Prompted by a tongue-in-cheek Jeremy Sear tweet asking the questions “Where the hell is Henry Ergas pulling this "$1 trillion" figure for the carbon price from? And who is Henry Ergas anyway?” I went looking for answers.
This is Henry:
Pic from The Australian
This is what what Wollongong University has to say about Henry:
Professor Ergas is a well-known regulatory economist who held a range of leading positions at the OECD before returning to Australia in the mid-1990s. He chaired the Australian Intellectual Property and Competition Review Committee for the Australian Government in 1999-2000 and was a member of the Prime Minister’s Export Infrastructure Task Force in 2005 and the Defence Industry Policy Review in 2006. He has published extensively on infrastructure regulation and cost-benefit analysis."
This is what Liberal Party hacks have been saying about Henry:
“evidence before the inquiry by Professor Henry Ergas, the carbon tax will cost the Australian economy more than $1 trillion between now and 2050.”
This is what The Prof tells the Murdoch meeja:
“the carbon tax will cost a year's national income: that is, $1 trillion.”
This is what the Liberal Party’s best mate told the Senate Carbon Tax Inquiry on 10th August 2011:
“Yes. What is available that Treasury have indeed released, and I congratulate them on doing so, is a spreadsheet that is similar to a spreadsheet that they had released for the CPRS model and that spreadsheet allows you to look at the change in the value of GDP under the base case, as it were, and with the so-called core policy, which is the primary abatement scenario that they model, and also under the so-called high-price scenario, which is where you go for more ambitious abatement. So what you can do, Senator, is you can use that spreadsheet—and you do need to make a number of assumptions—to calculate the value today of the change in GDP under those alternative carbon tax scenarios. To put it in perhaps simplistic terms—but this may help explain what is going on—say that in 2020 GDP would otherwise have been $2 trillion and instead, under the modelling of the core policy, it is $1.8 trillion, and in 2030 it would have been $3 trillion and instead is $2.6 trillion, you can take that difference and express it as if it were a value today. You can bring it back to the present. To do that you have to find some way of adding up amounts at different points in time. You have to take some account of the time value of money. In the calculation that I set out, I used a discount rate—that is, the assumed time value of money, as it were, that is used in the Garnaut report. When you do that, you get a GDP loss that is in the order of somewhere between $890 billion and $1.345 trillion for the core policy scenario. I rounded it to about $1 trillion.”
This is the conclusion he drew for the Business Council of Australia:
The Gillard government's emissions trading scheme poses a $9 billion risk to the already stretched federal budget in its first five years if carbon price estimates prove optimistic
And this is how good an economist ol’ Henry is:
Name | NETWORK ECONOMICS CONSULTING GROUP PTY LTD | |
ACN | | |
ABN | | |
Type | Australian Proprietary Company, Limited By Shares | |
Registration Date | 27/07/1987 | |
Next Review Date | 27/07/2010 | |
Status | Deregistered Date Deregistered 21/10/2009 | |
Locality of Registered Office | not available | |
Jurisdiction | Australian Securities & Investments Commission | |
Former Name(s) | ERGAS & ASSOCIATES PTY. LTD. | |
| WATRON PTY. LTD. | |
Extracted from ASIC's database at AEST 20:41:54 on 15/10/2011 | |
| | | |
| | | |
Name | CONCEPT ECONOMICS PTY LTD |
ACN | |
Type | Australian Proprietary Company, Limited By Shares |
Registration Date | 03/03/2008 |
Next Review Date | 03/03/2012 |
Status | Deregistered Date Deregistered 08/05/2011 |
Locality of Registered Office | not available |
Jurisdiction | Australian Securities & Investments Commission |
From Bloomberg Business Week:
Network Economics Consulting Group Pty. Ltd. provides economic and strategic advisory services.
Mr. Henry Ergas Managing Director
From Manta:
Concept Economics Pty Ltd
Henry Issac Simon Ergas Director
Inevitable conclusion – why on earth would I trust the carbon tax sums done by a Menzies House amigo who apparently couldn’t balance the books of two businesses?
1 comment:
Doesn't he also work for the IPA? That should explain everything. The point is that this 1 trillion is from now to 2030, almost 20 years. Given a long enough horizon, anything will cost 1 trillion dollars.
Post a Comment