Friday, 16 May 2008
Budget Reply '08: I'm big, I'm bad, I'm Brendan Nelson
It was obvious that the Budget Reply by the Leader of the Opposition, Brendan Nelson, was going to be something else when, before proceedings formally began, the cameras sprang the Coalition acknowledging a rent-a-crowd in had positioned in the public gallery.
Nelson's speech was different to the Federal Treasurer's 13 April budget speech on many levels.
The first was that, unlike Wayne Swan's speech, Nelson's monologue was heard out in polite silence by those on the other side.
The Coalition heckling during Swan's speech was a pitiful and petty effort and, it was a relief that Labor MPs were capable of more restraint last night.
The second difference was an amusing phenomenon.
The Coalition frontbench seated behind Nelson were a constant visual distraction as their heads bobbed in agreement like so many car rear-window animal ornaments.
Indeed Julie Bishop appeared almost frenetic at times.
The Labor frontbench behind Swan on Tuesday night were thankfully only occasionally afflicted with this peculiar tic.
However, it was the third difference which had the real impact.
The sheer hypocrisy which saturated Brendan Nelson's speech was almost beyond belief (Wayne Swan may have had a rather boring delivery but at least he sounded believable).
Suddenly Nelson was against policy, procedure and practices which were unchanged from the days of the former Howard Government in which he was first an ordinary MP and then a minister.
The Howard Government never locked in old age pension and carer bonus payments beyond one budget year, but suddenly the Rudd Government was mean and tricky to do the same.
He also decided that taxing 'alcopops' as spirits was unfair and would be resisted, although initially agreeing with the increased taxation proposal and way back in 1996 getting to his feet in the House of Representatives to complain that this type of alcoholic drink was too cheap.
Nelson repeatedly accused the Rudd Government of delivering a high taxing budget and then went on to say that he would oppose the removal of one tax - the Medicare levy for workers earning less than $150,000.
After years of Coalition neglect Nelson also decided to find that education and universities were important and chivvied the Rudd Government for its education policies which actually appear to reverse some of that neglect.
He was scathing about the current government's planned inquiries and reviews. Yet in a 2005 Sydney Morning Herald interview he cheerfully admitted; In the four years since he took over the $23 billion Education, Science and Training portfolio he's unleashed an unremitting stream of inquiries, reviews, reforms and initiatives, and says he has no intention of slowing down.
Brendan Nelson sketchily outlined his 'grand' economic plans for the future (which sounded very like old Howard policy) and his 5 cent solution to rising global petrol prices. Knowing full well that he will never survive as leader long enough to influence Coalition policy in the months leading up to the next federal election.
My favourite line in all this posturing occurred when Nelson accused Labor of the Coalition's biggest sin under the prime ministership of John Howard; punishing those it does not like.
Somewhere in the middle of his spin and unsupported accusations, the Leader of the Opposition decided to continue Howard's culture wars by denigrating university lecturers as social engineers and, somewhere towards the end of his delivery, resolved that Australia should become reconciled with our indigenous history (something that his national apology speech demonstrated that he was incapable of doing himself).
The Leader of the Opposition tried at times to whip himself into sincerity but failed. He declared himself angry with all the emotion of a limp lettuce leaf.
At one point Nelson stated;The government has perpetrated a fraud on the Australian public.
From my perspective this is exactly what Nelson himself was attempting last night.
Brendan Nelson's budget reply here.
Nelson's speech was different to the Federal Treasurer's 13 April budget speech on many levels.
The first was that, unlike Wayne Swan's speech, Nelson's monologue was heard out in polite silence by those on the other side.
The Coalition heckling during Swan's speech was a pitiful and petty effort and, it was a relief that Labor MPs were capable of more restraint last night.
The second difference was an amusing phenomenon.
The Coalition frontbench seated behind Nelson were a constant visual distraction as their heads bobbed in agreement like so many car rear-window animal ornaments.
Indeed Julie Bishop appeared almost frenetic at times.
The Labor frontbench behind Swan on Tuesday night were thankfully only occasionally afflicted with this peculiar tic.
However, it was the third difference which had the real impact.
The sheer hypocrisy which saturated Brendan Nelson's speech was almost beyond belief (Wayne Swan may have had a rather boring delivery but at least he sounded believable).
Suddenly Nelson was against policy, procedure and practices which were unchanged from the days of the former Howard Government in which he was first an ordinary MP and then a minister.
The Howard Government never locked in old age pension and carer bonus payments beyond one budget year, but suddenly the Rudd Government was mean and tricky to do the same.
He also decided that taxing 'alcopops' as spirits was unfair and would be resisted, although initially agreeing with the increased taxation proposal and way back in 1996 getting to his feet in the House of Representatives to complain that this type of alcoholic drink was too cheap.
Nelson repeatedly accused the Rudd Government of delivering a high taxing budget and then went on to say that he would oppose the removal of one tax - the Medicare levy for workers earning less than $150,000.
After years of Coalition neglect Nelson also decided to find that education and universities were important and chivvied the Rudd Government for its education policies which actually appear to reverse some of that neglect.
He was scathing about the current government's planned inquiries and reviews. Yet in a 2005 Sydney Morning Herald interview he cheerfully admitted; In the four years since he took over the $23 billion Education, Science and Training portfolio he's unleashed an unremitting stream of inquiries, reviews, reforms and initiatives, and says he has no intention of slowing down.
Brendan Nelson sketchily outlined his 'grand' economic plans for the future (which sounded very like old Howard policy) and his 5 cent solution to rising global petrol prices. Knowing full well that he will never survive as leader long enough to influence Coalition policy in the months leading up to the next federal election.
My favourite line in all this posturing occurred when Nelson accused Labor of the Coalition's biggest sin under the prime ministership of John Howard; punishing those it does not like.
Somewhere in the middle of his spin and unsupported accusations, the Leader of the Opposition decided to continue Howard's culture wars by denigrating university lecturers as social engineers and, somewhere towards the end of his delivery, resolved that Australia should become reconciled with our indigenous history (something that his national apology speech demonstrated that he was incapable of doing himself).
The Leader of the Opposition tried at times to whip himself into sincerity but failed. He declared himself angry with all the emotion of a limp lettuce leaf.
At one point Nelson stated;The government has perpetrated a fraud on the Australian public.
From my perspective this is exactly what Nelson himself was attempting last night.
Brendan Nelson's budget reply here.
Labels:
2008-09 budget,
Liberal Party of Australia,
politics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment