Friday, 11 April 2008
Hillsong make monkeys out of bunnies
Hillsong 1 defeated Rabbitohs nil
Sydney rugby league club South Sydney, the Rabbitohs, have been made to look like absolute dills by playing follow the leader and responding to a tune harped by the bible-bashing Hillsong mob.
The Rabbitohs, along with a number of piss-poor politicians and self-serving business leaders, are supporting the Hillsong Church in its bid to build a super-dooper church in Sydney's inner city.
The weird team of bedfellows supporting this proposal includes the right-wing religious rat bag Fred Nile and the Liberal's Scott Morrison, federal member for Cook, who was previously a director of the NSW Liberal Party.
Want another opinion on this matter? See Oz Atheist.
Sydney rugby league club South Sydney, the Rabbitohs, have been made to look like absolute dills by playing follow the leader and responding to a tune harped by the bible-bashing Hillsong mob.
The Rabbitohs, along with a number of piss-poor politicians and self-serving business leaders, are supporting the Hillsong Church in its bid to build a super-dooper church in Sydney's inner city.
The weird team of bedfellows supporting this proposal includes the right-wing religious rat bag Fred Nile and the Liberal's Scott Morrison, federal member for Cook, who was previously a director of the NSW Liberal Party.
Want another opinion on this matter? See Oz Atheist.
Facebook digital board games helped win the Australian 2007 federal election?
A National Library of Australia staff paper The 2007 Federal Election and the Internet is quite firm on the point that the Internet is beginning to impact on federal election campaigns.
Election 2007 staff paper link.
Besides a surprisingly high estimation of 300,000 18-24 year olds not bothering to sign onto the electoral roll, the study shows that while youth generally votes for the first time without a strong previous attachment to a specific political party, young women are more likely to reach their majority without this firm commitment and politicians are in with a chance with these women if they address social and environmental issues.
There is obviously a lesson or two for future election candidates in all this, as well as reasons for internet users to be cautious about political content.
Election 2007 staff paper link.
It is clear now that the 2007 federal election can safely be adjudged as the first in which the Internet became not just the repository for information, but also a tool both to communicate policies with the public and to allow potential voters to in return interact in multiple ways with the parties and their candidates. It is impossible to say what effect this may have had on the electoral outcome, and assuredly as in previous elections not every voter would have visited an election website. However, the Internet is now and remains the only medium in which all those involved in elections are present. It is the only place that the general public can examine political parties' policies as the days of the printed manifesto or policy brochure are long gone. It is also therefore the place of record and as such needs to be preserved. Democracy requires the political process to be open and accountable, maintaining an archive of online election documentation, media statements and policies therefore is a vital component of that process.---
Unsuccessful and essentially pointless use of social networking was that by politicians who did not actually themselves create or maintain their profiles instead letting party staffers intermittently update them. The only benefit that 'friends' got from these sources was an occasional press release. However, many other less high profile candidates, particularly those who were not sitting, used the opportunity to create networks, communicate their views and motivate supporters. Successful social networking involves giving over something of your self, sharing interests and activities. Thus a candidate who was prepared to converse, take quizzes, play scrabble games and other quotidian activities on Facebook, was far more likely to develop friendships which could translate into votes.---
Blogs have been a feature of the Australian Internet landscape for a number of years. The blogosphere is now a mature feature of political discourse. However being mature has meant that political affiliations on most influential or popular blogs have become fixed and it is made very clear on most of them which political persuasion is dominant. On some of these blogs comment facilities exist only for those who agree with the blog's political line and discussion or dispute is treating as emanating from 'trolls'- trolls being the popular term for generally pseudonymous online agitators who enjoy causing controversy and baiting other users. However, it is also the case that a number of open forum websites and blogs are used not as a place for debate, but somewhere where interested parties (often un-disclosed party staffers) try to score points. Consequently, the more open arena for balanced and non-partisan comment and analysis was on the psephology blogs. There are a number of amateur and professional psephologists in Australia, most of whom seem to have websites and blogs. Some such as Possum Comitatus (http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-77602), Peter Brent (http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-42909) and William Bowe (http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-42908) maintain large sites continuously and have been doing so for a number of years. These sites cater both for voters or offer policy guidance but primarily provide election predictions and analysis of other's predictions and of other opinion poll derived data.
Meanwhile the Australian Electoral Commission supported Youth Electoral Study No. 4 looking at today's 'apathetic' youth was recently released. Study No. 4 link.
There is obviously a lesson or two for future election candidates in all this, as well as reasons for internet users to be cautious about political content.
Labels:
federal election 2007,
media,
politics,
telecommunications
"Government doesn't listen to us blackfellas anymore"
In a recent conversation I was told: "Government doesn't listen to us blackfellas anymore."
Four and a half months after Labor won federal government, it is unfortunate but not exactly surprising that this feeling still exists here on the NSW North Coast.
Labor MPs Janelle Saffin and Justine Elliott and Nationals MP Luke Hartsuyker would do well to consider that it takes more than bi-partisan token gestures to bridge the divide perpetuated and often deepened by previous governments and parliaments.
Apart from Andrew Hegedus as a Clarence co-facilitator, how many people from local indigenous communities actually attended the two Labor sponsored three-hour Clarence Valley 2020 local summit meetings held on 4 & 5 April 2008?
Whatever local summit media release went out after these meetings obviously didn't contain much about Clarence indigenous views because nary a word from this perspective appeared in the online news media or any newspapers which came my way.
I await media coverage of the Lismore 2020 local summit next week with interest.
Perhaps that media release might also tell those without the means to attend exactly who was there creating the documents supposedly carrying our collective voices to Canberra at the end of the month.
Labels:
Australian society,
indigenous affairs,
media,
politics
Dr. 'I'm listening' Nelson fails to rate a blip on Google Trends this month
Poor Brendan Nelson didn't even raise a blip on this Google Trends graph covering worldwide searches for his name compared to that of Kevin Rudd, starting 30 March and ending 6 April 2008.
It seems his listening tour is not inspiring anyone to find out more about him.
* "kevin rudd" * "brendan nelson"
It seems his listening tour is not inspiring anyone to find out more about him.
* "kevin rudd" * "brendan nelson"
Labels:
e-ephemera,
Liberal Party of Australia,
politics
A waterfront opportunity Labor may find too hard to resist
Deputy Prime Minister Julia Gillard and Federal Labor are said to be considering eventually revoking those 'conclusive certificates' the former Howard Government slapped on documents covering the Australian waterfront dispute and mass sackings by Patricks Stevedores.
Won't that set the cat among the pigeons ten years down the track!
Perhaps we will be able to find out the truth of the rumour that John Howard 'engineered' this dispute and used $150 million of taxpayers money to underwrite those sackings.
At least we would probably get to see the 1998 ACIL-I aka Waterfront Strategy reported to be authored by consultant Paul Houlihan.
Howard and Reith may have led the charge to bring down the Maritime Union, but many of the current Coalition front bench were around in 1998.
Little Brennie Nelson was an MP at the time and became Secretary, Government Members' Employment, Education and Workplace Relations Committee in that same year.
Labels:
federal government,
industrial relations,
politics
Thursday, 10 April 2008
And you thought cricketers played for the love of the game
Ever wondered what motivates a bloke - okay, and the odd sheila - to don the creams and play cricket? Well, Aussie cricketer Stuart MacGill (pictured below - thanks, Sydney Morning Herald!) has let the cat out of the bag.

According to MacGill, "People have many different motivations. For some it's ego, some it's for appearances, some it's for cash, for some it's to be a pain in the arse and for some it's to get out of the house."
However, MacGill reckons money is the primary motive for some of Australia's cricketers to play the game.
"I don't think it's a problem - provided the guy does his job I don't care what the motivation is."
Confirming just how out of touch Australian cricket's establishment is Australia's chairman of selectors, Andrew Hilditch, rejected the idea that players were driven by money despite a survey, commissioned by the Australian Cricketers' Association, showing that 47 per cent of national and 49 per cent of state players would consider an early retirement to play in lucrative Twenty20 tournaments.
Read more about this matter in today's Sydney Morning Herald here.

According to MacGill, "People have many different motivations. For some it's ego, some it's for appearances, some it's for cash, for some it's to be a pain in the arse and for some it's to get out of the house."
However, MacGill reckons money is the primary motive for some of Australia's cricketers to play the game.
"I don't think it's a problem - provided the guy does his job I don't care what the motivation is."
Confirming just how out of touch Australian cricket's establishment is Australia's chairman of selectors, Andrew Hilditch, rejected the idea that players were driven by money despite a survey, commissioned by the Australian Cricketers' Association, showing that 47 per cent of national and 49 per cent of state players would consider an early retirement to play in lucrative Twenty20 tournaments.
Read more about this matter in today's Sydney Morning Herald here.
The global warming fencesitter's dilemma
Playing devil's advocate to win from http://xkcd.com
Labels:
accountability,
climate change,
environment
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)