Monday, 7 July 2014
Is Russian President Vladimir Putin's history written in the stars?
The Wire 3 July 2014:
Vladimir Putin may be a powerful and menacing leader here on Earth, but in the cosmos, he isn't getting such kind treatment. Ukrainian astronomers along with pro-Ukraine activists have gotten together to name a star "Putin-Huilo!" Huilo (sometimes spelled khulio) is a Ukrainian term which translates loosely to a combination of "dickhead," "fucker," and "asshole." So the name of the star translates to either "Putin is a dickhead" or "Putin is a dipshit," depending how you read huilo.
The star was adopted through the Pale Blue Dot Project, affiliated with the White Dwarf Research Corporation. Pale Blue Dot allows anyone to adopt a star for just $10, and pick its name. The $10 donation goes to funding the research of astronomers seeking Earth-like planets.
Labels:
just for fun
Clarence Valley Council Mayor determined that local government will not be transparent or accountable
The motion moved and lost (laid out in Points 1,2, & 3 and the casting vote below) clearly shows that Clarence Valley Council Mayor Richie Williamson is determined that even his fellow councillors will not know how much council has spent on investigations and industrial relations court cases over the last three years. A period which co-incidentally appears to roughly equate with the time Scott Greensill has been general manager.
[Snapshot from Clarence Valley Council Monthly Meeting Minutes, 24 June 2014]
Labels:
Clarence Valley Council,
governance
Sunday, 6 July 2014
The Very Christian Australian Minister for Immigration and Border Protection In Action
In a year when I thought that evidence before the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse had comprehensively blackened the reputation of Australian Christianity and that its standing could sink no lower, along came the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection.
This was the very Christian Scott Morrison, Liberal MP for Cook, as recorded by Hansard on 14 February 2008:
Growing up in a Christian home, I made a commitment to my faith at an early age and have been greatly assisted by the pastoral work of many dedicated church leaders, in particular the Reverend Ray Green and pastors Brian Houston and Leigh Coleman. My personal faith in Jesus Christ is not a political agenda. As Lincoln said, our task is not to claim whether God is on our side but to pray earnestly that we are on His. For me, faith is personal, but the implications are social—as personal and social responsibility are at the heart of the Christian message. In recent times it has become fashionable to negatively stereotype those who profess their Christian faith in public life as ‘extreme’ and to suggest that such faith has no place in the political debate of this country. This presents a significant challenge for those of us, like my colleague, who seek to follow the example of William Wilberforce or Desmond Tutu, to name just two. These leaders stood for the immutable truths and principles of the Christian faith. They transformed their nations and, indeed, the world in the process. More importantly, by following the convictions of their faith, they established and reinforced the principles of our liberal democracy upon which our own nation is built.
Australia is not a secular country—it is a free country. This is a nation where you have the freedom to follow any belief system you choose. Secularism is just one. It has no greater claim than any other on our society. As US Senator Joe Lieberman said, the Constitution guarantees freedom of religion, not from religion. I believe the same is true in this country.
So what values do I derive from my faith? My answer comes from Jeremiah, chapter 9:24:
... I am the Lord who exercises loving-kindness, justice and righteousness on earth; for I delight in these things, declares the Lord.
From my faith I derive the values of loving-kindness, justice and righteousness, to act with compassion and kindness, acknowledging our common humanity and to consider the welfare of others; to fight for a fair go for everyone to fulfil their human potential and to remove whatever unjust obstacles stand in their way, including diminishing their personal responsibility for their own wellbeing; and to do what is right, to respect the rule of law, the sanctity of human life and the moral integrity of marriage and the family. We must recognise an unchanging and absolute standard of what is good and what is evil. Desmond Tutu put it this way:
... we expect Christians ... to be those who stand up for the truth, to stand up for justice, to stand on the side of the poor and the hungry, the homeless and the naked, and when that happens, then Christians will be trustworthy believable witnesses.
These are my principles. My vision for Australia is for a nation that is strong, prosperous and generous: strong in our values and our freedoms, strong in our family and community life, strong in our sense of nationhood and in the institutions that protect and preserve our democracy; prosperous in our enterprise and the careful stewardship of our opportunities, our natural environment and our resources; and, above all, generous in spirit, to share our good fortune with others, both at home and overseas, out of compassion and a desire for justice…..
In conclusion, it says in the Book of Joel, ‘Your old men will dream dreams; your young men will see visions.’ Let us have in this place a vision of young men and women that realises the dreams of generations past—the dreaming of Dharawal elders of ancient times, the dreams of Cook and his era of discovery and enlightenment and the dreams of my grandparents’ generation, who fought wars, survived the Great Depression and gave birth to our great Liberal Party with the dream of a brighter day for those who came after them. May God bless and guide us all in this place as we serve those who have had the good grace to send us here on their behalf. [my red bolding]
This is the very Christian Minister for Immigration and Border Protection and Liberal MP for Cook, Scott Morrison, putting his values into action.
The
Sydney Morning Herald 4 July 2014:
The Abbott
government has singled out Sri Lankans for special treatment, or mistreatment,
if the conclusions of successive international reports on the country's human
rights abuses are accepted. Australia subjects only Sri Lankans to
"enhanced", or expedited, screening. Australia's
"arrangement" with Sri Lanka is all about stopping the boats carrying
its nationals.
The Tamil
boat exodus to Australia did not happen during Sri Lanka’s 26-year civil war,
in which atrocities on both sides – the Sinhalese majority and the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam – were well documented. Rather, the flood of boats
erupted almost three years after the official end to the war in 2009. Between
January 2012 and late last year, Australia received more than 8300 Sri Lankans
by boat.
Why? Other
destination countries are asking the same question. In the foreword to a 2014
report that documents the testimony of 40 Tamils who fled to Britain, South
Africa's Archbishop Desmond Tutu writes: "It shows how anyone remotely
connected with the losing side in the civil war is being hunted down, tortured
and raped, five years after the guns fell silent. Shockingly, more than half of
the abductions in the report took place as recently as 2013-14 ... The sheer
viciousness and brutality of the sexual violence is staggering ... Thirty-five
of the witnesses were forced to sign confessions in Sinhala, a language they do
not understand."
The Sydney Morning Herald 3 July 2014:
A bold move by the Abbott government to circumvent a decision of the High Court and the will of the Senate appears certain to trigger another High Court challenge.
Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has responded to a court decision two weeks ago on visa caps by declaring he will personally apply a "national interest" test to every application for permanent protection by those who arrive without a visa.
The minister has also signalled he will reject all such cases by outlining several reasons why the national interest test will deny the grant of permanent visas and no reasons that would support the grant of a permanent visa.
The Guardian 3 July 2014:
The UNHCR has expressed “profound concern” that two boats carrying Tamil asylum seekers may have been sent back to Sri Lanka by the Australian government, and directly raised the possibility that Australia has broken international law.
The Guardian 2 July 2014:
Children account for the "greatest percentage" of self-harm incidents and suicidal behaviour by asylum seekers in detention, the president of Australia's Human Rights Commission has revealed, citing new statistics showing there were 128 reported self-harm incidents amongst children in detention between January 2013 and March this year.
Excerpt from a doorstop interview on 28 June 2014 where questions were raised about the fate of Tamil refugees, who were subsequently transferred at sea by Australia to the custody of the Sri Lankan navy and the regime from which they were fleeing:
Excerpt from a doorstop interview on 28 June 2014 where questions were raised about the fate of Tamil refugees, who were subsequently transferred at sea by Australia to the custody of the Sri Lankan navy and the regime from which they were fleeing:
Scott Morrison June 2014:
The Guardian 30 May 2014:
The desperate state of healthcare offered to asylum-seeker families, children, babies and pregnant women inside the Nauru detention centre can be revealed for the first time in a comprehensive report produced by five independent clinical experts, obtained exclusively by Guardian Australia.
Dept. of Immigration and Border Protection Review into the events of 16-18 February 2014 at the Manus Regional Processing Centre May 2014 – details of injuries sustained by asylum seekers at the hands of Centre staff, expat Australian service providers and PNG nationals including:
Reza Barati (Boat number FRT068) who died as a result of his injuries
[redacted] who lost his right eye
[redacted] who was shot in the buttocks, and
Mr. T2 who was slashed across the throat.
The Australian 31 March 2014:
Immigration Minster Scott Morrison today confirmed he had fulfilled his election pledge to remove free legal advice to asylum-seekers who arrive without visas by sea or air …
“If people choose to violate how Australia chooses to run our refugee and humanitarian program, they should not presume upon the support and assistance that is provided to those who seek to come the right way, and they should certainly not receive additional assistance, as they did under the previous government,” he said.
ABC News 25 November 2013:
Mr Morrison says an asylum seeker who gave birth in Brisbane nearly three weeks ago could also be sent back to Nauru.
The baby boy was delivered by caesarean, and has suffered respiratory problems and feeding difficulties.
The Guardian 15 November 2013:
When asked if Nauru had suitable medical facilities for disabled children, since it did not have suitable pre-natal care, Morrison said there were disabled people in the detention centre receiving “appropriate” care.
“It doesn’t matter how much education you’ve had, it doesn’t matter whether you’ve come from Syria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, anywhere else, it doesn’t matter whether you’re a child, it doesn’t matter whether you’re pregnant, it doesn’t matter whether you’re a woman, it doesn’t matter whether you’re an unaccompanied minor, it doesn’t matter if you have a health condition, if you’re fit enough to get on a boat then you can expect you’re fit enough to end up in offshore processing,” he said.
The Australian 30 July 2013:
Thousands of asylum seekers will be housed on Nauru in a tent city for up to five years under a coalition government, as a cheap alternative to the Labor government's proposed Manus Island resettlement program.
At least 2000 people would be sent to a new camp to be built by the coalition if it wins government, but thousands more would be located elsewhere, with no guarantee of final settlement in Australia, The Australian reports on Tuesday.
We Did It Better Than You: former Maclean shire councillor hits back at Clarence Valley Council
Letter to the Editor in The Daily Examiner on 5 July 2014:
Scrutinising rate rise
We expect a lot from our elected councillors, but right at the top of the list is honesty, transparency and competence.
I nearly fell out of my car when I heard Mayor Williamson interviewed on ABC radio about general rates levied by his council in Iluka and Maclean and he spoke about council expenditure on new sewerage systems.
The costs of all sewer systems in every town in this Valley is paid via an annual and uniform service charge levied on every ratepayer and has absolutely nothing to do with general rate income or general rate expenditure.
Council pays for new sewerage projects with Government grants, plus loan funds which are totally repaid by this service charge. To link this service charge to general rate income or general fund expenditure is misleading and disgraceful.
The new Iluka sewerage scheme and the Maclean/Lawrence scheme were developed by the former Maclean Shire Council. The only things the Clarence Valley Council can claim credit for are delays and cost blow-outs.
Today Councillor Sue Hughes has attempted to justify her support for a massive 5.66 percent residential rate hike in Maclean and Townsend by suggesting that in 2013/14 Maclean ratepayers contributed just $1.3 million to the council and received $2.3 million expenditure in return. She makes no effort to detail that expenditure and she also fails to explain that council inevitably spends more than it earns in rates in every town in this Valley as council receives untied money from the Federal Government (known as FAGS), plus a variety of grants from State and Federal governments, plus fees and service charges, as well as rate incomes.
This council constantly wastes money with massive over-runs on project budgets; huge legal costs which include unsuccessful actions against their own staff; absolute incompetence in managing simple tenancies such as Georgie's Cafe...... It is a council that has major deficits year after year in its general fund. It is a council about to seek considerable increases in rates above rate pegging limits in the very near future.
While ratepayers on the Lower Clarence have carried an increased burden since 2008, all ratepayers, including those in Grafton, should take a long hard look at this council and demand honesty, transparency and competence. We deserve no less.
Bill Day
Yamba
Labels:
Clarence Valley,
local government
Saturday, 5 July 2014
It's Your Choice; Drink Smart says Clarence Valley Council
On
27 June 2014 The Daily Examiner
reported that; The NSW Department of Police and Justice
has awarded Clarence Valley Council $49,000 for a campaign to reduce
alcohol-related violence in and around licenced premises.
Most Clarence Valley residents do not experience alcohol-related violence. Nevertheless the valley has a rate for this sort of violence which exceeds the state rate, according to the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics & Research (BOCSAR).
So this is a worthwhile local government initiative.
So this is a worthwhile local government initiative.
January 2004 to December 2013:
Although it is by no means the only offender on the NSW North Coast:
Labels:
alcohol,
Clarence Valley Council,
violence
Friday, 4 July 2014
Over the last eighteen years the percentage of working-age Australians receiving income support from Centrelink or Dept. Veterans' Affairs has fallen
The Review of Australia’s Welfare System Interim Report, June 2014, reveals what Abbott, Hockey and Cormann are careful not to mention - the percentage of working-age people receiving income support in the major welfare cash transfer categories has been steadily falling for the last eighteen years:
Coal Seam Gas: "I dread the day the licence holder comes here to explore"
The Land 27 June 2014:
In April, NSW Resources Minister Anthony Roberts announced senior counsel Bret Walker would conduct a review into the controversial laws.
Mr Roberts said perceptions of lack of transparency, consistency and “perceived conflicts of interest” within the process had prompted the review.
Retired Family Court judge Ian Coleman SC, has returned to the Bar to work as a barrister representing landholders in negotiations with mining and gas exploration companies.
“In large measure I was motivated by what I saw happening,” Mr Coleman said.
“The arbitration process is slanted in favour of the mining companies.”
First on his list of “realistically achievable” reforms would be to make legal qualifications compulsory for government-appointed arbitrators who preside over a formal process to determine an explorer’s access conditions.
Arbitrators are selected from a panel appointed by the resources minister.
Not all have formal legal qualifications and Mr Coleman said it showed.
Some arbitrators were retired senior counsels “who are superb”, Mr Coleman said. But others “don’t understand the complexity of the matters”.
The decision-making process in arbitration can involve complicated legal arguments with significant consequences.
“There are some judges who hear cases that are no more complex,” Mr Coleman said.
Arbitrators’ rulings are “like a contract”, he said.
The only recourse for an unhappy landowner is to appeal to the Land and Environment Court, with the prospect of exorbitant legal costs.
Mr Coleman also wants to see a guaranteed right to legal representation during arbitration hearings.
Currently, a landowner can have their lawyer present if the explorer consents.
This can create an imbalance, as companies often have representation with legal expertise, sometimes a lawyer on a sabbatical, to represent them in hearings.
Lastly, Mr Coleman said landowners’ costs should be covered by the explorer.
Currently, the explorer only covers the cost of the arbitration process.
The cost of legal counsel, expert advice from agronomists, and so on, is borne by the landowner.
Mary Lou Potts runs a private practice and has advised about 50 clients in land access negotiations.
Her experience has formed her bleak view of land access laws.
“The current system, in my view, is truly a travesty of justice,” Ms Potts said.
An explorer could seek access before it had all the appropriate approvals, leaving the landowner with the choice of paying for legal advice or relying on their wits to negotiate access for exploration that might never occur, she said.
“A landholder potentially could spend $100,000 during arbitration, which could run for several years and in the end it might turn out that the miner doesn’t get approval or it doesn’t even undertake the exploration,” she said.
Risks and costs were pushed onto the landholder, Ms Potts said.
One clear point of law is explorers must not have an impact on significant improvements on a property, such as dams, valuable work or infrastructure, such as buildings, banks and so on.
However, Ms Potts said it was common for an explorer to contest what constitutes a significant improvement, citing a current battle over a six-strand electrified boundary fence as an example.
Even those who know the system are intimidated by it.
Mr Coleman owns a small farm near Rylstone, which is covered by a coal seam gas exploration licence.
“I dread the day the licence holder comes here to explore,” he said.
“I have been a barrister for 40 years, and it terrifies me.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)