Monday, 3 June 2013
Just when you think the Institute for Cetacean Research cannot sink any lower, the media reports this..................
ABC News 2 June 2013:
Japan's peak whaling body has launched a new campaign to promote whale meat as a nutritious food that enhances physical strength and reduces fatigue.
With about 5,000 tonnes of whale meat sitting unwanted in freezers around Japan, the country's Institute for Cetacean Research has decided to launch a new campaign to promote the by-product of its so-called scientific whaling program.
Once popular in school lunches, younger generations of Japanese rarely, if ever, eat whale.
But the institute hopes to revive flagging interest by advertising whale meat as a great source of balenine - a substance believed to enhance energy and physical health….
Sunday, 2 June 2013
Where Australian political parties and candidates are officially finding their funding
The Guardian's DataBlog posted these graphs covering donations to Australian political parties/candidates based on the latest publicly available information:
The Australian Electoral Commission:
Entitlement to election funding
A candidate or Senate group is eligible for election funding if they obtain at least 4% of the first preference vote in the division or the state or territory they contested. The amount to be paid is calculated by multiplying the number of votes obtained by the current election funding rate. The funding rate for the 2010 federal election was 231.191 cents per House of Representatives and Senate vote. This rate is indexed every six months to increases in the Consumer Price Index.
Amount paid
Amount paid
The amount of election funding payable is calculated by multiplying the number of first preference votes received by the rate of payment applicable at the time. The rate is indexed every six months in line with increases in the Consumer Price Index.
The current election funding rate from 1 January 2013 to 30 June 2013 is 247.316 cents per eligible vote.
The Sydney Morning Herald 31 May 2013:
While the parties are cagey about campaign spending, electoral commission figures show that in 2010-11, the financial year in which the last federal election was held, the Liberal Party spent $108 million, more than three times what the party spent the year before. In 2010-11 Labor spent $88 million, more than double what it spent the previous year.
The Sydney Morning Herald 31 May 2013:
While the parties are cagey about campaign spending, electoral commission figures show that in 2010-11, the financial year in which the last federal election was held, the Liberal Party spent $108 million, more than three times what the party spent the year before. In 2010-11 Labor spent $88 million, more than double what it spent the previous year.
Garma’wu Buku_luŋgthurra (Getting People Together), Gulkula NT, 9-12 August 2013
Labels:
Australian society,
Recognition
Saturday, 1 June 2013
This song is dedicated to Tony, Chris, Cory & the rest of the Canberra wingnuts *Warning Strong Language*
Can you post this song on North Coast Voices and dedicate it to Tony Abbott, Christopher Pyne, Cory Bernardi and the rest of Canberra wingnut crew?
Anony-mice
Yamba
Look inside, look inside your tiny mind
Then look a bit harder
'Cause we're so uninspired, so sick and tired
Of all the hatred you harbor
So you say it's not okay to be gay
Well, I think you're just evil
You're just some racist who can't tie my laces
Your point of view is medieval
Fuck you, fuck you very, very much
'Cause we hate what you do
And we hate your whole crew
So please don't stay in touch
Fuck you, fuck you very, very much
'Cause your words don't translate
And it's getting quite late
So please don't stay in touch
Do you get, do you get a little kick
Out of being small minded?
You want to be like your father
It's approval you're after
Well, that's not how you find it
Do you, do you really enjoy
Living a life that's so hateful?
'Cause there's a hole where your soul should be
You're losing control a bit
And it's really distasteful
Fuck you, fuck you very, very much
'Cause we hate what you do
And we hate your whole crew
So please don't stay in touch
Fuck you, fuck you very, very much
'Cause your words don't translate
And it's getting quite late
So please don't stay in touch
Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you
Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you
Fuck you
You say you think we need to go to war
Well, you're already in one
'Cause it's people like you that need to get slew
No one wants your opinion
Fuck you, fuck you very, very much
'Cause we hate what you do
And we hate your whole crew
So please don't stay in touch
Fuck you, fuck you very, very much
'Cause your words don't translate
And it's getting quite late
So please don't stay in touch
Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you
Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you
* Guest Speak is a North Coast Voices segment allowing serious or satirical comment from NSW Northern Rivers residents. Email ncvguestpeak at gmail dot com dot au to submit comment for consideration.
Australian Medical Association calls for coal seam gas health checks
23/05/2013
The AMA Federal Council today passed a policy resolution calling on all Australian governments to ensure that all coal seam gas (CSG) mining proposals in Australia are subject to rigorous and independent health risk assessments before they are allowed to proceed.
The motion reads as follows:
That Federal Council adopts the policy resolution urging governments to ensure that:
- all existing coal seam gas extraction projects are regularly monitored for any health impacts and the presence of air and ground-water pollutants in their local environment; and,
- all future proposals for coal seam gas mining are subject to rigorous and independent health risk assessments, which take into account the potential for exposure to pollutants through air and groundwater and any likely associated health risks. In circumstances where there is insufficient evidence to ensure safety, the precautionary principle should apply.
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that governments must strengthen the assessment and monitoring of the health impacts of coal seam gas (CSG) developments in Australia.
“Despite the rapid expansion of CSG developments, the health impacts have not been adequately researched, and effective regulations that protect public health are not in place,” Dr Hambleton said.
“There is a lack of information on the chemicals used and wastes produced, insufficient data on cumulative health impacts, and a lack of comprehensive environmental monitoring and health impact assessments.
“The assessment of the health impacts of CSG developments needs to strengthened and made consistent across all jurisdictions. The regulation of CSG varies between the States, with standards for health regulation ranging from a degree of consideration to apparent disregard.
“In circumstances where there is insufficient evidence to ensure safety, the AMA recommends that the precautionary principle should apply. This is essential given the threat of serious and irreversible harms to human health.
“The AMA welcomes the current move by the Commonwealth to strengthen environment protection laws relating to the impacts of CSG projects on water resources, but this must be supported with national standards and safeguards for health,” Dr Hambleton said.
23 May 2013
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
Labels:
Coal Seam Gas Mining,
health,
safety
Friday, 31 May 2013
Abbott is caught out - then slides away on the back of a number of political lies
On 24 May 2013 – eight days after he declared a budget emergency – Australian Opposition Leader Tony Abbott agreed to progress the passage and assure the Coalition vote for the Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Political Donations and Other Measures) Bill 2013 which would retrospectively and into the future deliver millions of dollars to the coffers of major political parties.
Then the issue became a hot topic in both the backrooms of the halls of power and in electorates across Australia.
Suddenly Abbott's office claimed that the opposition had not seen the legislation, then that A deal on the reform was originally negotiated between senior Labor and Liberal figures but Mr Abbott had not formally declared his position.
Later still the line was that he had actually agreed to the legislation before his budget reply pointed out the so-called 'budget emergency'.
Finally we hear that even though Abbott had agreed, it was only provisional as he had no power to sign off on the agreement.
The political lies ran trippingly off Mr. Abbott's tongue during a number of televised interviews.
However his letter is out there in cyberspace for all to see........
Then the issue became a hot topic in both the backrooms of the halls of power and in electorates across Australia.
Suddenly Abbott's office claimed that the opposition had not seen the legislation, then that A deal on the reform was originally negotiated between senior Labor and Liberal figures but Mr Abbott had not formally declared his position.
Later still the line was that he had actually agreed to the legislation before his budget reply pointed out the so-called 'budget emergency'.
Finally we hear that even though Abbott had agreed, it was only provisional as he had no power to sign off on the agreement.
The political lies ran trippingly off Mr. Abbott's tongue during a number of televised interviews.
However his letter is out there in cyberspace for all to see........
Labels:
Abbott,
Federal Election 2013
Telstra and the Federal Coalition want you to continue to pay for privacy
Consumers Federation of Australia 28 May 2013:
In February, ACCAN welcomed Telstra’s move to waive the fee for people who are under a protection order or at risk of violence. However, ACCAN argued in its submission to a recent Senate Committee inquiry that this exemption is not enough and a Silent Line should be free for all consumers.
“Under Telstra’s policy, many people who rightly need a Silent Line will still be forced to pay the fee,” said ACCAN CEO Teresa Corbin. “It’s clear Telstra aren’t going to remove this fee for all consumers, which is why we’re calling on the government to act. We want to make sure all Australians do not have to pay for this privacy protection,” said Ms Corbin.
In the Senate Committee’s report, Labor and Greens Senators recommended the fee be banned, however a majority of Coalition Senators recommended against banning the fee……
Telstra has not said publicly how much revenue is collected from the Silent Line fee, however in 2007 a Fairfax newspaper estimated that the fee generates as much as $30 million annually. This conservative estimate is a small fraction – around 1/1000th – of Telstra’s annual sales revenue (over $25 billion FY 2011-2012).
Other providers like Internode, iPrimus and iiNet all charge their customers a Silent Line fee due to the costs passed on from Telstra. Optus charges a Silent Line fee when it resells a Telstra landline service, although it doesn’t charge a fee on its own service.
In 2008 the Australian Law Reform Commission recommended the fee be abolished.
Labels:
Abbott economics,
privacy,
Telstra
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)