Friday 11 November 2011

Enough is enough, Prime Minister Gillard!




Melbourne 4 November, 2011

United First People’s Law men and women who are born leaders representing people of Prescribed Areas in the Northern Territory make this statement. Once again, they have gathered to openly discuss the future of our generation who have been subjugated by the lies and innuendo of the Federal Government, set out in the Stronger Futures document (October 2011).
The Stronger Futures report has created a lot of anger and frustration due to the lack of process and the ignorant way in which the views of the people have been reported. We therefore reject this report.
We will not support an extension of the Intervention legislation. We did not ask for it. In fact we call for a genuine Apology from the Federal Government for the hurt, embarrassment, shame and stigma, and for the illegal removal of the Racial Discrimination Act. It is our intention to officially call upon Government for reparation.
The recent consultations report shows that Government has failed to take seriously our concerns and feelings. This report is simply a reflection of pre-determined policy decisions. This is shown clearly by the absence of any commitment to bilingual learning programmes as well as the proposal to introduce welfare cuts and fines to parent of non-attending school children. Once again a punitive policy that is neither in the best interests of the child or the family.
Blanket measures have been central to the Northern Territory Intervention and have been the source of much distress. Where there are problems, they must be addressed on a case by case basis and preferably with the assistance through the appropriate community channels.
Since August 2007 till 2011, more than 45,000 First Nations Peoples living in the Prescribed Areas were traumatised when a Bill was passed through both Houses of Parliament (The House of Representatives and the Senate).
This legislation suspended the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 to put in place the Northern Territory Emergency Response. The Australian Greens were the only party to oppose the legislation.
These actions have placed Australia in breach of its international treaty obligations to the First Nations Peoples. Respectful discussion and negotiation with community elders did not take place before the introduction of the Intervention.
Discussions on a diplomatic basis are essential. There are elders in every Aboriginal Nation invested by the authority of the majority. These are the people with whom Minister Macklin should be negotiating, rather than with the chosen few, as has been her habit.
There has NEVER been acquiescence in the taking of our lands by stealth. Aboriginal people are sovereign people of this Nation. The process that will lead to legal recognition of customary law should be immediately commenced.
We believe that there should be an honest and comprehensive treaty negotiation with the Australian Government and facilitated by the United Nations.
We have a right under international law to self determination and after almost five years of the oppression of the Intervention, we demand that Government hand back to us control over our communities and provide adequate Government, long-term funding to ensure the future of Homelands.
Communty Councils have suffered from years of underfunding. The same is happening today with the Shires that have been imposed on us. There is a lack of funding for our Core Service.There is no capacity for Aboriginal communities to engage in long-term services planning without the certainty of long-term funding.
We have had enough! We need our independence to live our lives and plan our futures without the constant oppression and threats which have become central to the relationship between Government and Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory. We will not support policies that have not been negotiates with all elders of Prescribed communities and we will not support an extension of the Intervention, or an Interventionunder other names.
Since the Apology and since reconciliation, the level of incarceration of Aboriginal men has increased three-fold; our families are being punished for failure to attend a foreign school design; our capacity to govern our own lives has been totally disempowered; Aboriginal youth suicide rates in the Northern Territory are higher than anywhere else in Australia; and our people have been demonized, labelled and branded. This is not what an apology is and it is not reconciliation. These outcomes are the very opposite to their intent.
Australia is in breach of its international treaty obligations to the first nation’s people through it membership to the United Nations in the elimination of racial discrimination.
We as leaders of the Northern Territory acknowledge other peoples’ views. We acknowledge that some may agree and some may disagree with parts or all of the ‘intervention’; whatever the name the Government chooses to call it. The only right we now have left is to remain silent.
We as Aboriginal people call on the international community to hold Australia to account for its continuing crimes against humanity for its treatments of its first nation’s people. Again, we say to our visits by the Minister’s department; this is not consultation. Proper consultation is about listening and inviting and including the views of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Consultation is about outcomes that are progressive and agreeable to all parties.
The future is based on our children having a quality education, but to date this continues to be a systemic failure. A quality education for our people needs to include:
• Bilingualism in schools to be returned and strengthened to ensure our children learn their traditional languages, dialects and cultural knowledges.
• Attendances need to be rewarded, rather than children and families being punished for non-attendance.
• Aboriginal teachers in classrooms and school educational leadership roles are essential to building quality, localized schooling programs. This means also equal pay and entitlements, rewards and opportunities consistent with their important roles.
• Curriculum needs to change and reflect traditional knowledges not just for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children, but importantly for the broader Australian population who know very little about their own first peoples.
• Aboriginal teachers need to be treated fairly and equally to their non-Aboriginal counterparts in delivering quality education to our children. This includes the opportunity to tell oral stories of Kinship, Creation Stories, and about important cultural knowledge and skills.
Failure to accept these views and work seriously toward their inclusion will simply mean more of the same.

Rev. Dr. Djiniyini Gondarra OAM
Rosalie Kunoth-Monks OAM
Japata Ryan
Harry Nelson
Djapirri Murunggirritj
Barbara Shaw
Yananymul Mununggurr

Thursday 10 November 2011

What a Political Whopper!


Has to be the biggest political whopper so far in the battle for the seat of Clarence, and I don’t mean from the pen of Bill O‘Donnell……..

“NATIONAL Party candidate for the Clarence by-election Chris Gulaptis has described as "lies" claims he had ever sought preselection for the Labor party.”
Oh, and the way I’ve always heard it from political insiders over the years, it was Chris who approached the ALP not the other way round as he is now claiming.
Gall-aptis also forgets that the truth has been out there on Teh Intenetz, reading to haunt him:

THERE is an old Turkish saying that goes something like this: "If you don't tell the truth make sure you have one foot in the stirrups."
The level of fiction in the Chris Gulaptis letter (DE March 22) almost guarantees he'll shortly be in the market for a good horse.
Probably about the time Janelle Saffin, and not Steve Cansdell, delivers on Grafton Base Hospital.
But it's the last paragraph of his letter that really should have Chris Gulaptis galloping off into the sunset.
He's on pretty shaky ground when he starts accusing people of being something they are not.
I've been around the Labor Party a long time and I wouldn't know Craig Howe if I fell over him.
The Gulaptis story, however, is a little different. His claim to be National Party first, last and foremost is a road to Damascus conversion and came after he couldn't get what he wanted from the ALP.
He shed plenty of sweat chasing a position with Labor, right down to travelling to Sydney to meet with the then NSW general secretary, Mark Arbib, former minister Harry Woods and Harry's chief of staff Mike Fleming.
His comment that Steve Cansdell won seven primary votes to every one of Craig Howe's only proves he knows how to use a calculator.
The fact that Janelle Saffin is now in Federal Parliament proves that what the ALP thought of Chris Gulaptis was spot on.
Terry Flanagan
Orara Way

Much better to stick with the uncomfortabe truth, Chris. You should recall from 2007 that we all have long memories of the incredible length to which your nose can grow.

Clarence By-election: Independent candidate failed Political Advertising 101


A how-to-vote advertisement placed in a local paper by an independent candidate contesting the Clarence By-election suggests the candidate who secured the donkey vote position on the ballot paper is a bit of a donkey himself.

The candidate's ad shows no signs of authorisation, which is a dead-set requirement. The Electoral Commission of NSW's advice to candidates isn't all that difficult to read and comprehend.

The Commission's website clearly states "once the Writs have been issued all electoral material (advertisements, how-to-vote cards, handbills, pamphlets, posters or notices) must include details of the name and full address of the person authorising the printing of the material, and the name of the printer and the full address at which it was printed.
If the electoral material is to be distributed on election day, it must also clearly identify the person, political party, organisation or group on whose behalf the material is to be distributed.
It is acceptable for electoral material not originally including this information to be amended by writing, stamping or overtyping the necessary details.
It is also necessary for any electoral material displayed on electronic billboards, digital road signs and the like to contain visible, legible characters indicating the name and address of the person who has authorised the display."
 


Source: The ad is in The Clarence Valley Review, 9/11/11

Murdoch press tries to make Australia believe it has been in the grip of a gimme culture since 2007


With predictable regularity the Murdoch media runs articles on the level of Centrelink welfare payments. This month it is the turn of The Telegraph with its erroneous headline Massive blow-out in dole queue above an article telling us that Centrelink "customers" have swollen to 7.1 million since 2007.

Now before anyone starts to feel that taxpayers are being overwhelmed by a gimme culture, it is highly likely that The Telegraph has lumped all payments sent out through Centrelink in this figure. Including payments for drought assistance, disaster relief, child care rebate, paid parental leave and Austudy to name a few.

When looking close to home, the combined resident population of the NSW North Coast and Mid-North Coast was an estimated 557,407 in 2010, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

The unemployment rate on the North Coast in the March Quarter 2011 was 5.8% and the workforce participation rate was 55.3%. These rates indicate that there were less than 15,000 people out of work in thre first three months of the year.
The NSW unemployment rate was 4.8% and workforce participation rate was 64.2% over the same period. These percentages represent a distinct improvement.

Centrelink’s March 2011 quarterly report lists the main pensions, benefits and allowances paid in North Coast federal electorates:

Old Age Pension

Lyne 23,090
Cowper 20,474
Page 19,558
Richmond 15,880
Total  79,002

Carer Allowance

Cowper 5,220
Page 5,018
Lyne 5,102
Richmond 4,068
Total 19,408

Carer Payment

Cowper 2,306
Lyne 2,096
Page 2,031
Richmond 1,476
Total 7,909

Concession Cards

Lyne 2,280
Page 2,245
Richmond 2,137
Cowper 1,842
Total 8,504

Disability Support Pension

Cowper 9,383
Page 9,238
Richmond 8,069
Lyne 7,876
Total 34,566

Family Tax Benefit

Cowper 10,693
Page 10,264   
Richmond 10,066
Lyne 8,844
Total 39,867

Rent Assistance

Richmond 15,452
Cowper 14,143
Page 13,593
Lyne 12,200
Total 55,388

Wife’s Pension (Age)

Cowper 109
Lyne 107
Page 85
Richmond 62
Total 363

A contrarian's tale or Traps in the path of a preconceived position.


An object lesson on the ills of only reading material which agrees with your own preconceived position. Taken from Sceptic: one inclined to doubt accepted opinions  in The Bendigo Advertiser on November 6, 2011:

Stephen Harper: a contrarian's tale

1. What is your background?
I'm 51. I'm currently a builder. I also have a business degree and an applied science degree in wine science.
2. What sparked your interest in climate change?
The fact that a few years ago we were told the ''science is settled'' and anyone who asked any questions was an idiot and told to sit down and shut up.
My BS meter went off the radar and I started looking into it.
3. When did you become a sceptic?
Probably a couple of years ago; there was so much evidence, so many smoking guns. The whole point is we're meant to be sceptical. I'm just a product of the Enlightenment. If the people who want to put windmills all over the place were in charge 100 years ago, we wouldn't have half the technology or the lifestyle we've got today. They would have stopped everything.
4. What are your main sources of information?
I've read about 15 books. The first one was An Appeal to Reason: A Cool Look at Global Warming by former Thatcher government minister Nigel Lawson. Then there was Climate: The counter-consensus by Bob Carter. Websites? I look at wattsupwiththat.com and joannenova.com.au. Those two I find very interesting and fair.
5. What are your general political views?
I joined the Climate Sceptics Party two years ago, but I don't do anything. I probably would be libertarian. Each side of politics has got something to tell us … but the Greens are a complete disaster. I'd generally vote conservative. They're all corrupted, but it's the best of a bad bunch.
6. Do you ever have doubts?
It doesn't mean that some of these things aren't right to some extent, that humans are affecting the climate. I always want to keep an open mind and yes, we have caused some warming, but not very much; it's not catastrophic, it's not unprecedented, we just need to take a Bex and a good lie down and wait and see what happens.
7. Do you think there's a conspiracy to push global warming?
I do not think that there's a conspiracy to push global warming. There are many, many strands that keep the juggernaut rolling along. ''Noble cause corruption'' is a classic case in point. Morality has crept into science and some scientists have become convinced that the end justifies the means … This is never acceptable in science. There are elements of people in the United Nations who would love to have international government, but it's just one element of a much larger train that keeps rolling on.