Two conflicting sides to the same story reported by newspapers from two different stables.
Clarence Valley Council’s new general manager Scott Greensill (left) defends himself in The Daily Examiner on 15th December 2011:
Other side of the coin over at The Singleton Argus on 13th December 2011:
After his delegation, Mr Greensill twice sought and received advice from Mr McKelvey and wrote a memo for Mr Thomson which brought Mr Smith’s report on Cr Nichols to the full council.
While Mr Greensill, as general manager, may give advice or make recommendations to the council he did not have authority to direct councillors in the performance of their duties, Judge Schmidt accepted.
Mr Greensill could not forbid councillors from speaking with the Jones’, his advice could be rejected and did not bind councillors.”
Pic from The Daily Examiner
No comments:
Post a Comment