Saturday 20 October 2012
ACT Election 20 October 2012 - Virtual Tally Room live updates
The approaching storm about to engulf the NSW North Coast
When NSW Labor was swept from power 18 months ago, no issue symbolised the community’s frustration more than a notorious law known as Part 3A.
Part 3A gave the state government the power to remove decision-making on "significant" proposals from local councils and hand it to the minister, who could either make a decision or appoint an expert panels. Around NSW, community groups found that controversial developments were removed from their local councils……
Eventually, the NSW Minister for Planning Brad Hazzard appointed Tim Moore — an ex-minister for planning in a former Liberal government and former judge of the Land and Environment Court — and lawyer Ron Dyer to conduct a review.
Their review was expected to be the basis for a green paper, which was subsequently published in June. After a further consultation period, a white paper and draft legislation will be released later this year. When passed, this bill is expected to become the new planning legal framework, replacing the 1979 act, which was passed after the Green Ban period but has been constantly amended since.
The Moore/Dyer review found the key objective of planning reform should be to "provide an ecologically, economically and socially sustainable framework". But when the green paper appeared, this and many other recommendations had disappeared. Now the first objective was "economic development and competitiveness". The underlying philosophy was now pro-growth and pro-developer.
Community groups which had welcomed the solid consultation process of the review now found that the paper proposed less rights for community consultation than now exist. Under the new regime, communites would be engaged in forming broad regional plans, but once guidelines were in place they would not be consulted on developments in their local neighbourhoods.
Developers, on the other hand, could apply for rezonings, even if these did not fit with regional guidelines. If council decisions went against developers they could appeal to non-elected Regional Planning Boards that may include developer representatives. There would also be more opportunity in the new system for checking off proposals against a list of criteria, using certificates supplied by developer consultants. [New Matilda 19 October 2012]
Rapacious land developers and real estate agents are about to be given carte blanche by the O’Farrell Government and, it is hard to see the situation ending well for coastal communities in particular when this pivitol recommendation set out below is apparently being rejected.
The Hon Tim Moore and The Hon Ron Dyer (May 2012) Recommendations of the Independent Review of the NSW Planning System:
A new legislative framework
The reforms need to be set out in a new legislative framework – one founded on three new
Acts of Parliament:
• a Sustainable Planning Act – to establish the framework for a reformed
planning system
• a Planning Commission Act – to establish the composition, powers and functions of
an independent Planning Commission
• a Spatial Information Act – to facilitate a ‘whole of government’ approach to
the application of information technology to spatial data (and not confined to
planning information).
The principal new legislation – the Sustainable Planning Act – will contain the major
elements of the reformed framework. It will be in a plain English, narrative form. Technical
aspects will be in schedules to the Act or in regulations (separate ones for different topics).
Although foreshadowed in this Volume, the discussion of and detailed recommendations for the proposed Planning Commission Act and proposed Spatial Information Act will be set out in Volume 2.
The Sustainable Planning Act will have a single overarching object:
The object of this Act is to provide an ecologically, economically and socially sustainable
framework for land use planning and for development proposal assessment and
determination together with the necessary ancillary legislative provisions to support
this framework.
The Act is structured to set out the elements necessary for this broad object and to
provide more detailed objects relevant to the planning processes.
The current O’Farrell-Stoner-Hazzard plan encapsulated:
individuals and markets are best placed to deliver diverse choices, vibrant communities and strong and sustainable economies
It should be noted that at least one of the NSW National Party MPs representing the North Coast, Chris Gualptis, is a former land developer.
Yamba developer grows wordy
The Daily Examiner published his needless rant on 18 October.
Is the rather arrogant Mr. Mitchell signaling that he will only accept an unconditional 100 per cent vote from councillors in future?
Apparently David Mitchell may have to look in the mirror when asking what or who changed Cr McKenna's mind.
A letter in reply from Cr. Margaret McKenna, published on 20 October, reveals that an email he sent her before the committee meeting caused her to later ask for staff comment on its contents and she; took their answer into my further deliberations for the council meeting.
The words hoist and petard come to mind.
Mitt Romney: the shot heard round the world
Arrggh!
I shot my foots! cries Mitt Romney after he said this:
So
now Teh Netz has Binders Full of Women
(tumblr), Binders Full of Women
(Facebook) and #bindersfullofwomen (Twitter)
Wonder if
Abbott will give the "binders full of women" line a go in his next
censure motion?
Labels:
U.S. presidential election,
US election
Friday 19 October 2012
Now the NSW Speaker becomes involved in Cansdell-gate
Rumours have been circulating on the NSW North Coast that there are more revelations to come in the matter of the O’Farrell Government, North Coast Nationals and disgraced former state government MP Steve Cansdell - this media report would seem to be the first of these.
The Sydney Morning Herald 18 October 2012:
ALLEGATIONS that the former NSW MP Steve Cansdell rorted a staff allowance to benefit a Nationals colleague were referred by corruption authorities to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly a year ago but not investigated.
The allegations, similar to those over which the former Labor MP Karyn Paluzzano was convicted last month, were made to the Independent Commission Against Corruption by Mr Cansdell's former staff member Kath Palmer.
Ms Palmer alleged Mr Cansdell, who was the member for Clarence and parliamentary secretary for police, abused a staff allowance by requiring her to work on the 2010 federal election campaign of the Nationals candidate for Page, Kevin Hogan…..
Ms Palmer also said Mr Cansdell submitted claims for the allowance that differed from the days she worked.
The ICAC referred the allegations to the Speaker, Shelley Hancock, Ms Palmer's employer, last November. But Ms Hancock, who is also the Liberal MP for South Coast, did not pursue the matter.
''I considered material conveyed to me from ICAC, noting that they had not taken any action in respect of the allegations,'' Ms Hancock told the Herald. ''On the basis of the nature of the material, it was concluded at the time that it was not appropriate for this matter to be pursued since verification of the material would be difficult.''
Following inquiries by the Herald, Ms Hancock has asked parliamentary officers to review the material, which is understood to include Ms Palmer's work diaries and claim forms.
The decision to review the material could pose difficulties for Mr Hogan, who has been preselected to contest Page for the Nationals at next year's federal election.
The revelation adds to questions surrounding the handling of allegations against Mr Cansdell, who resigned from state Parliament in September last year after admitting to falsifying a statutory declaration to keep his driver's licence.
Mr Cansdell admitted to falsifying a statutory declaration to say Ms Palmer was driving his car when it was caught speeding in 2005……
Mitt 'n' Tony sitting in a tree....
The Political Bobbsy Twins- America's Romney & Australia's Tony Abbott
Sound
familiar?
“It has dawned on
Mitt Romney that he has a problem with female voters. He just has no idea what
to do about it, since it is the result of his positions on abortion,
contraception, health services and many other issues. On Tuesday
night, he bumbled his way through a cringe-inducing attempt to graft
what he thinks should be 2012 talking points onto his 1952 sensibility.” {New
York Times 17th October 2012}
Labels:
Abbott,
right wing politics,
Romney
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)