Tuesday, 24 March 2015
How the Irish fought big tobacco and won
Using Australia as a role model, the Irish Government introduced plain packaging for tobacco into law on 9 March 2015.
MerrionStreet Irish Government News Service:
Published on Thursday 19th March 2015
Speech: Dr James Reilly, the Minister for Children and Youth Affairs was today the keynote speaker at the 16th World Conference on Tobacco or Health in Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates
It’s an honour to address you here today as a Minister but I feel particularly privileged as a doctor.
Recently, Ireland became the second country in the world and the first in Europe to enact plain packaging legislation.
This has been a long journey.
We first considered this policy after it was introduced in Australia in December 2012 - and I’d like to pay particular tribute to them.
The road to passing the legislation had far more twists and turns than we anticipated – both in Ireland and in Europe.
It was clear from the outset that there would be additional hurdles to passing legislation for plain packaging in Ireland due to our obligations to comply with European Directives.
At the time, a 2001 Directive was in force which did not permit picture warnings on the front of the packet.
A draft Directive – that would make plain packaging far more effective and legally sound – was progressing slowly through the European bureaucracy.
By a happy coincidence, Ireland held the Presidency of the European Union at the beginning of 2013.
With the support of other countries, we succeeded in passing a new Directive through the Council of Ministers in just six months.
This Directive permitted warnings – including pictures – to occupy 65% of the front and back of the packet and explicitly permitted countries to introduce plain packaging.
It was only when the Directive made its way to the European Parliament that we saw the full power and influence of the tobacco industry at work.
Leaked tobacco industry documents show that 161 lobbyists were hired and millions of euro was spent by one tobacco company alone.
Members of the European Parliament complained that the scale of lobbying on this Directive was unprecedented.
Key parts of the Directive were under serious threat.
There was a very real danger that the European Parliament would vote in favour of reducing the size of warnings and even that the Directive wouldn’t get through the European Parliament.
In an unprecedented response, I and 15 other European Health Ministers co-signed a letter urging Members of the European Parliament to progress the Directive.
At the same time, the Irish Prime Minister and I wrote to every Member of the European Parliament in the largest grouping urging them to keep large warnings on the packets and to progress the Directive.
Thankfully, the tobacco industry’s lobbying was not successful in diluting picture warnings or the right of member states to introduce plain packaging. Ireland’s legislation was evolving in tandem with these events in Brussels.
After the Tobacco Products Directive was passed in Europe, the tobacco industry shifted their focus to Ireland.
Their response was unprecedented and global.
From Members of the European Parliament to US Congressmen. From Indonesian farmers to Irish retailers.
We were lobbied on a scale that Irish politics had never seen before but we had built a strong coalition that proved impenetrable to tobacco industry lobbying.
Politicians from all parties and none joined forces to support this measure. Committed NGOs - from both the public health sector and the protection of children sector - worked tirelessly to maintain public support.
We formed a coalition whose resolve was unshakeable.
When the tobacco industry realised this, they changed tactics.
Japan Tobacco International, Imperial Tobacco and Philip Morris all threatened the Government with legal action should our legislation proceed.
The legal letter from Japan Tobacco International was especially aggressive.
Not only did they attempt to tell a sovereign Government that we did not have the authority to enact plain packaging legislation, they attempted to tell us how far we could progress it through our Parliament and insisted that we provide them with a written undertaking – within a matter of days - not to progress it any further.
They did not receive any such undertaking.
Our plain packaging Bill was passed through our Upper House and Lower House without a single Member of Parliament or Senator voting against it.
There has been a battle to progress this legislation every step of the way.
But these were all battles worth fighting The Irish Philosopher, Edmund Burke said “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.
If we do nothing, the tobacco industry will delay and thwart public health legislation.
If we stand up to them – if we meet them head on – we will defeat them.
Because their only aim is to protect their profits.
Our aim is to protect the health of our people, especially that of our children.
We have the truth on our side.
Truth - as an old lady once told me - is not fragile. It will not break - nor will we.
I’ve been asked repeatedly why don’t we wait to see how a larger country - one with a bigger legal arsenal – gets on with plain packaging before we proceed.
Ladies and Gentlemen, there is a time to follow and there is a time to lead.
When one addiction is responsible for almost one in five deaths in our country – it is time to lead.
We have taken the lead from Australia but we are now giving the lead to Europe.
The UK are following and France intends to move next.
If Europe follows, can the rest of the world be far behind?
I’ve worked as a doctor for almost three decades. I’ve seen first hand the consequences of smoking.
I’ve seen the painful deaths – watching patients gasp for air or waste away from cancer as their lungs fail. I’ve seen the devastation on the faces of their families.
All these deaths are entirely preventable. All these deaths for what? For nothing. This addiction gives nothing to smokers lives and robs us all of so much.
Robs us of 5,200 Irish people who die of smoking every year.
Robs us of 700,000 Europeans who die of smoking every year.
That’s almost the population of Amsterdam annihilated every single year.
That’s 700,000 families who must live their lives without their loved ones. Children without their parents; partners without their partners.
While the economic impact of this can be estimated, the human toll cannot.
But there is hope. Throughout the developed world, smoking rates are falling.
We now know the policies that work.
When we meet again in three years time, I hope cigarettes will be sold in plain packaging, not just in Australia and Ireland, but in the UK, France, Norway, Finland, New Zealand and many other countries.
I hope plain packaging will be driving down smoking rates throughout the world. Throughout the world we have committed NGOs and politicians who are showing the determination required to tackle this scourge head on.
That is why conferences like this are so important. We learn from each other. We learn what works. We learn to stand together. Despite their billions of euros and hidden connections, the tobacco industry can be defeated.
We must rise to the challenge to protect our children from a killer addiction that ends the lives of half of those who become addicted to it.
Remember: “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.
We won’t stand idly by - our children can’t afford us to fail. Standing together - we can, we must, we will prevail.
Labels:
Australia-Ireland relations,
law,
tobacco
In which Tony Abbott calls Bill Shorten "the Dr Goebbels of economic policy and Christopher Pyne accuses Mark Dreyfus of calling Abbott "Goebbels-like" in the past
Just to make it very clear, despite what Christopher Pyne was saying to The Speaker in this video, the Member for Isaacs Mark Dreyfus never at any time referred to Tony Abbott as "Dr. Goebbels" or called him “Goebbels-like” in the House of Representatives.
It is easy enough to check using OpenAustralia.
In recent years there has only been one offender in the House and three in the Senate before Prime Minister Abbott opened his mouth on 18 March 2015 and called Opposition Leader Bill Shorten “the Dr. Goebbels of economic policy”.
Senator Ross Lightfoot (Liberal) used the sentence The spin you put on it would make Goebbels blush in May 2008,Senator Ian MacDonald (Liberal) said Goebbels would be proud of you in September 2011, MP for Moreton Graham Perrett (Labor) used the phrase Goebbels-type experiment in June 2013 and, Senator Linda Reynolds (Liberal) stated Goebbels was in favour of free speech for views he liked in October 2014.
Whatever MPs and Senators may say or imply outside of parliament is not normally the business of parliament and, it should not have been on the day though I suspect it was a factor as The Speaker, Liberal MP Bronwyn Bishop, sent Labor MP Mark Dreyfus from the House for objecting.
How the Northern Hemisphere saw the situation.....
Whatever MPs and Senators may say or imply outside of parliament is not normally the business of parliament and, it should not have been on the day though I suspect it was a factor as The Speaker, Liberal MP Bronwyn Bishop, sent Labor MP Mark Dreyfus from the House for objecting.
How the Northern Hemisphere saw the situation.....
The
Independent (Ireland) 18 March 2015:
Speaker
Bronwyn Bishop ordered Labour lawmaker Mark Dreyfus - one of only three Jewish
lawmakers in Parliament - out of the House of Representatives for rising from
his seat to angrily berate the prime minister.
Fellow Labour
lawmaker Michael Danby, also Jewish, left the chamber with Mr Dreyfus in
solidarity.
"There
are no Nazis here and we shouldn't be making comparisons with the paradigm of
the ultimate evil in politics to heighten political differences," Mr Danby
told The Associated Press (AP) later.
"It's
beneath him and it goes to the question of his judgment. I think a lot of his
backbench will be groaning and tearing their hair out."
Mr Dreyfus
later described the Nazi reference as inappropriate for a prime minister….
Peter
Wertheim, executive director of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, an
organisation representing Jewish community organisations, declined to comment
today because of his council's apolitical stance.
But he
referred AP to the council's long-standing policy statement that it: "Deplores
the inappropriate use of analogies to the Nazi genocide in Australian public
debate."
On 20 March 2015 Abbott tries a little 'context' in an ABC interview reported in The Age on the same day:
On 20 March 2015 Abbott tries a little 'context' in an ABC interview reported in The Age on the same day:
"Mr
Abbott for a Rhodes scholar, how come you say so many stupid things? 'Lifestyle choices' has enraged Aboriginal community
leaders, and yesterday, bringing Goebbels into the Parliament?" Faine put to
the Prime Minister.
"I
withdrew and I apologised and I did it straight away, there was no hesitation.
I accept that in the context of history and the way things have developed that
was an over-the-top remark and I straight away withdrew and apologised,"
Mr Abbott responded.
"But why
do you have this foot in mouth disease, what's going on?" Faine asked.
"All of
us from time to time in the heat of debate and you know how heated the
Parliament can get, sometimes can go too far," Mr Abbott said.
Unfortunately for Abbott images of him laughing at the response to his remark during and at the end of the incident give lie to the sincerity of his apology.
Unfortunately for Abbott images of him laughing at the response to his remark during and at the end of the incident give lie to the sincerity of his apology.
Financial Review 19 March & 21 March 2015
Labels:
Nazi slur,
right wing politics,
Tony Abbott
Monday, 23 March 2015
So just how different are NSW Premier Mike Baird and Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott?
Photograph from The Daily Telegraph, Tony Abbott (left) and Mike Baird (right)
Michael Bruce "Mike" Baird MP Anthony John “Tony” Abbott
Liberal Premier of NSW Liberal Prime Minister of Australia
State Member for Manly Federal Member for Warringah
on Sydney’s North Shore on Sydney’s North Shore
Born April 1968 in Melbourne Born November 1957 in London
Almost 48 years old 58 years old
Attended an exclusive private school, Attended an exclusive private school,
King’s School St Ignatius College
Bachelor of Arts (Economics) Bachelor of Arts (Economics)
University of Sydney Bachelor of Laws
University of Sydney
Master of Arts (PPE)
Oxford University
Studied theology with a view Studied theology with a view
to becoming an Anglican minister to becoming a Catholic priest
Regent College, British Columbia St. Patrick’s Seminary, Sydney
Member of Queenscliff Surf Life Member of Queenscliff Surf Life
SavingClub Saving Club
Sometimes boxes for exercise Former recreational boxer
Lives in federal electorate Lives in federal electorate
of Warringah at Fairlight, NSW of Warringah at Forestville, NSW
Announced a budget deficit in 2014-15 Announced a budget deficit in 2014-15
in his first state budget as Premier in his first federal budget as Prime Minister
Has a policy of privatization of Has a policy of privatization of
state assets state assets
Supports petroleum & mineral exploration Supports petroleum & mineral exploration
including coal seam gas including coal seam gas
Cut public service jobs as Cut public service jobs as
NSW Treasurer Australian Prime Minister
Sometimes avoids press questions Frequently avoids press questions
after a media announcement after a media announcement
"And what a pleasure it is to stand here in “Mike Baird, my friend, my local
“If everybody had the chance to sit down his responsibilities with integrity and
Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott spoke and hysterical laughter echoed across the land
Tony
Abbott is a genius.
He has proved
Albert Einstein's greatest theory, propounded 100 years ago. Time and space do
bend!
Mr Abbott, we
learn, was pumping out metadata when he was a journalist years before
journalists used the internet. He was spinning stories in hyperspace before we
knew it existed.
We know this
because the Prime Minister told us so on Wednesday.
"In the
days when I was a journalist," he revealed to seekers of truth,
"there were no metadata protections for journalists and if any agency,
including the RSPCA or the local council, had wanted my metadata, they could
have just gone and got it on authorisation. Look, I was perfectly comfortable
as a journalist."
Mr Abbott was
a journalist in the second half of the 1980s. He quit the craft in 1990.
The first
commercially available internet web browser, Netscape Navigator, appeared in
1994. Internet Explorer appeared in 1995. And even then, a computer with access
to the internet was scarcer in the Australian news industry than a sober lunch.
Labels:
right wing rat bags,
Tony Abbott
Why do we still have Tony Abbott as Prime Minister of Australia? Perhaps we should blame rightwing Christian lobbyists
ABC News 16 March 2015:
ABC's Four Corners program has revealed the campaign was run by lobby group the National Civic Council (NCC), which emailed thousands of its members and associates, urging them to contact the Liberal MPs.
It follows the leak of a confidential message from party treasurer Philip Higginson pushing for Peta Credlin's removal as Mr Abbott's chief of staff.
The emails link to a live webpage hosted by sister organisation, The Australian Family Association, where almost 100 Liberal MPs could be contacted with a single click.
MPs described being deluged with emails leading up to the leadership spill.
"In the last few days the emails have been overwhelmingly flooding the office saying all this nonsense about leadership has gone far too far, and the emails are now overwhelmingly saying 'stick to the team you've got'," Senator Eric Abetz told ABC Hobart at the time.
Four Corners uncovered the campaign after a detailed instruction email was inadvertently sent to a Sydney barrister.
NCC vice president Patrick Byrne, who organised the email campaign, said it was effective.
"Our email campaign would've gone out to maybe 10,000 people; I'm not exactly sure and I don't have direct feedback, but I think it's had some influence," he told Four Corners.
One NCC email, obtained by Four Corners, warned about the possibility of either Malcolm Turnbull or Julie Bishop being elected to the leadership.
"Whatever his failings, the alternatives are Malcolm Turnbull, who failed as leader, and Julie Bishop, who was forced to resign as shadow treasurer due to dissatisfaction within Liberal ranks over her performance," one email read.
The emails credit Mr Abbott with holding the line on same-sex marriage and repealing the carbon tax.
The Prime Minister is held in high regard by the NCC.
Mr Abbott described its founder, Bob Santamaria, as, "my first political mentor", in his book Battlelines.
National Civic Council website here.
BACKGROUND
The Monthly April 2007:
In the aftermath of the Great Split in the Labor Party, in 1954-55, the Catholic-based anti-communist wing was driven out of all the states, other than New South Wales. The anti-communists, led by Bob Santamaria, then received the cold shoulder from Rome. They soldiered on, forming one of the most determined political forces in Australia. Through his organisation, the National Civic Council, and his newspaper column, his TV spot on the Nine Network and his regular contact with government ministers, Santamaria exerted the kind of influence which political activists and lobbyists these days can only dream of.
Sunday, 22 March 2015
March 2015 NSW Election: 7 out of 8 Clarence Electorate candidates against mining on the Dorrigo Plateau*
Blicks River Guardians
Media Release 17th March 2015
No to mining on the Dorrigo Plateau
Left to Right:
Independent Deb Novak, Christian Democrat’s Carol Ordish, Independent Bryan Robins,
Country Labor’s Trent Nathan, The Greens’ Janet Cavanaugh
Country Labor’s Trent Nathan, The Greens’ Janet Cavanaugh
A public forum was held on Sunday 15th March at the Dundurrabin Community Centre on the Dorrigo Plateau where Labor and Greens candidates from the Oxley electorate and Labor, Greens, Christian Democrats and independent candidates from the Clarence electorate debated the upcoming election issues.
The event was hosted by the Blicks River Guardians a local community group who formed in July 2013 to raise awareness of gold, copper and antimony exploration in local catchments. A spokesperson for the group, Meredith Stanton said,
“Ahead of the forum we sent questions to the candidates and asked, “Do you agree. Is mining an inappropriate land use for the Dorrigo Plateau?”, because our group has serious concerns about mining development in our area and the risk of water contamination.”
A majority Chinese-owned company, Anchor Resources holds three exploration leases covering private and public land on the Dorrigo Plateau. The Blicks Project (EL 6465 & EL 8100 - Scorpio Resources) is a gold and copper prospect located about 2km’s from Dundurrabin and the third - the Bielsdown Project (EL6388)- is an antimony prospect located in the Oxley electorate, above the Nymboida River catchment near Dorrigo.
Ms Stanton added, “The forum was a great success and I’m pleased to report that all seven candidates who attended voiced opposition to any mine development here on the Dorrigo Plateau. We are still waiting to hear from the Nationals who could not attend, but we hope they will reply in writing when they have time.”
The Dorrigo Plateau has one of the highest annual rainfalls in NSW and receives an average of 2000mm of rainfall p.a. with daily falls of over 400mm recorded during the 2009 floods.
Prime Minister Abbott's plan still permits an outrageous attack on Australian press freedom
Media Entertainment & Arts Alliance 16 March 2015:
The Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance (MEAA), the union and industry advocate for Australia’s journalists, cannot support the Prime Minister’s proposal for government “agencies to obtain a warrant in order to access a journalist’s metadata for the purpose of identifying a source”.
The Prime Minister’s plan still permits an outrageous attack on press freedom and would have a chilling effect on journalism in Australia leading to whistleblowers being fearful that they risk exposure if they seek to reveal instances of wrongdoing, corruption, waste, illegal activity and dishonesty.
MEAA believes the lack of understanding of what is at stake requires the proposed Parliamentary Inquiry into press freedom concerns to go ahead in order the concerns of journalists and media organisations are heard and acknowledged by MPs.
MEAA CEO Paul Murphy said: “What needs to be understood is that no journalist, anywhere, can ever allow the identity of a confidential source to become known – that is a guiding principle of journalism the world over. It is a principle acknowledged by every Australian journalist in clause 3 of MEAA’s Journalist Code of Ethics: ‘Where confidences are accepted, respect them in all circumstances’.”
Murphy added: “Accessing metadata to hunt down journalists’ sources, regardless of the procedures used, threatens press freedom and democracy. It means important stories in the public interest can be silenced before they ever become known, and whistleblowers can be persecuted and prosecuted. It means journalists can be jailed for simply doing their job.
“The so-called ‘safeguards’ recommended by the Parliamentary Committee were no safeguards at all because they still allowed government agencies to hunt down journalists’ sources. Similarly, the Prime Minister’s proposal also allows those agencies to trawl through a journalist’s metadata in order to expose a confidential source. Putting a hurdle like a warrant in the way will not change the outcome: using a journalists’ metadata to pursue a whistleblower. Why does the Government not understand that no journalist can breach their fundamental ethical obligation to never allow the identity of a confidential source to be revealed?”
MEAA has consistently explained this principle of press freedom in every submission to Parliament on the national security laws. MEAA also repeated those concerns on Thursday last week when it was visited by representatives from the Prime Minister’s, Attorney-General’s and Communications Minister’s offices and the AFP Commissioner Andrew Colvin. During that meeting, the AFP confirmed it has been repeatedly asked to hunt down journalists’ sources by accessing journalists’ metadata and he confirmed that it is doing so. The Data Retention Bill will simply formalise these activities with no regard to the press freedom implications and presumably encourage at least 20 government agencies to go trawling through journalists’ metadata.
Murphy said: “Journalists cannot allow the relationship they have with a confidential source to be breached, under any circumstance – that is their ethical responsibility. If the surveillance continues and is formally adopted in the Data Retention Bill with or without a warrant, then journalists will be forced to use the tools of counter-surveillance such as anonymisation and encryption to protect their sources. It remains our fundamental position that this Bill should not be proceed at all and that the press freedom concerns of the previous two tranches of national security laws must be addressed.”
MEAA CEO Paul Murphy said: “What needs to be understood is that no journalist, anywhere, can ever allow the identity of a confidential source to become known – that is a guiding principle of journalism the world over. It is a principle acknowledged by every Australian journalist in clause 3 of MEAA’s Journalist Code of Ethics: ‘Where confidences are accepted, respect them in all circumstances’.”
Murphy added: “Accessing metadata to hunt down journalists’ sources, regardless of the procedures used, threatens press freedom and democracy. It means important stories in the public interest can be silenced before they ever become known, and whistleblowers can be persecuted and prosecuted. It means journalists can be jailed for simply doing their job.
“The so-called ‘safeguards’ recommended by the Parliamentary Committee were no safeguards at all because they still allowed government agencies to hunt down journalists’ sources. Similarly, the Prime Minister’s proposal also allows those agencies to trawl through a journalist’s metadata in order to expose a confidential source. Putting a hurdle like a warrant in the way will not change the outcome: using a journalists’ metadata to pursue a whistleblower. Why does the Government not understand that no journalist can breach their fundamental ethical obligation to never allow the identity of a confidential source to be revealed?”
MEAA has consistently explained this principle of press freedom in every submission to Parliament on the national security laws. MEAA also repeated those concerns on Thursday last week when it was visited by representatives from the Prime Minister’s, Attorney-General’s and Communications Minister’s offices and the AFP Commissioner Andrew Colvin. During that meeting, the AFP confirmed it has been repeatedly asked to hunt down journalists’ sources by accessing journalists’ metadata and he confirmed that it is doing so. The Data Retention Bill will simply formalise these activities with no regard to the press freedom implications and presumably encourage at least 20 government agencies to go trawling through journalists’ metadata.
Murphy said: “Journalists cannot allow the relationship they have with a confidential source to be breached, under any circumstance – that is their ethical responsibility. If the surveillance continues and is formally adopted in the Data Retention Bill with or without a warrant, then journalists will be forced to use the tools of counter-surveillance such as anonymisation and encryption to protect their sources. It remains our fundamental position that this Bill should not be proceed at all and that the press freedom concerns of the previous two tranches of national security laws must be addressed.”
In
an interesting twist, the Australian
Federal Police issued a media
release in which it admitted that police already request access to journalists’ metadata:
Fact check: Use of metadata in
relation to journalists
Release
Date: Tuesday, March 17 2015, 02:34 PM
In
a statement released yesterday, the Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance
(MEAA) claimed that AFP Commissioner Andrew Colvin confirmed the AFP had “been
repeatedly asked to hunt down journalists’ sources by accessing journalists’
metadata and he confirmed that it is doing so. The Data Retention Bill will
simply formalise these activities with no regard to the press freedom
implications and presumably encourage at least 20 government agencies to go
trawling through journalists’ metadata.”
This is inaccurate and a distortion of the comments made.
Commissioner Colvin said that over the past 18 months, the AFP has received 13 referrals relating to the alleged unauthorised disclosure of Commonwealth information in breach of section 70 of the Crimes Act.
This offence specifically criminalises the activity of Commonwealth officials who have released Commonwealth information in contravention of their obligations, not journalists.
In the overwhelming majority of these investigations, no need was identified to conduct a metadata telecommunications inquiry on a journalist. AFP requests for accessing a journalist’s metadata are rare. [my red bolding]
On 19 March 2015 the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014 was passed by the House of Representative. Only three MPs voted against it - The Greens'Adam Bandt and Independents Andrew Wilkie and Cathy McGowan.
This is inaccurate and a distortion of the comments made.
Commissioner Colvin said that over the past 18 months, the AFP has received 13 referrals relating to the alleged unauthorised disclosure of Commonwealth information in breach of section 70 of the Crimes Act.
This offence specifically criminalises the activity of Commonwealth officials who have released Commonwealth information in contravention of their obligations, not journalists.
In the overwhelming majority of these investigations, no need was identified to conduct a metadata telecommunications inquiry on a journalist. AFP requests for accessing a journalist’s metadata are rare. [my red bolding]
On 19 March 2015 the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2014 was passed by the House of Representative. Only three MPs voted against it - The Greens'Adam Bandt and Independents Andrew Wilkie and Cathy McGowan.
Image from The Guardian 19 March 2015
Labels:
Abbott Government,
AFP,
information technology,
Internet,
spies
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)