Australia's Great Barrier Reef has been under threat from increased human activity for generations.
Sediment runoff due to land clearing and agrigultual activity, pollutants from commercial shipping, unlawful discharge of waste water from mining operations and coral bleaching due to climate change.
North Queensland Bulk Ports Corporation is a port authority responsible for facilities at Weipa, Abbot
Point, Mackay and Hay Point trading ports, and the non-trading port of
Maryborough.
Three of these ports are in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. One of these, Hay Point is reportedly among the largest coal export points in the world.
This is what the Morrison Government's Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority has given this corporation permission to do.............
The Great Barrier
Reef Marine Park Authority has approved the dumping of more than 1m tonnes
of dredge spoil near the reef, using a loophole in federal laws that were
supposed to protect the marine park.
The Greens senator Larissa
Waters has called for the permit – which allows maintenance dredging to be
carried out over 10 years at Mackay’s Hay Point port and the sludge to be
dumped within the marine park’s boundaries – to be revoked.
“The last thing the reef
needs is more sludge dumped on it, after being slammed by the floods recently,”
Waters said. “One million tonnes of dumping dredged sludge into world heritage
waters treats our reef like a rubbish tip.”
Acting on concerns from
environmentalists, the federal government banned the disposal of dredge spoil
near the reef in 2015. But the ban applied only to capital dredging.
Maintenance work at ports – designed to remove sediment from shipping lanes as
it accumulates – is not subject to it.
On 29 January the marine
park authority granted conditional approval for North Queensland Bulk Ports to
continue to dump maintenance dredge spoil within the park’s boundaries. The
permit was issued just days before extensive
flooding hit north and central Queensland, spilling large amounts of
sediment into the marine environment.
Waters said the
distinction between capital and maintenance dredging made little difference to
the reef…..
North Queensland Bulk
Ports, in a statement posted online shortly after the permit was issued, said
it had to meet conditions to protect the marine environment. The ports
authority said its dumping plan was peer-reviewed and considered best practice.
“Just like roads,
shipping channels require maintenance to keep ports operating effectively,” the
ports authority said. “Maintenance dredging involves relocating sediment which
travels along the coast and accumulates over the years where our shipping
operation occurs.
“Importantly, our
assessment reports have found the risks to protected areas including the Great
Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and Great Barrier Reef Marine Park and
sensitive habitats are predominantly low with some temporary, short-term
impacts to (bottom-dwelling) habitat possible.
“The permits allow for
the long-term, sustainable management of maintenance dredging at the Port and
will safeguard the efficient operations of one of Australia’s most critical
trading ports.”
Maintenance dredging
will begin in late March. Initial dredging will take about 40 days.
Australia plans to dump
one million tonnes of sludge in the Great Barrier Reef.
Despite strict laws on
dumping waste, the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) gave the
go-ahead.
A loophole was found -
the laws don't apply to materials generated from port maintenance work.
It comes one week after
flood water from Queensland spread into the reef, which scientists say will
"smother" the coral.
The industrial residue
is dredged from the bottom of the sea floor near Hay Point Port - one of the
world's largest coal exports and a substantial economic source for the country....
"If they are
dumping it over the coral reef itself, it will have quite a devastating effect.
The sludge is basically blanketing over the coral.
"The coral relies
on the algae, that's what give them their colour and what helps them feed -
without this partnership the coral will suffer dramatically."
Dr Boxall says his
worries about sludge-dumping are short-term - with the current Australian
summer a time for "rapid algae growth".....
Dr Boxall says the
impact will be lessened if the sludge is taken far enough offshore, but that it
will still contain high amounts of harmful materials such as trace metals.
"If it's put into
shallow water it will smother sea life," he says.
"It's important
they get it right.
"It'll cost more
money but that's not the environment's problem - that's the port authorities'
problem."
One of the threats
listed at the time was "large amounts of sediment".
No comments:
Post a Comment