Monday 23 December 2013

Yet another broken promise by the Abbott Government


Prior to its election on 7 September 2013 the Abbott Government promised to send an Australian customs vessel into the Southern Ocean during the present Japanese whaling season.

We now learn that it has instead decided to send an aircraft to monitor the whaling fleet and protest boats.

An aircraft which will have to turn around and return to home base once it has flown a mere 1,870 nautical miles or around 3,463 km.

According to the Department of the Environment’s Australian Antarctic Division the distance between Hobart and Casey Station in Antarctica is 3,443 km.

Adverse weather conditions, poor visibility and fuel consumption constraints are likely to mean that the Abbott Government will not have this lone aircraft within sight of the whaling fleet for more than a handful of days over the 3-4 month killing season.

Liberal Party MP Greg Hunt as Shadow Minister for Climate Action, Environment and Heritage.

Media Release announcing the Coalition Whale and Dolphin Protection Plan on 23 August 2013 during the federal election campaign:


Snapshot taken 22 December 2013

Greg Hunt as Minister for the Environment in the Abbott Government.

ABC News 22 December 2013:

The Federal Government will send a plane to the Southern Ocean in an effort to step up its monitoring of Japanese whaling fleets early next year.
Customs will send an A319 during the whaling season, which begins in January and ends in March.
A number of nations have recently warned environmentalists and whalers against taking action that endangers human life.
Environment Minister Greg Hunt says the Government is acting in the absence of a decision against whaling by the International Court of Justice.
He says it is important Australia has a monitoring presence in the area given the risk of confrontation between whalers and anti-whaling protestors in order to ensure both parties obey the law.
Minke whales
One of the smallest species of baleen whales, growing to nearly nine metres long and a weight of about 10 tonnes.
The most abundant baleen whale species and are found in all the world's oceans.
There are an estimated 800,000 worldwide.
The common minke and the Antarctic minke are distinguished by size and colour pattern differences.
There is also a dwarf minke species.
Feed primarily on krill and small fish and can gather in pods of hundreds of whales.
Pacific minkes reproduce year-round.
Japan has an International Whaling Committee permit to kill about 850 Antarctic minkes for 'scientific research'.
According to the Australian Government, their conservation status is listed as of "least concern".
"It will be to ensure that there is a presence to make sure that there is no conflict between the parties," he said.
"It will also be to make sure there is an awareness between the parties that the world is watching."

The aircraft in question



2014: What awaits Australian voters in the coming new year


The Australian Parliament is in recess until February 2014, state parliaments have likewise fallen silent, Christmas cheer and New Year’s revelling beckon.

Surely the coming year will give weary voters some respite from the constant politicking of their elected representatives and they can look forward to twelve months of Uneventful?

Before you get comfortable with that thought.......

2014 will bring:
Local government elections in South Australia
State elections in South Australia, Victoria and Tasmania
One federal by-election in the Griffith electorate in Queensland
A federal half-senate election in West Australia
The first Abbott Government Federal Budget

Happy New Year!

Sunday 22 December 2013

A cry for help from Melbourne suburbia


Kelly O'Dwyer (Liberal), the Member for Higgins, like her colleague Teresa Gambaro, desperately needs remedial lessons. Her colleague Christopher Pyne, Education Minister and Leader of the House, should provide her with the lessons.

Evidence of Ms O'Dwyer's need for help is provided in her entry in the register of members' interests dated 12 December 2013.




Is the former member for Higgins,'the world's greatest treasurer', tutoring Ms O'Dwyer?

Clarence Valley Council asked to explain its latest legal débâcle


In mid-November 2013 Clarence Valley Council General Manager Scott Greensill contacted The Daily Examiner to complain about a letter to the editor written by one John Catesby.

Heaven knows what he had to say about Mr. Catesby's latest letter (below) published on Page 8 of The Daily Examiner on 17 December 2013.

A letter  which had many Lower Clarence residents laughing into their morning coffees - because try as he might the general manager just can't silence debate on this issue and his attempts to control information to date have only resulted in an unleashing off the Streisand Effect.

Questions remain
The article in DEX (Wed 4.12.13) concerning the adjournment of the NSW Industrial Commission hearing of the unfair dismissal application by council's senior ranger against Clarence Valley Council is alarming.
Having dismissed the ranger more than 12 months ago; having engaged in protracted and no doubt very expensive legal process; and having subjected the ranger to what must have been enormous stress, humiliation, and embarrassment, Council has now decided to enter into "negotiations behind closed doors" rather than expose the findings of the Commission to the public.
As your editorial quite rightly suggests, the man's conduct and personal integrity remain in question. Worse, Council's actions could easily be interpreted as malicious, vindictive or incompetent. This is simply not acceptable. Justice has not been seen to be done.
Has this been an act of magnanimity by Council? Has it been an acknowledgment that perhaps the offence was not deserving of dismissal? Or is this an attempt to hide an incident created by a culture of threats and intimidation that has seriously backfired because one man had the courage to speak out?
There are just too many unanswered questions. Why did Council allow this to drag on for 12 months if this outcome appears now to have been not only possible but highly likely? Where did Council get its advice to dismiss the Ranger in the first instance and on what grounds? Who are the people in Council with the expertise in these areas and just what is this "expertise", because from where I stand it doesn't appear to be all that flash.
What is going on in this Council and, in particular, in Council's Industrial Relations and Legal Department? We ratepayers are entitled to the answers.
John Catesby
Maclean