Wednesday, 27 March 2013

O'Farrell's new coal seam gas policy is an invitation to corruption


In March 2013 the O’Farrell Government placed a draft State Environmental Planning Policy on public exhibition which purports to create exclusion zones wherein coal seam gas exploration and mining cannot take place in future.

However, this draft amendment to the Mining State Environmental Planning Policy allows local councils to grant exemptions to these exclusion zones.

Apparently Premier O’Farrell and his backers have decided to ignore the fact that local government is the most corruptible of all three tiers of government in Australia.

One has only to look at this short list of NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) investigations into councils over the last five years to realise this.

In 2012 ICAC found that twenty-one people employed or formerly employed by fourteen different local government councils had acted corruptly and, that fifteen employees of private sector companies and one employee of a government agency had assisted in these corrupt activities.
Also in 2012 ICAC found that a councillor and a property developer had acted corruptly in 2009 and 2010.
In 2011 ICAC found three employees at three separate councils had acted corruptly.
In 2010 the Commission found an employee and a contractor had acted corruptly at one council, while a job applicant had been found to have offered a bribe at a second council. In that same year another person was found to have acted corruptly when seeking a licensing agreement with a third council.
In 2009 ICAC made corruption findings involving two persons associated with a property development and one council employee and, also found that two person had attempted to bribe council employees at another council.
In 2008 the Commission found ten people had acted corruptly with regard to one particular council, including four sitting councillors and, that this corruption had allegedly involved 139 offences.
In 2007 ICAC made corruption findings involving three councils.

As for any thought that the revamped Division of Local Government (now under the wing of the Dept. of Premier and Cabinet) may curb any future enthusiasm for corrupt behaviour should local councillors and senior managers be given any right to extinguish the possibility of exclusions zones on land wanted by mining companies – on past performance aid from this quarter is highly unlikely. Especially as the Division appears to prefer sending problems brought to its notice back to councils for resolution and, as since April 2012 the pecuniary interest of councillors is no longer a bar to voting on the creation or amendment of a local environmental plan which is a land use planning instrument.

In 2011-12 alone at least 34 per cent of the complaints concerning 125 councils the Division received involved either natural resource management, public land management, land use planning/development or pecuniary interest.

That mining companies may offer bribes as a matter of course in doing business is not a new issue, often misleadingly referring to them as tax deductible facilitation payments or business expenses if they appear on company books at all.

The O’Farrell Government’s desire to shift responsibility for creating lasting exclusion zones back onto local government, with its highly suspect track record, is an act of betrayal of Northern Rivers communities. Nothing more, nothing less.

If Federal Labor retains the Page electorate in September 2013 it will be due to the almost universal respect won by the sitting member Janelle Saffin


Only the most rusted on of Liberal or Nationals supporters dispute the assertion that Labor's Janelle Saffin is a respected and hardworking advocate for her electorate.

This is a typical view.......

UrsulaTunks from Grafton in The Daily Examiner 22 March 2013:

Janelle has always been a Kevin Rudd supporter, since this government was first elected. She didn't commit political suicide she simply displayed her integrity and remained loyal. Janelle isn't interested in 'politics' per say, Janelle’s primary interest is our electorate. I'm not a Labor voter, nor a member of the Labor party. However when it comes to Members of Parliament Janelle will go down in history as one of the best, hardest working members in the history of Federal Government.

Just how many unfortunate nicknames can one bloke have?


 LUKE AQUINAS FOLEY MLC giving evidence before ICAC last Tuesday morning and revealing to the world knowledge of obscure nicknames:
“Well, one of Ian Macdonald’s nicknames was bestowed by Bob Carr that he was Della’s pet crocodile, another nickname was that he was Obeid’s left testicle.”

Tuesday, 26 March 2013

Cansdellgate continues


Northern NSW newspapers, including The Northern Star and The Daily Examiner, are carrying reports about the latest 'happening' associated with disgraced former Member for Clarence Steve Cansdell.

Smith won't pressure DPP to charge MP Steve Cansdell 

Attorney-General Greg Smith has told NSW Parliament he will not call on the Director of Public Prosecutions to pursue criminal charges against disgraced Clarence MP Steve Cansdell until "otherwise advised".
Despite lying about not being behind the wheel of his car when it was snapped by a speed camera in 2005, the former police secretary escaped criminal punishment when the staffer he claimed was driving refused to make a statement.
The Government's handling of the investigation has been subject to debate since retired QC Bruce James suggested in February that Mr Cansdell could still have been prosecuted for lying under oath.
He questioned whether the DPP had properly investigated the charges that could have been laid.
Earlier this month Mr Smith told parliament Mr James's concerns were a matter for the DPP.
But in a letter sent to shadow Attorney-General Paul Lynch last week, the DPP advised that Mr James's recommendations must be referred by Mr Smith's office.
Yesterday, Mr Lynch again asked Mr Smith if he would use his power to ask the DPP to consider the senior barrister's advice.
Mr Smith said while he had "great respect" for Mr James, he was willing to "stand by" other well-respected lawyers who did not agree with the advice until "otherwise advised".
Mr Lynch he would not give up, the questions raised must be pursued and instead of "sitting on his hands", Mr Smith needed to ensure the DPP "has another look".
Mr Cansdell quit shortly after the 2011 election following revelations he had told police his staffer Kath Palmer was driving at the time of the offence to avoid being stripped of his licence.

Source: The Northern Star and The Daily Examiner.

Have you accepted The Out Of Order Coke Challenge?

'Sticking it to Coke' for suing the Northern Territory over their 'cash for cans' scheme and standing up for our wildlife!

Abbott the hypocrite par excellence



A yet to be Leader of the Opposition Tony Abbott writing to BA Santamaria when he was considering entering politics and Santamaria was advising him to join the Liberals:

To join either existing party involves holding ones nose.

The Liberal Pary is without soul, direction or inspiring leadership.

Abbott during Question Time on 21 March 2013:

I have seen enough of good people on both sides of this chamber to have some respect for the Labor Party…..

Abbott in an Address to the Victoria Liberal Party State Council on 28 April 2012:

And we, my fellow Liberals, are fundamentally a party of values and of principles.

Tony Abbott photograph from Google Images

Monday, 25 March 2013

The difference between Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott


During the National Apology for Forced Adoptions held in the Great Hall at Parliament House in Canberra, the difference between the world views of Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott was graphically demonstrated.

There were tears and applause for Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard:




The first moment when approval of the Leader of the Opposition Tony Abbott  turned to anger, interjection and shouting:



Full speech transcript
Note: transcript appears to have been amended by author since first publication

A perspective from one of the many in the Great Hall that day:

Yesterday I stood proudly alongside my biological mother -- who I now call mum -- in Canberra to hear the historic national apology. It was a monumental occasion to be sitting next to my mother listening to Prime Minister Julia Gillard give an authentic and informed apology. Mum and I were both impressed, and you could tell by the response of other people affected by forced adoption that they were elated when she actually acknowledged the harm by talking about the loss of lives to suicide.
The emotions in the room were palpable. Gillard used the word illegal, which we were hoping for. Mum desperately needed to hear that word... 


When Abbott started speaking, immediately the tone of the room and the elated atmosphere disintegrated rapidly. Abbott obviously had not consulted with anyone. He didn’t understand the findings of the Senate inquiry and didn’t understand that language is so important when we’re talking about forced adoption. He spoke about "relinquishment" not "forced adoption". We were there for a national apology on forced adoption, not relinquishment. My mother did not relinquish me, I was taken.
He also used the term "birth mothers". For the majority, the mothers and fathers consider themselves parents, period. That’s when the heckling occurred, when he used the term birth parents. For my mother, it echoed the judgemental and insensitive practices of the past.
Everything that Gillard achieved in terms of validating all the mothers, fathers, sons and daughters was completely eroded by Abbott’s speech. One of the recommendations was to bring broader public awareness around the coercive and illegal practices that occurred. If our Opposition Leader couldn’t even understand what happened and use the appropriate words, then what hope do we have of the broader community understanding?