Thursday, 27 June 2019
Clarencegirl is unwell and on sick leave until further notice.
Wednesday, 26 June 2019
News Corp, Morrison Government & mining lobby groups in concerted attack on environmental lawyers
The Attack.....
The
Australian,
22 June 2019:
A taxpayer-funded
network of environmental lawyers has been handed more than $2.5 million by
state governments, helping the group to clog up courts and launch dozens of
cases against gas and mining projects, including Adani’s Carmichael mine.
Environmental Defenders Offices
in NSW and Queensland were awarded more than $1m from the Berejiklian
government and almost $400,000 from the Palaszczuk government in 2017-18….
Resources Minister Matt
Canavan yesterday called on the states to deprive the green lawyers’ groups of
any more taxpayer funds.
“These EDOs are not
defending the public interest but pursuing a political agenda,” he said.
“As such, they should
not be receiving taxpayer support to destroy people’s jobs.”….
Leading business groups accused
the EDOs of engaging in “vexatious litigation” which is delaying projects for
years, damaging job-creation efforts and hindering the flow of royalties to
states and territories.
“Frivolous and vexatious
legal challenges to environmental approvals delay projects and threaten jobs
in regional Australia,” Minerals Council chief executive Tania Constable said.
An Australian Petroleum
Production & Exploration Association spokesman said the EDOs’ advocacy on
climate change was out of step with their apparent role as a community legal
centre for environmental cases.
“We have for some time
questioned the role of the EDO and its public funding,” he said.
The Response.....
NSW Environmental Defenders
Office (EDO NSW),
22 June 2019:
EDOs stand firm against
attacks
We are a community legal
centre of expert lawyers, proudly and unapologetically helping the NSW
community to use the law to protect wildlife, people and our planet.
Environmental laws
should not be for the few. They affect us all. Yet once again we are forced to
defend the community's access to justice against attacks by a fossil fuel lobby
aggrieved by the power our work provides to communities who seek to challenge
the lawfulness and merit of their major projects.
EDO NSW's litigation
work on behalf of our clients plays an important role, ensuring that people
have access to justice and are able to exercise their rights under Australian
law. People have a right to use the law to protect their family, homes and
environment. To be clear, as public interest community legal centres, EDOs do
not litigate on our own behalf, but represent clients (community groups,
Aboriginal groups and individuals) who may otherwise be unable to have access
to the justice system.
It’s disappointing to
see, yet again, the Minerals Council and Australian Petroleum Production &
Exploration Association demonstrating their lack of understanding of, and
respect for, the rule of law. At their heart, these claims are an attack on our
democracy and we should all be very concerned.
The fossil fuel lobby
has a track record of making the unsubstantiated claim that EDOs engage in
vexatious litigation, and frankly it’s getting tired. Despite being
over-utilised, this claim remains a troubling proposition. EDO NSW lawyers, who
include some of the best in our field, take our professional responsibilities extremely
seriously. Our 30 year track record is evidence of that. Not once in our
history have our clients’ cases been found to be ‘frivolous or vexatious’.
Underpinning most of our
litigation work is a question about whether the law has been complied with.
That decision-makers apply the law is a fundamental feature of our democracy.
Ensuring the law is complied with should be uncontroversial.
In other instances, our
work interrogates whether approving a project is – considering all the
circumstances – the correct or preferable decision. These are not simple
questions. The answer lies in the weighting of a range of different factors.
Our important work ensures that evidence proffered in support of a project is
thoroughly tested.
In a number of
instances, including in the recent case concerning the proposed Rocky Hill coal
mine, the economic benefits of the mine put forward by the mining company were
found to be overstated, based on the evidence put forward by both the
Government’s expert and our client’s. Equally the economic negatives of
that project - including social impacts and impacts on Aboriginal cultural
heritage - were found to have been understated by the mining company.
Litigation is a small
component of the work this office does on behalf of clients. When we do so, it
is only after application of our casework guidelines and detailed analysis from
senior legal experts to ensure there are merits in bringing a case.
EDO NSW also provides
the community with free legal advice and education - work that does see us
receive some State government grants. Our office operates a daily advice line
providing free advice on matters of environmental and planning law.
The NSW Government has
provided EDO NSW with funding for decades, irrespective of which party is in
Government. This demonstrates a bipartisan understanding of our role and
corresponding support for the provision of access to justice in this space -
that is, allowing members of the community to understand and seek advice about
NSW environmental and planning laws.
Our work relates to
ensuring that laws are applied correctly, and ensuring that evidence put
forward by project proponents is tested in an appropriate and independent forum.
Any changes to the law that erode community opportunities to participate in
environmental decision-making would be very concerning. This could easily be
seen as a blatant attempt to further prioritise the rights of coal mining
companies over the rights of communities, including farmers, eco-tourism
operators and others.
David Morris
CEO - Solicitor
Labels:
environment,
funding,
law,
mining
Tuesday, 25 June 2019
The Daily Examiner celebrates 160 years
Admittedly, this bloke hasn't always seen eye to eye with the Clarence Valley's local daily newspaper, The Daily Examiner. Some its efforts have caused more than a raised eyebrow.
However, chalking up 160 years of continuous coverage since it was first published as The Clarence and Richmond Examiner on June 21, 1859 is no mean feat. Last Friday the paper celebrated the occasion.
Congratulations DEX.
Credit: Image of The Daily Examiner's page 1 on Friday, June 21,
2019 (https://www.dailyexaminer.com.au/)
Labels:
The Daily Examiner
Governments must not allow private, profit-seeking parties such as Facebook Inc.to put the entire global financial system at risk
Wikipedia, 22 June 2019:
A cryptocurrency (or crypto
currency) is a digital asset designed to work as a medium of exchange that uses strong cryptography to secure financial
transactions, control the creation of additional units, and verify the transfer
of assets. Cryptocurrencies
use decentralized control as opposed to centralized
digital currency and central banking systems……
As the popularity of and
demand for online currencies has increased since the inception of bitcoin in
2009, so have concerns that such an unregulated person to person global
economy that cryptocurrencies offer may become a threat to society.
Concerns
abound that altcoins may become tools for anonymous web criminals.
Cryptocurrency networks
display a lack of regulation that has been criticized as enabling criminals who
seek to evade taxes and launder
money.
The Guardian, 22 June 2019:
Facebook is developing
Libra from a base in Switzerland, in partnership with 27 other corporations –
including Mastercard, Paypal, Uber and Vodafone – collectively known as the
Libra Association.
Financial Review, 21 June 2019:
Facebook has just
unveiled its latest bid for world domination: Libra,
a cryptocurrency designed to function as private money anywhere on the planet. In
preparing the venture, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been in negotiations
with central banks, regulators, and 27 partner companies, each of which will
contribute at least $US10 million. For fear of raising safety concerns,
Facebook has avoided working directly with any commercial banks.
Zuckerberg seems to
understand that technological innovation alone will not ensure Libra’s success.
He also needs a commitment from governments to enforce the web of contractual
relations underpinning the currency, and to endorse the use of their own
currencies as collateral. Should Libra ever face a run, central banks would be
obliged to provide liquidity.
The question is whether
governments understand the risks to financial stability that such a system
would entail. The idea of a private, frictionless payment system with 2.6
billion active users may sound attractive. But as every banker and monetary
policymaker knows, payment systems require a level of liquidity backstopping
that no private entity can provide.
Unlike states, private
parties must operate within their means, and cannot unilaterally impose
financial obligations on others as needed. That means they cannot rescue
themselves; they must be bailed out by states, or be permitted to fail.
Moreover, even when it comes to states, currency pegs offer only an illusion of
safety. Plenty of countries have had to break such pegs, always while insisting
that “this time is different”.
What sets Facebook apart
from other issuers of “private money” is its size, global reach, and
willingness to “move fast and break things.” It is easy to imagine a scenario
in which rescuing Libra could require more liquidity than any one state could
provide. Recall Ireland after the 2008 financial crisis. When the government
announced that it would assume the private banking sector’s liabilities, the
country plunged into a sovereign debt crisis. Next to
a behemoth like Facebook,
many nation-states could end up looking a lot like Ireland.
Facebook is barreling
ahead as if Libra was just another private enterprise. But like many other
financial intermediaries before it, the company is promising something that it
cannot possibly deliver on its own: the protection of the currency’s value.
Libra, we are told, will be pegged to a basket of currencies (fiat money issued
by governments), and convertible on demand and at any cost. But this guarantee
rests on an illusion, because neither Facebook nor any other private party
involved will have access to unlimited stores of the pegged currencies…..
Will the Clarence Valley see an upgrade of Grafton Base Hospital within the next three years or will it take a decade to commence?
Grafton Base Hospital is a 50-99 bed public health facility which offers health services to an est. 51,647 resident population in the Clarence Valley on the NSW North Coast and an additional annual tourist population which can reach or exceed 1 million visitors.
In the first
quarter of 2019 ambulance arrivals at Grafton Hospital were up 11.5 per
cent, emergency department presentations rose by 3 per cent, emergency
presentations climbed by 4.2 per cent, hospital admissions increased by 14.9
per cent with acute admissions totalling 3,127 patients and the elective surgery
waiting times continued to grow.
In that same
quarter during the NSW state election campaign the Nationals MP for Clarence on
behalf of the Berejiklian Coalition Government promised
voters in the Clarence Electorate a much needed $263.8-million overhaul
of Grafton Hospital.
At the time
doubts were raised about the genuineness of this promise as it contained little
detail.
Those doubts
are now resurfacing……
The Daily Examiner, 21 June 2019, p.3:
A major hospital upgrade
looks to be a while off as the Clarence Valley joins the long queue of regions
promised big projects at the New South Wales election.
The $263million
commitment to the Grafton Base Hospital redevelopment was
made in the final weeks of the campaign in March and is just one of many major
infrastructure promises outlined in the 2019-20 Budget Papers.
However, there there was
no specific line item in the 2019-20 Budget and Nationals MP Chris Gulaptis was
quick to point out it would take time.
“It’s not a line item as
such as we are still in the very early planning stages but there is a
commitment for works to commence during this term of government,” he said.
“In the meantime,
consultation needs to occur between the LHD, clinicians and the community to
ensure the redeveloped hospital is able to provide for the community
into the future.”
Mr Gulaptis said he had
received assurances from Premier Gladys Berejiklian, Treasurer Dominic Perrotet
and Deputy Premier John Barilaro that all election commitments would be
honoured and provided a letter from Health Minister Brad Hazzard responding to
representations he made after winning the election.
In the letter, Mr
Hazzard said the project was one of many promised but work would still start
before the end of the current term of parliament.
“In the period prior to
the March election, the NSW Government announced a significant number of
upgrades to hospital and health facilities across the state,” he said.
“This requires a
prioritisation of when projects will commence over the next four years and will
occur in alignment with the annual budget process.
“Once funding is made
available through the budget process, Health Infrastructure will work with the
local health district and clinical staff to progress the project through the
planning stages.”......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)