Monday 30 January 2017
Trump's assault on open and transparent democratic principals has begun.....
Boston Globe, 24 January 2017:
The Trump administration has instituted a media blackout at the Environmental Protection Agency and barred staff from awarding any new contracts or grants.
Emails sent to EPA staff since President Donald Trump’s inauguration on Friday and reviewed by The Associated Press detailed the specific prohibitions banning press releases, blog updates or posts to the agency’s social media accounts.
The Trump administration has also ordered a ‘‘temporary suspension’’ of all new business activities at the department, including issuing task orders or work assignments to EPA contractors. The orders are expected to have a significant and immediate impact on EPA activities nationwide.
The EPA did not respond to phone calls and emails requesting comment Monday or Tuesday.
The Huffington Post, 24 January 2017:
The Huffington Post also received a message that was reportedly sent to staff Monday that seems to cover the current agency guidance on talking to the press in general, not just about the directive on grants. The memo states that the agency is imposing tight controls on external communication, including press releases, blog posts, social media and content on the agency website.
(”Beach team” refers to staffers for the new administration working at the various agencies while new leadership is put in place; “OPA” most likely refers to the “Office of Public Affairs.”)
The
Guardian, 26
January 2017:
The Trump
administration is mandating that any studies or data from scientists at
the Environmental Protection Agency undergo review by political appointees
before they can be released to the public.
The communications
director for Donald Trump’s transition team at the EPA, Doug Ericksen, said on
Wednesday the review also extends to content on the federal agency’s website,
including details of scientific evidence showing that the Earth’s climate is
warming and manmade carbon emissions are to blame.
Former EPA staffers said
on Wednesday the restrictions imposed under Trump far exceed the practices of
past administrations…..
The EPA’s 14-page
scientific integrity document, enacted during the Obama administration,
describes how scientific studies were to be conducted and reviewed in the agency.
It said scientific studies should eventually be communicated to the public, the
media and Congress “uncompromised by political or other interference”.
The scientific integrity
document expressly “prohibits managers and other agency leadership from intimidating
or coercing scientists to alter scientific data, findings or professional
opinions or inappropriately influencing scientific advisory boards”. It
provides ways for employees who know the science to disagree with scientific
reports and policies and offers them some whistleblower protection.
Labels:
censorship,
Donald Trump,
fascism,
right wing politics,
USA
Sunday 29 January 2017
Where Australians stand when it comes to Trump's travel/immigration bans of 27 January 2017
At 30 June 2015, 28.2% of Australia's estimated resident population (ERP) (6.7 million people) was born overseas [Australian Bureau of Statistics, Estimated Resident Population by Country of Birth, 30 June 1992 to 2015]
Of these a total of 166,310 individuals born in the listed countries are potentially affected by the U.S. travel/immigration ban by presidential order on 27 January 2017 [PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES]:
Iran 53,510
Iraq 68,180
Libya 2,510
Sudan 23,380
South Sudan 4,410
Syria 13,660
Yemen 660
When one adds to this an unknown number of Australians who have travelled to these countries since 1 July 2011 and face the possibility of being denied a U.S. tourist or work visa on that basis, the number of Australia citizens and permanent residents potentially affected grows.
Smartraveller.gov.au:
Changes to entry requirements from 27 January 2017
The
US State Department has advised visa issuance to nationals of Iraq, Iran,
Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen has been temporarily suspended following
the signing of the Executive Order on Protecting the Nation from Terrorist
Attacks by Foreign Nationals on 27 January 2017.
Australians
who are dual citizens of Iran, Iraq, Sudan, or Syria are no longer eligible to
apply for an ESTA to enter the United States under the VWP. Any of these
Australians who have previously been issued an ESTA are likely to have the ESTA
revoked.
Australians
who have travelled to Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen since
1 March 2011 will also no longer be eligible to apply for an ESTA to enter the
United States under the VWP.
If
you are affected by these changes and wish to travel to the United States, you
will need to apply for a non-immigrant visa at a US Embassy or Consulate.
Exceptions from these travel restrictions will be made for Australians who have
travelled on official Australian Defence Force or Australian Government
business. No exceptions will be made for government officials or ADF members
who are dual citizens of Iran, Iraq, Syria or Sudan.
The
Secretary of Homeland Security may waive these travel restrictions on a case by
case basis for travellers from the following categories: Australians who have
travelled on behalf on international organisations, regional organisations or
State and Territory governments on official duty; Australians who have
travelled on behalf of a humanitarian NGO; Australian journalists who have
travelled for reporting purposes; Australians who have travelled to Iran for
legitimate business-related purposes following the conclusion of the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action on 14 July 2015; or Australians who have travelled to Iraq for
legitimate business-related purposes. Those travellers who are potentially
eligible for waivers do not need to apply separately for this – an application
will be automatically generated by the ESTA questionnaire.
For
further information regarding the changes, visit the Embassy of the United States of
America in Australia, the United States Department
of State Visa Information or the United
States Customs and Border Protection website. You should also speak to
your nearest US Embassy or Consulate for further assistance on visa
applications.
If
you need to apply for a non-immigrant visa, the United States Visa Information
Service for Australia encourages applicants to apply at least three months in
advance of the intended date of travel.
Labels:
Australia-US relations,
immigration,
islamophobia,
racism
The American Resistance has many faces - this is just one of them
ACLU PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, 28 January 201... by clarencegirl on Scribd
One of the temporary restraining orders granted 28 January 2017:
The Economist, 29 January 2017:
In her brief and unequivocal ruling on the evening of January 28th, Ms Donnelly wrote that Mr Alshawi and Mr Darweesh “have a strong likelihood of success” in showing that their deportation would violate their rights to due process and equal protection. There is “imminent danger”, she wrote, that “there will be substantial and irreparable injury to refugees, visa-holders and other individuals from nations” targeted by Mr Trump’s executive order, should it be fully implemented. Ms Donnelly thus “enjoined and restrained” the government from deporting refugees or “any other individuals from Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Somalia and Yemen legally authorised to enter the United States”.
The ruling, along with similar non-removal orders from judges in Virginia and Seattle, means that nobody who was told they didn’t belong in America when they arrived on January 27th can be deported—for now—though there were reports from several cities on the night of January 28th that customs officials were disregarding the judges' orders and arranging for individuals to be sent home. It also bears reminding that these rulings are stays, not final determinations. Further judicial hearings in February will determine if the stays should be lifted. And the rulings do not come close to erasing Mr Trump’s executive order; the ban remains in effect for refugees and others who were planning to come to America in the coming days, weeks and months.
Oi, Malcolm! Where's our NBN?
With only three years of borrowed money left to complete roll out of the National Broadband Network (NBN) and still not yet at the halfway mark, serious questions about this increasingly sub-standard telecommunications infrastructure are being asked.
Australian Medical Association, media release, 17 January 2017:
Better Access to High Speed Broadband for Rural and Remote Health Care - 2016
1
10 Jan 2017
1. Introduction
Approximately 30 per cent of Australia’s population lives outside the major metropolitan areas[1]. Regional, rural and remote Australians often struggle to access health services that urban Australians would see as a basic right. These inequalities mean that they have lower life expectancy, worse outcomes on leading indicators of health, and poorer access to care compared to people in major cities.
In 2016 the AMA conducted a Rural Health Issues Survey, which sought input from rural doctors across Australia to identify key solutions to improving regional, rural and remote health care. The survey identified access to high-speed broadband for medical practices as a key priority.
This result reflects not only the increasing reliance by medical practices on the internet for their day to day operations, but also the increasing opportunities for the provision of healthcare services to rural and remote communities via eHealth and telemedicine. For the full potential of these opportunities to be realised, good quality, affordable, and reliable high-speed internet access is essential.
The AMA recognises that technology-based patient consultations and other telehealth initiatives can improve access to care and can enhance efficiency in medical practice, but the need for better access to high speed broadband goes beyond supporting rural and remote health. In today’s world, it is a critical factor to support communities in their daily activities, education, and business, and has the potential to drive innovation and boost the rural economy.
This position statement outlines the importance of better access to high speed broadband for medical practices, other healthcare providers and institutions, and patients, to improve regional, rural and remote health care in Australia, and highlights key solutions for achieving this.
2. Internet access in regional rural and remote Australia
Despite its tremendous growth, internet access is not distributed equally within Australia, and internet use by country people has yet to reach the level of use in capital cities, for a wide range of reasons.
In many country areas the internet connection is still very poor.[2] In 2015, 80 percent of non-urban Australians had an internet connection at home compared with 89 percent of those in capital cities[3]. Internet use via mobile phone was much lower in non-urban areas, at 37 percent, compared to 60 percent for capital cities[4]. This reflects the patchy, unreliable or absent mobile coverage in many rural and remote areas. While mobile broadband use was highest in non-urban areas, at 29 percent, compared to 25 percent in capital cities, mobile broadband is currently not a good solution for business or eHealth, due to the relatively small amounts of data on the relatively costly plans available.
Internet services, particularly in more isolated areas, only make available relatively small download allowances and these come at a much higher cost and slower speed than those services available in metropolitan areas.
3. Supporting regional rural and remote health
3.1 The need for better access for health services
The health sector needs telecommunications connectivity for health service delivery and management, doing business with Government and complying with Government requirements, continuing professional development, online education, mentoring, and clinical decision and other support.
Health was identified in the Regional Telecommunications Review report[5] as one of the particular segments of the community requiring special consideration. To effectively leverage telecommunications technology to deliver better health outcomes at lower cost in regional, rural and remote areas and to implement new models of health care, both mobile and broadband technology must be reliable, affordable, and supply adequate capacity.
However, the utilisation of telehealth and telemedicine in rural and remote Australia remains patchy and is not used to full potential, because of no, or inadequate internet access. As noted in the Regional Telecommunications Review report[6], the ability of hospitals and clinics to support remotely located clinicians and patients via video conferencing and remote monitoring could be severely limited in areas serviced by satellite, which may not be able to consistently and reliably deliver the necessary capacity and technical capability.
The AMA Rural Health Issues Survey received many comments from rural doctors on the problems encountered with poor internet access. For example:
- High-speed broadband [is the] single most critical issue to run practices now, many areas not getting the best from NBN.
- Internet services by satellite are slow and time consuming. Reliable internet services at reasonable speed and reliability is critical.
- Internet services are a critical area [of concern]. The NBN has been deficient in providing a comprehensive coverage even in areas that are under 25km from a major regional centre i.e. Orange and Dubbo.
As mainstream healthcare provision becomes increasingly technology based and requires more and faster broadband services to operate, there is a real risk that regional, rural and remote areas of Australia will be left further and further behind in their ability to provide quality health services.
3.2. The benefits of high speed broadband for rural and remote health care
High-speed affordable broadband connectivity to the Internet has become essential to modern society, and offers widely recognised economic and social benefits, with numerous studies showing a strong link between broadband growth and rapid economic development[7]. Affordable and reliable broadband access can support the development of new content, applications and services that allow people to work in new ways, changing business processes in ways that stimulate productivity and potentially increase labour-force participation[8].
3.2.1 Economic benefits
It has been estimated that in New Zealand, the benefits from broadband-enabled health care could reach around $6 billion over a 20-year period[9]. These benefits come from reduced hospital, travel and drug costs and improvements in care. A case study by Deloitte Access Economics shows savings to a single older Australian of $7,400 per year, with savings to the Government, through reduced health and service provision costs, of over $14,500[10].
3.2.2 Driving greater efficiency and reducing costs
Telehealth practice will be one of the most important online services in the broadband future, enabling significant changes to work practices to drive greater efficiency and reduce costs[11].
If sufficiently supported, telehealth services, such as video-conferencing, could become more effective in complementing local health services. They could be used to expand specialty care to patients in areas with shortages of health care providers as well as extend primary care to remote areas, reducing the need to travel, and increasing the frequency of patient and primary care provider interactions. By providing timely access to services and specialists, telehealth could improve the ability to identify developing conditions, and thereby reduce the need for more costly treatments and hospitalisations in the future. Telehealth could also help to educate, train and support remote healthcare workers on location and support people with chronic conditions to manage their health.[12]
A CSIRO report on home monitoring of chronic disease[13], for example, shows that a modest investment in home monitoring technology, allied to risk stratification tools and remote monitoring, could save the healthcare system up to $3 billion a year in avoidable admissions to hospital, reduced length of stay and fewer demands on primary care.
3.2.3 Supporting eHealth solutions now and into the future
eHealth encompasses patient access to doctors via online consultation, remote patient monitoring, online tools and resources for patients and doctors, clinical communications between healthcare providers, and professional’s access to information databases and electronic health record systems. If sufficiently supported with affordable, high-speed broadband services, eHealth has potential to improve health outcomes at all levels, from preventative health, specialist and acute care and self-management of chronic conditions, through to home monitoring for people living with disabilities[14].
Advances in information technology will act as a catalyst for the development of a range of potential eHealth solutions to some of the challenges faced by rural and remote communities. If available and accessible, improved connectivity will facilitate new and emerging best practice models of health care, such as those which incorporate high definition video conferences, data exchange and high resolution image transfer[15].
Technological advancements in health care that could become the way of the future, if affordable and sufficient access to broadband services becomes available, include better point of care diagnostics, resulting in faster, cohesive patient care; biosensors and trackers to allow real time monitoring; 3D printed medical technology products; virtual reality environments that could accelerate behavioural change in patients; and social media platforms to improve patient experience and track population trends[16].
3.2.4 Supporting education and training
The internet also plays a big part in the lives of doctors and their families, assisting with education and social cohesion. It enables rural doctors to learn from the most current resources, explore treatment options, watch demonstrations of procedures and attend live discussions with experts.
Access to high speed broadband has the potential to change the way medical education, training and supervision is delivered in rural and remote areas [17]. As pressure on access to prevocational and vocational training places increases, harnessing this technology to support training is a viable strategy to create additional training places in rural and remote locations and ultimately improve access to specialist services for rural and remote patients.
The use of telehealth and telesupervision as an adjunct to face-to-face teaching will allow doctors in training to remain in rural and remote settings to complete their training, and enhance the likelihood that they will choose to work long term in a rural areas. Improved information and communications technology will enhance the learning experiences for trainees at rural sites and during rural rotations, provide exposure to innovative models of care, and improve supervisor capacity by allowing supervisors to transfer knowledge, supervise and mentor trainees remotely.
Improved telehealth and communication technology infrastructure to support teaching and training at rural sites will also enhance professional collaboration between rural and remote medical generalist practitioners and other specialists in the provision of shared care, skills transfer and education.
The requirement for doctors to maintain their skills is a fundamental component of medical registration. It is important that processes mandated by the Medical Board of Australia, including in revalidation proposals, do not discriminate against medical practitioners working in rural and remote Australia. Access to high speed broadband is an essential support for rural and remote practitioners who must comply with these requirements.
4. What can be done to improve broadband access for country Australians?
The AMA is of the view that high-speed broadband should be available to the same standard and at the same cost to all communities, businesses and services across the whole of Australia. The platforms used must be able to accommodate future developments in information and communications technologies and provide connectivity through suitable combinations of fibre, mobile phone, wireless, and satellite technologies. For rural practices, in order to be incorporated routinely in everyday practice (clinical, educational and administrative), network connectivity must be sufficient, reliable, ubiquitous and dependable.
The Government must ensure that broadband services are affordable in regional, rural and remote Australia. Lack of affordability is regarded as one of the most important barriers to good internet access for country people whose incomes, on average, are 15 per cent lower than those of city people[18].
Government policies play a tremendous role in bringing internet access to underserved groups and regions. Unless issues around equitable and affordable access to telecommunications in regional, rural and remote Australia are addressed, the potential benefits of the digital economy for non-urban Australians will go unrealised.
The AMA urges the Government to consider the following actions:
· Fully consider the recommendations of the 2015 Regional Telecommunications Review, and, in particular, adopt Recommendations 8, 9, and 12, to:
o Develop a new Consumer Communication Standard for voice and data which would provide technology neutral standards in terms of availability, accessibility, affordability, performance and reliability.
o Establish a new funding mechanism, the Consumer Communication Fund to replace the existing telecommunications industry levy and underwrite over the longer term, necessary loss-making infrastructure and services in regional Australia.
o Collect benchmark data on availability and affordability of broadband data and voice services (including mobile services), to be reported annually, in order to improve the understanding of the changing circumstances of regional telecommunications.
· Extend the boundaries of the NBN’s fibre cable and fixed wireless footprints and mobile coverage wherever possible.
· Begin an incremental process of terrestrial network expansion over the longer term to address increase in usage over time.
· Develop measures to prioritise or optimise the broadband capacity available by satellite for hospitals and medical practices, such as exempting or allocating higher data allowance quotas, or providing a separate data allowance (as is the case with distance education[19]).
· Create universal unmetered online access to government, hospital and health services for people and businesses in rural and remote areas.[20]
· Establish an innovation budget for development of local infrastructure solutions for rural and remote areas.[21]
· Engage with state and local government and related stakeholders who wish to co-invest or coordinate planning to achieve the optimum overall infrastructure outcome for their area. This could involve public-private partnerships or the leveraging of philanthropic infrastructure funding through, for example, tax concessions.
[1] Australian
Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2015), Australia’s Welfare 2015
[2] Curtin
J (2012), A digital divide
in regional and rural Australia.
[3] Australian
Communications and Media Authority (2016), Regional
Australians Online
[4] Ibid
[5] Australian
Government Regional Telecommunications Review (2015)
[6] Ibid.
[7] Alcatel-Lucent
(2012), Building the Benefits of Broadband. How New Zealand can
increase the social & economic impacts of high-speed broadband
[8] Centre
for Energy-efficient Telecommunications (CEET)(2015), Economic Benefit
of the National Broadband Network
[9] Alcatel-Lucent
(2012), op.cit.
[10] Deloitte
Access Economics (2013), Benefits of High-Speed Broadband for
Australian Households. Commissioned by the Australian Department of
Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy
[11] CEET
(2015), op.cit.
[12] National
Rural Health Alliance (2013), eHealth and telehealth in rural and remote Australia.
Accessed October 2016
[13] Prof.
Branko Celler et al (2016), Home Monitoring of Chronic Disease for Aged
Care, CSIRO Australian e-Health Research Centre.
[14] National
Rural Health Alliance (2013) op. cit.
[15] National
Rural Health Alliance (2016), website accessed October 2016
[16] Deloitte
(2016), Design, service and infrastructure plan for Victoria’s rural
and regional health system discussion paper, commissioned by the
Victorian Department of Health and Human Services.
[17] Wearne
S M (2013), Using telehealth
infrastructure for remote supervision could create medical training places
where they are needed. Medical Journal of Australia, 198 (11):
633-634. 17 June 2013.
[18] AIHW
(2016), Are things
different outside the major cities? Accessed October 2016.
[19] Australian
Government (2016), Australian Government Response to the Regional
Telecommunications Independent Review Committee Report: Regional
Telecommunications Review 2015.
[20]Broadband
for the Bush Alliance (2016), Broadband for the Bush Forum V: Digital Journeys
Communiqué
[21]Broadband
for the Bush Alliance (2014), Broadband for the Bush Forum III: Building a
Better Digital Future Communiqué
Related document (Public):
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)