Tuesday, 20 November 2018
More reasons why establishing a federal independent commission against corruption is a good idea
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
14 November 2018:
Australia is becoming
more corrupt because successive federal governments have failed to create an
effective national anti-corruption body similar to the NSW Independent
Commission against Corruption, a leading jurist has argued.
Writing in support of a
national anti-corruption body, David Harper, a former Court of Appeals justice
at the Supreme Court of Victoria, noted that in 2012 Australia ranked seventh
in Transparency International’s global corruption index, but that today we were
ranked 13th.
“The lack of a federal
anti-corruption agency remains a reason why we have never come close to being
corruption-free,” he has written in an opinion piece for the Herald.
Mr Harper writes that
the lack of an effective federal anti-corruption watchdog had allowed corruption
to flourish undetected and, in turn, allowed federal politicians to hide behind
the myth that the federal sphere is free of corruption.....
One can see Mr. Harper's point. Allegations of federal corruption regularly surface and are never fully addressed.
Take the allegations that one Liberal MP when minister borrowed money to buy into a proposed coal seam gas field (a proposal he supported in the parliament) and another Liberal minister inappropriately handed federal funding to his mates.......
ABC
News, 14
November 2018:
A Northern Territory
consulting company that employs Country Liberal Party president Ron Kelly was
awarded more than $1.4 million through federal grants intended to tackle
Indigenous disadvantage.
North Australian Remote
Management Consultants (NARMCO) was given the money by Indigenous Affairs
Minister Nigel Scullion over a three-year period through the Indigenous
Advancement Strategy and the Aboriginal Benefits Account.
The Indigenous
Advancement Strategy is a $4.9 billion federal fund that was designed "to
improve the way that the Government does business with Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander people to ensure funding actually achieves outcomes".
NARMCO is not an
Aboriginal-owned company, but has previously said it works with Indigenous
companies.
It is unclear how the
award of funds achieves the stated aims of the IAS fund.
Mr Scullion has recently
faced criticism for his allocation of IAS funds, with Indigenous groups calling
for an investigation into the awarding of hundreds of thousands worth of Indigenous grants to a variety of non-Indigenous groups
to assist their legal opposition of land right claims.
The NT Amateur
Fishermen's Association, the NT Cattlemen's Association and the NT Seafood
Council received funds.
Mr Scullion told the ABC
he issued NARMCO with a "show-cause notice" about how it intended to
manage the perceived conflict of interest, but the company declined to comment
on how it handled that and said it was following proper processes.
ASIC records show NARMCO
was established by longstanding CLP member John Jansen in 2003.
According to Government
records, the company received its first IAS payment in June 2015 — nine months
after Mr Scullion assumed the role of Indigenous Affairs Minister.
Mr Scullion was
president of the CLP until October when he was succeeded by Mr Kelly, who
formerly worked as Mr Scullion's chief of staff.
Mr Kelly began working
for NARMCO in February 2018.
He previously worked as
former NT chief minister Adam Giles's chief of staff before being handed a
lucrative role as chief executive of the NT Department of Mines and Energy in
2015.
NARMCO 'supporting
regional and remote people'
NARMCO's first grant
through the Indigenous Advancement Strategy was awarded in June 2015.
It received $385,000
for a 12-month project that was later amended by the Department of Prime Minister
and Cabinet to $330,000 for a 36-month project in Katherine, under the heading
of "provide employee management and support".
Later in June 2015, the
company received $225,000 listed as money "to provide Indigenous
employment and economic development and business support services to indigenous
Australians".
It was later changed to
a 13-month contract from a 28-month term, which is permitted under the grant
rules.
On September 13, 2017,
NARMCO was again awarded $251,453 for a 10-month project in Katherine, but this
time through the Aboriginal Benefits Account to "deliver outcomes by
getting adults into jobs, fostering Indigenous business and assisting
indigenous people".
On December 7, 2017, the
company received $289,300 for "VRD Quarry Enterprises — Indigenous
Business Entity Establishment" to run until June 2018.
The ABC asked Senator
Scullion and NARMCO to explain how the grant money was spent for each project
listed.
NARMCO said it supported
"regional and remote people to establish and develop sustainable
businesses and implement Indigenous employment programs", but would not
release the names of which companies they worked with, citing confidentiality
issues.
It said it could not
comment on how it spent the money, and added that it does not distribute the
funds to Indigenous companies on behalf of the Commonwealth Government.
ABC
News, 31
October 2018:
The Indigenous
Advancement Strategy was established in 2014 to improve employment, economic
development and social participation in Indigenous communities, and has been
funded to the tune of $4.9 billion.
Senator Scullion told
the hearing the money would help speed up longstanding land claims in the
Northern Territory by allowing non-Indigenous groups affected by the claims to
submit "detriment" applications to the Aboriginal Land Commissioner.
The commissioner is due
to make recommendations by the end of the year about 16 outstanding land claims
which have previously been recommended for grant, but never finalised.
"I'm sure many
Aboriginal people wouldn't be happy with their public money being used by third
parties who are effectively trying to cease or alter an Aboriginal land
claim," NLC chairman Joe Morrison told the ABC.
"I think it's a
poor look."
But during the hearing,
Senator Scullion rejected concerns from Labor senator Malarndirri McCarthy that
the funding would be used to oppose land claims.
"It is about making
their position about how they use the land at the moment and about how
different determinations may affect their industry in different ways," he
said.
"It certainly
wouldn't be about opposing land claims … this is a process about establishing
what detriment they will have.
"The land
commissioner can then cross-examine or question or ask for more evidence about
that, but it is a requirement under the act that the land commissioner take
detriment into consideration."
Funding to educate
members and represent interests
Senator Scullion pointed
out that the Northern Land Council had received $7.5 million in federal funding
to progress the claims, and that another $1 million had gone to the land commissioner.
But Mr Morrison said
AFANT, NTCA and NTSC should not have received their funding from the IAS.
"There's a process
under the Land Rights Act that if people require assistance to submit detriment
claims then that's dealt with by the Attorney-General's department, not by the
Indigenous Affairs Minister," he said.
The
Australian,
16 February 2018:
Barnaby Joyce owns land
near a coal-seam gas project he promoted as resources minister, despite
admitting it could be seen as a conflict of interest and pledging to sell it 4½
years ago.
The land, at Gwabegar in
central NSW, is covered by the same petroleum exploration licence as Santos’s
Narrabri Gas Project, which could supply up to half the state’s gas needs for
the next 20 years.
Santos is seeking
approval to drill up to 850 wells on 425 sites in the Narrabri project area,
about 25km to the east of Mr Joyce’s land. If approved by the NSW government,
the project could make way for further LNG developments in the area including,
potentially, on Mr Joyce’s property.
The Deputy Prime
Minister and his wife hold the land in two blocks totalling 970 hectares. They
paid $230,000 for the first, on Heads Road, Gwabegar, in July 2006. They
purchased an adjacent block for $342,000 in 2008.
Mr Joyce is on record as
saying he didn’t realise the blocks — in The Pilliga region between
Coonabarabran and Narrabri — were subject to a petroleum exploration licence
when he bought them.
He told Fairfax Media
before the 2013 election that he would sell the properties, acknowledging it
could be “viewed as a conflict of interest”.
But the register of
members’ interests, updated in January, shows he still holds the blocks.
Mr Joyce’s office
told The Australian the Deputy Prime Minister was open to offers on
the land, but declined to say what steps he had taken to sell it.
Real estate agents in
the area said the properties were not currently listed for sale. Mr Joyce
grazes cattle on the land, but locals say it is marginal farming country.
Mr Joyce advocated
strongly for the project to go ahead in September last year, when, as resources
minister, he and Malcolm Turnbull met with Santos and other gas companies.
Labels:
anti-corruption,
corruption,
federal government
Climate Change: Wallarah 2 longwall coal mine legal challenge
The Australian Coal
Alliance states it is; concerned citizens of
the Central Coast are worried about the impact that longwall coal mining in the
Central Coast Water Catchment Valleys and beneath residential homes will have
upon our drinking water catchment, and upon our health, lifestyle and properties. We will continue to
demand that the government introduces legislation into the Parliament to
protect the Wyong Water Catchment District, the largest drinking water resource
on the Central Coast, from mineral extraction, and to protect homes from being
undermined by longwall coal mining.
This is its legal battle............
Environmental Defenders
Office NSW, 14
November 2018:
EDO NSW, on behalf of
the Australian Coal Alliance (ACA), argued in Court that the Planning
Assessment Commission’s (PAC) decision to approve the Wallarah 2 longwall coal
mine on the Central Coast was unlawful and invalid.
Barristers Craig Leggat
SC and Josie Walker argued against the approval of the mine on the basis of
climate change, ecologically sustainable development, impacts to water
resources and flooding impacts.
The legal team: Craig
Leggat SC, Josie Walker of Counsel, Brendan Dobbie, Acting Principal Solicitor
and Isaac St Clair-Burns, Solicitor of EDO NSW.
“Our client ACA
argued that the PAC’s decision was invalid on 10 specific grounds”, said David
Morris, CEO of EDO NSW. "We focused on the PAC’s assessment of the mine’s
downstream greenhouse gas emissions and impacts to the Central Coast water
supply and likely flood-affected properties.”
The Wallarah 2 project
is predicted to have impacts on 88 private properties, which will be exposed,
in varying degrees, to increased risks of flooding. The mine has proposed
various options to mitigate those impacts or, where that is not practicable, to
make arrangements for the voluntary purchase of flood affected properties. The
ACA questioned the legal validity of those conditions.
In addition to the
predicted impacts from flooding and to the Central Coast water supply, Wallarah
2 will make a substantial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions – estimated
to be more than 264 million tonnes of CO2 over the 28-year life of the mine.
NSW law required the PAC to consider an assessment of those emissions when
approving the mine. However, the ACA argued in Court that the PAC specifically
disavowed consideration of downstream greenhouse gas emissions and therefore
the approval was contrary to the law and also to the principles of ecologically
sustainable development, which includes the principle of intergenerational
equity.
“This case is by its
very nature climate change litigation, which we’re seeing more and more in
Australia. We argued that the law in this case wasn’t followed with respect to
climate change impacts and the principle of intergenerational equity”, David
Morris said.
Of additional interest,
this was a paperless trial, one of the first that EDO NSW has been involved
with, and it proceeded very smoothly.
A judgment is expected
sometime before the end of May 2019.
Further detail on this
case can be found here: www.edonsw.org.au/wallarah2_aca
EDO NSW is an independent community
legal centre specialising in public interest environmental law and members of Northern Rivers communites can
contact the EDO at any time via the hotline on 1800 626 239 for free legal advice concerning local environmental matters.
Labels:
climate change,
coal,
EDO NSW,
law,
mining,
NSW Central Coast
Monday, 19 November 2018
Will a minority Morrison Government be forced to raise Newstart & Youth Allowances?
Depending on where you live in New South Wales the unemployment rate in September 2018 ranged from 2% to 9%, while youth unemployment went from 4% to 24%.
At the same time employment growth was -3% to barely 10%.
Which means that in September there were est. 195,300 job seekers on Centrelink's books in NSW and only est. 82,400 job vacancies available.
Centrelink Newstart Allowance for a single jobseeker is currently $275.10 per week and Youth Allowance is $222.90 per week for a single jobseeker under 21 years of age.
The million dollar question many people struggling on meagre unemployment benefits in rural and regional NSW will be asking themselves is whether Adam Bandt, Cathy McGowan, Kerryn Phelps, Andrew Wilkie, Rebekha Sharkie, and Bob Katter will use the increased bargaining power which comes to the crossbench in a minority government to force the government's hand on this welfare payment issue. Or will they turn to water?
Here is where the crossbench stands now.....
The
NewDaily, 16
November 2018:
Pressure is mounting on the
Coalition government to raise the Newstart rate following
unanimous lower house crossbench support for a $75 increase.
The Guardian, 16 November 2018:
The entire lower house
crossbench has come out in favour of an increase to Newstart, prompting
Australia’s peak body for the community services sector to accuse the major
parties of being out of touch.
Bob Katter outlined his
support for an increase to the unemployment benefit on Friday, saying it would
help tackle malnutrition in Indigenous communities.
His statement follows
Rebekha Sharkie calling for an increase earlier this week, while the new
Wentworth MP Kerryn Phelps committed to raising the payment in a candidates’
survey during the byelection campaign.
Cassandra Goldie, the
chief executive of the Australian Council of Social Service, said the “diverse
crossbench’s unity on increasing Newstart confirms just how out of touch the
major parties are on this issue”.
“When Adam Bandt, Cathy
McGowan, Kerryn Phelps, Andrew Wilkie, Rebekha Sharkie, and Bob Katter all
agree, it’s time to stop talking and act,” she said.
Katter said the payment
was insufficient for those in regional Queensland, where the cost of finding a
job was high.
“If you’re outside of
Brisbane, it’s no car, no job,” he said.
Increasing the dole
“would go a long way to enabling First Australians to buy fresh fruit and
vegetables”.
“You’ve crucified us
with the cost of food, you’ve crucified us with the cost of electricity,” he
said. “We can’t possibly live on Newstart.”
The prime minister,
Scott Morrison, has said the government had no plans to increase the payment –
currently $275.10 a week – despite an improved budget position, saying “I don’t
think you can all of a sudden go ‘oh, let’s make whoopee’”.
He said earlier this
month that the government would be more inclined to increase the pension, which
stands at $458.15 a week. The pension was increased during the Gillard
government while Newstart was last raised in real terms in 1994.
Labor has not committed
to lifting Newstart, but signalled it would use a “root and branch review” to
argue for an increase.
Labels:
Australian society,
jobs,
politics,
unemployment,
welfare payments
Eastern Australia is now a global deforestation hotspot and koala numbers are plummeting
![]() |
| Image: Wilderness Society |
Echo
NetDaily, 16
November 2018:
Koala numbers have
plummeted by 33 per cent over the last twenty years and experts are now warning
that they are likely to be driven to extinction. In NSW the decline of koalas
and other native wildlife is being driven by inadequate state laws regulating
both private land clearing and logging.
The National Parks
Association of NSW (NPA) is calling on the NSW government to ‘abandon its draconian logging plans and chart an exit out of
native forest logging, and for the federal government to rethink its commitment
to signing new Regional Forest Agreements (RFAs),’ said Ms Alix Goodwin, NPA
CEO.
They’ve based their call
on the recent study by three University of Canberra academics for Forest
& Wood Products Australia (FWPA) reported recently in the Sydney Morning
Herald that showed a strong majority of people oppose native forest
logging.
‘The study found that
urban and rural votes broadly share the same strong disapproval of logging –
putting the lie to claims that only urban dwellers care about the environment –
and that logging is unpopular even where the remnants of the industry persist,’
said Ms Goodwin.
‘The results are in line
with polling conducted in the NSW electorates of Lismore and Ballina in
December 2017 that showed 90 per cent support for protecting forests for
wildlife, water, carbon stores and recreation.
‘This is the latest
piece of evidence that clearly demonstrates how far the NSW government’s plans to intensify logging, abandon species
protections and open protected forests up for logging are removed from public
expectation,’ she said……
‘Koala numbers are
plummeting in NSW. It is estimated they fell from 31,400 to 21,000 in the two
decades from 1990–2010, and their numbers are continuing to decline in most
parts of the state.
‘Deforestation rates
have escalated in NSW and eastern Australia is now a global deforestation
hotspot. We need new laws to turn this around.
‘We want people to
understand that koalas face extinction unless we stop destroying their homes,
which means ending deforestation and the bulldozing of habitat.’
NSW Nature Conservation
Council CEO Kate Smolski said: ‘In one district in the northwest of the
state, more than 5,000 hectares of koala habitat were bulldozed in just 12
months.
‘Trees in that region
were bulldozed at a rate of about 14 football fields a day, and that’s just one
part of our state.
‘We know what the
solution is. We need strong new laws to end deforestation and start restoring
degraded habitat so wildlife like koalas can thrive.
‘That’s why we are
advocating for law reform to protect high-conservation-value forest and
bushland, and to set up a biodiversity and carbon fund to pay landholders to
restore degraded areas.....
Sunday, 18 November 2018
US DOJ 'Mueller' Investigation: the list keeps getting bigger
Mueller's list now includes an Australian citizen......
The
Sydney Morning Herald,
16 November 2018:
WikiLeaks founder Julian
Assange has been charged under seal, prosecutors inadvertently revealed in a
recently unsealed court filing – a development that could significantly
advance the probe into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential
election and have major implications for those who publish government secrets….
Special counsel Robert
Mueller has also exploring the publication by WikiLeaks of emails from the
Democratic National Committee and the account of Hillary Clinton campaign
chairman John Podesta. Officials have alleged the emails were hacked by Russian
spies and transferred to WikiLeaks.
Mueller has also been
exploring, among other things, communications between the group and associates
of President Donald Trump, including political operative Roger Stone and
commentator and conspiracy theorist Jerome Corsi…..
And another Russian gets named....
Fortune, 19 October 2018:
A Russian national was
charged by the U.S. for allegedly being one of the masterminds behind a
conspiracy to interfere in both the 2016 and 2018 elections, marking the first
charges related to next month’s congressional midterm vote.
The woman, identified as
Elena Alekseevna Khusyaynova of St. Petersburg, Russia, allegedly served as the
chief accountant for an operation known as “Project Lakhta,” the Justice Department
said Friday in a statement. The department identified the operation as “a
Russian umbrella effort funded by Russian oligarch Yevgeniy Viktorovich
Prigozhin and two companies he controls, Concord Management and Consulting, and
Concord Catering.”
The charges come as top
U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies warn Americans about ongoing
efforts by Russia, China and other foreign actors to interfere in the 2018
midterm and 2020 presidential elections.
The charges announced on
Friday centered on a conspiracy that included the creation of thousands of
social media and email accounts that appeared to be run by U.S. persons as part
of what the conspirators referred to as “information warfare against the United
States.”
US Dept. of
Justice, Special Counsel's Office:
On May 17, 2017, Robert
S. Mueller III was appointed by
acting Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein to serve as Special Counsel by the
order below.
U.S. v. Paul J.
Manafort, Jr. (1:17-cr-201, District of Columbia)
Paul J. Manafort, Jr.,
of Alexandria, Va., pleaded guilty on September 14, 2018, to a
superseding criminal information filed today in the District of Columbia, which
includes conspiracy against the United States (conspiracy to commit money
laundering, tax fraud, failing to file Foreign Bank Account Reports and
Violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act, and lying and misrepresenting to
the Department of Justice) and conspiracy to obstruct justice (witness
tampering). A status report with regard to sentencing was scheduled for Nov.
16, 2018.
U.S. v. Viktor
Borisovich Netyksho, et al (1:18-cr-215, District of Columbia)
A federal grand jury in
the District of Columbia returned an indictment on July 13,
2018, against 12 Russian nationals for their alleged roles in computer
hacking conspiracies aimed at interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections. The
indictment charges 11 of the defendants with conspiracy to commit computer
crimes, eight counts of aggravated identity theft, and conspiracy to launder
money. Two defendants are charged with a separate conspiracy to commit computer
crimes.
U.S. v. Konstantin
Kilimnik (1:17-cr-201, District of Columbia)
A federal grand jury in
the District of Columbia returned a third superseding indictment on June 8,
2018, against Konstantin Kilimnik, of Moscow, Russia. Kilimnik is charged
with conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice.
U.S. v. Richard W.
Gates III (1:17-cr-201, District of Columbia)
Richard W. Gates III of
Richmond, Va., pleaded guilty on Feb. 23, 2018, to a superseding
criminal information that includes: count one of the indictment, which charges
conspiracy against the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371 (which includes
conspiracy to violate 26 U.S.C. 7206(1), 31 U.S.C. 5312 and 5322(b), and 22
U.S.C. 612, 618(a)(1), and 618(a)(2)), and a charge of making false statements
to the Special Counsel’s Office and FBI agents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
U.S. v. Paul J.
Manafort, Jr., and Richard W. Gates III (1:18-cr-83, Eastern District of
Virginia)
Paul J. Manafort, Jr.,
of Alexandria, Va., and Richard W. Gates III, of Richmond, Va., were indicted
by a federal grand jury on Feb. 22, 2018, in the Eastern District of Virginia.
The indictment contains 32 counts: 16 counts related to false individual
income tax returns, seven counts of failure to file reports of foreign bank and
financial accounts, five counts of bank fraud conspiracy, and four counts of
bank fraud. On March 1, 2018, the court granted a motion to dismiss without
prejudice the charges against Gates, following his guilty plea in a related
case in the District of Columbia (1:17-cr-201). On Aug. 21, 2018, a federal
jury found Manafort guilty on eight counts: counts 1-5, subscribing to a false
individual income tax return for tax years 2010-2014; count 12, failure to file
reports of foreign bank and financial accounts for year 2012; count 25,
bank fraud; and count 27, bank fraud. The court declared a mistrial on 10
counts (counts 11, 13-14, 24, 26, 28-32). As part of his plea agreement on
Sept. 14, 2018, Manafort admitted his guilt of the remaining counts against him
in this case.
U.S. v. Alex van der
Zwaan (1:18-cr-31, District of Columbia)
Alex van der
Zwaan, of London, pleaded guilty on Feb. 20, 2018, to making false
statements to FBI agents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001. Van der Zwaan was
sentenced on April 3, 2018, to serve 30 days in prison and pay a $20,000 fine.
U.S. v. Internet
Research Agency, et al (1:18-cr-32, District of Columbia)
A federal grand jury in
the District of Columbia returned an indictment on Feb. 16, 2018, against 13
Russian nationals and three Russian entities accused of violating U.S. criminal
laws in order to interfere with U.S. elections and political processes. The
indictment charges all of the defendants with conspiracy to defraud the United
States, three defendants with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud,
and five defendants with aggravated identity theft.
U.S. v. Richard
Pinedo, et al (1:18-cr-24, District of Columbia)
Richard Pinedo, of Santa
Paula, Calif., pleaded guilty on Feb. 12, 2018, to identity fraud, in violation
of 18 U.S.C. 1028. On Oct. 10, 2018, Pinedo was sentenced to serve six months
in prison, followed by six months of home confinement, and ordered
to complete 100 hours of community service.
U.S. v. Michael T.
Flynn (1:17-cr-232, District of Columbia)
Lieutenant General
Michael T. Flynn (Ret.), of Alexandria, Va., pleaded guilty on Dec. 1, 2017, to
making false statements to FBI agents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001.
U.S. v. George
Papadopoulos (1:17-cr-182, District of Columbia)
George Papadopoulos, of
Chicago, Illinois, pleaded guilty on Oct. 5, 2017, to making false statements
to FBI agents, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1001. The case was unsealed on Oct.
30, 2017. On Sept. 7, 2018, Papadopoulos was sentenced to serve 14 days in
prison, pay a $9,500 fine, and complete 200 hours of community service.
Labels:
Russian probe,
US politics
GJD Developments' Byron DA rejected by NSW Northern Joint Regional Planning Panel as “disrespecting the process”
A four-storey
mixed use development covering three building lots totally 2,834m2 approx. 1km from Main Beach, comprising
commercial premises, café, child care centre, 24 shop top residential units, 26
serviced apartments and underground parking for 120 cars, has failed to gain
consent.
Echo
NetDaily, 14
November 2018:
A contentious
application to build a four-storey residential/commercial development at the
southern end of Jonson Street has been refused by the Joint Regional Planning
Panel, with one panelist branding it ‘disrespectful’.
There was a burst of
applause from the public gallery as the panel unanimously rejected the $21.1m
development at a meeting in Mullumbimby on Wednesday afternoon.
In doing so the panel
went against a recommendation from Byron Council staff that the development
be approved.
Instead, the panel
accepted one of the main objections from locals, namely, that the proposed
development was to be two-and-a-half metres above the current 9-metre height
limit for that part of Byron.
This would have allowed
the developer to squeeze a fourth storey into the building, going against
resident’s long-held desire to maintain a three-storey CBD height limit.
In arguing that its
proposal should be approved, the developer relied heavily on the fact that
Byron Council has proposed to increase building height limits in this part of
town to 11.5m.
But the panel found that
until the proposed increase had gone through the appropriate community consultation
processes and become law, the development could not be approved.
‘I’m concerned that
we’re being asked to vary a height limit based on a proposal that hasn’t been
subject to community consultation,’ panel member Pamela Westing said.
‘I find it disrespectful
quite frankly, not to go through that process before making the application.’
Panel Chair Garry West
agreed.
‘Who’s to say that,
after the community consultation process, it [the new height limit] won’t come
back to 10.5 metres or 10 meters?’ Mr West asked.
‘If we were to approve
that at the moment we would be disrespecting the process.’
Earlier, the meeting
heard from around a dozen residents and resident group representatives, all of
whom objected to the proposal development.
Labels:
Byron Bay,
coastal development,
overdevelopment
Saturday, 17 November 2018
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
