The Washington Post, 17 June 2021:
The five-person jury for the category picked the finalists but the larger Pulitzer Prize Board, which selects the winners for all the prizes in journalism and the arts, did not do so for cartooning because no consensus pick emerged. That happens every so often in various categories, but this was the first time in nearly a half-century that it had happened to political artists.
The Australian Cartoonists Association was not amused.....
To
the Pulitzer Board.
I
write as President, and on behalf, of the Australian Cartoonists
Association, to express solidarity with our American editorial
cartoonist colleagues, and to express our disappointment in the
decision by the Pulitzer Prize Board not to award a prize for
cartooning this year.
I
note that the last year has been epic in the colliding of
catastrophes, upheavals and conflicts both natural and man-made, and
cartoonists, in spite of their precarious employment and challenging
circumstances, have risen mightily to capture the moment(s).
In
an era when the sharp line and elucidating perspective of cartoonists
is more vital than ever to counter forces of obscurity and
suppression of truth, we can ill afford to placate the powers for
whom our silence and invisibility would be convenient. Cartoonists
are necessary for a healthy democracy. Dictators hate us!
We
could understand, having seen the work of contenders, that it may
have been difficult for you to choose one over another. Could they
have shared the prize? However, to not award a cartoonist this year
suggests not an embarrassment of riches, but that no cartoonist was
good enough.
And
we think that is far from the truth.
Yours
sincerely,
Cathy
Wilcox
President Australian Cartoonists Association
president@cartoonists.org.au
27
June, 2021
Well said, Ms. Wilcox!