Australian Prime Minister & Liberal MP for Cook Scott Morrison's inability to face the reality that climate change has well and truly arrived and, that the Liberal-Nationals response has been alarmingly inadequate for the last four years under not one but three Liberal Party prime ministers, means that newspaper opinion pieces such as the one below are going to continue to make it into print.
There
is an invidious strain of centrism in Australian media and politics
that is one of the most powerful forces against effective action on
climate change.
It
is a strain that has become more virulent in response to protests by
Extinction Rebellion and the raised voices of those who care not to
genuflect to the systems that have led us to the current crisis.
It
is a strain that conservatives use to their advantage.
Two
weeks ago, as New South Wales and parts of Queensland burned, the
prime minister was at pains to argue that now was not the time to
talk about climate change.
And
the centrists agreed.
This
week Scott Morrison was ready to talk about climate change and he had
the script all prepared.
Morrison
told the ABC’s Sabra Lane that “the suggestion that any way,
shape or form with Australia accountable for 1.3% of the world’s
emissions, that the individual actions of Australia are impacting
directly on specific fire events, whether it’s here or anywhere
else in the world, that doesn’t bear up to credible scientific
evidence either”.
It’s
a line straight out of the climate-change denial playbook.
No
one is suggesting if we had a price on carbon there would be fewer
bushfires, or it alone would significantly reduce global
temperatures, but that does not mean Australia cannot make a
difference.
Only
on climate change do you ever hear conservatives argue we are
powerless. Our economy is only around 1.5% of the world’s total GDP
and yet we have no qualms in going to the G20 every year and pushing
our agenda.
But
on climate change? Sorry, we are impotent.
Except
we’re not.
We
are the 15th biggest emitter in the world, the biggest on a per
capita basis among advanced economies. We have massive power, because
we are wealthy enough to show what can be done. If we do nothing, it
becomes a strong reason for anyone who emits less than us either in
total or per capita to do the same.
And
the problem is we are using what power we have to obstruct action on
climate change.
Morrison
argued that “if anything, Australia is an overachiever on our
commitments, on global commitments, and for 2030, we will meet those
as well with the mechanisms that we’ve put in place and we’ll
ensure we do achieve that”.
What
utter tosh.
Our
Kyoto commitment is based on the dodgy counting of land use; and our
commitment to Paris targets doubles down on that dodginess by using
carry-over credits from the Kyoto target – something nations such
as the UK are now fighting hard to have removed.
Our
target is also well below what scientists say is needed to keep
temperature rises below 1.5C.
Thirteen
months ago the UN issued a report that concluded we have 12 years to
do something to limit climate change, after which it will be too late
to keep the rise in temperatures below 1.5C.
The
science has not changed in that time; all that has is we now have
only 11 years.
But
this week it was reported that fossil fuel production by 2030 is set
to be double that which is needed to keep temperature rises below
1.5C.
We
are failing, and Australia’s own policy is ensuring that failure
will continue.
But
heck, pointing that out will seem biased, and so the centrist looks
for a chance to appear balanced…..
Not
all extremism is equal and no force of social or economic change
happened due to people refusing to make waves. It happened because
people were prepared to go
to prison, be attacked,
and seek
to disrupt those who would go about their lives ignoring the
issue.
Centrists
love the final vote that sees change occur – where politicians from
both sides sit together and agree; they care only in retrospect for
the work, suffering and effort over decades that leads to that
change.
And
they ignore that throughout those decades, the powerful in the media
and politics actively prevented change occurring by spending more
time calling for calm and reason than noting reality.
And
so long as powerful journalists believe that arguments are worthy
purely because they call for a middle ground, then ever will they be
a force that prevents effective action on climate change.
Read
the full article here.