Friday, 6 February 2009
Senator Conroy and the Federal Bureau of Investigation
Remember way back when (January 2008) Senator Conroy's spokesperson was quoted:
Senator Conroy's spokeswoman said the blacklist would be expanded through liaison with the Australian Federal Police, and international agencies such as Interpol and the FBI.
Then, it was a little worrying that the super-conservative Federal Bureau of Investigation would presumably have some input into Conroy's expanded blacklist.
It became all the more worrying this month when the Bureau formally entered communication partnerships with the following faith-based organizations:
Oak Cliff Bible Fellowship in Dallas, Texas, under the leadership of Dr. Tony Evans;
The Potter's House in Dallas, Texas, under the leadership of Bishop T.D. Jakes;
The First Baptist Church of Glenarden in Upper Marlboro, Maryland, under the leadership of Pastor John Jenkins;
The Full Gospel Baptist Church Fellowship in Decatur, Georgia, under the leadership of Bishop Paul Morton;
Greater Mount Calvary Holy Church in Washington, D.C., under the leadership of Bishop Alfred Owens; and
Ever Increasing Faith Ministries in Los Angeles, California, under the leadership of Dr. Fred Rice.
Treatment of Grafton workers lower than a snake's belly
Directors of companies used to hire workers for the parent company operating Grafton abattoir are still giving former workers (sacked without receiving their due entitlements) the runaround.
It seems that no-one is taking responsibility.
And now Liberals MP Bronwyn Bishop is jumping on the bandwagon with offers of help.
Yep, Bronnie - you helped set up the WorkChoices legislation which virtually encouraged employers to shaft workers and now you want to help.
Too little, too late, mate.
It seems that no-one is taking responsibility.
And now Liberals MP Bronwyn Bishop is jumping on the bandwagon with offers of help.
Yep, Bronnie - you helped set up the WorkChoices legislation which virtually encouraged employers to shaft workers and now you want to help.
Too little, too late, mate.
Thursday, 5 February 2009
Some pollies show what a waste of space they can be
The Libs and Nats are revolting.
No they're not just moving against the government, they are repulsive.
Malcolm Turnbull is going to the newspapers and saying that he wants a smaller second stimulus package (less than half of the $42 billion)and that he will block the Rudd Government in parliament.
What's he going to cut?
Social housing, defence forces accomodation, making homes warmer in winter, a little extra money for students, better class rooms and school libraries, a bonus for the working poor?
What an utter waste of space that man has turned out to be.
Upriver Bill
Northern Rivers
Guest Speak is a North Coast Voices segment allowing serious or satirical comment from NSW Northern Rivers residents.
Email ncvguestpeak at live dot com dot au to submit comment for consideration.
No they're not just moving against the government, they are repulsive.
Malcolm Turnbull is going to the newspapers and saying that he wants a smaller second stimulus package (less than half of the $42 billion)and that he will block the Rudd Government in parliament.
What's he going to cut?
Social housing, defence forces accomodation, making homes warmer in winter, a little extra money for students, better class rooms and school libraries, a bonus for the working poor?
What an utter waste of space that man has turned out to be.
Upriver Bill
Northern Rivers
Guest Speak is a North Coast Voices segment allowing serious or satirical comment from NSW Northern Rivers residents.
Email ncvguestpeak at live dot com dot au to submit comment for consideration.
The FBI is watching YouTube
The FBI is watching
Apparently the bureau is searching for Al Qaeda videos.
For heavens sake don't tell Senator Conroy! ;-)
Suggestions on the future of the International Whaling Commission: details of the Hogarth-De Soto proposal for Japanese whaling
Is Japan beginning to win its war of attrition against the anti-whaling nations?
The International Whaling Commission (IWC) has released its Chairs’ Suggestions on the Future of the International Whaling Commission found in the Report on the Small Working Group (SWG) on the Future of the International Whaling Commission, 2 February 2009.
Element 6: JAPANESE SMALL TYPE COASTAL WHALING
An interim quota for "O" stock common minke whales in Japanese coastal waters for a five year period would be implemented, having regard to the unique circumstances that exist for four Japanese coastal communities. This whaling would be managed, consistent with the advice of the Scientific Committee, under a Schedule amendment that would last for 5 years. The Scientific
Committee would provide interim advice concerning the total removals of O and J stock common minke whales. The advice would be provided under the following two scenarios: a) constant catches for 5 years and 0 thereafter, b) constant catches for 5 years with the same level of catches thereafter.
Any direct take of J-stock animals must be identified and included with J-stock animals taken as bycatch in commercial fisheries, and managed according to the recommendations of the Scientific Committee. No more than a total of five vessels from Taiji, Abashiri, Ayukawa and Wada would be used, all trips must be day trips, and monitoring, control and enforcement methods must be identified and implemented. All meat would be locally consumed. In accordance with the Schedule, annual reports would be submitted to the IWC for each year’s hunt identifying the number of whales taken, the position of capture, the species taken and locations where whales are landed. Arrangements would be made for the Secretariat to verify the composition of total removals regarding J- and O- stock animals.
Element 23: RESEARCH UNDER SPECIAL PERMIT
This issue was one of the most contentious discussed by the Small Working Group. Many countries remained opposed to whaling under special permit. Various approaches have been suggested, including elimination, bringing it under the control of IWC and using a Code of Conduct. However, in the spirit of trying to reach a consensus on measures to improve the performance of the IWC, a significant reduction in the number of whales taken under special permit during the interim period is proposed; during that period the issue will be addressed further with a view to seeking a long-term arrangement. Such a proposal should in no way be interpreted as meaning that countries who are opposed to special permit whaling are thereby endorsing it; they might prefer to view it as a step in the process of reducing the number of whales taken while negotiations continue on the future of the IWC.
Based on discussions, the following options are proposed:
Option 1:
(1) For the next five years, a phase-out of special permit whaling of Antarctic minke whales in the Southern Ocean would occur, where takes of minke whales in the Southern Ocean would be reduced by 20% in the first year and each year thereafter to reach zero by year 5.
(2) No takes of humpback or fin whales in the Southern Ocean.
(3) All removal levels would be reviewed by the Scientific Committee and consistent with its recommendations.
Or,
Option 2:
(1) for the next five years, an annual limit of x Antarctic common minke whales and y fin whales is established in the Southern Ocean associated with JARPA II research, pending interim advice from the Scientific Committee regarding the sustainability of these removal levels.
(2) It is anticipated, pending advice from the Scientific Committee on sustainability, that in the western North Pacific as part of JARPN II research, ww O-stock common minke whales, xx sei whales, yy Brydes and zz sperm whales will be harvested annually.
Concerning the conduct of research under special permit, the Commission adopted a new approach (Annex P) at the Santiago meeting. The Scientific Committee will continue to use this approach for the review of existing and new research programmes. Member nations will take account of recommendations from the Scientific Committee regarding the experimental design.
During the 5-year interim period the Commission will address all issues pertaining to Article VIII. Of special importance are the issues of where special permit whaling would be allowed (i.e. whether special permit whaling should be allowed in designated sanctuaries), the long term purpose or need for special permit whaling, and monitoring and compliance protocols.
Element 27: SANCTUARIES
A South Atlantic Sanctuary should be established for an initial period of five years. The boundary for this sanctuary would take into account the interests of coastal range states. A ¾’s majority vote of the IWC would be required to extend this designation beyond the interim period.
The International Whaling Commission (IWC) has released its Chairs’ Suggestions on the Future of the International Whaling Commission found in the Report on the Small Working Group (SWG) on the Future of the International Whaling Commission, 2 February 2009.
Element 6: JAPANESE SMALL TYPE COASTAL WHALING
An interim quota for "O" stock common minke whales in Japanese coastal waters for a five year period would be implemented, having regard to the unique circumstances that exist for four Japanese coastal communities. This whaling would be managed, consistent with the advice of the Scientific Committee, under a Schedule amendment that would last for 5 years. The Scientific
Committee would provide interim advice concerning the total removals of O and J stock common minke whales. The advice would be provided under the following two scenarios: a) constant catches for 5 years and 0 thereafter, b) constant catches for 5 years with the same level of catches thereafter.
Any direct take of J-stock animals must be identified and included with J-stock animals taken as bycatch in commercial fisheries, and managed according to the recommendations of the Scientific Committee. No more than a total of five vessels from Taiji, Abashiri, Ayukawa and Wada would be used, all trips must be day trips, and monitoring, control and enforcement methods must be identified and implemented. All meat would be locally consumed. In accordance with the Schedule, annual reports would be submitted to the IWC for each year’s hunt identifying the number of whales taken, the position of capture, the species taken and locations where whales are landed. Arrangements would be made for the Secretariat to verify the composition of total removals regarding J- and O- stock animals.
Element 23: RESEARCH UNDER SPECIAL PERMIT
This issue was one of the most contentious discussed by the Small Working Group. Many countries remained opposed to whaling under special permit. Various approaches have been suggested, including elimination, bringing it under the control of IWC and using a Code of Conduct. However, in the spirit of trying to reach a consensus on measures to improve the performance of the IWC, a significant reduction in the number of whales taken under special permit during the interim period is proposed; during that period the issue will be addressed further with a view to seeking a long-term arrangement. Such a proposal should in no way be interpreted as meaning that countries who are opposed to special permit whaling are thereby endorsing it; they might prefer to view it as a step in the process of reducing the number of whales taken while negotiations continue on the future of the IWC.
Based on discussions, the following options are proposed:
Option 1:
(1) For the next five years, a phase-out of special permit whaling of Antarctic minke whales in the Southern Ocean would occur, where takes of minke whales in the Southern Ocean would be reduced by 20% in the first year and each year thereafter to reach zero by year 5.
(2) No takes of humpback or fin whales in the Southern Ocean.
(3) All removal levels would be reviewed by the Scientific Committee and consistent with its recommendations.
Or,
Option 2:
(1) for the next five years, an annual limit of x Antarctic common minke whales and y fin whales is established in the Southern Ocean associated with JARPA II research, pending interim advice from the Scientific Committee regarding the sustainability of these removal levels.
(2) It is anticipated, pending advice from the Scientific Committee on sustainability, that in the western North Pacific as part of JARPN II research, ww O-stock common minke whales, xx sei whales, yy Brydes and zz sperm whales will be harvested annually.
Concerning the conduct of research under special permit, the Commission adopted a new approach (Annex P) at the Santiago meeting. The Scientific Committee will continue to use this approach for the review of existing and new research programmes. Member nations will take account of recommendations from the Scientific Committee regarding the experimental design.
During the 5-year interim period the Commission will address all issues pertaining to Article VIII. Of special importance are the issues of where special permit whaling would be allowed (i.e. whether special permit whaling should be allowed in designated sanctuaries), the long term purpose or need for special permit whaling, and monitoring and compliance protocols.
Element 27: SANCTUARIES
A South Atlantic Sanctuary should be established for an initial period of five years. The boundary for this sanctuary would take into account the interests of coastal range states. A ¾’s majority vote of the IWC would be required to extend this designation beyond the interim period.
North Coast pensioners took your advice, Kev - so how about it?
The Prime Minister gave pensioners a one-off bonus payment in December 2008 and told them to go out and spend to help the Aussie economy.
As far as I can tell on the NSW North Coast they did just that.
They spent it at the dentist, at the vet, buying clothes, sheets for the bed, tyres for the car, a new fridge, shoes for the grandkids and extra Christmas groceries - simple things like that which sent money straight into the tills of local businesses.
So Rudders not including a commitment to Aussie pensioners in his latest stimulus package anounced this week was a little alarming.
Is the Rudd Government going to put the promised mid-year payment increase for single pensioners on the backburner as it did paid maternity leave?
I second Senator Bob Brown when he called on the Rudd Government to once again include pensioners in the stimulus package by ensuring that they get a pension increase this year.
On the North Coast pensioners and seniors (besides being the backbone of many not-for-profit community groups and the bulk of the population in some areas) are what makes the money go round. I kid you not.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
