Current state of play......
Tuesday, 26 February 2019
On the subject of income, welfare support and spending
Will negative wage growth, the acute poverty of jobless people combined with the avarice of employers and punitive federal government policy intesect to create a perect storm which will see household spending fall this year?
Current state of play......
Current state of play......
ABC
News, 23
February 2019:
Rather, Dr Lowe saw
stagnant household incomes is a much bigger threat to consumer spending, and
thus to the 60 per cent of the economy based on it.
"Aggregate
household income used to grow at 6 per cent, it's growing sub-3," he told
the MPs on the committee.
"That's a big
difference, and you accumulate that over three or four years and income is 8,
10 or 12 per cent lower than it otherwise would have been.
"Many people
borrowed assuming their incomes would grow at the old rate and they haven't.
"They're having
more difficulty, they've got less free cash and so they can't spend, so this is
why I've put so much emphasis on the need for a pick-up in wage growth."
Dr Lowe told the
committee he has been using speeches to try and lift wage expectations, while
the RBA has been keeping interest rates low and stable for an extended period
of time to relieve the pressure on households.
The RBA governor said,
while the strategy seems to be working — with unemployment down at 5 per cent
and wage growth starting to pick up from recent lows — he could use a bit more
help from the Fair Work Commission and employers.
Fair Work last year
awarded a 3.5 per cent pay rise for those on the minimum wage and linked
awards, and Dr Lowe said that was a "sensible and right policy" and a
similar increase this year "makes a lot of sense".
"If workers get
their normal long-run share of that [productivity increase] then their real
wages should rise by 1 per cent a year," he said.
Financial
Review, 7 February 2019:
Consumer anxiety has
reached its highest level in three years, with households spending less on
discretionary items as they worry about their finances and the future.
The National Australia
Bank consumer anxiety index rose to 62 points in the December quarter, and
close to 40 per cent of those surveyed said they had experienced financial
hardship during the quarter – the highest level in two years.
Households said they had
pulled back their spending on things like travel, eating out and entertainment
due to heightened anxiety about their financial conditions.
The primary causes of
anxiety through the December quarter were how to finance one's retirement and
how to provide for one's family's future....
"What's happening
here is you haven't got much wages growth, you're paying off utilities, you're
paying off debt, and you're doing things that you have to do."
Mr Oster said after
doing all those things, there wasn't much money left for households.
Anxiety about job
security reached its highest level since 2016, and 50 per cent of homes in
hardship found their financial position impacted by high utility bills.
The Guardian, 17 September 2018:
A proposal to increase
Newstart allowance by $75 a week would lead to a boost in consumer spending,
creating more than 10,000 jobs and lifting wages, a new report shows.
The report by Deloitte Access Economics, released on Monday morning, said the
policy to increase the incomes of more than 700,000 people by $10.71 a day
would cost the federal budget $3.3bn a year.
But a “prosperity
dividend” would see the government collect an extra $1bn in taxes as a result
of a stronger economy, and the proposal was also projected to create 12,000
extra jobs in 2020-21 and increase wages by 0.2%.
It comes amid debate
about the rate of Newstart, which at $272.90 for a single person has not risen
in real terms in more than two decades. It will increase by $2.20 this week as
a result of indexation.
The Australian Council
of Social Service (Acoss), business groups, unions and a former prime minister,
John Howard, have all argued for an increase, but the government has so far
dismissed those calls….
The bulk of the economic
benefits from increasing the payment would go to the bottom 5% of Australian
income earners, who would receive “six times the dollars going to the highest
income quintile”. The “poorest of the poor” would receive 28 times the relative
boost to their disposable incomes, than the top income quintile.
Regional areas “most in
need of help” would be key winners from increased spending….
The current rate is the
equivalent to living on $38.99 a day. The report said a single person who also
receives the maximum rent assistance and the energy supplement would be living
on about $49.24 a day.
Previous research has
shown that those on Newstart live on as little as $17 a day after their housing expenses and
bills.
ABC
NEWS, 9
September 2018:
It may not have garnered
the same attention as the surprisingly strong second-quarter GDP growth, but an
equally striking fact in last week's national accounts was household savings
had just hit a post-GFC low.
It is not a new phenomenon.
The household saving ratio — or the ratio of households' net saving to
disposable income — has been shrinking since 2014.
What makes the latest
figure uncomfortable is that there is now little fat left to trim, and on
current trends households will be spending more they earn.
The ability of the
Australian economy to keep growing in the face of a number of challenges in
recent years owes a fair bit to the savings so prudently built up after the
sobering experience of the GFC.
As JP Morgan's Tom
Kennedy points out, the persistent decline in savings since 2014 has been an
important part of Australia's real GDP growth performance, helping offset some
of the spending drag associated with record low wages growth and an
unemployment rate that has yet to fire up wages.
While the correlation
between savings and spending is far from perfect, Mr Kennedy has drilled down
into the figures, and is worried.
Labels:
cost of living,
jobs,
wages,
welfare payments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment