Thursday 7 April 2016
Australian Federal Election 2016: nowhere to run to, nowhere to hide
It is not just individual taxpayers who should be worried about being caught out using Panama-based firm Mossack Fonseca & Co to allegedly hide unexplained wealth or avoid/evade tax on income earned in this country.
The Turnbull Government should also be worried because this story is likely to run right through the federal election campaign this year and, it is not outside the realms of possibility that names will surface which include known Liberal Party political donors.
It is already a problem for the Prime Minister and Cabinet because along with
many other federal government departments/agencies, the Australian Dept. of Defence and Department of Immigration and Border Protection have previous
and current contracts with Wilson
Security Pty Ltd, a client of Mossack Fonseca.
Neither
Defence nor Immigration appear to have conducted genuine due diligence on this company during tender processes, as evidence by their response here and here.
Leaked documents have
revealed that two brothers embroiled in a massive Hong Kong corruption scandal
were ultimately in control of an Australian security company that earned
roughly half a billion dollars in lucrative government contracts.
The two billionaire
brothers, Thomas and Raymond Kwok, were charged with bribing a Hong Kong
government official in July 2012 in a case that shook the Hong Kong
establishment.
Soon after their arrest,
the leaked documents, obtained by the ABC's Four Corners, show the brothers
covertly remained directors of the offshore company that ultimately controls
Wilson's operations in Australia — Wilson Offshore Group Holdings (BVI) Limited…..
In December 2014, Thomas
Kwok was convicted of the bribery offences and sentenced to five years in
prison.
His brother Raymond Kwok
was acquitted of all charges.
According to Jason
Sharman, professor at the Centre of Governance and Public Policy at Griffith
University, the "common sense" definition is that the company listed
as the ultimate holding company is "not only the legal owner but the entity
in control," he said.
"You would expect
that if you've got a company at the top of the chain that is in control of a
lot of assets, people would really want to know who they are working for, who
they are owned by and who they are being directed by," said Professor Sharman…..
Since the arrest of the
Kwok brothers in July 2012, Wilson Security secured a sub-contract to provide
garrison services for Australia's offshore detention centres on Nauru and Manus
Island as well as various other contracts with Defence, The Australian Tax
Office and the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet.
The Kwok brothers
maintained effective control as directors via a covert manoeuvre facilitated by
Mossack Fonseca.
Two weeks after the
brothers were charged, both Thomas and Raymond Kwok removed themselves as
directors from Wilson Offshore Group Holdings (BVI) Limited but replaced
themselves with two mysterious new directors that were companies, Winsome Sky
and Harmony Core.
The leaked files show
the directors of those mystery companies were in fact the Kwok brothers
themselves.
Thomas Kwok signed on as
the director of Winsome Sky on July 30, 2012, and on the same day Raymond
signed on as the director of Harmony Core……
Wilson Offshore Group
Holdings (BVI) Limited was originally registered in 1991 under a different
name, Covert Investments.
Thomas and Raymond Kwok,
as well as their older brother Walter, were early directors of Covert
Investments before it changed its name to Wilson Offshore Group Holdings (BVI)
Limited in 2004.
BACKGROUND
The company founded by Jürgen Mossack and Ramón Fonseca says of itself:
Established in 1977, the Mossack Fonseca Group is a leading global company which provides comprehensive legal and trust services.
With over 500 staff members across every continent, the Mossack Fonseca Group provides excellent services based on more than 35 years of experience. As part of its added value, the Group offers personal advice and a world-class online experience through a virtual Client Portal which is available 24 hours a day. Our web-based Client Information Portal application allows clients to reserve companies online, verify the status of companies, and pay invoices, in addition to other transactions.
Our service and research-oriented professionals specialize in trust services, wealth management, international business structures, and commercial law, among other areas.
Our product and service portfolio is constantly updated and renewed, enabling the Group to find the appropriate solution for your business. We offer research, advice and services for the following jurisdictions: Belize, The Netherlands, Costa Rica, United Kingdom, Malta, Hong Kong, Cyprus, British Virgin Islands, Bahamas, Panama, British Anguilla, Seychelles, Samoa, Nevada, and Wyoming (USA).
Our law firm has specialized attorneys experienced in all areas of law such as shipping, immigration, contracts and intellectual property, as well as commercial law in general. We also assist clients in physically relocating to Panama and supporting them with regard to all of the steps required, from handling immigration matters and buying or renting property to establishing their business in Panama.
Australian Taxation Office media release 4 April 2016:
ATO statement regarding release of taxpayer data
Recently, the ATO received data in relation to a Panamanian law firm containing names of a significant number of Australian residents. Currently we have identified over 800 individual taxpayers and we have now linked over 120 of them to an associate offshore service provider located in Hong Kong.
These cases relate to the release of data by transparency or media organisations in Australia and overseas. ATO intelligence on tax evasion comes from a variety of sources, including from concerned citizens, advisers, partner agencies and international bodies. For example the ATO has raised tax liabilities of around $400 million from data supplied by confidential informants.
Deputy Commissioner Michael Cranston said that since the completion of the offshore disclosure initiative 'Project DO IT', the ATO has ramped up its compliance work to deal with those taxpayers who have failed to disclose offshore income and assets. Sharing information and coordinating action closely with other tax administrations is a large part of this work.
"We promised the community that following Project DO IT we would continue to build our intelligence base, undertake audits, apply significant penalties and refer the worst cases for criminal investigation" Mr Cranston said.
"We have been analysing the latest data against information these taxpayers had reported to the ATO and against the information we already have. We are also working closely with the AFP, Australian Crime Commission and AUSTRAC to further cross-check the data and strengthen our intelligence. Some cases may be referred to the Serious Financial Crime Taskforce.
This Taskforce builds on the success of Project Wickenby where we raised $2.29billion in tax liabilities and there were 46 criminal convictions.
"The information we have includes some taxpayers who we have previously investigated, as well as a small number who disclosed their arrangements with us under the Project DO IT initiative. It also includes a large number of taxpayers who haven't previously come forward, including high wealth individuals, and we are already taking action on those cases" Mr Cranston said.
"Through data analysis we have been able to identify patterns such as clusters of individual taxpayer and advisers for further investigation."
"The message is clear - taxpayers can't rely on these secret arrangements being kept secret and we will act on any information that is provided to us" Mr Cranston said.
The Sydney Morning Herald, 4 April 2016:
More than 11.5 million documents have been leaked from Mossack Fonseca's files, revealing the secrets of hundreds of thousands of clients – including several thousand Australians – covering a period over almost 40 years, from 1977 until as recently as last December.
The release of the documents on Monday follows a 12-month investigation by media groups including The Australian Financial Review, led by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) in Washington…..
The files show how Mossack Fonseca thwarted Australian regulators and police inquiries, continued to act for individuals accused of fraud and embezzlement, and lobbied actively to prevent Australia from signing agreements that would allow the exchange of tax information with Samoa, a key tax avoidance jurisdiction.
While most investors and corporations who use tax havens have legitimate reasons to use these structures, the leaked records also show some companies domiciled in tax havens were being used for suspected money laundering, arms and drug deals, and tax avoidance.
"Some cases may be referred to the Serious Financial Crime Taskforce," ATO deputy commissioner Michael Cranston told the Financial Review, confirming the Australian link with Mossack Fonseca.
The data includes high wealth individuals "and we are already taking action on those cases", Mr Cranston said.
"ATO intelligence on tax evasion comes from a variety of sources, including from concerned citizens, advisers, partner agencies and international bodies…..
Mr Cranston said some of the Australians under scrutiny had previously been investigated by the Tax Office but the probe included a "large number of taxpayers who haven't previously come forward".
The ATO investigation is based on a smaller set of files detailing Mossack Fonseca's Luxembourg operations, which were sold to the German government by a former employee, triggering scores of raids by tax investigators who targeted Commerzbank clients in Germany in February last year.
German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung, working with the ICIJ, subsequently obtained much more extensive files, with a total 2.6 terabytes of data for Mossack Fonseca's entire global operations, from an anonymous informant. No payment was made……
The Panamanian firm is one of the top five global groups providing corporate registry services in 21 low-tax jurisdictions around the world for more than 214,000 companies, trusts and foundations, providing an essential services for legitimate companies and investors, including BHP Billiton.
But the files show that the firm also protects its less reputable clients, keeping Swiss advisory firm Strachans on its books despite a decade of Project Wickenby investigations initially focused on Strachans that led to 46 criminal convictions, including a jail term for a Strachans partner, Philip de Figueiredo.
Another Wickenby target, Rockhampton-born lawyer Peter Borgas, based in Switzerland, remained a valued Mossack client even after he was arrested in Sydney in 2013 (the charge was dropped five months later).
Last December, Mossack decided it would not act on its probity concerns for a firm controlled by Tan Yixin, a Chinese executive jailed for 3½ years for bribes and leaking secrets to Australia's Rio Tinto, because "the client will destroy us with their comments" in the high-growth Chinese market.
When the Australian Federal Police wrote to Mossack Fonseca's British Virgin Islands office in July 2012 to enforce an Australian court order to sell a Perth apartment on which a BVI company, Anchorville Holdings Ltd, allegedly held a mortgage, Mossack replied that Anchorville had been struck off in 2007 and asked the AFP to stop sending letters.
Perth entrepreneur Roger Bryer had lived for a decade in the spectacular Perth penthouse, which was tied up in lengthy criminal trials over a $US15 million ($19.5 million) embezzlement case involving Commerzbank. Most of the proceeds had been transferred to Australian accounts controlled by Mr Bryer, to invest. Mr Bryer told police he had no knowledge the money was stolen. It was not suggested that he had acted improperly.
In 2012, the DPP applied to sell the penthouse as part of the proceeds of crime, but Anchorville had been set up as mortgagee on it.
Rebuffed by Mossack Fonseca, the AFP obtained a BVI search warrant in November 2012. A Mossack executive produced old documentation showing Anchorville was owned by yet another nominee company.
Meanwhile, Mossack had contacted the original registered owner of Anchorville and offered to reinstate the company, for $5487. As part of that reinstatement, new documents were registered in 2013 that showed that Bryer had owned Anchorville since 2001.
Mr Bryer told the Financial Review on Sunday that he had made it clear to the AFP that he controlled Anchorville and the matter had been completely resolved in a confidential settlement with the AFP and DPP on February 6, 2013.
While Anchorville was set up as a mortgagee company, its mortgage on the penthouse was not valid.
"I have very grave doubts as to whether they were acting legitimately," Mr Bryer said of Mossack Fonseca. "None of it was credible for that company."…..
In 2008, Sydney developer George Ghossayn, who at the time was a regular in the appointment diary of Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid before later switching his support to the Liberal Party, was setting up an offshore partnership with fellow developer Fouad Deiri, in a BVI company, Fitall Development Limited.
In September 2013, convicted cocaine dealer-turned-Queensland property developer Joseph Frangieh took control of a Seychelles company, Silver Tiger Enterprises Limited.
In late 2011, sports promoter Dominic Galati was publicly challenging to replace Frank Lowy as chairman of Football Federation Australia, "because I believe that someone has to be a voice out there for the people that are passionate about this game".
Behind the scenes, Galati was involved in setting up half a dozen companies in Samoa, which were transferred to a new Hong Kong company, Global Wealth Group, controlled by Galati, William Aloisi, John McGeary and Roy Bijkerk.
William Aloisi's website describes him as an investment banker. Mr McGeary is a greyhound trainer, while Bijkerk is a convicted cocaine importer who has built a property empire through Guardian Care Properties.
A remarkable 269 shareholdings of companies in the British Virgin Islands, Samoa, the Seychelles and Panama, almost all of them holding bearer shares, are linked to just four addresses on the Gold Coast associated with family members of Ian Taylor, a New Zealand businessman who, with his father Geoffrey Taylor, has set up shell companies that have since been linked to arms deals, Mexican drug lords and Russia's largest tax fraud.
There has been no suggestion of illegality by the Taylors.
Ian Taylor has previously told Fairfax that "only a small handful" of their companies were misused.
"Clients of certain nationalities are discriminated against only due to their citizenship.
Read the full article here.
The Australian, 4 April 2016:
More than 1000 Australian links to companies have been found in a data leak of millions of documents from a Panama law firm…..
The passports of hundreds of Australian citizens connected to companies as directors, shareholders and beneficial owners, are included according to the ABC.
Panama Papers: some of the corporations Malcolm and/or Lucy Turnbull created or invested in since 1981
A reader asked if North Coast Voices would look at the Australian Prime Minister’s investments in light of the release of information contained in the Panama Papers.
A searchable online database is yet to be created and information in the media on the ‘who and when’ of use of the Panamanian tax haven is still emerging, so there is not that much to compare Mr. Turnbull's extensive financial portfolio with at present.
However, I have created a short company list readers can refer to when the subject of Mossack Fonseca’s Australian clients is mentioned.
Companies/investments marked with a red asterisk denote association with a tax haven/low tax jurisdiction.
Companies/investments marked with a red asterisk denote association with a tax haven/low tax jurisdiction.
Private companies of which Malcolm Bligh Turnbull is known to be a director:
Turnbull & Partners Pty Limited – created 1998, private investment company
Turnbull & Partners Holdings Pty Ltd – created 1987, private investment company
M.B. Turnbull Pty. Limited – created 1998, private investment company
M.B. Turnbull Pty. Limited – created 1998, private investment company
Wilcrow Pty. Limited – created 1998, private investment company
Pokana Pty Ltd – created 1981, private investment company/trustee of self-managed super fund
Bonalil Pty Ltd – created 1985, private investment company
Bonalil Pty Ltd – created 1985, private investment company
Felix Bay Ltd – created 2000, not for profit company/trustee of the Turnbull Foundation
Bonedale Pty Ltd – created 1987, intermediate holding company
A selection of some of the corporations in which Malcolm and/or Lucy Turnbull invested from time to time, as set out in his Members’ Interests statements:
Century Turnbull LLC – created 2014 and incorporated in US, private holding company for Lucy Turnbull's New York property investments
Want Want China Holdings P/L, – Chinese company, food manufacturing
Want Want China Holdings P/L, – Chinese company, food manufacturing
Hochtief AG – German company, construction. Taken to court by Australian Securities & Investment Commission for alleged insider trading of Leighton Holdings (now CIMIC) shares
Melbourne IT Limited – incorporated Australia, domain registration company
Prima BioMed Limited – incorporated in Australia, German-Australian company, biotechnology
Porsche Automobil Holding – German-based holding company, automobile manufacture
Rubicor Group Limited – incorporated in Australia, contracting & recruitment services
Seadrill Limited – incorporated in Bermuda, offshore deepwater drilling
CVB Financial Corporation – incorporated in U.S., holding company for Citizens Business Bank
Siemens AG – German company, industrial conglomerate. Certain Siemen managers were allegedly clients of Mossack Fonseca in the British Virgin Islands tax haven after corruption scandal *
Salzgitter AG – German-based company, steel production
Volkswagen AG VORZ - German automobile manufacturer
Centric Wealth – incorporated in Australia, financial services
Lexmark International (?) – US company, printing and imaging equipment
New World Energy Ltd – incorporated in Australia, renewable energy
Tarazz Pte Ltd – incorporated in Singapore, IT *
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group – allegedly facilitated clients use of Mossack Fonseca in the British Virgin Islands tax haven *
Commonwealth Bank of Australia – allegedly facilitated clients use of Mossack Fonseca in the British Virgin Islands tax haven *
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles – incorporated in The Netherlands, automobile manufacture
Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
BHP Billiton Limited – incorporated in UK, approx. 19 subsidiaries incorporated in British Virgin Islands, diversified resources, alleged client of Mossack Fonseca in the British Virgin Islands tax haven *
ETFS Physical Palladium Shares - shares issued by ETFS Palladium Trust aa company providing specialist investment solutions
Panoro Energy ASA – Norwegian-based company, exploration and production of oil and gas resources in West Africa
SPDR S&P 500 – incorporated in US, exchange-traded fund
Orocobre Ltd – Argentinian-based company, industrial chemicals and minerals
Magellan Flagship Fund Limited – ASX-listed investment company
Forte Energy – incorporated in Australia, minerals company focused on the exploration, evaluation and development of uranium and energy-related projects worldwide
JPMorgan USD Emerg Markets Bond – incorporated in US, exchange-traded fund
iShares MSCI Brazil Index Fund – investment fund
iShares iBoxx $ Invst Grade Crp Bond – investment fund trading in U.S. investment grade corporate bonds *
Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund – incorporated in US, exchange-traded fund
Annaly Capital Management Inc – US-based company, mortgage real estate investment trust
Avita Medical Ltd – global medical technology company
Revo Pty Ltd – Australian-based company, custom computer programming service
Goldman Sachs Private Equity Funds – part of a US-based investment group specializing in fund of funds and direct co-investments with 21 entities registered in Cayman Islands tax haven. The firm invests in other funds that invest in leveraged buyouts, growth financings, natural resources, venture capital, and distressed securities. It also acts as a co-investor in direct investments. The firm seeks to invest in private equity funds located in the United States, the United Kingdom, continental Europe, Latin America, and Asia *
Zebedee Growth Fund - incorporated in Cayman Islands,
hedge fund *
Bowery
Opportunity Fund
– incorporated in Cayman Islands, distressed debt *
3G Natural Resources Offshore Fund Ltd – Cayman Islands-based, hedge fund *
Predictive Discovery Limited – incorporated in Australia, gold and
uranium exploration company
Vanguard Health Care ETF – incorporated in US, exchange-traded fund
CVC Global Credit Opportunity Fund - incorporated in Cayman
Islands, hedge fund *
MSD Torchlight Partners Ltd - incorporated in Cayman Islands, hedge fund *
Seven Locks Enhanced Fund Ltd – registered in Cayman Islands, double-leveraged equity fund *
Elbrook Offshore Fund Ltd – registered in Cayman Islands,
hedge fund *
Brookfield
Wells Street Offshore Fund – Cayman Islands-based, pooled fund global
real estate equities *
Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund IV – US-based company, global commercial
property portfolio.
First Eagle Global Fund – incorporated in US, long-term growth of capital
Labels:
Finance,
Malcolm Bligh Turnbull
Wednesday 6 April 2016
How the Federal and Queensland Governments are betraying The Great Barrier Reef and the people of Australia
This billionare Gautam Adani and his family, through majority ownership of the Adani Group, are apparently considered favoured foreign investors by both the Abbott-Turnbull Federal Government and successive Queensland Governments.
He and his family are responsible for this…..
The bribery…..
ABC 7.30, 17 October 2012:
Investigators have raised concerns about some of Adani enterprise's dealings with politicians and officials. In August the Auditor-General named Adani Power as one of the companies that received coal deposits from the Government at well below market rates. Gautam Adani declined our request for an interview, but the companies Australian CEO says Adani enterprises has always acted in accordance with the law…..
The Central Bureau of Investigation is now probing allegations of corruption and has opened files on at least seven unnamed companies. The Auditor-General says the lack of a transparent bidding process cost the Government $33 billion in lost revenue…..
Former Chief Justice Santosh Hegde is a well-known anti-corruption campaigner. Last year in his final act as Karnataka State Ombudsman, he released a detail report into the theft of iron ore by numerous companies which cost the state $3 billion in royalties. Justice Hegde's report found Adani Enterprises acted corruptly in the illicit transportation of iron ore in excess of the permitted quantity…..
Justice Hegde's report says the officials of ports department, custom, police, mines, local politicians and others received bribe money from Adani Enterprises.
The pollution…..
Business Standard, 24 December 2015:
Goa State Pollution Control Board (GSPCB) has issued notices to Mormugao Port Trust (MPT) and two major companies handling coal at its terminal under pollution control norms for allegedly causing environmental hazard.
GSPCB has issued show cause notice to MPT, M/s Adani Murmugao Port Terminal Private Ltd and JSW's South West Port Ltd after it was noticed that the dust pollution emanating from the coal handling has increased in the port town of Vasco, 40 kms from here.
Board Chairman Jose Manuel Noronha said the companies and the port administration have been asked why their consent under Water and Air Pollution Prevention Act should not be withdrawn.
"The show cause notices were issued when it was noticed that the coal handling terminals did not take mandatory measures to control the pollution emanating from the coal dust," Noronha said.
GSPCB has issued show cause notice to MPT, M/s Adani Murmugao Port Terminal Private Ltd and JSW's South West Port Ltd after it was noticed that the dust pollution emanating from the coal handling has increased in the port town of Vasco, 40 kms from here.
Board Chairman Jose Manuel Noronha said the companies and the port administration have been asked why their consent under Water and Air Pollution Prevention Act should not be withdrawn.
"The show cause notices were issued when it was noticed that the coal handling terminals did not take mandatory measures to control the pollution emanating from the coal dust," Noronha said.
The deaths…..
The New York Times, 22 March 2013:
This month, the first comprehensive assessment of the health impact of pollution from India’s coal-fired power plants was published.
The findings are grim. Scientists estimate that exposure to coal-related pollution caused between 80,000 and 115,000 premature deaths and more than 20 million asthma attacks in 2011-12.
The conclusion is particularly worrying, given that the World Resources Institute estimates that 455 new coal power plants are planned in India, more than four times the number that exist now.
UbAlert, 10 April 2015:
Madhya Pradesh: Five people, three laborers and two security guards, died mysteriously in a Neemuch-based private factory on Thursday when they stepped down to clean a 25-feet deep tank filled with impurities generated by oil milling. The incident occurred at Adani Wilmar Oil Limited located four kilometers away from Neemuch district headquarter. Investigation is going on as to what caused the deaths of the factory workers whether it was acid in tank or they died due to suffocation.
The exploitation….
The Sydney Morning Herald, 5 September 2014:
But a Fairfax Media investigation into the treatment of 6000 construction labourers at a luxury housing project in Gujarat owned by the Adani family has uncovered lax safety standards, underage workers and regular cholera outbreaks from contaminated drinking water.
It comes after Mr Adani's company was found in February to have failed to gain proper environmental approval for construction around India's largest private port, also in Gujarat - destroying mangroves and displacing local villagers.
The poor choice of senior management…..
The poor choice of senior management…..
ABC News, 12 November 2015:
Adani Australia's chief executive officer was in charge of an African copper mine which allowed a flood of dangerous pollutants to pour into a Zambian river, the ABC can reveal.
Jeyakumar Janakaraj has been chief executive of Adani's Australian operations since leaving Konkola Copper Mines (KCM) in Zambia in 2013.
Now KCM and its parent company Vedanta Resources are being taken to the High Court in London by locals who say pollution from the company's huge Chingola open-pit copper mine made them ill and devastated nearby farmland over a 10-year period from 2004.
Mr Janakaraj was director of operations of KMC when the company was charged in 2010 with causing a serious pollution spill, which saw a toxic brew of highly acidic, metal-laden discharge released into the Kafue River.
The river is one of Zambia's largest waterways and a source of water and food for about 40 per cent of the country's people.
The 31-square-kilometre KCM open pit mine in Zambia's Chingola region is described as the biggest copper mine in Africa, producing about 2 million tonnes of ore a year.
The 2009 annual report of KCM's parent company, London-listed mining conglomerate Vedanta Resources, said Mr Janakaraj was "responsible for overall operations of KCM".
"On [Mr Janakaraj's] watch, significant pollution events happened," lawyer Ariane Wilkinson of Environmental Justice Australia said.
"The court documents show that they discharged what's called a pregnant liquor solution into the Kafue River. That's a highly acidic, metal-laden pollutant, and that it changed the colour of the river."
KCM was prosecuted by the Zambian Government, and the company pleaded guilty to charges of polluting the environment, discharging toxic matter into the aquatic environment, wilfully failing to report an incident of pollution, and the failure to comply with the requirements for discharge of effluent.
The court was told the source of the contamination was the mine's tailings leach plant, with the pollution changing the colour of the Kafue River to "deep blue". The company was fined 21,970,000 Zambian kwacha (about $4,030).
A few months later, in 2011, a Zambian newspaper reported the company's copper mine had again polluted the river, and that environmental authorities were investigating.
The lies told….
The Age, 16 December 2015:
A Queensland court has found Indian mining company Adani exaggerated the economic benefits of its proposed Carmichael coal mine, including the amount of jobs and royalties the $16.5 billion project would generate…..
he court agreed the company had overstated the economic benefits that would flow from its project both in its environmental impact statement and in statements to the court.
Adani has promoted the project as a jobs bonanza for Queensland and its environmental impact statement forecast 10,000 jobs annually from 2024 and $22 billion in royalties.
But Adani's own witness Jerome Fahrer told the court this year the coal mine and connecting rail project would create an average of just 1464 jobs annually, an assessment Queensland Land Court president Carmel MacDonald agreed with.
"Dr Fahrer's evidence, which I have accepted, was that the Carmichael Coal and Rail Project will increase average annual employment by 1206 fte [full time equivalent] jobs in Queensland and 1,464 fte jobs in Australia," her judgment states.
President MacDonald also found Adani's modelling had "probably overstated the selling price of the coal and therefore the royalties generated by the project and the corporate tax payable".
The environmental danger....
But conservationists say
the mine is an environmental disaster waiting to happen, citing particular
risks to the Great Barrier Reef.
"It's an
extraordinary decision, especially coming at a time when the Great Barrier Reef
is experiencing its worst ever coral bleaching event," Australian
Conservation Foundation chief executive Kelly O'Shanassy said. "We know
the bleaching is because of global warming, and Carmichael will only make that
worse."
By Adani's own figures,
the mine and its coal will emit more than 4.6 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide
over its lifetime. "The pollution from this mine is so big that it cancels
the pollution cuts the Turnbull government committed to at the Paris Climate
Summit," Ms O'Shanassy said.
The impact of such
emissions could be terminal to the reef, according to Dr Veron. "The reef
is obviously in dire straights, irrespective of what anyone says, and that's blindly
obvious.
"There is
extraordinary disconnect between science and the political action. Politicians
think the mine is good because it's good for economy, but we are selling out
the next generation of Australians as fast as we can go."
Dr Veron has devoted his
life to studying coral reefs: he discovered more than 20 per cent of the
world's coral species, and has been likened by Sir David Attenborough to a
modern day Charles Darwin.
"Roughly a third of
marine species have parts of their life cycle in coral reefs," Dr Veron
said. "So if you take out coral reefs you have an ecological collapse of
the oceans. It's happened before, mass extinctions through ocean acidification,
and the main driver of that is CO₂."
Dr Veron recently
travelled to Canberra to talk to government about the decline in the reef.
"The politicians do listen to scientists, but that is the worst part of
it," he said.
"If this was all done out of sheer ignorance, that is sort of understandable. It's like child porn – you might say you don't know it exists, but if you know it exists and you do everything to promote it, then that's evil."
"If this was all done out of sheer ignorance, that is sort of understandable. It's like child porn – you might say you don't know it exists, but if you know it exists and you do everything to promote it, then that's evil."
The granting of the
Carmichael leases coincides with increased concerns over threats to Great
Barrier Reef from land-based pollution, including sediments, nutrients and
pesticides.
Australian Institute of
Marine Science principal research scientist Dr Frederieke Kroon has told the
ABC that government policies designed to keep the reef on UNESCO's World
Heritage list are insufficient.
"Our review finds
that current efforts are not sufficient to achieve the water quality targets
set in the Reef 2050 Plan," she said.
The other danger….
The Age, 10 December 2015:
Last week billionaire businessman Gautam Adani paid a visit to Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull asking him to enact a special law to stop anyone challenging big coal and gas projects once they have been approved by government. This meeting raises questions about the relationship between government and big polluting companies.
The Prime Minister is entitled to meet with anyone he likes, you may very well say, but there are two issues here – one is the fossil fuel industry's direct access to power and the other is the implications of that on Australia's democracy.
Turnbull's back room meeting with international billionaire businessman Adani is an example of the warm reception the fossil fuel industry enjoys in Australia. This direct access to the highest office in our country is an unfortunate feature of our democracy, and speaks of the pernicious dynamic where money enables access to power. Just by the way, according to data released by the AEC, Adani donated $49,500 to the Liberal Party of Australia in the 2013-2014 financial year.
The state government manoeuvres....
The solemn vow and plea for assistance....
The state government manoeuvres....
The Sydney Morning Herald, 4 April 2016:
Two groups fighting the mine in separate court battles have accused Dr Lynham of abandoning previous assurances that leases would not be granted until two existing cases were resolved.
Just eight weeks ago, Dr Lynham said he wanted to give certainty to Adani and "granting a mining lease in the presence of two JRs (judicial reviews) does not provide the certainty".
Separate Federal Court challenges brought by the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) and the Wangan and Jagalingou (W&J) traditional owners are yet to be concluded.
The Environmental Defenders Office - which is representing ACF in its challenge to the project's federal approvals - has already said it's considering challenging Dr Lynham's decision to grant Adani mining leases.
AAP has asked Dr Lynham to explain why he issued the leases despite the two outstanding challenges.
On ABC radio on Monday, he agreed there was a prospect of further court appeals.
The solemn vow and plea for assistance....
Excerpt from
a 4 April 2016 email from Adrian
Burragubba on behalf of the Wangan and Jagalingou Traditional Owners:
The
Queensland Government just betrayed us.
Queensland Mines Minister Anthony Lynham wrote a letter to us in October, promising he would await the outcome of our Federal Court action against the Carmichael mine before considering issuing Adani with the mining leases. But today the Premier and the Minister double-crossed us.
Adani doesn't have our free, prior and informed consent to build their Carmichael coal mine on our land, and they never will.
The Queensland Government just rode roughshod over our rights and granted the mining leases anyway. They have given Adani the green light to ignore our opposition and to tear the heart out of our country. To destroy our rivers and drain billions of litres of groundwater. To leave a black hole of monumental proportions in our homelands.
Queensland Mines Minister Anthony Lynham wrote a letter to us in October, promising he would await the outcome of our Federal Court action against the Carmichael mine before considering issuing Adani with the mining leases. But today the Premier and the Minister double-crossed us.
Adani doesn't have our free, prior and informed consent to build their Carmichael coal mine on our land, and they never will.
The Queensland Government just rode roughshod over our rights and granted the mining leases anyway. They have given Adani the green light to ignore our opposition and to tear the heart out of our country. To destroy our rivers and drain billions of litres of groundwater. To leave a black hole of monumental proportions in our homelands.
The Minister has trashed our rights
and pushed the leases out the door in one of the worst acts of bad faith
towards Queensland's Indigenous people in living memory.
This fight will define our people and be a landmark moment for Indigenous rights in Australia. Can you help us fight for our rights and our country in court?
Adani and the Queensland Government think they can walk all over us but they've never seen anything like this. Our lands and our way of life, and the legacy of our ancestors, mean too much to our people for us to roll over.
Our resolve is doubled. Minister Lynham can issue all the bits of paper he likes, hide behind false claims of jobs and benefits, and pander to big coal for an unviable project.
But our people's rights are not expendable. This act of infamy will be challenged all the way to the High Court if necessary, and we will continue to pursue our rights under international law.
This fight will define our people and be a landmark moment for Indigenous rights in Australia. Can you help us fight for our rights and our country in court?
Adani and the Queensland Government think they can walk all over us but they've never seen anything like this. Our lands and our way of life, and the legacy of our ancestors, mean too much to our people for us to roll over.
Our resolve is doubled. Minister Lynham can issue all the bits of paper he likes, hide behind false claims of jobs and benefits, and pander to big coal for an unviable project.
But our people's rights are not expendable. This act of infamy will be challenged all the way to the High Court if necessary, and we will continue to pursue our rights under international law.
Adrian Burragubba leads a protest against the proposed mine outside Queensland Parliament in March.ABC News: Patrick Williams
'Truffles' Turnbull and his reasons for bringing back the ABCC
Prime Minister Malcolm ‘Truffles’ Turnbull has made it clear that if the Senate refuses consent, for a bill re-establishing the federal Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (ABCC) with even greater legislated power, he will call a double dissolution election for 2 July 2016.
Turnbull is effusive in his praise for the effectiveness of the ABCC:
Turnbull's office says his claim about a 20 per cent jump in productivity came from the Australian Bureau of Statistics. It's there all right, if you use 2012-13 as the end date for the ABCC even though it finished at the end of 2011-12. But over the same period productivity in the entire market sector jumped 14 per cent. Something other than the ABCC was at play. In the post-ABCC era productivity in the construction sector climbed 3 per cent. Productivity in the entire market sector climbed 7 per cent.
So is he right about the ABCC?
So is he right about the ABCC?
The Office of the Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (ABCC) commenced operating on 1 October 2005 under the Howard Coalition Government. It possessed significant investigative and regulatory powers in relation to the Australian building and construction industry.
In the four years up to the 2011-12 financial year the ABCC reportedly cost taxpayers somewhere between an est. $135 to $165 million, depending on who you’re talking to.
From 1 June 2012 the Gillard Labor Government replaced the ABCC with the Fair Work Building and Construction (FWBC) regulator.
According to the Productivity Commission Inquiry Report: Public Infrastructure, Volume 2 (27 May 2014) data covering approximately ten years:
The Commission has carefully reviewed the studies and the empirical evidence on aggregate productivity (appendix I).
This assessment covers the evidence from IE and MBA (sub. DR211), and the Commission’s own synthesis of studies and data.
The Commission’s view is that given the case studies, industry surveys and other micro evidence, there is no doubt that local productivity has been adversely affected by union (and associated employer) conduct on some building sites, and that the BIT/ABCC is likely to have improved outcomes.
However, when scrutinised meticulously, the quantitative results provided by IE or others do not provide credible evidence that the BIT/ABCC regime created a resurgence in aggregate construction productivity or that the removal of the ABCC has had material aggregate effects. Indeed, the available data suggests that the regime did not have a large aggregate impact….
There is no robust evidence that the new industrial relations environment specific to construction had significant effects on the costs and productivity performance of the construction industry as a whole. There is likely to have been more important effects for the non-residential building segment of the industry, but any such effects would be hard to discover in the aggregate construction productivity data.
The report also said this:
FWBC can take matters to court or refer them to other enforcement agencies. Its own enforcement powers relate only to civil matters (as did the ABCC).
Up until February 2014, the ABCC/FWBC had formally referred 21 matters to the State or Federal Police. Data on FWBC’s investigations and court actions suggest that it has commonly found breaches by employers as well as employees (or their nominated agents).
In 2012-13, out of just over 1100 investigations, its four main areas of investigation related to recovering employees’ wages and entitlements (31 per cent), freedom of association (13 per cent), coercion (13 per cent) and unprotected industrial action (12 per cent).
Most investigations have not resulted in actions before the courts. In 2012-13, there were 13 cases before the courts under the FWA, which involved unlawful industrial action (4), wages and entitlements (4), coercion (3), sham contracting (1) and adverse action (1) (FWBC 2013a, pp. 29, 38–39)….
the issue of notices dropped significantly after 2009-10, even though the ABCC was still in place and possessed the same statutory powers (Independent Economics 2013, p. 10)….
What the report shows is that any increases in building and construction industry productivity are more likely to be localised to individual companies/building sites and overall productivity levels cannot be safely attributed solely to the existence of the ABCC.
It also highlights that on average only two matters per year were referred to the courts by either the ABCC or FWBC over an approximately eight-year period.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)