Tuesday, 17 June 2014

When NSW Deputy Premier Andrew Stoner "(@AndrewStoner) replied to one of your Tweets!"


Sometimes a minor classic in political stupidity reveals itself. This is NSW Deputy Premier and National Party Leader Andrew Stoner giving his head for a Streisand Effect-style washing on social media:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Andrew Stoner (via Twitter) <notify@twitter.com>
Date: 17 June 2014 08:48
Subject: Andrew Stoner (@AndrewStoner) replied to one of your Tweets!
To: Jenna Cairney <jenna.cairney@fairfaxmedia.com.au>

@JennaCairney1 great piece of journalism, take 1 comment completely out of context to sensationalise it & rev up anti gas protestors #agenda - @AndrewStoner
 
 
 
Jenna Cairney,
Andrew Stoner replied to your Tweet!
 
Jenna Cairney











"It broke my heart that some of those professional bludgers thought they had a win." @AndrewStoner on some of the protesters at Bentley - 13 Jun





@JennaCairney1 great piece of journalism, take 1 comment completely out of context to sensationalise it & rev up anti gas protestors #agenda












One interesting twist in this Twitter email is that it reveals the fact that the foolish Andrew Stoner regards tweeting his comments (made at a National Party conference attended as a member of the press by Ms. Cairney) as evidence of the grave sin of journalism.

Stoner remains resolutely silent on two other quotes concerning protesters at the Metgasco Limited drilling site at Bentley in north-east New South Wales:


It should also be noted for the record that the 16 June The Land article, which also quoted the Deputy Premier, was actually written by Mike Foley. I wonder what sort of email he received from the obviously irate politician?

Working women, rural & regional Australians hardest hit by Abbott Government plan to stop Low Income Super Contribution


Industry Super Australia Media Release 14 June 2014:

Working Mums, rural and regional Australians the hardest to be hit by Government plans to drop the Low Income Super Contribution (LISC)

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has today released a new analysis that illustrates the enormous impact of scrapping the Low Income Super Contribution (LISC) across Australia.

The LISC rebates up to $500 into the super accounts of all Australians earning less than $37,000 whose marginal rate of tax is 15% or less.

It was previously known that 3.6 million Australians stand to lose up to $500 a year from the proposed abolition – equating to one in three workers or one in every two working women.  But the new analysis, based on ABS data, highlights where the pain is felt most profoundly.  It shows:

·     24 of the 25 worst affected electorates are in regional/rural Australia.
·     In regional areas, 40 per cent of employees are affected, with over 30 per cent in metropolitan areas.
·     In the worst effected electorates, almost one in two employees are affected compared to less than one in five in the least effected metropolitan electorates.

The ISA analysis shows the damage to super balances for those on modest incomes in every electorate in every state:


People impacted
% of total impacted
% of total women impacted
Estimated value of lost LISC p.a.
NSW
1,096,277
34.4%
43.3%
$297m
Vic
935,784
36.4%
46.1%
$249m
QLD
744,286
35.7%
46.6%
$203m
SA
291,800
38.5%
49%
$79m
WA
353,613
31.4%
44.3%
$93m
Tas
92,426
41.3%
52%
$25m
NT / ACT
79,952
24.5%
29.6%
$21m

Crucially, the new Senate will have a chance to consider this legislation after the swearing in takes place in early July.

ISA Chief Executive David Whiteley said today that it was not sustainable to have a “two-tier” system, with only middle and high income earners attracting a tax break on their super contributions.

“Retention of the LISC is necessary for the integrity of compulsory super. The reality is that until every Australian receives a tax concession on their super contributions, no other changes to the taxation of super will be accepted by the community at large.”

Monday, 16 June 2014

Meet the troll Will Dallas Brooks * WARNING: Offensive Material *


Image of William Dallas Brooks from his YouTube account

WA TODAY on 15 June 2014:

People power nets a sexist ratbag
As if we needed reminders that being a woman in public life can be brutal and cruel, along comes another ratbag with a rancid line in public discourse - but in the case of Will Dallas Brooks, he might have gone a step too far. The founder of the hyperventilating website polliter.com is in hot water after promoting T-shirts carrying a truly offensive message about deputy Labor leader Tanya Plibersek. This prompted a swift reaction from equality campaigners Destroy the Joint and their supporters, with advertisers on Brooks' website sent images of the offending T-shirt along with a request to remove their advertisements. There were some big names among them and they were aghast to find their names associated with such tawdriness. Medibank Private and Officeworks both promised immediate action to remove themselves, while Telstra said its ad had been ''sent to this site without being cleared by us'' and promised an investigation. Modern people power at work.

This is Will Dallas Brooks on his Twitter account @WDallasBrooks  tweeting what looks like a photoshopped t-shirt, a nasty slur or two and retweeting the truely horrible:



So who is Will Dallas Brooks from Sydney ?

His Linkedin entry reads:

Journalist and founder of polliter.com, working exclusively in the digital media and broadcast media space, exploring the best ways to communicate information and ideas using new and traditional media methods. Available for panel and interview discussions via digital and broadcast media.

This entry also divulges that Mr. Brooks has a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (M.B.B.S.) from the University of New South Wales.

Before that, in May 2013 Quadrant stated:

This article first appeared at Polliter.com, where Will Dallas Brooks is the chief editor. Brooks is an independent consultant in hospital management, healthcare reform and clinical care. He worked extensively with Professor Chris O’Brien on developing the world’s first comprehensive cancer data repository, and has advised State and Federal governments on improving public healthcare systems and increasing accountability in medicine.

Currently Mr. Brooks has FacebookTwitter, YouTube and Google+ accounts - along with two websites carrying identical material. 

The first is polliter.wordpress.com which appears to have begun in December 2013 and the second is the older pollitor.com which according to Brooks was created not out of need, but necessity. It is the lone voice of free Conservative speech left to Australians. Both of these websites he links to on his Twitter account.

Neither website appeared to be displaying advertisements early on the evening of 15 June 2014. Although his Facebook page was still showing adverts for Wespac, GIO, Lite n Easy, Acer, Microtrade, Malaysia Airlines, Total Focus, a number of dating sites and even Australian Customs.

Some of his favourite word descriptions or those he retweets appear to be JuLIAR, feminazi hate group, ALP, unions, ABC, lefties, brain dead, morons, leftards, warming cult, unfortunate looking, nazi stitchup, socialist sycophants, f*cking,  - so be warned that this is the level of 'debate' which will greet you if you click onto his sites or open some of the offensive links.

This is the Whois record for Polliter.com: The Peoples Voice at IP 216.239.141.110 hosted by the Omnis Network:

Whois Record (last updated on 2014-06-14 )
Whois Output for: polliter.com

Registrant:
  Brooks, William
  3655 Torrance Blvd Suite 230
  Torrance, CA 90503
  US

Administrative Contact:
  Guarded Services, Guarded Services
  Guarded Services
  3655 Torrance Blvd Suite 230
  Torrance, CA 90503, US
  Phone: +1.3103161688
  Email: 

Technical Contact:
  Guarded Services, Guarded Services
  Guarded Services
  3655 Torrance Blvd Suite 230
  Torrance, CA 90503, US
  Phone: +1.3103161688
  Email: 

Billing Contact:
  Guarded Services, Guarded Services
  Guarded Services
  3655 Torrance Blvd Suite 230
  Torrance, CA 90503, US
  Phone: +1.3103161688
  Email: 

Record Information:
  Domain Record Created: March 06, 2013
  Domain Record Updated: March 01, 2014
  Domain Record Expires: March 06, 2015

DNS Information:
  Name Server: ns1.omnis.com
  Name Server: ns2.omnis.com
  Name Server: ns3.omnis.com

Memo to those new Australian senators due to take their seats on 1 July 2014


Memo to senators-elect Joe Bullock, Matthew Carnavan, Bob Day, Chris Ketter, Jacqui Lambie, Glenn Lazarus, David Leyonhjelm, James McGrath, Ricky Muir, Linda Reynolds, Janet Rice and Zhenya Wang,

A national price on carbon pollution came into effect on 1 July 2012.

The Australian economy did not subsequently crash and burn, as then Opposition Leader Tony Abbott had predicted.

In fact the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increased in the 2012-13 financial year by 2.6 per cent, labour productivity rose by 2.2 per cent over the same period, the number of employed persons grew by over 122,000 nationally and, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) stood at 2.4 per cent which was the sixth lowest cost of living figure in the Australian Bureau of Statistics 12 nation international comparison table.

Likewise, the amount of greenhouse gas emissions produced by the electricity production/consumption fell by 5 per cent between January 2012 and December 2013 according to the December 2013 quarterly update of the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory released in April 2014, with a national fall across all industry sectors of 0.8 per cent.

Emissions from waste and industrial processes also began to fall.
What this all means is that the so-called Carbon Tax is working efficiently and effectively in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

To repeal the Clean Energy Act 2011 and associated legislation and regulations would be a wanton act of ideology-driven vandalism.

Sunday, 15 June 2014

That political buffoon masquerading as the NSW Nationals MP for Clarence strikes again



Photo from ABC North Coast NSW

THEN

Member for Clarence Chris Gulaptis will take his implacable opposition to the sale of electricity poles and wires to a party room meeting on the issue ahead of the June 17 State budget. [The Daily Examiner, 6 June 2014]

NOW

Nationals MP for Clarence Chris Gulaptis has voted with his party to back the State Government's proposed sell-off of electricity infrastructure.
[The Daily Examiner, 13 June 2014]

And you thought Lord of the Rings was pure fiction......



* Original image found on Twitter

Saturday, 14 June 2014

The world moves on and leaves Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott lagging far behind


This was Prime Minister Tony Abbott addressing the Minerals Week 2014 Annual Minerals Industry Parliamentary Dinner on 28 May 2014:

You see, the main difference which I'm sure you know but which I suspect many of our people have forgotten, between the modern and the pre-modern world is energy consumption and it is our destiny in this country to bring affordable energy to the world.
It's particularly important that we do not demonise the coal industry and if there was one fundamental problem, above all else, with the carbon tax was that it said to our people, it said to the wider world, that a commodity which in many years is our biggest single export, somehow should be left in the ground and not sold.
Well really and truly, I can think of few things more damaging to our future.

This is where major investors and much of Australia diverge from his worldview……….

Excerpts from the Australasia Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) June 2014 BRIEFING NOTE- Fossil Fuels, Energy Transition and Risk:

In this briefing note, the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) explores regulatory, market, technology and reputational risks resulting from the transformation of global energy markets – with a focus on the implications for Australian fossil fuel investment.

Executive Summary – The Structural Decline of Coal?

 A key theme emerging in the global energy markets relates to the increasing debate on the topic of cyclical verses structural decline in the thermal coal industry.
 Evidence continues to mount that investment in renewables, distributed solar and energy efficiency combined with regulatory change is continuing to erode the traditional demand base for thermal coal.
 This is a well established trend in developed countries like Germany and the United States. Germany's coal demand was down 11% year on year in the March quarter of 2014. President Obama's use of the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate air pollution combined with record solar installs and a resurgence in US wind installations to see the same end spells the progressive decline in U.S. coal demand. The Environmental Protection Agency forecasts coal demand will fall 30% by 2030 due to its emissions rules.
 Further, the evidence that China is pursuing an energy policy that is based on more of everything except coal continues to increase. The US$400bn Russia-China gas transaction is
a case in point. The doubling of China's solar target to 70GW by 2017 is another. A trebling of China's installed nuclear capacity by the end of next year is a third example.
 India is the last major bastion of growth in imported coal demand, for now. India's new Prime Minister Narendra Modi aims to kick-start investment and remove domestic growth impediments. Coal India Ltd aims to grow domestic coal production 6% over the next three years if logistics impediments are removed. If Modi is successful, more imported coal is not needed. Additionally, we question why India would lock in imported fossil fuel inflation when domestic renewables provide a more commercial solution that is able to be rapidly deployed without undermining India's current account deficit.
 Global financial markets continue to facilitate an increasing flow of capital to renewable energy. The growth of the U.S. "YieldCo" listed renewable equities sector and the global Green Bonds initiative illustrate this trend. Divestiture trends also show the increased focus on the risks of stranded fossil fuel assets….

Deutsche Bank and HSBC both Agree Not to Finance Abbot Point Coal Expansion

Deutsche Bank confirmed at its AGM in Germany that it will not fund any coal export port expansion. Co-chair Juergen Fitschen said:
"As there is clearly no consensus between the Australian government and UNESCO regarding the impacts of the Abbot Point expansion on the reef we will not consider financial applications of an expansion".

At HSBC Holdings AGM in London, the company was asked to match Deutsche Bank's commitment not to fund the Abbot Point port expansion adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef. In response, Chief Executive Officer Stuart Gulliver said it was "extraordinarily unlikely it would go near it."….

Investor Responses – Australia

AMP Capital introduces fossil fuel screening
AMP Capital announced it will screen out companies with a material exposure to fossil fuels in its Responsible Investment Leaders (RIL) range of funds, in response to client demand. This fund will now screen out companies that have more than a 20% exposure to mining thermal coal, exploration and development of oil sands, brown-coal, coal-fired power generation, transportation of oil from oil sands or conversion of coal to liquid fuels/feedstock. AMP Capital Head of ESG Research Ian Woods said: "The Charter of Operation requires the RIL funds to avoid investing in companies with a material exposure to activities that have a high negative social impact including the production and manufacture of tobacco, nuclear power (including uranium), armaments, alcohol, pornography and gambling."

Hunter Hall Ends Fossil Fuel Investments
Hunter Hall Investment Management announced it will exclude investments in fossil fuel companies. Hunter Hall's Ethical Investment Policy excludes investment in companies directly involved in tobacco, gambling, armaments, uranium, nuclear energy, cutting down old growth forests and intensive animal husbandry. CIO Peter Hall said: "The decision to exclude investments in fossil fuel companies is a natural addition to our existing list of exclusions."

Retail Australian Investors Express Concerns over Fossil Fuel Investments
Concerns about coal and gas projects on the Great Barrier Reef and other protected areas are putting banks and super-funds at risk of losing customers, with 67% indicating they would choose a bank or superfund that doesn't invest in fossil fuels over one that does, a new survey from Lonergan Research has found. The nationwide survey of 1300 randomly-selected Australians shows that 77% are concerned about their bank or super fund financing coal and gas projects in or near the Great Barrier Reef and 72% are concerned about their bank or super fund financing coal and gas anywhere in Australia. Australians are also concerned about the long-term risks involved in investing in fossil fuels with 76% believing the risks associated with these investments are growing and 75% believing that Australia has too many eggs in the mining basket