Prideaux on Whales and Dolphins: ‘resource’ or ‘right’?

Whales and Dolphins: 'resource' or 'right'?

2010 started with a physical clash between whalers and activists in the southern ocean, sparking a global conversation about how we regard whales and dolphins – are they a resource for the human race, or do they have an inherent right to their life, their liberty and their wellbeing?

In January I asked this question on openDemocracy. At the time it seemed, to some at least, irrelevant and somewhat odd.

Now, with only one week to go before on the most fundamental wildlife protection decision in 25 years is taken – to resume legitimate and legalized whaling again or not, it seems more relevant than ever. The dialogue sparked by an eventful half year has also progressed.

An eventful half-year sparks a global conversation

In February, the 2010 Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science discussed whether the emerging scientific knowledge about the cultural and cognitive processes of whales and dolphins should influence international policy decisions concerning them. Their conclusions were that yes, it should.

Within three days of the conference, the orca Tilikum drowned his trainer. Unexpectedly, the media and the public didn't turn on Tilikum. Instead they openly asked if we should keep such mighty, complex and intelligent species in captivity.

In March the International Whaling Commission (IWC) met to discuss the details of a 'deal' about the future of whaling activities. Sharp debate erupted. And the political dance for positions began.

Within the week, The Cove, a documentary investigating the annual slaughter of more than 20,000 dolphins and porpoises around Japan, unexpectedly received the Academy Award for Best Documentary 2010.

By the end of March, a Los Angeles restaurant the Hump was closing its doors as a self-imposed penalty for serving whale meat.

In late April, an unprecedented US Congressional oversight hearing was held to review if there was education and conservation value of keeping marine mammals in captivity.

April also marked the second major oil spill in six months. Remarkably, people noticed that these spills were seriously threatening the habitats of whale and dolphin populations.

In late May another conference was being held in Finland to discuss question of whether whales and dolphins should be considered as non-human persons, concluding that all whales and dolphins have the right to life, liberty and wellbeing. The Declaration quickly went online for the world to adopt and signatures poured in nearly crashing the site.

Soon after Australia announced its formal intent to challenge to Japan's whale hunting in the Antarctic through the International Court of Justice.

Japan's rebuttal was to launch a fleet of five vessels to slaughter some 260 whales in the Northeast Pacific.

With six eventful months behind us, we now look towards the IWC meeting next week where Governments will formally consider the 'deal' to resume commercial whaling.

Taking the debate to the people, this weekend, Peter Garrett launched a YouTube campaign.

No longer is the Australian Government just speaking to Australians, now they invite the world to join them.

We have to decide now

This IWC meeting will in some ways conclude the six month conversation, and set the tone for our relationship with these animals for decades to come. Will our consideration of whales and dolphins be based on numerical calculations of abundance, or will we recognize whales and dolphins as highly evolved mammals living in complex societies, which we simply wish to respect?

That the discussion is even taking place, indicates we are on the road towards a position of respect, perhaps even rights.

No-one is suggesting that whales and dolphins be granted a right to vote, to hold a drivers license, or to receive a free and fair education. But, in this short half-year we have had enough examples posed to evoke a deep and thoughtful global conversation about our collective moral compasses.

Will we return to a world that accepts whaling? Will whales and dolphins, like Tilikum, continue to circle a pool for our entertainment? The conversation has evolved, and now the choice is ours to make.

Margi Prideaux, WildPolitics.net

* North Coast Voices would like to take this opportunity to welcome Margi Prideaux as a guest contributor and applaud her advocacy on behalf of all cetaceans.

I shouldn't laugh, but......

* A plague of locusts is due to hit Australia in time for the next federal election according to Bloomberg:
"Locusts are expected to hatch from August to October in Victoria, New South Wales and South Australia states, according to the commission. The first-generation spring hatching alone could occur over a total area of 1.8 million hectares (4.4 million acres), the commission's Adriaansen said."

* One small mining company Metgasco is shooting itself in the foot. Assiduously lobbying federal government for regional infrastructure funding (which will help corporate development plans) while at the same time dissing the local MP over the new resources Super Profits Tax. Word is that Canberra is not amused.

* Someone locked a Labrador in the house - oh noes!

"MAX, the black labrador was accidentally locked inside a Daily Examiner reporter's house yesterday and decided to leave his mark in more ways than one. Not only did he wee in the master bedroom, he pooed in one of the kids' room, chewed up a nappy, raided the pantry and vomited after the debauchery."

* At least one dedicated reader of NSW State Library online offerings is threatening to cut that library card in half because it's becoming a bit of a lottery as to which webpage links actually work each day. Ah, life in rural 'n' regional Oz!

* Anglo-Swiss mining giant Xstrata lets its slip show this month in that version of Teh Great Tax Fight:

"Mining company Xstrata Coal has revealed it will continue to buy up farmland within its Wandoan exploration lease area in Queensland despite last week suspending plans for the $6 billion project on the grounds the government's mining tax would make it uneconomic."

* Patrons at one Byron watering hole were overheard debating how long it would take a sheila to do a Corday if Tony Abbott became Australia's 27th prime minister.

* rod3000 Nothing perks you up like a 3 yr old's headbutt on the nose #wrestlemania

* The U.S. state which spawned Sarah Palin shows just how low dumb can go:

"The state of Alaska filed a lawsuit last Friday seeking to overturn the listing of beluga whales in Cook Inlet, home to the Port of Anchorage, as an endangered species."

* An oldie but a goodie from 2007 with an object lesson for Oz e-health proponents:

"An Italian woman who was mistakenly reported dead has won a yearlong battle to have her existence recognized by the government.
Pension agency INPS issued a formal apology to Maria Giuliani and reinstated her into its databank after removing her in January 2006 when another woman by the same name died, ANSA reported Thursday.
"But they only did it because the local media got hold of my case," Giuliani said of the apology.
Giuliani's removal from the databanks caused her pension rights to be revoked and she was removed from municipal and health computers.
"The first I heard about it was the following March when I went for a checkup."
"My GP fell back into his chair and said, 'But you're dead!'
"'No, I'm alive and kicking and I want to be examined,' I said. But he said he couldn't do it because officially I no longer existed."

* NSW Premier Kristina Keneally is staring down the barrel of massive electoral loss at the next state elections according to the bookies, :

"A specialist election punter from Sydney with leading bookmaker Centrebet has sounded a "death knell" for the NSW Labor government, outlaying nearly $25,000 on the Coalition at short odds to sweep to power next March! "The punter in two bets has taken just $1.15 and $1.14, with the Coalition now a red-hot $1.14 favourite to win, with Labor out to a whopping $5.35."

But she will never beat Sir Geoge Fuller's short 7 hour record as state premier.

* With all the media hoo-ha lately over Victoria Police, no-one's noticed a teeny weeny question surrounding the tale of two Garden State police commissioners having corresponded with a person convicted of serious offences.

When the Rudd Government decided that it wanted to first install and now extend ISP traffic interception, I bet it didn't factor in the possibility that some of this carefully saved info might be potentially embarrassing for future Labor governments if it 'leaked' onto the Internet.

Queen's Birthday Honours 2010: NSW North Coast recipients & full honours list

Margaret Hodgson, artist and illustrator of Copmanhurst; Jon Riordan, philanthropist from Yamba; Phyllis Pearson, musician from Nambucca; Tony Miller Dads in Distress founder from the Coffs Harbour district; these are just four of the many singled out in the Queen's Birthday Honours 2010.

The complete list can be found at The Australian Honours Secretariat:

• Companion (AC) in the General Division of the Order of Australia (29KB)

• Officer (AO) in the General Division of the Order of Australia (95KB)

• Officer (AO) in the Military Division of the Order of Australia (11KB)

• Member (AM) in the General Division of the Order of Australia (A-L) (242KB)

• Member (AM) in the General Division of the Order of Australia (M-Z) (206KB)

• Member (AM) in the Military Division of the Order of Australia (20KB)

• Medal (OAM) of the Order of Australia in the General Division (A-E) (203KB)

• Medal (OAM) of the Order of Australia in the General Division (F-L) (145KB)

• Medal (OAM) of the Order of Australia in the General Division (M-R) (134KB)

• Medal (OAM) of the Order of Australia in the General Division (S-Z) (145KB)

• Medal (OAM) of the Order of Australia in the Military Division (21KB)

• Public Service Medal (PSM) (85KB)

• Australian Police Medal (56KB)

• Ambulance Service Medal (ASM) (15KB)

• Emergency Services Medal (ESM) (18KB)

• Commendation for Gallantry (10KB)

• Distinguished Servce Medal (DSM) (11KB)

• Commendation for Distinguished Service (14KB)

• Conspicuous Service Cross (CSC) (34KB)

• Conspicuous Service Cross and Bar (CSC and Bar) (10KB)

• Conspicuous Service Medal (CSM) (32KB)

Note: Biographical notes have only been provided where the recipient has allowed this information to be provided online.

Say no to whaling today over at WDCS International

Whale photograph from The Daily Mail online

Below is one online email which was sent from the NSW North Coast in support of the international ban on whaling.
You too can have your say through the International Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society email page here.
Emails are needed before 20 June 2010. This is your last chance to influence the vote at the next International Whaling Commission meeting in Morocco.
Given Sunday's report in The Times concerning alleged vote buying by the Government of Japan, a grassroots counterbalance is needed.

President Obama
The Hon. Dª Elena Espinosa Mangana
The Right Honourable John Key
Ambassador Christian Maquieira

I call upon you to oppose whaling, to ensure the International Whaling Commission's ban on commercial whaling stays and to act to stop all commercial whaling and trade in whale products now!
I fully support the IWC moratorium on commercial whaling. This ban should not be reversed or weakened in any manner.
Additionally, I respectfully ask that any further slaughter of whales under the guise of 'scientific' research be stopped.
Living as I do in a small coastal community dependent in large part on the fishing industry and tourism, I am very aware that a healthy and biodiverse ocean returns the most rewards.
Both in terms of food and cultural/aesthetic values.
Whales are an integral part of this healthy diversity; and reducing their numbers through non-subsistence/commercial whale hunts is not just an assault on cetacean species, it is an assault upon future human generations.

Yours faithfully
[redacted for privacy reasons]
Australia

Excerpt from The Times 13 June 2010 article:

The revelations come as Japan seeks to break the 24-year moratorium on commercial whaling. An IWC meeting that will decide the fate of thousands of whales, including endangered species, begins this month in Morocco.
Japan denies buying the votes of IWC members. However, The Sunday Times filmed officials from pro-whaling governments admitting:
- They voted with the whalers because of the large amounts of aid from Japan. One said he was not sure if his country had any whales in its territorial waters. Others are landlocked.
— They receive cash payments in envelopes at IWC meetings from Japanese officials who pay their travel and hotel bills.
- One disclosed that call girls were offered when fisheries ministers and civil servants visited Japan for meetings.

McDonald's versus Yamba: boycott calls continue

The following was posted on Menu Mate at the webpage titled
McDonald's Family Restaurants (Ballina)
on 25 May 2010 and a copy sent to me:

Reviewer Name: EK
Title: McDonald's stay away from Yamba!
Comments: Dear Mr Campbell, I know a McDonald's restaurant in Yamba was approved last week by the local Council but the majority of Yamba residents DO NOT want it. Why do you want to come to Yamba when it is quite clear you are not wanted here. Please take back your application as most people will be boycotting it and you will not make any money.

To date this post is failing to display on the webpage in question. Hhmm........
However, the call to boycott any McDonald's eat-in and drive through fast food outlet in the small NSW North Coast town of Yamba continues.
While planning issues and councillots' votes refuse to die in The Daily Examiner letters to the editor on 11 June 2010 (twenty-five days after Clarence Valley Council development consent):

Valley Watch on Maccas decision
THE issues addressed by Valley Watch were not anti-McDonalds per se - they were mainly based on the inappropriateness of the intensified use of this particular site and the resultant adverse effects on local residents.
The zoning allows some uses 'with consent', meaning planners and councillors must take into account all the issues; it does not mean mandatory approval, a fact, which escaped five of the seven councillors voting on the DA.
A "refreshment room" is allowed in the zoning.
The definition does not include drive-through facilities, which the applicant claims is an ancillary use.
An accepted definition of ancillary use is that the area is subordinate or incidental to the dominant use (example being: accommodation for nurses on a hospital site).
As the drive-through will operate when the restaurant is closed, we do not believe it meets the accepted definitions of ancillary use, and is therefore not allowed in the zoning.
The fact that this commercial zoning abuts a residential area, the extra traffic that will be generated in the already planned Community Health Centre and Performing Arts Centre opposite, the increased traffic in residential streets, the adverse effect of lighting on surrounding residences, and the increased noise generated by this development as opposed to a retail outlet operating normal trading hours, were totally inadequately addressed in the planning report and by the majority of councillors.
Crime prevention was mentioned in the application, but it was not properly addressed in the report.
Councillors and planners were given many instances of increased anti-social behaviour and litter problems at other McDonalds outlets, but the issue was not addressed in the planning reports (Cr Margaret McKenna suggested Yamba residents could pick up the rubbish on their walks).
We thank Crs Tiley and Hughes, who voted against the development, and express our disappointment in the other councillors' lack of understanding of the issues and the inadequate information provided to them in the planning reports.
RONWYN LOPEZ, Valley Watch Inc secretary

A poll just for laffs....

Click on poll results to enlarge

A whimsical poll from The Bureau Chiefs.

Not everyone loves a mining millionaire.....

SMH online polling A.M. (above) and P.M. (below) on 10 June 2010

According to ABC News on Thursday, the Australian Securities and Investment Commission has given a timely reminder to mining companies that their rhetoric needs to be in line with their advice to the stockmarket, institutional investors, shareholders and creditors:

The corporate regulator says mining companies need to ensure they comply with continuous disclosure rules, when making statements during the debate about the proposed resources super profits tax.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission says the directors of resources firms need to work out whether they have enough information to form a view on the impact of the tax, when making statements to financial markets.
ASIC's deputy chairman Belinda Gibson says responsibility for compliance with the stock exchange's continuous disclosure rules ultimately lies with directors.
"The rules require that: a) that the market is fully informed; and, b) that the market is not misled," she said.
"Now it's up to directors when they make statements about their companies, whether it's in relation to the resources tax, that their statements are accurate and that all material information is given to the market."

Elsewhere it has been suggested that the Australian Electoral Commission also had some stern words about one of the anti-RSPT advertisements that the mining industry was running.