This blog is open to any who wish to comment on Australian society, the state of the environment or political shenanigans at Federal, State and Local Government level.
Showing posts with label Great Australian Bight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Great Australian Bight. Show all posts
Last month, Patagonia
Surf Ambassador Heath Joske joined an Australian delegation to Oslo,
Norway, taking the fight for the Bight directly to Equinor. The delegation was
led by Peter Owen from The Wilderness Society and included Aboriginal elder and
singer Bunna Lawrie and various local and international environmental groups.
The delegation met with Norwegian Indigenous Sami people to discuss their
shared experiences in the fight to protect their oceans and lands from
development by the oil industry.
The delegation also found support in the 500-strong crowd of local Norwegians
who joined them for a paddle out in the harbour in front of the city’s Opera
House. This peaceful protest was one of the largest paddle-out demonstrations
held in the country's history and members of the delegation were buoyed by the
camaraderie shown by the local community who braved near freezing water
temperatures in support of the Great Australian Bight.
“Borders were smashed and countries were united,” said Heath. “Thank you to the
people of Norway for supporting our pleas to save our southern seas! You turned
up in hundreds and screamed “Fight for the Bight!” with me, and when I stopped,
you kept screaming. That was incredibly moving and heartening.”
Taking on Goliath
The delegation also
attended Equinor’s Annual General Meeting in Stavanger where they presented a
shareholder proposal that the company should refrain from oil and gas
exploration and production activities in frontier areas (such as the Great
Australian Bight), immature areas and particularly sensitive areas. Heath Joske
also spoke at the AGM, taking to the stage to explain his connection to the
Bight as both a surfer and fisherman. Following the meeting, he personally
delivered over 300 letters from concerned Australian citizens to Equinor’s CEO,
Eldar Saetre.
“For the campaign, the AGM is not an end-point in any way,” says Norwegian
citizen and Great Australian Bight Alliance campaigner Rune Woldsnes. “It is a
step on the way to getting Equinor out of the Bight. There is no question the
Board got the message.”
Plans to drill in the middle of the Great Australian Bight have led to a fierce battle, as a Norwegian Energy giant faces off with Aussie surfers, environmentalists and fishermen. #TheProjectTVpic.twitter.com/2ppO02m0or
A Norwegian MP has
called for a state-owned Norwegian oil and gas company not to start drilling in
the Great Australian Bight, while a scientist says noise from the project could
hurt marine life.
It needs approval from
the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority.
MP Kristoffer Robin Haug
addressed the Norwegian Parliament last week and said going ahead with the
project could see Norway become the enemy.
"Will the
[Petroleum and Energy] Minister use this power as a majority shareholder in
Equinor to instruct their company to stop their oil exploration in the
Bight?" he asked.
New
research from The Australia Institute shows that 60% of Australians are
opposed to drilling for oil in the Great Australian Bight, while the rate of
opposition amongst South Australians is even higher at 68%.
The first ever national
poll on the issue found that only one in five Australians, and 16% of South
Australians, support drilling in the Bight, while more than two thirds of
Australians want to see the area given World Heritage protection.
The poll also found
there is greater support, both nationwide and in SA, for ending coal, gas and
oil exploration across Australia than there is for allowing it to continue.
“The Great Australian
Bight is a national treasure and now we know that people across the country
want to see it protected from exploitation,” said Noah Schultz-Byard, The
Australia Institute’s SA projects manager.
“Equinor and the other
oil giants looking to drill in the Great Australian Bight are attempting to do
so in direct opposition to the wishes of the Australian people.
“We’ve known for some
time that the Great Australian Bight holds a special place in the hearts of
South Australians, but this research has shown that opposition to exploiting
the Bight exists across the country.
The Norwegian Greens
Party has also adopted the Australian Greens slogan "Fight for the
Bight".
South Australian Greens
senator Sarah Hanson-Young said Mr Haug's speech showed the fight was now
receiving international attention.
"This is starting
to cause problems and waves overseas," Senator Hanson-Young said.
"People are questioning why Australia would put
at risk our beautiful pristine areas.
"This is a whale
sanctuary. This is an untouched wonderland. Why would we put this at
risk?"….
Protesters took to
Encounter Bay this morning to protest against oil drilling in the Great
Australian Bight.
Oil and gas testing is
set to take place in the Great Australian Bight this year, after the national
petroleum regulator granted permission to exploration company PGS.
Environmental groups
have slammed the decision to allow seismic testing near Kangaroo Island and
Port Lincoln, while the tuna industry has questioned whether it is even likely
to go ahead.
Seismic testing involves
firing soundwaves into the ocean floor to detect the presence of oil or gas
reserves….
The National Offshore
Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) granted
permission for the testing to be done over a 30,100-square-kilometre area,
located 80 kilometres from Port Lincoln and 90 kilometres west of Kangaroo
Island.
The testing is set to
take place between September and November.
The fishing industry has
long had reservations about the impact seismic testing would have on the local
tuna industry.
PGS has been ordered not
to interfere with or displace pygmy blue whales, southern bluefin tuna, and
southern right whales…..
The Wilderness Society
has slammed the permit, saying the practice can deafen whales and even kill
smaller marine animals.
"It's obvious that
blasting massive amounts of noise constantly for months on end through a water
column in a space where animals communicate and navigate and live by sound and
sonar, it is obvious that this is going to have a terrible impact on those
animals," the environmental group's Peter Owen said.
"I fail to see how
you can actually approve this type of seismic activity in the middle of one of
the most significant whale nurseries in the world.
"It's totally
unacceptable."
The Greens say the
seismic testing is the first step to drilling in the Great Australian Bight.
"Why on Earth would
we be wanting to sink oil wells in the Great Australian Bight, put our marine
life and beaches at risk and make climate change worse," senator Sarah
Hanson-Young said.
"We've got to be
getting out of fossil fuels and transitioning to a clean, green economy."
Commencing on
or about 1 September 2019 for an initial period of 91 days a fofeign-owned PGS survey vessel will
be operating sounding equipment 24/7 in the Bight at a seismic source pressure of est.
~2,000 pounds per square inch (psi) with the two or three arrays firing
alternately every 16.67 to 25 m, each with a maximum volume of 3260in. (See Duntroon
Multi-client 3D and 2D Marine Seismic Survey Environment Plan at pp.24-25).
This is what happened when
such testing went ahead in the Atlantic Ocean……..
Earthjustice is suing
the federal government to prevent seismic testing in the Atlantic Ocean. The
process involves the blasting of shockingly powerful seismic airguns every few
seconds for hours or even days on end and can cripple or kill marine life in the
search of offshore oil or gas deposits.
Earthjustice is challenging the
administration’s actions in court, and on Feb. 20, we joined a coalition of
other conservation groups asking a
federal judge to block the start of seismic airgun blasting in the Atlantic
Ocean until our case has been heard.
The tests, harmful in
their own right, are just the first step in the administration’s broader plans
to open up 90 percent of U.S. federal offshore waters to the fossil fuel
industry, despite widespread opposition from Americans across the nation.
BP p.l.c. is a British multinational oil and
gas company headquartered in London, UK.
It operates
in this country as BP Australia and Chevron.
On 11 October
2016 this multinational corporation announced it was not proceeding with its
exploration drilling programme in the Great
Australian Bight (GAB), offshore South Australia, in the foreseeable future.
It still owns
two oil/gas exploration leases in the GAB.
The Norwegian
multinational Equinor formerly Statoil Petroleum also holds two leases
in the same area and intends to drill an exploratory well in one of them by
October this year.
Last year in
October the Morrison Coalition Government
offered a new GAB acreage S18-1
for lease, with bids closing on 21 March 2019.
So it is well
to remember how Big Oil views Australia…….
Coastal towns would
benefit from an oil spill in the pristine Great Australian Bight because the
clean up would boost their economies, energy giant BP has claimed as part of
its controversial bid to drill in the sensitive marine zone.
BP, which has since withdrawn
the drilling plan, also told a federal government agency that a diesel spill
would be considered “socially acceptable”.
BP made the statements
in an environment plan submitted to the National Offshore Petroleum Safety and
Environmental Management Authority in March 2016.
The company had been
seeking to drill two wells off the South Australian coast, raising fears of an
environmental disaster akin to BP's 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in
the Gulf of Mexico.
Documents obtained under
Freedom of Information laws, first
published by London-based website Climate Home News, showed the
government authority had identified serious shortcomings with BPs environment
plan.
In a letter to BP, the
authority said a number of statements should be removed or supported by
analysis. They included BP's claim that “in most instances, the increased
activity associated with cleanup operations will be a welcome boost to local
economies”.
BP also claimed it had
not identified any social impacts arising from the event of a diesel spill and
“since there are no unresolved stakeholder concerns ... BP interprets this
event to be socially acceptable”.
In 2016, BP released
modelling showing a spill could hit land as far away as New South
Wales. The letters revealed that BP’s “worst case shoreline oiling scenario
predicts oiling of 650km coastline at 125 days after the spill, increasing to
750km after 300 days”. Nopsema had raised concerns over BP’s ability to
mobilise the people and equipment needed to clean up such a vast expanse of
coast.
If an oil spill happened
in the Great Australian Bight, it could reach as far east as Port Macquarie's
beaches, two thirds of the way up the New South Wales coast, according to a
leaked draft environment plan obtained by the ABC.
Under a "worst
credible case discharge" scenario, more than 10 grams of oil per square
metre could wash up on some of Australia's coasts, according to the document
authored by Norwegian oil company Equinor.
Maps show coastal areas
that could potentially be impacted, from above Sydney to Albany in Western
Australia.
Environmental group
Greenpeace, which obtained the leaked draft Oil Pollution Emergency Plan, said
it was the first time modelling had shown an oil spill could reach so far....
North Coast Voices no longer allows the Facebook Button sited at the end of each blog post to activate when it is clicked on by a reader.
This button has been deactivated because it has become clear that Facebook Inc. is not now and has never been a corporation genuinely committed to principles of digital privacy and security of Internet users' personal information and other associated data.
Unfortunately, because Blogger installs this button as part of a set, Gmail, Blog This!, Twitter, Pin Interest and Google + have also been deactivated and, we apologise to readers who may use these features.
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 19
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
[Adopted and proclaimed by United Nations General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948]
Hi! My name is Boy. I'm a male bi-coloured tabby cat. Ever since I discovered that Malcolm Turnbull's dogs were allowed to blog, I have been pestering Clarencegirl to allow me a small space on North Coast Voices.
A false flag musing: I have noticed one particular voice on Facebook which is Pollyanna-positive on the subject of the Port of Yamba becoming a designated cruise ship destination. What this gentleman doesn’t disclose is that, as a principal of Middle Star Pty Ltd, he could be thought to have a potential pecuniary interest due to the fact that this corporation (which has had an office in Grafton since 2012) provides consultancy services and tourismbusiness development services.
A religion & local government musing: On 11 October 2017 Clarence Valley Council has the Church of Jesus Christ Development Fund Inc in Sutherland Local Court No. 6 for a small claims hearing. It would appear that there may be a little issue in rendering unto Caesar. On 19 September 2017 an ordained minister of a religion (which was named by the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse in relation to 40 instances of historical child sexual abuse on the NSW North Coast) read the Opening Prayer at Council’s ordinary monthly meeting. Earlier in the year an ordained minister (from a church network alleged to have supported an overseas orphanage closed because of child abuse claims in 2013) read the Opening Prayer and an ordained minister (belonging to yet another church network accused of ignoring child sexual abuse in the US and racism in South Africa) read the Opening Prayer at yet another ordinary monthly meeting. Nice one councillors - you are covering yourselves with glory!
An investigative musing: Newcastle Herald, 12 August 2017: The state’s corruption watchdog has been asked to investigate the finances of the Awabakal Aboriginal Local Land Council, less than 12 months after the troubled organisation was placed into administration by the state government. The Newcastle Herald understands accounting firm PKF Lawler made the decision to refer the land council to the Independent Commission Against Corruption after discovering a number of irregularities during an audit of its financial statements.The results of the audit were recently presented to a meeting of Awabakal members. Administrator Terry Lawler did not respond when contacted by the Herald and a PKF Lawler spokesperson said it was unable to comment on the matter. Given the intricate web of company relationships that existed with at least one former board member it is not outside the realms of possibility that, if ICAC accepts this referral, then United Land Councils Limited (registered New Zealand) and United First Peoples Syndications Pty Ltd(registered Australia) might be interviewed. North Coast Voices readers will remember that on 15 August 2015 representatives of these two companied gave evidence before NSW Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee No. 6 INQUIRY INTO CROWN LAND. This evidence included advocating for a Yamba mega port.
A Nationals musing: Word around the traps is that NSW Nats MP for Clarence Chris Gulaptis has been talking up the notion of cruise ships visiting the Clarence River estuary. Fair dinkum! That man can be guaranteed to run with any bad idea put to him. I'm sure one or more cruise ships moored in the main navigation channel on a regular basis for one, two or three days is something other regular river users will really welcome. *pause for appreciation of irony* The draft of the smallest of the smaller cruise vessels is 3 metres and it would only stay safely afloat in that channel. Even the Yamba-Iluka ferry has been known to get momentarily stuck in silt/sand from time to time in Yamba Bay and even a very small cruise ship wouldn't be able to safely enter and exit Iluka Bay. You can bet your bottom dollar operators of cruise lines would soon be calling for dredging at the approach to the river mouth - and you know how well that goes down with the local residents.
A local councils musing: Which Northern Rivers council is on a low-key NSW Office of Local Government watch list courtesy of feet dragging by a past general manager?
A serial pest musing: I'm sure the Clarence Valley was thrilled to find that a well-known fantasist is active once again in the wee small hours of the morning treading a well-worn path of accusations involving police, local business owners and others.
An investigative musing: Which NSW North Coast council is batting to have the longest running code of conduct complaint investigation on record?
A which bank? musing: Despite a net profit last year of $9,227 million the Commonwealth Bank still insists on paying below Centrelink deeming rates interest on money held in Pensioner Security Accounts. One local wag says he’s waiting for the first bill from the bank charging him for the privilege of keeping his pension dollars at that bank.
A Daily Examiner musing: Just when you thought this newspaper could sink no lower under News Corp management, it continues to give column space to Andrew Bolt.
A thought to ponder musing: In case of bushfire or flood - do you have an emergency evacuation plan for the family pet?
An adoption musing: Every week on the NSW North Coast a number of cats and dogs find themselves without a home. If you want to do your bit and give one bundle of joy a new family, contact Happy Paws on 0419 404 766 or your local council pound.
When making comment defamatory statements, racist remarks, hate speech, incitement to violence, gratuitous insults, obscenities, sexual innuendo, active matters before the courts and linking to commercial products/promotions should be avoided.
Trolling will not be tolerated. Spam will not be accepted.
The blog administrator reserves the right to reject comments which ignore this policy.