Sunday 7 October 2012
The State Infrastructure Strategy 2012 - 2032: Cheat Sheet for NSW North Coast residents and other users of the Pacific Highway
Selected quotes from this document concerning the Pacific Highway upgrade – in which Greiner et al recognise the economic importance of this highway, the safety issues for users** and, then recommend that upgrade funding first go towards that road leg closest to Sydney while pushing out the completion schedule for North Coast sections until 2022 and suggesting drivers might possibily have to pay a toll or similar tax:
Duplication of the Pacific Highway and the Princes
Highway (to the Jervis Bay turnoff) are critical for
economic growth along the coast. Inland, freight access
needs to be improved through a bridge replacement
program and investments to fix identified bottlenecks on
both railways and roads.
2012-17 Pacific Highway and Princes Highway: review scope and costs,
then continue construction*
* Indicates project recommendations that are existing Government commitments.
2017-22 Complete duplication of Pacific Highway and Princes Highway
(to Jervis Bay turnoff)*
A number of major road programs are underway.
These include upgrades to the Pacific Highway
and Princes Highway. Getting the best value for
these major investments is essential. Infrastructure
NSW is concerned that cost estimates for these
programs appear very high.
Major investment has been undertaken in recent years
on the regional road network in Regional NSW. This
has been supported by Commonwealth Government
funding through the Nation Building Program, which
will invest around $11 billion in regional NSW’s roads
over the period from 2008-09 to 2013-14. Projects
have included investment in the duplication of the
Hume and Pacific Highways, and in new routes such
as the Hunter Expressway.
The ongoing Pacific Highway duplication is
one of the largest infrastructure programs in the State.
10.6.2. Duplicating the Pacific Highway
Current Status
The Pacific Highway runs 670 kilometres from the F3 at
Hexham to the Queensland border. It carries over half the
freight task between Sydney and Brisbane, as well as a mix
of long distance and local vehicle traffic. Road safety has
been another major driver of investment in this corridor.
As at April 2012, 52 percent of the Highway
(346 kilometre) had been upgraded to dual carriageway
and another nine percent (60 kilometre) was under
construction. A further $7.7 billion is forecast to be
needed for remaining unfunded works (giving a total
program cost of over $16 billion). The NSW and
Commonwealth Governments are in discussion around
funding options for remaining works.
Scope of Remaining Work
The remaining undivided sections of the Pacific Highway
comprise two main sections:
• Port Macquarie to Urunga
• Woolgoolga to Ballina
The economic merit of the remaining sections is
much lower at 0.8 (Benefit Cost Ratio) than that of the
Highway as a whole31. This reflects the relatively low
traffic volumes on the remaining sections – for example
the traffic between Woolgoolga and Ballina is generally
below 10,000 vehicles per day.
Given competing priorities for NSW and Commonwealth
Government funds, the high cost and relatively limited
benefits of these remaining sections raises questions
about the:
• relative merit of prioritising busier sections of the
Pacific Highway corridor for upgrade sooner,
(in particular from the F3 to Raymond Terrace
40,000 vehicles per day)
• appropriate scope of works and priority for those
sections with relatively light traffic.
Construction costs
Construction costs on the Pacific Highway appear to have
increased significantly as the upgrades have progressed.
The cost of the currently unfunded sections are estimated
to be some 20–40 percent more per kilometre than the
already delivered or committed sections, even after
allowing for normal industry cost escalation32.
Current highway planning seems more focussed on
delivering an outstanding engineering outcome than
on controlling costs. The Ballina Bypass provides a
recent illustration of the consequences of having high
performance standards. For 12 kilometres of new road,
the cost was $640 million – more than twice the cost per
kilometre of previous sections33.
Given the scale of the forecast spending and the limited
resources available, Infrastructure NSW recommends
that now is an appropriate time for an independent review
of the scope of work, with a focus on value engineering
(discussed in section 16). The independent review
should also consider how constraints such as work
practices and planning approval conditions are adding
to the budget.
RMS should also consider options to improve
contracting efficiency. Currently the Highway is being
constructed through a large number of different
contracts, which reduces the scope for economies
of scale and in practice limits potential bidders to
local suppliers.
Lower costs may be achieved if the remaining unfunded
sections were issued as fewer, but much larger
packages, which may attract international suppliers and
increase competitive pressure.
Given the scale of major road programs in
Regional NSW, action is needed to contain costs and
where possible, particularly with the Pacific Highway
and Princes Highway programs. Finite funding means
the alternative is likely to be further delay in delivering
these programs.
In many cases, pinch point upgrades will be sufficient
to meet the transport demands placed on the regional
roads network over the next 20 years.
Commonwealth
Commonwealth funding may augment the funding
options under the State’s control. The Federal
Government has made significant contributions to NSW
infrastructure projects in recent years, particularly the
Pacific Highway, freight rail upgrades and the M7.
Infrastructure Australia has identified a number
of key themes and challenges that are consistent
with the approach taken by Infrastructure NSW. In
particular there is a shared focus on improving the
liveability and productivity of our cities, the efficiency
of our international gateways and the prosperity of
regional areas.
The challenge is to ensure that NSW’s infrastructure
projects are best positioned to secure Commonwealth
support going forward. This requires a more rigorous
approach to planning and selecting projects for
submission to Infrastructure Australia, as well as a
more thorough exposition of their benefits relative to
Infrastructure Australia’s priorities.
Nonetheless it must be recognised that current fiscal
pressures at the Federal level mean that Commonwealth
support cannot be seen as an alternative to the other
funding strategies set out in this section, in particular the
user funding options.
** NSW Parliament Hansard records that there have been 555 fatalities on the Pacific Highway between 1997 and early 2012. The Daily Examiner on 5 October stated that; In the
past year 107 people lost their lives on the road north of Newcastle.
Michael Gawenda makes a bit of an ass of himself over Alan Jones
Michael Gawenda in the Business Spectator on 3rd October 2012:
Er, Alan’s show can only be heard in Sydney? Even though it’s syndicated
and carried by radio stations as far away as Darwin?
Michael
needs to talk with 2GB
which says that Jones can be heard on:
2BS AM 1503 Bathurst
2CC AM 1206 Canberra
2CS FM 106.3 Coffs Harbour
2GB AM 873 Sydney
2GN AM 1368 Goulburn
2GZ FM 105.1 Orange
2LT AM 900 Lithgow
2MC FM 100.7 Port Macquarie
2RG AM 963 Griffith
2WG AM 1152 Wagga Wagga
2XL AM 918 Cooma
3MA FM 97.9 Mildura
4AM AM 558 Mareeba
4CA AM 846 Cairns
4GC AM 828 Charters Towers
4K1G FM 107.1 Townsville/ Cape York/Gulf of Carpentaria
4KZ AM 531 Innisfail
4LG AM 1098 Longreach
4MK AM 1026 Mackay
4RO AM 990 Rockhampton
4GR AM 864 Toowoomba
104.1 Territory FM
5SE AM 963 Mt Gambier
MIXFM 103.5 Maryborough
99.5 Flow FM Kapunda
104.1 Territory FM
4OUR Moreton Bay 101.5
Labels:
radio
Saturday 6 October 2012
Quite rightly, Mr. Hunt is not amused
Letter to the Editor in The Daily Examiner 4 October 2012:
I WAS not at the CVC Extraordinary Meeting September 25, but having read the business papers I wonder whether Mr Deefholts was there.
His claim that "Cr Karen Toms a caravan park operator in the Lower Clarence, opposed a council staff initiative to have Grafton declared an RV Friendly Town" (Time to be RV Friendly) appears to be incorrect.
One thing that came across loud and clear during the council elections was the failure of the past council to implement "due process", particularly the failure of public notification or community consultation.
At the very first meeting of council, "due process" (or the failure thereof) raised its ugly head.
From reading the business papers it appeared to me that it was another example of senior council staff endeavouring to dictate council policy, taking shortcuts in a laidback style of local governance, where ratepayers suddenly find their lives affected by a council decision of which they were never consulted or made aware.
It is my understanding that it is part of the role of the mayor to set council agenda.
If Mr Deefholts is concerned at the time it has taken to have Grafton declared an RV Friendly Town, he had the opportunity to search for the truth and write a very informative news article.
Instead he chose a news headline and commented without any factual foundation or legal substance.
I, like many of your readers, would like to know the whole facts of this story and it is not too late to publish it before the next "thumbs down" edition is published.
Ray Hunt
Yamba
An Open Letter To Margie Abbott
Dear Margie,
You have been out there this week telling the world that your husband is a wonderful, sensitive and caring husband and father.
Radio, television and newspapers have been full of your opinions on this subject.
I’ve seen the direct quotes and I’m sure you are sincere, that you are indeed speaking up for 'the man I love'.
However, your belief that many people think that because a man has the cauliflower ears of a rugby player, continues to play sport and spends a fair number of weekends volunteering as a firefighter or lifesaver, that somehow it is all proof that he is a boofy bloke who is anti-women cannot go unchallenged.
I for one do not have reservations about Tony Abbott based on any of those things.
My concerns are grounded in literally years of listening to your husband on his feet in the Australian Parliament, of watching him during televised interviews, reading his speech transcripts, press statements, published articles and his book, Battlelines.
In his role as a politician both in and out of government, he has often left me open mouthed with astonishment at the depth of his ideologically-driven antipathy towards women who are not part of his family or friendship circle – the 11.3 million or so of us that are Australian females in the general population.
So Margie, while I admire your loyalty to the man I won’t be voting for the politician in the 2013 general election.
Hell will freeze over first.
clarencegirl
Labels:
politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)