Sunday 14 November 2010

Saffin on the attack over those bank interest rate hikes


The big banks close ranks over rates
Image: Herald-Sun 13 November 2010

In the wake of the financial feeding frenzy as big banks raise interests rates between 10 to 20 basis points above the recent Australian Reserve Bank increase of 0.25 per cent (affecting an estimated 80 per cent of homeowners), Federal Labor Member for Page Janelle Saffin sent out this media release which would appear to accurately reflect the mood of many people living on the NSW North Coast:

Page MP Janelle Saffin has joined the attack on the Commonwealth, NAB and ANZ banks for raising interest rates above and beyond moves by the Reserve Bank.

“The time is not right and mortgage holders rightly feel ripped off.

The banks have a guaranteed profit making business, with less risk than our small businesses and family operated businesses but pay their executives at the top levels as though they are running really risky businesses.

The grab these higher fees and yet they provide us with the most basic services.

It is time the big banks were held to account.

Our banks came out of the global financial crisis strong, and there is no justification for moving interest rates above Reserve Bank rates.

Local customers are tired of the arrogant way the banks treat them.

“This is yet another case of the big banks putting profits before their customers and before the community’s standards,” Ms Saffin said.

“It is because of this arrogance that so many people turn to the community-based banks and credit unions.”

Saturday 13 November 2010

Abbott never fails to live down to his frightening reputation


The only thing that one can rely on Australian Opposition Leader Tony Abbott to consistently do – blindly play to mob mentality.

Next he is likely to suggest the re-introduction of the death penalty for those committing serious offences, including minors and the intellectually disabled.

ABC News on 11 November 2010:

Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott says if the courts keep on handing down lenient sentences then Australia will probably move to a system of elected judges.

Mr Abbott made the comments after being confronted with concerns about crime and sentencing during a community forum in Brisbane last night.

He says he would rather not change the system, but too many judges are handing down sentences that do not reflect community anger at crime.

"I never want lightly to change our existing systems but I've got to say if we don't get a better sense of the punishment fitting the crime, this is almost inevitable," he said.

"If judges don't treat this kind of thing appropriately, sooner or later we'll do something that we've never done in this country: we will elect judges and we will elect judges that will better reflect our sense of anger at this kind of thing."

Now I have always believed that sentencing by an independent judiciary was all about law not anger and, that if a society wanted sterner sentencing its legislators wrote law which specifically reflected that desire.

Court imposed punishment should never be subject to political pressure or mob whim and Abbott's silly media bite reflects a mind which meanders down dangerous paths.

Now THIS is illegal immigration :-D


Pic from Google Images

Friday 12 November 2010

Premier's Department gets down and dirty as the NSW March 2011 election draws nearer?


At 12am on 12 November 2010 Andrew Clennell of The Daily Telegraph reported online:

BARRY O'Farrell lobbied the State Government in defence of an alleged Serbian war criminal accused of torturing and murdering civilians and prisoners of war.

A letter from the Opposition Leader to Corrective Services Minister Phil Costa, leaked to The Daily Telegraph, lists complaints about the treatment of Dragan Vasiljkovic in Silverwater jail.

The Australian High Court recently decided there was a case for Vasiljkovic, otherwise known as Daniel Snedden, to be extradited to face war crime charges.

No prize for guessing the ‘leaker’ when, less than twelve hours before the article was published, a computer in the NSW Premier’s Department was clocked on the Internet doing a Google search using the search term dragan vasiljkovic nsw liberals”.

Presumably this eager beaver was looking for additional material to feed the Premier and perhaps the media.

Those who have followed the Vasiljkovic story will remember that he was apprehended earlier this year at Harwood in the Clarence Valley on the NSW North Coast.

Your personal privacy and Australian politicians' get-out-of-gaol-free card


It is well-known that browsing the Internet often brings down unwelcome types of cookies onto a personal computer. However, one does not always think of this possibility when clicking onto politicians’ websites.

The Sydney Morning Herald reminds us:

Politicians are letting foreign-owned companies covertly gather information about voters.

The websites of Barry O'Farrell, Kristina Keneally, Tony Abbott and the Greens plant spying devices on visitors' computers, which can track them as they browse the internet.

Information gathered about a user's online behaviour can be used to build detailed profiles to help target advertisements - a practice many believe is a threat to privacy.

Online tracking is done mainly by cookies (text files) and beacons (invisible images)…….

The devices allow a third-party company to see which elements of a page the user has clicked on, potentially identifying information held in the URL, such as an email address.

A tracking device, owned by Yahoo! and dated to expire in 2037, was planted on this website's test computer when visiting the website of the federal Opposition Leader, Tony Abbott.

The site of the Premier, Kristina Keneally, placed devices owned by ShareThis, a company that collects information about online habits.

All four websites planted YouTube cookies, even though this website's computer did not play any videos.”……

The websites of Ms Keneally, Mr Abbott and the Greens also planted flash cookies which can hold more data than standard cookies. They also have no expiration date and are stored on an external server, which makes them difficult for users to detect or delete…….

The Australian Privacy Commissioner, Timothy Pilgrim, said aggregated data might enable identification of individuals.

Now at the time of writing the stated privacy policies of Tony Abbott, Kristina Keneally and Barry O’Farrell did not spell out the extent of information gathering they were allowing on their websites.

Perhaps it’s time they did – even if a loophole in the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988 apparently allows the collection and compilation of digital and tracking data on the grounds that Members of Parliament, local government councillors and their respective contractors and sub-contractors (as well as political party volunteers) are exempt from this act’s provisions when participating in the political process.

Privacy protection is obviously a one-way street in this country and internet users are playing in the path of oncoming traffic.

Murray Darling Basin Plan brings the loons down from the hills


I can almost feel sorry for those small irrigation cockies who face the prospect of having the national water nipple plucked from their gaping mouths and really try to tolerate their irrational rants against the coming Murray Darling Basin Plan.
However, if ever I needed proof that conspiracy theories aren't just the province of the American far-right then this media release from the Citizens Electoral Council of Australia provides ample proof.
Read and enjoy this particular absurdity:

Media Release 9th of November 2010
Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
Phone: 03 9354 0544 Fax: 03 9354 0166
Email:
cec@cecaust.com.au
Website:
http://www.cecaust.com.au

Isherwood: Murray-Darling is another British imperial land-clearance; i.e. genocide


In an emergency address to the nation, Citizens Electoral Council leader Craig Isherwood charged that the Murray-Darling Basin Authority’s Basin Plan to shut down Australia’s food bowl was part of the British Empire’s drive to slash the world’s population down to only two billion or fewer people from its present almost 7 billion, using a characteristic tool of British imperialism—“land clearances”, which the British historically deployed to genocidal effect against Ireland, Scotland and more recently sub-Saharan Africa.

Click here to view Craig’s national address, delivered in Brisbane on 6th November.

Craig exposed that the British Crown, through Prince Philip’s World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), established in 1961 to reduce global population under the cover of “saving Nature”, has directed every aspect of the process that has culminated in the MDBA Plan:

  • The John Howard-led Coalition government passed the Water Act 2007 not for any ostensible domestic reason, but in slavish fealty to the diktats of the 1971 Ramsar International Convention on Wetlands, which was written by the WWF, in particular by longtime Ramsar chief, Dr Luc Hoffmann, who has been a director of Prince Philip’s World Wildlife Fund since 1963; to this day, the WWF is the major Partner Organisation of Ramsar.
  • Prince Philip personally founded the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) in 1963 as an arm of his WWF, and it is the ACF, together with the WWF-founded and bankrolled Wentworth Group of Concerned Scientists [sic], that have spearheaded the years of lobbying and PR to shut down the basin’s agriculture, in accordance with the Prince’s expressed creed, “You cannot keep a bigger flock of sheep than you are capable of feeding. In other words conservation may involve culling in order to keep a balance between the relative numbers in each species within any particular habitat. I realise this is a very touchy subject, but the fact remains that mankind is part of the living world. … Every new acre brought into cultivation means another acre denied to wild species.” [emphasis added]
  • Given the intense opposition to shutting down Australia’s food bowl, Prince Philip has sent in Ian Sinclair, a longtime member of his Privy Council—the official ruling body of the British Empire—to chair the token consultation meetings, to ram through the WWF/Ramsar policy on “wetlands”.
  • Craig detailed three historical examples of this British imperial policy of “land clearance” now being applied in the Murray-Darling Basin, in which entire peoples are simply forced off the land in pursuit of British imperial goals, foremost of which is “population control”:
  • Ireland, especially in the 17th and 19th Centuries, which the British sought to “replant” with Englishmen of “superior breed”, by confiscating 80 per cent of arable land, extracting almost all the food—except potatoes—as “rent”, and killing millions of Irish in the process.
  • The Scottish Highland land clearances of the 18th and 19th centuries, when hundreds of thousands of Gaelic-speaking Scots were forcibly-evicted from their homes in the Scottish Highlands by English and Scottish aristocrats—the British oligarchy—to either perish, to move to narrow strips of poor land along the coast, or to emigrate to North America, Australia and New Zealand, where to this day live far more descendents of Scottish Highlanders than in Scotland.
  • The post-1961 genocide of sub-Saharan Africa by Prince Philip’s WWF, which financed the sequestering of vast swathes of the African continent as “nature preserves”, for which, in British East and south-central Africa, evictions on a scale far larger than the Highland Clearances were carried out. Entire tribes were forced from their traditional homes, to the point that already by the late 1960s, 20 per cent of the land of many African states which had supposedly been given “independence” by the Crown, had in fact passed under permanent supranational control as “wildlife parks” and “nature preserves”, and the process has greatly expanded since. The WWF was involved in the mass-murder of Africans using ex-British SAS mercenaries, agent-provocateur operations which killed thousands in South Africa, and providing staging points under the cover of nature preserves for attacks on nations, including the 1994 Rwandan genocide.

Craig blasted the mentality of Australian victims, who protest against the oppressive and genocidal free trade and/or green policies that destroy their livelihoods, and which are destroying their very nation, but refuse to look at, and thus fight, the British Crown source of those policies, and its imperial system, based on a genocidal hatred of nation-states, and human beings.