Monday, 15 April 2019
Another federal Coalition Government ‘epic fail’
Seems
whatever our neigbour to the west, the National Party’s Barnaby
Joyce, touches turns to dross……
The
Sydney Morning Herald, 6 April 2019:
A phone tower that
Barnaby Joyce fought for ended up on the northern NSW property of long-time
friend and mining baron Gina Rinehart, who gets an annual fee to host the
tower. Locals are baffled why the tower was put there over another location, as
it's plagued with reception problems.
The Northern Daily
Leader reports that
Kingstown's community in Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce's New England electorate
campaigned hard for the tower, switched on two weeks ago, to be co-located with
a police and emergency services tower at the highest point in the district.
But it was built instead
at Sundown Valley Pastoral Company, bought by Ms Rinehart's pastoral arm
Hancock Prospecting in August last year. Landowners are paid a yearly fee by
telecommunications companies to have towers placed on their property.
Kingstown resident Jeff
Condren led the charge for a tower to be funded by the federal government's
Mobile Blackspot Program and called it an "epic fail".
"Now that the tower
has been in operation for several weeks it's evident the community concerns
relating to the location and the service was well-justified," he said.
"Service levels
drop to nothing just a couple of kilometres in any direction.....
Sunday, 14 April 2019
Who will be to blame if Essential Energy cuts down koala trees in Lawrence, NSW?
Koala habitat within Lawrence, NSW |
Essential Energy is a NSW state-owned corporation supplying
‘poles and wire’ infrastructure to communities on the North Coast.
One of those
communities is the small village of Lawrence
on the Lower Clarence River.
An attractive feature of living in this village is that it is one of the ever
diminishing small regional/rural urban areas which still have resident koalas.
Koalas like
this one sitting in a tree line marked by Essential Energy for felling.
Photograph of Lawrence koala supplied |
Koala mid-canopy & circled in black Photograph supplied |
Apparently those surveying the short new route for a section of poles and wires in Lawrence neglected to look up into the trees – what else can explain the fact that known koala trees have been marked for destruction?
So who is it
that employs such incredibly blind staff?
Well
Essential Energy has a Board
of Directors (very comfortably remunerated from $60,600 up to $764,200 pa) and all apparently living far from this particular group of
koalas.
These board
members are:
Patricia McKenzie – Chair, Non-Executive Director
Robyn Clubb – Non-Executive Director
Jennifer Douglas – Non-Executive Director
John Fletcher – Non-Executive Director
Peter Garling – Non-Executive Director
Patrick Strange – Non-Executive Director
Diane Elert – Non-Executive Director
John Cleland – CEO and Executive Director.
The
shareholders are represented by the NSW
Treasurer and Minister for Finance,
Services and Property. Current Treasurer is MP for Epping Dominic Perrottet.
With the
exception of the Treasurer all these people belong to what might be called the
professional directors class and, between them are associated with a number of other businesses and a research facility:
APA Group, Health
Direct Australia,
Australian Wool Exchange Ltd,
Craig Moyston Group Ltd, Elders Ltd, NSW Primary Industries Ministerial Advisory Council, Rice Marketing Board of NSW,
Hansen Technologies Limited, Opticomm Pty Ltd, Peter MacCullum Cancer Foundation,
Hansen Technologies Limited, Opticomm Pty Ltd, Peter MacCullum Cancer Foundation,
Charter Hall Funds Management Limited, Charter Hall Limited, Energy Group Limited, Downer EDI Limited, Newcastle Coal Infrastructure Limited, Tellus
Holdings Limited,
Auckland International Airport Limited. Chorus
Limited, Mercury Energy, NZX Limited.
A fair number of people in Lawrence have told Essential Energy that they want these koala trees to be left standing and the corporation states it has taken its plan under review.
So if Essential Energy does decide these koala trees are to be cut down in the next few months, don’t blame the men with chainsaws, blame these eight professional directors and the successive NSW Coalition governments who appointed them - from the O'Farrell Government in 2013 through to the Berejiklian Government in 2018.
So if Essential Energy does decide these koala trees are to be cut down in the next few months, don’t blame the men with chainsaws, blame these eight professional directors and the successive NSW Coalition governments who appointed them - from the O'Farrell Government in 2013 through to the Berejiklian Government in 2018.
Because state government is clearly appointing directors who cannot even ensure that Essential Energy’s
environmental
policy (for which they are responsible) is comprehensive and actually mentions vulnerable and threatened
flora and fauna.
It is a policy which (aside from a brief mention of greenhouse gas emission reduction) fails to give clear direction to staff, given there is only a single broadly worded line in its 12 point health, safety & environmental policy to cover all manner of environmental issues ie., "Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, standards, codes, licences and commitments"
These directors appear so divorced from real life that they apparently never thought that their regional/rural staff need to be trained to look up into tree canopies before they decide to mark a tree line for destruction.
It is a policy which (aside from a brief mention of greenhouse gas emission reduction) fails to give clear direction to staff, given there is only a single broadly worded line in its 12 point health, safety & environmental policy to cover all manner of environmental issues ie., "Comply with relevant legislation, regulations, standards, codes, licences and commitments"
These directors appear so divorced from real life that they apparently never thought that their regional/rural staff need to be trained to look up into tree canopies before they decide to mark a tree line for destruction.
The bottom
line is that the Koala as a species is at risk of localised extinction across the areas in which
populations still survive and, sadly is at risk of total extinction across the entire country by as early as 2050 if those in positions of power continue to be
deliberately blind to the fate of this Australian icon.
Morrison Government caught out attempting to retrospectively censor native bird export information
The Guardian, 4 April 2019:
The Australian
government has attempted to retrospectively censor critical information related
to exports of rare and exotic birds to a German organisation headed by a
convicted kidnapper, fraudster and extortionist.
Guardian Australia revealed late last
year that
Australia had permitted the export of 232 birds, some worth tens of thousands
of dollars, to the Brandenburg-based Association for the Conservation of
Threatened Parrots (ACTP) between 2015 and November 2018.
Conservation groups and federal politicians
had repeatedly expressed concern about the group, which is headed by Martin
Guth, a man with multiple criminal convictions.
The Guardian’s
investigation relied on internal government documents secured through freedom
of information laws, released in August.
Guardian Australia made
subsequent freedom of information requests and received further documents in
January. But the federal department of environment has now attempted to
retrospectively redact parts of the documents, saying it accidentally released
information it shouldn’t have.
Some of the inadvertently
released information could “facilitate fraudulent export applications”, the
department said. The department had also accidentally released “personal
information, such as birth dates and name, and confidential business
information”.
The department has asked
Guardian Australia to destroy its copies of the documents, and not further
disseminate the newly redacted details.
“While we understand
that the FOI decisions have already been made, and that you are under no
obligation to follow the department’s wishes, we kindly request that you
either: destroy the documents that the department has previously released to
you and instead, use the redacted documents attached to this letter; or
otherwise ensure that the information in question … is not further disclosed or
made publicly available,” the department said in a letter emailed to the
Guardian on Wednesday, but dated last month.
The documents have not
been published on the department’s online FOI disclosure log. The department’s
stance suggests that other parties – journalists or conservation groups, for
example – would be subject to the newly introduced redactions if they requested
the same documents.
Freedom of information
experts say the government’s actions have “no legal basis”……
The new redactions remove
details that made it possible for Guardian Australia to establish that the
operator of ACTP’s Netherlands facility was convicted in 2015 of involvement as
a buyer in a trading ring that was illegally selling protected exotic birds.
The department has also
removed identification numbers for the birds that were exported to Germany, arguing that its original decision
to release that information could lead to “fraudulent” exports of Australian
birds overseas.
It has also blacked out
permit numbers from the export permits issued in Australia, the names of
individuals who operate other ACTP facilities in Germany and in other
countries, and removed information relating to ACTP’s exemption status from corporate
tax.
The redactions remove
images of ACTP’s main breeding facility and maps that illustrate its layout.
In recent months,
Guardian Australia has been trying to establish whether the department
undertook adequate due diligence to ensure that all of the birds sent to ACTP
were legally captive bred.
But the department has
refused to release names of suppliers in Australia that would show the chain of
custody for each of the birds before they were exported to Germany. Those
details were redacted from FoI documents released to the Guardian in January
and from documents tabled after an order for the production of documents in
parliament.
Attempts by government
agencies to retrospectively recover or redact FOI documents have previously
been found to have no lawful basis under NSW freedom of information law.
Landcom, the NSW government’s land and property development organisation,
attempted to retrieve documents it had accidentally released to a school
committee group in 2005, and took its case to the NSW
Administrative Decisions Tribunal.
The tribunal found it
had no power whatsoever to retrieve previously released FOI documents.
Labels:
#MorrisonGovernmentFAIL,
birds,
exports,
flora and fauna
Saturday, 13 April 2019
Tweet of the Week
During the last LNP gov, Centrelink required my blind son to have vision tests to see if his sight improved. He was born without eyes. https://t.co/cSCjxsPmvt— EggShellBlonde (@HeyMum3) April 9, 2019
Labels:
Centrelink
What a difference twenty-two months makes to that textbook hypocrite, Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison
A little over twenty-two months out from a federal election this was then Australian Treasurer Scott Morrison's voting down the creation of a Royal Commission into the abuse and neglect of people with a disability........
Less than six weeks out from a federal election Morrison will have to fight very hard to win we have tears being shed by the Prime Minister.....
* Snapshots by Highlighter @tvdc99
Labels:
#ScottMorrisonFAIL,
disability,
right wing politics
Friday, 12 April 2019
Is NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian intending "to make it a priority to finish off effective protection of the natural environment – something started years ago under the Coalition State Government"?
On Thursday 4 April 2019 the local Knitting Nannas held a protest knit-in outside the electoral office of NSW Nationals MP for Clarence, Chris Gulaptis.
Below is the text of their letter to Mr. Gulaptis dated the same day.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Knitting Nannas Against
Gas
Grafton Loop
c/- PO Box 763
Grafton 2460
knaggrafton@gmail.com
4th April 2019
C O P Y
Mr C Gulaptis MP
Member for Clarence
11 Prince Street
GRAFTON NSW 2460
Dear Mr Gulaptis
Dissolving of Office of Environment and
Heritage
The Grafton Nannas are very concerned about
your Government’s recently announced intention of doing away with the Office of
Environment and Heritage as an independent entity.
We have long been worried about the
Government’s lack of concern about protecting the natural environment for
current and future generations of humans as well as for other life forms.
Government policies over recent years have
been seen by many in our community and elsewhere as being a de facto war on the
natural environment.
For example:
- Changes to vegetation laws which have led to a large increase in clearing of habitat which is important to the survival of native flora and fauna. This weakening of the former laws is also likely to lead to increased topsoil loss and general land degradation.
- Changes to logging regulations which threaten the sustainability of native forests which belong to the people of NSW – and not to logging interests. These changes include limiting pre-logging fauna surveys, an inevitable increase in clear-felling, and reduction in the width of buffer zones along streams.
- Failure to protect the health of rivers, particularly those in the Murray-Darling Basin. For years the NSW Government, as well as the Federal Government, has been pandering to the irrigation industry while ignoring the need to protect river health by ensuring that flows are adequate for river health. The drought is not an excuse for this folly.
- Other examples include the cutting of funding to the National Parks & Wildlife Service and penny-pinching changes to its structure as well as the failure to ensure that the existing weak environment laws are enforced and appropriate penalties imposed on those who breach them.
We are aware that the Premier recently stated that her Government
would make the environment a priority.
Since hearing that OEH was to lose any of
the limited independence it currently has and is to be pushed into a
mega-Planning Department, we are left wondering about what the premier actually
meant about “priority”. Did she mean
that she intended to make it a priority to finish off effective protection of
the natural environment – something started years ago under the Coalition State
Government? It looks very much like that
to the Nannas.
Yours sincerely
Leonie Blain
On behalf of the Grafton
Nannas
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Morrison’s plan to use whatever is left in Coalition MPs and Senators electoral communications parliamentary allowance to fund his national election campaign has been scuttled
REGULATIONS AND
DETERMINATIONS Parliamentary Business Resources Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1)
Regulations 2019 Disallowance Senator FARRELL (South Australia—Deputy Leader of
the Opposition in the Senate) (21:29): I move: That item 4 of the Parliamentary
Business Resources Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2019, made under
the Parliamentary Business Resources Act 2017, be disallowed [F2019L00177]. The
PRESIDENT: The question is that business of the Senate notice of motion No. 2,
standing in the name of Senator Farrell, relating to the disallowance of item 4
of the Parliamentary Business Resources Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1)
Regulations 2019, be agreed to. The Senate divided. [21:34] (The
President—Senator Ryan)
Ayes
......................34 Noes ......................26 Majority.................8
The New Daily, 4 April 2019:
The Morrison government
has lost a bid to allow MPs to use taxpayer-funded electoral allowances to pay
for TV and radio advertisements during the looming federal election campaign.
Late on Wednesday night
– in one of this parliament’s last votes before the election is called – the
Senate dumped a government regulation allowing $22 million of public
money to
be used for political ads in the lead up to May’s federal poll.
MPs have a budget of
about $137,000 for electorate communications, while senators have up to
$109,000.
Under existing rules,
they cannot use office expenses money to pay for content on television or
radio. The government’s changes would have allowed them to use printing
entitlements to buy TV and radio ads for the first time.
The Coalition had argued
lifting the ban on TV and radio promotions would have put Australian media on a
level playing field by ensuring all communities had the same access to
information from their federal MP.
But Labor frontbencher
Don Farrell, who moved the disallowance motion in the Senate, accused Prime
Minister Scott Morrison of wasting taxpayers’ money in a bid to save his job.
“Publicly funded office
budgets are for members and senators to communicate with their constituents –
not for spamming voters with hollow election slogans from the ad man, Scott
Morrison,” he said.
With the support of the
Greens and a handful of crossbench senators, Labor won the disallowance vote....
The heroes of
the hour who saved us all from what was clearly an attempt to create a lasting
rort at taxpayer’s expense were:
Bilyk,
CL. Carr, KJ. Chisholm, A. Ciccone, R. Di Natale, R. Dodson, P. Farrell, D.
Faruqi, M. Gallacher, AM. Griff, S. Hanson-Young, SC. Hinch, D. Ketter, CR. (teller) Kitching, K. Lines, S. Marshall, GM.
McAllister, J. McCarthy, M. McKim, NJ. O'Neill, DM. Patrick, RL. Polley, H.
Pratt, LC. Rice, J. Siewert, R. Smith, DPB. Steele-John, J. Sterle, G. Storer,
TR. Urquhart, AE. Waters, LJ. Watt, M. Whish-Wilson, PS. Wong, P.
Well
done one and all!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)