Snapshot of ABC TV Mad As Hell image
Friday 7 July 2017
The fight continues in US Court of Appeal against Trump's 'Muslim Travel Ban'
Business Insider, 29 June 2017:
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - The state of Hawaii asked a federal judge in Honolulu on Thursday to clarify a US Supreme Court ruling that reinstated parts of President Donald Trump's revised travel ban, arguing that the Trump administration had interpreted the court's decision too narrowly.
In a court filing, Hawaii said the US government intended to violate the Supreme Court's instructions by improperly excluding from the United States people who actually have a close family relationship to US persons.
The 90-day ban took effect at 8 p.m. ET along with a 120-day ban on all refugees.
On Monday, the Supreme Court revived parts of a travel ban on people from six Muslim-majority countries, narrowing the scope of lower court rulings that had blocked parts of a March 6 executive order and allowing his temporary ban to go into effect for people with no strong ties to the United States.
The court agreed to hear arguments during its next term starting in October to decide finally whether the ban is lawful.
The Supreme Court exempted from the ban travelers and refugees with a "bona fide relationship" with a person or entity in the United States. As an example, the court said those with a "close familial relationship" with someone in the United States would be covered.
The Trump administration decided on the basis of its interpretation of the court's language that grandparents, grandchildren and fiancés traveling from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen would be barred from obtaining visas while the ban was in place.
In its court filing, Hawaii echoed criticism from immigrant and refugee groups that the Trump administration had defined too narrowly who should be exempted.
Hawaii called the refusal to recognize grandparents, fiancés, and other relatives as an acceptable family relationship " a plain violation of the Supreme Court's command."
The State of Hawaii’s latest motion is Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050- DKW-KSC EMERGENCY MOTION TO CLARIFY SCOPE OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Around the same time this motion was filed, the Trump administration announced on the US State Department website that it was removing “fiancé” from the list of relationships not considered bona fide:
Upon further review, fiances are now included as close family members.
UPDATE
U.S. Court of
Appeals for the 9th Circuit is reported in The Guardian to have ruled on 7 July 2017 that it did
not have jurisdiction to weigh in on this particular aspect of the matter:
In a statement, Hawaii
Attorney General Douglas S. Chin said the ruling “makes clear that Judge Watson
does possess the ability to interpret and enforce the Supreme Court’s order, as
well as the authority to enjoin against a party’s violation of the Supreme
Court’s order placing effective limitations on the scope of the district
court’s preliminary injunction.”
Thursday 6 July 2017
Yet another Liberal-Nationals publicly funded program ripe for rorting by the private sector
HuffPost, 3 April 2017:
CANBERRA – A voluntary internship program, designed to get young people eventually into work, has just been kicked off by the Turnbull Government despite widespread concern about its efficacy and potential for youth exploitation.
Under the Youth Jobs PaTH Program, an unemployed or disadvantage young person under 25 years will be paid an extra $200 a fortnight "incentive" on top of the usual income support payments to complete an internship of between four to 12 weeks….
Businesses partaking in the program will receive an upfront bonus of $1,000 for taking on an intern and get an additional $6,500 if the internship turns into a job.
The Guardian, 3 April 2017:
The Turnbull government launched its Prepare, Train and Hire (PaTH) internship program on Monday despite the legislation for its full implementation being stuck in the Senate.
Implementing the internships without legislation could cost workers up to $42 a fortnight, because the $200 a fortnight they receive for taking on work placements will count as income that reduces their other social security payments.
HuffPost, 3 July 2017:
Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull trumpeted a breakthrough for his government's controversial PaTH internship program on Monday, as he unveiled a plan for 10,000 retail interns, but the businesses onboard with the plan have come under fire over previous penalties for mistreating and underpaying workers.
The PaTH plan -- Prepare, Trial, Hire -- was announced in the 2016 budget, designed as a way to get young unemployed people into job training and work experience programs, with a view to getting them off welfare and into paid employment. The job skills training is compulsory, but participating in an internship is voluntary, and completing up to 25 hours a week gives "interns" an extra $200 on top of their existing welfare payments. Businesses that take on interns would also receive thousands in financial incentives.
Unions and workers groups slammed the idea, claiming it would lead to "churn" culture where businesses would stop employing casual or part-time employees who the business itself has to pay, and instead sign up to receive a revolving door of interns who the business not only does not pay, but actually gets paid to take on.
On Monday, Turnbull joined employment minister Michaelia Cash to announce the Australian Retailers Association would "partner" with the government to offer up to 10,000 internships through the PaTH program. News Corp reported that retailers including Battery World, Coffee Club, Bright Eyes and Bakers Delight will participate in the program, but opponents have seized on the recent history of some of those businesses.
"The employers that have signed up to the Youth Path program don't have a good track record treating their workers with respect," said Labor's shadow employment minister Brendan O'Connor and shadow minister for employment services Ed Husic.
"Bakers Delight apprentices, and assistants were reimbursed almost $40,000 after the Fair Work Ombudsman found they were being underpaid. A former Coffee Club franchisee in Brisbane was fined more than $180,000 in penalties for contraventions including an unlawful cash back payment."
The Coffee Club decision was announced on the government's own Fair Work Ombudsman website just two weeks ago.
"The Turnbull Government can't explain how the Youth PaTh program won't displace jobs that could go to full-paid employees. The Government has not outlined how its agreement with retailers will stop subsidised workers from being used by some retailers to avoid paying penalty rates -- by engaging subsidised, so-called 'interns' in penalty shifts that would normally be staffed by employees," Husic and O'Connor said.
SBS News, 4 July 2017:
On Monday, Minister Cash sought to assure potential interns that they would have a decent chance of getting a job at the end of their placement…..
Australian Council of Trade Unions president Ged Kearney said the program offered no path to qualification, employment or workforce protection.
"This is a government-sanctioned program that actually borders on slavery," she told reporters in Melbourne.
"If this does create new jobs, then pay the kids for the jobs. Pay them a wage. They're going to be productive. They're going to be contributing to the bottom line of these businesses."
Trump's America reaches dangerous toxicity levels
The United States of America is becoming a nation to fear.
If the checks and balances within its political structure continue to fracture and the propaganda narrative that those who oppose the Trump Regime are 'evil' grows in volume and intensity, then a destabilised, disintegrating America gone rogue lurching across the international stage is likely to injure us all.
US President Donald J. Trump at a Washington faith rally on Saturday, 1 July 2017
National Rifle Association of America call to arms against citizens who oppose Trump
Somehow this
scenario doesn’t seem so farfetched anymore:
Business
Insider, 3
May 2017:
TIMOTHY SNYDER: So,
it’s really important, I think, to accept the logic of our constitutional
structure. The logic of our constitutional structure is not that Americans are
great. The logic of our constitutional structure is that Americans are people
and people have weaknesses.
When the framers of the
Constitution were setting up our system, they weren’t thinking about how
wonderful we were gonna turn out to be, which is a good thing because we’re not
always so wonderful. They were thinking about the structures that would be
needed to preserve a Democratic Republic overtime. So the right mood is always
scepticism. The framers of the Constitution were worried that someone might
come along at some point who could be elected president. This was precisely
their worry, who didn’t have concern about the rule of law or about democracy.
We are now in that situation.
Up until now, there is
nothing in Mr. Trump’s words or in his actions which would convince us or which
would even suggest that he cares even a little bit about democracy or about the
rule of law. On the contrary, there are plenty of things he said like
referring to judges as “so-called” judges, referring to journalists as enemies
of the people, talking about “America First” and indulging other kinds of
nostalgia for the 1930’s, which suggests he doesn’t like democracy at all. His
admiration tends to be limited to foreign tyrants.
So we need to be
sceptical about ourselves and we need more than sceptical about him. What I
would say is that our institutions were set up for a moment just like this one
but they will only protect us if we enliven them and if we support them.
Wednesday 5 July 2017
Would you trust these men with your personal health information?
The darknet
vendor says they are “exploiting a vulnerability which has a much more solid
foundation which means not only will it be a lot faster and easier for myself,
but it will be here to stay. I hope, lol.” [The
Guardian, 4 July 2017]
Left to Right: Minister for Human Services and Liberal MP for Aston, Alan Tudge
& Minister for Health and Liberal MP for Flinders, Greg Hunt
These two federal politicians have portfolio responsibility for some of the largest government databases in Australia.
One has portfolio responsibility for those sensitive e-health records which are due to be rolled out nationally on an opt-out basis by 2020.
One has portfolio responsibility for those sensitive e-health records which are due to be rolled out nationally on an opt-out basis by 2020.
This is how secure your personal information is on their watch…….
The Sydney Morning Herald, 4 July 2017:
The Australian Federal Police is investigating reports Australians' personal Medicare details are being accessed and sold on the dark web, an apparent breach that has been labelled an "internet catastrophe".
According to a Guardian Australia report, an online vendor can pull up the full Medicare card details of any Australian on request — and is selling them for around $30 each — indicating a security hole somewhere in the health system.
Human Services Minister Alan Tudge said the government was taking the matter seriously.
The sales are reportedly listed on an undisclosed dark web marketplace, in which the vendor claims to be "exploiting a vulnerability" in order to run software that pulls the data. The vendor calls it "the Medicare Machine".
"Leave the first and last name, and DOB of any Australian citizen, and you will receive their Medicare patient details in full", the listing says, adding that the nature of the security hole being utilised means the vendor will be "here to stay".
In a statement, Mr Tudge said any authorised access to Medicare card numbers was "of great concern" and his department was also conducting its own investigation.
Medicare's database was always a honeypot waiting to be exploited once governments embraced data matching, data retention and data sharing with much enthusiasm but little understanding.
Once someone decides they want your Medicare details ID theft is now just 0.0089 bitcoin away - as is your abusive former spouse/partner or that anonymous stalker or Internet troll that has been making your life a misery.
Medicare's database was always a honeypot waiting to be exploited once governments embraced data matching, data retention and data sharing with much enthusiasm but little understanding.
Once someone decides they want your Medicare details ID theft is now just 0.0089 bitcoin away - as is your abusive former spouse/partner or that anonymous stalker or Internet troll that has been making your life a misery.
UPDATE
Anthony
Baxter, 4 July
2017:
You supply the person with name, date
of birth and gender and around $30 of Bitcoin they'll give you the person's
Medicare number. This is pretty bad, as it allows idemtity thieves to forge
them - a Medicare card is usually worth 25 points on the standard 100 point ID
check here. The AU govt had no idea this was happening until the journo from
The Guardian let them know.
It turns out there's a portal that any health care provider can use to look up Medicare numbers this way. In case you've lost your card or whatever. Likely it's someone who works for one of them selling access, or someone's popped a PC there (more on that to come).
When asked, the relevant government minister (the same guy who presided over the Census fuckup last year (update: I misremembered, that was a different clown), the accidental publishing of PBS data that was poorly deidentified and the ongoing Centrelink robodebt nightmare) claimed it's OK because you can't get access to someone's medical records through the shiny new online electronic health records system with just a Medicare number. Aside from ignoring the ID theft issue there's a liiiiiittle bit of an issue here.
Guess what information you need along with the Medicare number to pull someone's medical records? Did you guess "name, date of birth and gender"? Collect your prize.
According to https://www.itnews.com.au/news/govt-blames-medicare-card-breach-on-traditional-crims-467502 the folks who did the Privacy Impact Assessment on the electronic health records system were told it would be secure because you needed Medicare number as well as name/DOB/gender and weren't told you could use the latter to look up the former.
It Gets Worse.
In theory you can only look up this stuff from a secure endpoint, with a client side certificate installed. Which in practice means maybe 20K PCs scattered across every doctors office in the country. Worse still, many of these client certs were originally sent out via unencrypted email, and a nontrivial number were "lost". And you reckon all or even a significant fraction of these 20K boxes are running modern Windows with up to date patches? Me neither. I can't count the number of times I've been left alone in a room with an unlocked doctor's PC while he went to check something.
It (Incredibly) Gets Even Worse.
They have a Two Factor Auth system which doctors are supposed to use. One of the ways to get the 2FA key is, and I wish I was joking here, email.
So get access to a box running some XP/Win7 version that's ludicrously unpatched that's also logged into the doctors email, collect health care records. Australian government cannot computer.
At the moment the electronic health records thing is opt-in, at some point next year they'll be moving to an opt-out scheme with a window to opt-out. There's an email form here https://myhealthrecord.gov.au/internet/mhr/publishing.nsf/content/home where you can sign up to be notified when the window to opt the hell out is opened and I urge everyone to do so ASAP.
It turns out there's a portal that any health care provider can use to look up Medicare numbers this way. In case you've lost your card or whatever. Likely it's someone who works for one of them selling access, or someone's popped a PC there (more on that to come).
When asked, the relevant government minister (the same guy who presided over the Census fuckup last year (update: I misremembered, that was a different clown), the accidental publishing of PBS data that was poorly deidentified and the ongoing Centrelink robodebt nightmare) claimed it's OK because you can't get access to someone's medical records through the shiny new online electronic health records system with just a Medicare number. Aside from ignoring the ID theft issue there's a liiiiiittle bit of an issue here.
Guess what information you need along with the Medicare number to pull someone's medical records? Did you guess "name, date of birth and gender"? Collect your prize.
According to https://www.itnews.com.au/news/govt-blames-medicare-card-breach-on-traditional-crims-467502 the folks who did the Privacy Impact Assessment on the electronic health records system were told it would be secure because you needed Medicare number as well as name/DOB/gender and weren't told you could use the latter to look up the former.
It Gets Worse.
In theory you can only look up this stuff from a secure endpoint, with a client side certificate installed. Which in practice means maybe 20K PCs scattered across every doctors office in the country. Worse still, many of these client certs were originally sent out via unencrypted email, and a nontrivial number were "lost". And you reckon all or even a significant fraction of these 20K boxes are running modern Windows with up to date patches? Me neither. I can't count the number of times I've been left alone in a room with an unlocked doctor's PC while he went to check something.
It (Incredibly) Gets Even Worse.
They have a Two Factor Auth system which doctors are supposed to use. One of the ways to get the 2FA key is, and I wish I was joking here, email.
So get access to a box running some XP/Win7 version that's ludicrously unpatched that's also logged into the doctors email, collect health care records. Australian government cannot computer.
At the moment the electronic health records thing is opt-in, at some point next year they'll be moving to an opt-out scheme with a window to opt-out. There's an email form here https://myhealthrecord.gov.au/internet/mhr/publishing.nsf/content/home where you can sign up to be notified when the window to opt the hell out is opened and I urge everyone to do so ASAP.
UPDATE
The federal government
was warned more than three years ago of security deficiencies surrounding
personal Medicare data, with the Department of Human Services told it was not
fully complying with spy agency rules.
Questioning the
department's ability to keep the data safe from "security threats
from external and internal sources", the government auditor made
a series of recommendations in April 2014 but it is unclear if they were fully
implemented.
Unique International College Pty Ltd could face multi-million-dollar fines
Yet another example of the Australian Government’s failed vocational education privatisation policy ……..
On 12 February 2016 Unique International College Pty Ltd had its membership of the Australian Council for Private Education and Training terminated – this was challenged by the company and that matter is still before the Supreme Court,
On 18 April 2017 Unique International College’s VET Provider Approval was revoked.
At that point students who had been enrolled under VET in the college’s Diploma of Management, Advanced Diploma of Management, Diploma of Salon Management and Diploma of Marketing were liable for individual debts of up to $25,000.
By the time this ‘college’ came to the attention of the Australian Consumer Affairs Commission in 2015 its annual income after tax had reached $33.7 million.
During the subsequent court case Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Unique International College [2017] FCA 727 (30 June 2017):
It was alleged that Unique had targeted particular locations for enrolment purposes. These towns and cities were said to be situated in areas where inhabitants were generally people of lower socio-economic means and/or were comprised of a higher percentage of indigenous persons than the average eastern Australian town or city. These locations were said to include: Bankstown, Boggabilla, Bourke, Brewarrina, Emerton, Moree, Taree, Toomelah, Walgett, Wagga Wagga and Granville. At these locations it is then said that Unique conducted marketing operations by, inter alia, calling on consumers at their homes for the purpose of conducting group marketing activities. At these group marketing events, it is alleged that Unique’s staff told the attendees that its courses were free or free until they reached a particular level of income following completion of their chosen course. At the same time, free laptops were allegedly handed out to those who signed up. It is also alleged that the staff were on remuneration arrangements which were based on the number of students whom they were able to convince to enrol.
The Federal Court judgment found that:
The Applicants’ case was that Unique had a ‘system of conduct or pattern of behaviour’ within the meaning of s 21(4)(b) of the ACL. The four features of the Applicants’ case on this which I have accepted are:
(a) the strategy of targeting disadvantaged people by reference to indigeneity, remoteness and social disadvantage (whether deliberate in its original conception or not);
(b) the use of gifts of laptops or iPads to students signing (or loan computers after 31 March 2015);
(c) the use of incentives to staff to encourage them to sign up students; and
(d) the holding of sign-up meetings…..
(b) the use of gifts of laptops or iPads to students signing (or loan computers after 31 March 2015);
(c) the use of incentives to staff to encourage them to sign up students; and
(d) the holding of sign-up meetings…..
The effect of the system in (b) to (d) was to supercharge the exploitation of the disadvantaged group which was being targeted (and also Unique’s remarkable profits). The system was unconscionable within the meaning of s 21.
ABC News reported the matter on 30 June 2017:
A private college in Sydney breached consumer law when it signed up thousands of students to loans without them knowing, the Federal Court has ruled.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) took action against the Unique International College in Granville.
It alleged the training college, owned by Amarjit Singh, misled up to 3,600 people when it enrolled them in courses, giving them free laptops and telling them the class was free when in fact they were incurring VET FEE-HELP loans of up to $25,000.
The debt would be payable if they earned more than $54,126 per annum……
Judge Nye Perram found the college made false representations and engaged in a pattern of behaviour that amounted to unconscionable conduct in breach of Australian Consumer Law.
Mr Sims said it was a significant victory and the college could face multi-million-dollar fines.
"Our focus is now on ensuring that the affected customers will not remain in debt because of Unique's exploitative behaviour," he said.
Tuesday 4 July 2017
The man intent on bringing down the Liberal Party of Australia
Driven by what looks suspiciously like an increasingly desperate and insatiable need for revenge, sacked prime minister and now ‘humble’ backbencher, Anthony John ‘Tony’ Abbott MP …….
Tony #Abbott is running amok and it's causing the Liberal Party a world of pain, says @barriecassidy. #insidersextra #insiders #auspol pic.twitter.com/zbLHkWUXJq— Insiders ABC (@InsidersABC) June 30, 2017
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
