The NSW Government domestic violence program rolled out between September 2014 and July 2015......
The safety and
protection of victims and their children lies at the heart of It Stops
Here: Standing Together to End Domestic and Family Violence, the NSW
Government’s Domestic and Family Violence Framework for Reform.
Safer Pathway proposes a
fundamental change in how agencies and organisations support victim’s safety in
NSW. Through Safer Pathway, the right services are provided to victims when
they need them, in a coordinated way.
The key components of
Safer Pathway build on the existing service response. These are:
* a Domestic Violence
Safety Assessment Tool (DVSAT) to better and consistently identify the level of
domestic violence threat to victims
* a Central Referral
Point to electronically manage and monitor referrals
* a state-wide network
of Local Coordination Points that facilitate local responses and provide
victims with case coordination and support. By the end of March 2018, Safer
Pathway will be operational at the following 43 sites: Albury, Armidale,
Ashfield/Burwood, Bankstown, Bathurst, Blacktown, Blue Mounatins, Bourke,
Broken Hill, Campbelltown, Coffs Harbour, Deniliquin, Dubbo, Far South Coast,
Goulburn, Gosford, Griffith, Hunter Valley, Illawarra, Lismore, Liverpool,
Moree, Mt Druitt, Newcastle, Newtown, Northern Beaches, Nowra, Orange,
Parramatta, Penrith, Port Macquarie, Queanbeyan, St George, Sutherland,
Tamworth, Taree, Toronto, Tweed Heads, Wagga Wagga, Walgett, Waverley,
Wollongong and Wyong.
* Safety Action Meetings
in which members develop plans for victims at serious threat of death,
disability or injury as a result of domestic and family violence
* information sharing
legislation that allows service providers to share information about victims
and perpetrators so that victims do not have to retell their story multiple
times, to hold perpetrators accountable and promote an integrated response for
victims at serious threat.
The outcome at Year 4 of the program......
Clare Ringland, The
Domestic Violence Safety Assessment Tool (DVSAT) and intimate partner repeat
victimisation, April 2018
Wai-Yin Wan, Hamish Thorburn, Suzanne Poynton and Lily Trimboli, Assessing
the impact of NSW’s Safer Pathway Program on recorded crime outcomes – an
aggregate-level analysis, February 2018
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
2 May 2018:
A signature NSW
government program to reduce domestic violence rates is failing to protect
women from further harm, a new report reveals, casting doubt over the
Premier’s target of reducing reoffending by 25 per cent by 2021.
The Safer Pathway
program, a key feature of state government's 2014 domestic violence reforms,
"has only had a limited effect on the incidence of domestic
violence", according to two reports released today by the NSW Bureau of
Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR).
It is the third
government-led domestic violence initiative to be found ineffective by
BOCSAR in recent months.
Dr Don Weatherburn,
BOCSAR's director, said the Premier's goal of reducing the number of
perpetrators who reoffend within 12 months to 10.7 per cent by 2021 was
now out of reach.
"Judging from what
we've seen there's no way we are going to have a 25 per cent reduction in
domestic violence reoffending by 2021," he said.
Under the Safer Pathway
program, police are required to assess all victims who report domestic violence
using a questionnaire known as the Domestic Violence Safety Assessment Tool.
Victims assessed as
having a "serious risk" are then referred to a Safety Action
Meeting (SAM), where a team of experts develop an "action plan"
for the victim.
BOCSAR tracked more than
24,000 cases of domestic violence between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2016,
and found that the questionnaire was a "very poor instrument for
measuring the risk of repeat domestic violence victimisation, often performing
little better than chance".
As part of the
questionnaire, victims are required to answer 25 questions designed to assess
their risk-level. A police officer then performs a further assessment,
including whether there are children at risk of harm. Victims are considered at
"serious risk" if they respond "yes" to at least 12
questions, and if the officer's assessment also concludes there is a legitimate
threat.
However, BOCSAR's report
found that 90 per cent of those who experienced repeat victimisation had
responded ‘'yes'’ to fewer than 12 items in the questionnaire.
“Large numbers of women
who are at serious risk aren't being identified as such and aren't being
given the support of a safety action meeting,” Dr Weatherburn said.
He said the questionnaire also
failed to ask critical questions, such as whether the victim intended to live
with the perpetrator.
"We were shocked to
discover how bad that instrument was. You might as well guess who is at
serious risk,” Dr Weatherburn said…..
Dr Weatherburn said the
program's ineffectiveness was partly a byproduct of the inadequacies of the
screening process, which he said resulted in women who were not at serious risk
being referred to the safe action meetings.
A spokeswoman for Pru
Goward, the minister for the prevention of domestic violence, said the NSW
government was currently working with BOCSAR to develop "a revised and
improved risk assessment tool for domestic violence victims."
