronouncement of a “national injustice” is the sole justification provided in the government’s motion to dismiss the pending indictment." and denying the request that this dismissal be “with prejudice.”

While the second in Criminal Action No. 22-413 (CKK) ended her reasons with All of what I have described has been recorded for posterity, ensuring that what transpired on January 6, 2021 can be judged accurately in the future.

and the third in Criminal Action No. 24-CR-135 (TSC) the Order transcript opening with; The Government’s Motion to Dismiss the Indictment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a), ECF No. 29, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

The Government’s only stated reason for pursuing dismissal with prejudice is that the President, in addition to pardoning the Defendant, has ordered the Attorney General to do so.

See Gov’t’s Mot. at 1, ECF No. 29 (citing Unnumbered Proclamation, __ Fed. Reg. __ (Jan. 20, 2025).1

The Court does not discern—and neither party has identified—any defect in either the legal merits of, or the factual basis for, the Government’s case. Indeed, while a pardon exercises the Executive’s “exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case,” United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974), it “does not necessarily render ‘innocent’ a defendant of any alleged violation of the law,” United States v. Flynn, 507 F. Supp. 3d 116, 136 (D.D.C. 2020).

More broadly, no pardon can change the tragic truth of what happened on January 6, 2021. On that day, “a mob professing support for then-President Trump violently attacked the United States Capitol” to stop the electoral college certification. Trump v. Thompson, 20 F.4th

10, 15 (D.C. Cir. 2021). The dismissal of this case cannot undo the “rampage [that] left multiple people dead, injured more than 140 people, and inflicted millions of dollars in damage.” Id


23 January 2025 the fourth day of the presidential term


Trump addressing the World Economic Forum

at Davos via a live feed.



Excerpt from official transcript of Donald Trump's Davos speech taken from the Question and Answer segment with Trump speaking:


And the big problem is we need double the energy we currently have in the United States — can you imagine? — for AI to really be as big as we want to have it. Because it’s a very competitive — it will be very competitive with China and others.


So, I’m going to give emergency declarations so that they can start building them almost immediately.


And I’m — I’m — I think it was largely my idea, because nobody thought this was possible. It wasn’t that they were not smart, because they’re the smartest, but I told them that what I want you to do is build your electric generating plant right next to your plant as a separate building, connected. And they said, “Wow, you’re kidding.” And I said, “No, no. I’m not kidding.” You don’t have to hook into the grid, which is old and, you know, could be taken out. If it’s taken out, they wouldn’t have any way to get any electricity.


So, we are going to allow them to go on a very rapid bas- — basis to build their plant — build the electric generating plant. They can fuel it with anything they want, and they may have coal as a backup. Good, clean coal.


You know, if there were a problem with a — with a pipe coming in — as an example, you’re going with gas — oil or gas — and a pipe gets blown up or, for some reason, doesn’t work, there are some companies in the U.S. that have coal sitting right by the plant so that if there’s an emergency, they can go to that short-term basis and use our very clean coal.


So, that’s something else that a lot of people didn’t even know about. But nothing can destroy coal — not the weather, not a bomb — nothing. It might make it a little smaller, might make it a little different shape. But coal is very strong as a backup. It’s a great backup to have that facility, and it wouldn’t cost much more — more money.


And we have more coal than anybody. We also have more oil and gas than anybody.


So, we’re going to make it so that the plants will have their own electric generating facilities attached right to their plant. They don’t have to worry about a utility. They don’t have to worry about anything. And we’re going to get very rapid approvals.


24 January 2025 the fifth day of the presidential term


By 24 January Donald Trump has signed around 60 Memos, Briefing Statements and Presidential Actions/Executive Orders. Each and everyone coming together to form a concerted attack on the US Constitution, existing law and the administration of federal government.

In addition by the fifth day Trump had publicly withdrawn federal protective services from his former national security adviser John Bolton, former top health official Dr. Anthony Fauci, his former top diplomat Mike Pompeo and former Iran envoy Brian Hook. All of whom have been out of favour with him and perceived to be 'critics'.


On a flying visit to North Carolina Donald Trump announced the reorganisation and possible closure of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), continuing to assert the misinformation he spread as presidential candidate during Hurricane Helene - including that some FEMA employees refused to help people who displayed Trump signs on their properties.

Trump stated a general preference that in future the states take care of disasters. Let the state take care of the tornadoes and the hurricanes and all of the other things that happen. And I think you’re going to find it a lot less expensive. You’ll do it for less than half, and you’re going to get a lot quicker response.

So, that seems to be the recommendation, but we’ll be making that recommendation over the next couple of weeks.

Any additional federal aid to California in relation to the Los Angeles wildfires will come not through FEMA but through the White House and have specific conditions attached before it can be accessed by this Democrat governed state. With Trump stating two prerequisites: I want to see two things in Los Angeles: Voter ID, so that the people have a chance to vote, and I want to see the water be released and come down into Los Angeles and throughout the state. Those are the two things. After that, I will be the greatest president that California have ever — has ever seen.


Oregon Capital Chronicle, 24 January 2024:


As U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement intensifies its efforts to apprehend and deport undocumented immigrants throughout the country, concern is rising among Indigenous communities residing in urban areas about reports of Indigenous people being detained in the Valley.


Since President Donald Trump issued his executive order for an increase in ICE raids, Navajo tribal leaders have received alarming reports that their tribal members are being detained, heightening uncertainties over the implications these actions have for their communities and the safety of their people.


We now know that Navajo people and enrolled members of other tribes are being detained in Phoenix and other cities by ICE,” Navajo Nation Council Speaker Crystalyne Curley said during a committee meeting on Thursday. “The reports that we have received indicate that we need to coordinate an operation or some type of response to help our enrolled tribal members here on the Navajo Nation.”....


In State of Washington et al v Donald Trump et al filed as CASE NO. C25-0127-IC a US District Court Judge granted a 14 Day Temporary Restraining Order, stating in part; Plaintiff States face irreparable injury as a result of the signing and implementation of the Executive Order. and

There is a strong likelihood that Plaintiffs will succeed on the merits of their claims that the Executive Order violates the Fourteenth Amendment and Immigration and Nationality Act.


The Laken Riley Act having passed both Houses this week awaits Trump's signature to become federal law.

This Act requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement.

Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting.



To be continued......


Thursday, 9 January 2025

Zuckerberg abandons fact checking on Facebook's US platform, with cessation of fact-checking on its Australian platform expected to follow in the near future

 


ECHO, 8 January 2024:


Coinciding with the return of Donald Trump to the US presidency, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp has announced it’s abandoning the independent fact-checking processes set up in 2016 in favour of a ‘community notes’ program, as used on Elon Musk’s X platform, where the community decides which posts are misleading or need more context.


Meta’s press release quotes a 2019 speech by its CEO Mark Zuckerberg in which he argued that free expression has been the driving force behind progress in American society and around the world, and that inhibiting speech, however well-intentioned the reasons for doing so, reinforces existing institutions and power structures instead of empowering people.


Some people believe giving more people a voice is driving division rather than bringing us together, said Mr Zuckerberg.


More people across the spectrum believe that achieving the political outcomes they think matter is more important than every person having a voice. I think that’s dangerous.’


How did that work out?


In practice, Meta’s policies and role in fuelling misinformation led to the earlier election of Donald Trump in the USA, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, and the success of Brexit in the UK.


As Meta sought to rebuild its credentials as a good corporate citizen following the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which Facebook data was manipulated and exploited for political purposes in the UK and elsewhere (without the permission of users), independent fact checking was one of Meta’s responses.....


The statement goes on to say, ‘We want to undo the mission creep that has made our rules too restrictive and too prone to over-enforcement. We’re getting rid of a number of restrictions on topics like immigration, gender identity and gender that are the subject of frequent political discourse and debate....


Anything to avoid another Donald meltdown? Cloudcatcher Media.


Trumped


Meta’s latest press release doesn’t mention Donald Trump anywhere, but his influence is clearly apparent on the new direction of the company.


After clashing with Mr Trump earlier, Mark Zuckerberg has grown increasingly close to the incoming president in recent years, along with his fellow billionaires, notably Jeff Bezos, with significant implications for global media and information and eco-systems.


Donald Trump praised Meta’s latest announcement. ‘I think they’ve come a long way,’ he told a press conference yesterday. When a journalist asked the President-elect if he thought Zuckerberg was responding to threats he had made in the past, Trump responded with one word: ‘Probably’.


While the changes at Meta will only affect the United States initially, they are expected to be rolled out globally in the near future, including Australia.


Read the full article at

https://www.echo.net.au/2025/01/meta-abandons-independent-fact-checking/.



The question that immediately springs to mind - 'Will Zuckerberg remove the fact-checking function from the Australian version of Facebook ahead of the 2025 federal general election?'.


Due to the 2024 electoral redistribution, more than half of the 150 federal electorates will be going to the polls with altered electorate boundaries and, it is not hard to imagine that all political parties as well as third party lobbyists will begin campaigning vigorously in those seats in particular when the timing of this year's election is announced.


CNN Business, 8 January 2025:


New York CNN

Meta’s surprise decision to scrap its fact-checking partnerships – blindsiding journalists involved in the program and putting some out of work – is part of a much bigger shift in media and politics.


The very notion of fact-checking is under assault by a wide array of fact-challenged politicians and interest groups. Particularly on the right, “fact-check” has been turned into a dirty word, one that presupposes the fact-checker is actually suppressing some inconvenient truth.


Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg played right into that assumption on Tuesday when he insulted fact-checkers as “too politically biased” and said they “have destroyed more trust than they’ve created, especially in the U.S.”


Destroyed trust among whom, exactly? Zuckerberg didn’t say. But President-elect Donald Trump, who keeps fact-checkers busy and hates being corrected by them, welcomed Meta’s changes. So did the wide world of pro-Trump media. “Trump gets results,” Fox’s Laura Ingraham said Tuesday night, touting Meta’s “major shakeup.”


As CNN’s Donie O’Sullivan found through his interviews with Trump rallygoers, MAGA loyalists bristled at the existence of fact-checks on Facebook and objected to content moderation that they described as censorship. They trusted Trump over any attempt to fact-check him.


But for a wider audience, Meta’s support for outside fact-checking outlets helped make the internet a little bit less polluted by lies and propaganda.....


Without fact checking on Meta, disinfo spreaders will be partying like it’s 2016,” said Duke [former CNN journalist Alan Duke, Lead Stories] .....


Wednesday, 4 December 2024

The 2024 Australian parliamentary year ended on a rather busy note.....

 

Last week mainstream media began discussing the "incredible number" of Bills before the Australian Parliament that week and how many "laws changed overnight".


Yes, there were a high number of bills before Parliament, but no, laws do not change overnight. While the amendments and provisions set out in the Bills mentioned below will have received the Governor-General's assent on or about 29 November 2024, some do not come into effect until 2025. 


Here is a breakdown of legislative business covering the progress of bills before the Australian Parliament in 2024.


As at 29 November 2024 the 47th Australian Parliament - commenced at the start of the first term of the Albanese Labor Government - had considered 428 Bills to date.


A total of 162 of these were introduced during 2024 - including 7 received from the Senate. A total of 100 received consent and passed into law.


In the week beginning 25 November 2024, both the House of Representatives and the Senate were particularly busy, as the Albanese Government sought to enter the 2025 federal general election year with fewer policy and procedural matters outstanding.


During that last sitting week of 2024 the following Bills were agreed to:

  • Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Amendment (Scheduling) Bill 2024 (Senate bill presented and agreed in the House this week)

  • Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024

  • Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) Bill 2024 (presented and agreed in the House this week)

  • Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) Tax (Imposition) Bill 2024 (presented and agreed in the House this week)

  • Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin) Bill 2024 (amended in the House this week)

  • Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin Charges) Bill 2024

  • Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024 (amended in the House this week)

  • Future Made in Australia (Production Tax Credits and Other Measures) Bill 2024 (presented and agreed in the House this week)

  • Health Insurance (Pathology) (Fees) (Repeal) Bill 2024

  • Health Legislation Amendment (Modernising My Health Record—Sharing by Default) Bill 2024

  • Midwife Professional Indemnity (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme Amendment Bill 2024

  • Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2024

  • Surveillance Legislation (Confirmation of Application) Bill 2024 (amended in the House this week)

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Fairer for Families and Farmers and Other Measures) Bill 2024 (presented and agreed in the House this week)


The following Bills were returned by the Senate with amendments:

  • Aged Care Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Better and Fairer Schools (Information Management) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) Bill 2024 (presented and agreed in the House this week; the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Crimes Amendment (Strengthening the Criminal Justice Response to Sexual Violence) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Family Law Amendment Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Future Made in Australia (Omnibus Amendments No. 1) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Future Made in Australia Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Help to Buy Bill 2023 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Migration Amendment (Removal and Other Measures) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024 (presented and agreed in the House this week; the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Privacy and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Taxation (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendment)

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Multinational—Global and Domestic Minimum Tax) (Consequential) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Reserve Bank Reforms) Bill 2023 (the House agreed to Senate amendments)

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024 (the House agreed to Senate amendments).


On Thursday, 28 November 2024, the last sitting day of the year a total of 34 Bills were still before the House of Representatives.


Being read for the second time:

  • Transport Security Amendment (Security of Australia's Transport Sector) Bill 2024

  • Customs Amendment (Expedited Seizure and Disposal of Engineered Stone) Bill 2024

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Incentives and Integrity) Bill 2024

  • Health Legislation Amendment (Improved Medicare Integrity and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Workplace Gender Equality Amendment (Setting Gender Equality Targets) Bill 2024


Being read for the third time:

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Fairer for Families and Farmers and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Future Made in Australia (Production Tax Credits and Other Measures) Bill 2024


The following 27 Bills were passed by the House of Representatives in the space of 39 minutes as the House extended its last sitting day to the early morning of the next day, Friday 29 November 2024:


  • Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) Bill 2024

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Responsible Buy Now Pay Later and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Amendment Bill 2024

  • Migration Amendment (Removal and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2024

  • Sydney Airport Demand Management Amendment Bill 2024

  • Aged Care (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024

  • Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) Tax (Imposition) Bill 2024

  • Commonwealth Entities (Payment Surcharges) (Consequential Provisions and Other Matters) Bill 2024

  • Capital Works (Build to Rent Misuse Tax) Bill 2024

  • Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin) Bill 2024

  • Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2024

  • Future Made in Australia (Guarantee of Origin Charges) Bill 2024

  • Universities Accord (National Student Ombudsman) Bill 2024

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Fairer for Families and Farmers and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Superannuation (Objective) Bill 2023

  • Customs Tariff Amendment (Incorporation of Proposals and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Communications Legislation Amendment (Regional Broadcasting Continuity) Bill 2024

  • Crown References Amendment Bill 2023

  • Customs Amendment (ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Area Second Protocol

  • Implementation and Other Measures) Bill 2024

  • Midwife Professional Indemnity (Commonwealth Contribution) Scheme Amendment Bill 2024

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (2024 Tax and Other Measures No. 1) Bill 2024

  • Surveillance Legislation (Confirmation of Application) Bill 2024

  • Treasury Laws Amendment (Mergers and Acquisitions Reform) Bill 2024

  • Migration Amendment Bill 2024

  • Migration Amendment (Prohibiting Items in Immigration Detention Facilities) Bill 2024


Tuesday, 29 October 2024

Laffing at #FĂĽhrertuber Dutton......

 

 Deputy Sussan Ley & Liberal Party Leader Peter Dutton
Mark Knight







The Shot, 28 October 2024, excerpts:


34 thoughts I had while watching the Liberal Party conference


Ronnie Salt


To the ballroom of the Sydney Hyatt, (were you expecting West Wyalong?) where the Liberal Party’s 64th federal council conferencefestmeet is in full swing in June. I’m at home on a Sunday afternoon watching it back on Facebook and reading along with the comments from Brian and Raelene and Irene and Ron, who enjoys writing his comments in all capitals......


1. And we’re off. Sussan is wearing a fetching navy blazer to match all the other navy blazers at the two bridal tables on the stage full of white people. So very, very white. And navy – lots of navy.


2. Sussan says something about Peter being a leader and then does that head toss thing that reminds me of horses when their fly veil isn’t sitting on their head right.


3. No matter, Sussan has mercifully finished telling us all about Peter’s entire life story which nobody in Australia has ever heard before. Did you know he used to be in the police force? Stop it.


4. Sussan scurried back to her chair and here he comes, Peter Dutton, the Andrew Tate of Australian politics. Like Tate, hair-free and boring, he likes waggling the ToughMan persona-dildo in your face while nothing of any substance ever comes along to back it up.


5. Ron doesn’t seem to be bothered by that, GET RID OF THE GREENS!!


6. Oh, Peter is telling us that Sussan is a great friend of Women-In-The-Liberal-Party and a very good friend of something called Women-In-General. Not sure what Women-In-General he means, but it probably doesn’t include the attention-seeking missile Jacinta Price, who loves a good women’s uterus policing.


7. Immediately after Peter tells us how good Sussan and the Liberal party are for Women-In-General, he thanks the Liberal party president and the Liberal party treasurer and the Liberal party managers, who are all men called John and Charles and Andrew. Guess Sussan ain’t that great a friend of Women-In-The-Liberal-Party and Women-In-General after all.


8. He thanks yet another man, Jeremy Rockliffe, for being Tasmanian but I miss the part where he mentions the Rockliffe Government delaying charges in child sexual abuse cases that happened within the Tasmanian government, however Pete does tell us how exciting the Rockliffe Government will be for young people, and oh goodness what a clanger you dropped there Peter.....


10. Peter’s only seven minutes in and already the lady in the second row with one of those Prude & Trude black velvet hairbands (they must be compulsory) is checking her phone for emails. Have a fistful of mints Judith, cos Pete’s due to talk for 45 minutes and not even a bowl of blow is going to help you through this.


11. Apparently Australians cannot afford to buy a home, says the man who’s been in Parliament for 23 years and in government for 17. Did everyone know Peter and Mrs Peter sold one of their homes on the Gold Coast in 2022 for $6 million? Peter forgets to tell the audience this, too.


12. Yay. Here we go. Law, order and unity get their first call out and we’re only 10 minutes in. Peter has not yet referenced his nine years in the police, but there’s still time yet.


13. Peter is alarmed. There are radical Greens activists in the Teal’s midst. Why have the Teals never noticed them? Get Ron in the comments on the case. He’s seen them. Ron knows.


14. An annoying young journo is in the way of Judith the hair-band lady. She’s leaning over and giving him a good Karening.


15. Our Peter owns a little collection of Australian industries too, it seems. He’s talking about our miners, our farmers, our fishers and our foresters, but sadly no mention of our property developers, our $6 million Gold Coast apartment owners, and our billionaires who live in Singapore for tax purposes (wave to Gina everyone).


16. I’m worried about the journo. He’s a young’ish sort of fella. He’s not seasoned enough for the wrath of Judith from Double Bay. Run little journo boy, run.....


18. At 29:29 we hear, a Prime Minister cannot conduct themselves as somebody who is only there for sexual interests, and I’ve played it back and I think he might mean ‘sectional’, but ‘sexual’ is what Peter has said and I really don’t know what to say about that.


19. Peter has recently spoken to a man in the Cunter, which worries me until I replay it and realise it’s a man in the Hunter (Valley) and I’m not sure if Pete needs to see a speech therapist, or he’s just deathly tired, but this speech is getting very out there.


20. Peter thinks Anthony Albanese does not have a robust handle on nuclear. Does nuclear energy have a robust handle? And if it does, Peter sure doesn’t have one either. What in the name of stale conference room odour does it even mean? One day God herself is going to have to answer that one.


21. Nuclear! Nuclear! Nuclear for all! We will have so many jobs in the Cunter that people will be lining up to live there due to all the nuclear power stations that people want to live next to and somehow I think Peter’s telling us a bit of a fib here.


22. Peter is telling us the Liberal party will speak to Australians about nuclear power and consult with Australians about nuclear power and do costings with Australians about nuclear power and have meetings about nuclear power and lots of other sentences that include the words nuclear power, but sadly no information follows about the construction of stations for nuclear power or the timelines and money involved or where to read the full policy on nuclear power. What was that about Andrew Tate?


23. Aspiration dies where crime thrives. He looks very pleased with himself after that hilarious quip and so does the lanyard guy at the end of the bridal table who obviously wrote it cos he’s got that used-up radio ad man look about him....


25. The camera shows us the full room and they all have free Liberal Party travel mugs, so now you can recognise these people when they’re out in the wild at their lawn bowls clubs.


26. Judith is out of mints.


27. Raelene in the Facebook comments wants us to, Ask Albo what happens to all the waste of solar panels, batteries and turbines when they reach their use-by!? I assume Raelene has never seen the toxic wasteland of abandoned mines across the globe and the rising temperatures that are cooking the planet from those mine’s fossil fuel emissions, but you do you Raelene. (Narrator: it’s also clear these comments have been heavily censored, because every single comment is rejoicing in Sussan and Peter and everything Liberal. Either that or they’re handing out free nangs as well as free travel mugs.)


28. Peter is shifting to terrorism and immigration, which he says in the same sentence because that’s Peter’s safe place. But you go off king, while your ship is sinking, keep going.


29. Peter’s looking excited, which means he’s circling back to CRIME and LAW AND ORDER again. He gets a little glint in his eye when he’s talking about crime, like a penguin at feeding time.


30. Sorry, I dropped my laptop on my face because Peter’s just told me that highly credentialed politicians “like Dan Tehan” will help “restore Australia back to what it once was”, and even Judith looks like she ain’t swallowing that one, unlike the mints.


31. We’re working up for the big finish because the little journo boy and his camera are back, bravely facing danger in the untamed jungle of navy blazers and privilege and personalised travel mugs.


32. BORDERS, BORDERS, LAW AND ORDER, POWERS TO POLICE, CRIME, KNIFE SALES, GANGS, STOP AND SEARCH, INTERNET BADDIES, SOCIAL MEDIA BAD, CHILDREN COMMITTING CRIMES FOR LIKES, (unlike politicians), BAD BORDERS, SARAH HENDERSON IS IN CLASSROOMS WORKING AGAINST EXPLICIT SEXUAL THINKING (I have nothing to add there) BAD PEOPLE ARE EVERYWHERE, EVEN IN CLASSROOMS (probably get Sarah out of there then)......


Read the full article at

https://theshot.net.au/uncategorized/34-thoughts-i-had-while-watching-the-liberal-party-conference/