A little star in the Milky Way.
— For the Love of Birds (@GeorginaSteytl1) June 19, 2021
🐤 Painted Finch (F8, 1/1600, ISO640)🐤
The Mowanjum Community of North West Australia call finches wirrirri jirri, the 'little stars in the Milky Way'. I just LOVE that! #birds #birdsoftwitter #australianbirds #paintedfinch #birding pic.twitter.com/QHT970VJ8v
Port Macquarie News, 23 June 2021, article excerpt:
The Ballina Commonwealth Vaccination Clinic began administering the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine this week and will be able to start accepting people aged 40 to 59.
Planning is underway to increase the number of Commonwealth vaccination clinics offering the Pfizer vaccine.
The other six Commonwealth vaccination clinics in the region are at Wauchope, Kempsey, Murwillumbah, Casino, Yamba and Nambucca Heads.
Additionally, 20 local general practices are due to begin administering the Pfizer vaccine from July 5, with a further 10 starting on July 12.
More practices are expected to come on board from July 19.
There are more people in line for the Pfizer vaccine after the federal government announced that Pfizer is the preferred vaccine for people aged 59 and under, based on updated advice from the expert vaccine body.
BACKGROUND
Australian Technical Advisory Group, statement excerpt,
17 June 2021:
A statement from the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) on the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine in response to new vaccine safety concerns.
Summary
The Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) recommends the COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine (Comirnaty) as the preferred vaccine for those aged 16 to under 60 years. This updates the previous preferential recommendation for Comirnaty over COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca in those aged 16 to under 50 years. The recommendation is revised due to a higher risk and observed severity of thrombosis and thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) related to the use of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine observed in Australia in the 50-59 year old age group than reported internationally and initially estimated in Australia.
Australian Government, Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), COVID-19 vaccine weekly safety report - 17-06-2021, snapshot:
Hi, COVID-19 vaccines are effective at preventing you from getting very sick, going to hospital or dying from COVID-19. The vaccines will help you sustain an immune response for longer and help us avoid prolonging the pandemic.
— NSW Health (@NSWHealth) June 24, 2021
LISMORE MP Janelle Saffin’s strong advocacy over the past two years has paid off for the Northern Rivers Conservatorium with a $277,000 State grant to make its heritage building more accessible.
Ms Saffin welcomed Government MLC Ben Franklin’s announcement that the grant would fund a lift so that people with disabilities can access all three levels of the building in Lismore’s Central Business District.
“The Con came to me for help on several occasions and I made direct representations to NSW Deputy Premier John Barilaro, meeting with responsible policy advisers to explain the need, to ensure it stayed on the Government’s radar,” Ms Saffin said.
“The Conservatorium has a track record of successfully securing over $600,000 in funding to upgrade its teaching, administration and performance spaces, so I was confident this missing piece of infrastructure had a good chance of being funded.
“This much-needed project includes the installation of a lift, and upgrade of amenities and grounds to meet modern day accessibility standards.”
Ms Saffin paid tribute to the tenacity of the Northern Rivers Conservatorium’s Executive Director Anita Bellman and her dedicated staff.
“The Con plays a significant role in enhancing the educational, cultural and social vibrancy of the Northern Rivers community,” Ms Saffin said.
“Once completed, the lift project will allow for true inclusion and participation for all, and over time attract more members by aligning its physical spaces with the excellent education services it provides.”
Friday, 18 June 2021.
Echo Net Daily, 21 June 2021:
News that Netflix was planning to film a vacuous docudrama in Byron Bay brought a collective snort of derision across the Shire.
But amidst the anger and disgust about Byron Baes, a gem of an idea was forming.
What if locals made their own series about the Bay – telling the stories of real people living in the town rather than those simply seeking profit and self-promotion?
The idea was hatched by local bar owner and audio engineer, Saphia Smereka.
And though the plan is still in its infancy, locals have so far taken to it with gusto.
‘I could see how many people were upset about this Netflix show and I thought “why don’t we make our own series? One that way more people will want to watch”,’ Ms Smereka says.
‘I know so many creative people in Byron – this is the perfect place to do a project like this because we’ve already got people with the skills.
‘So I put a few posts up and so many people contacted me saying they wanted to be a part of it– retired script writers, cinematographers, sound people, copywriters, ex news journalists.’
The first major step in the process will take place today (Monday) when locals who are interested in getting involved in the project will meet at Ms Smereka’s bar, Kiki on Byron.
She is hoping for a lively discussion about the show, including the chance for people to talk about the kinds of stories they’d like to see covered…..
She has set up a GoFundMe page and is also interested in enlisting the services of a local grant writer who might help the project apply for government funding.
‘The point I really want to make here is that we’re not helpless in all of this,’ she says.
‘We have the power to do something, to respond to what’s happened and make something good out of it.’
Clarence Valley Council - On Exhibition
Water Restrictions V5 (draft)
Outlines the triggers that we use to introduce or revoke water restrictions.
Purpose
To introduce or revoke water restrictions on the use of reticulated water in the Clarence Valley as required in accordance with the triggers nominated in the procedures and in compliance with relevant Acts.
This policy applies to all properties using water supplied by Council’s water supply infrastructure. The policy does not apply to the use of water from sources that are not part of Council’s water supply infrastructure such as farm dams, watercourses, bores, and rainwater tanks on properties that have no connection to Council’s water supply.
The Draft Water Restrictions policy is available here.
Council welcomes submissions to this policy. Submit online by 11:00 pm on Friday 25 June 2021 by clicking on the Make a Submission button below.
 |
| https://www.clarence.nsw.gov.au/cp_themes/metro/make-a-submission.asp |
Alternatively, comments can be made in writing to the General Manager, Clarence Valley Council, Locked Bag 23, Grafton, NSW 2460 and clearly marked “Draft Water Restrictions Policy".
For further information about the draft policy, please contact Chris Hellyer, Environmental Officer, Education; Water Efficiency < Christopher.Hellyer@clarence.nsw.gov.au >.
NOTE: A major change in Water Restrictions V5 is that the trigger for imposition of Level 1,2, 3 & 4 water restrictions will no longer be the volume of water remaining in the Shannon Creek Dam, but the combined water volume in Shannon Creek and Karangi dams. This in effect will allow water extraction (without accompanying Level 1 water use restrictions) to continue after Shannon Creek Dam water levels have fallen below the current trigger point of 80% of this dam's water storage capacity.
On 17 June 2021 Shannon Creek Dam was 84% full and Karangi Dam was 99.2% full. This means that Permanent Water Conservation Measures are in place for the Clarence Valley - the use of sprinklers and unattended hoses is banned permanently between the hours of 9am and 4pm every day when evaporation is at its highest. However, there are no restrictions on handheld hoses or micro-sprays and drippers/sub-surface irrigation.
Given that Coffs Harbour City LGA contributes little to water storage in Karangi Dam (water supplied by Orara & Nymboida Rivers & Shannon Creek Dam) and nothing to storage in the Shannon Creek Dam (water supplied by Nymboida River) and, with no backfeed to Clarence Valley LGA according to Karangi Dam's daily data, it will be the higher water use of Coffs Harbour, with an est. resident population 33 per cent larger than Clarence Valley's population, which will all but guarantee that a return to Level 1 restrictions will likely occur before Spring arrives - even though the entire north-east region of NSW is now drought free and expecting more rain.
However it is not just the size of Coffs Harbor City's population which makes its water extraction levels potentially problematic. It's the fact that the resident population does not live in the Clarence River catchment area which leads to widespread misunderstanding of: (i) the boundaries of the actual catchment area; (ii) the highly variable nature of rivers within the system; the actual volume of freshwater flows; and (iii) the point at which the 394km long Clarence River itself - from its rising near Rivertree to its emptying into the sea at the tidal estuary mouth - starts to become saline and increasingly unfit for human and animal consumption as well as unfit to use for irrigation. That point is approximately at the end of the first 286km of its journey to the ocean. The combined average annual flow from the freshwater tributaries as this flow enters the Clarence River tidal pool appears to be in the vicinity of 3,072,884ML, which is perhaps a better indicator than the annual water exchange that occurs between the ocean and the estuary.
Clarence Valley residents will recognise these basic misunderstandings in this quote on Coffs Harbour City Council's website:
“Regardless of whether the water supplying Coffs Harbour City Council residents comes from the Orara River or the Nymboida River, our water all comes from the same catchment.
The mighty Clarence River catchment is 22,716km2 in size, making it the one of the biggest river systems on the east coast of Australia.
The Clarence River catchment headwaters are found around Dorrigo to the south, near Glen Innes in the west, the NSW/QLD border near Woodenbong in the north and along the Richmond Range to the south of Whiporie out to the coast where the Clarence River empties into the Pacific Ocean at Yamba. It is estimated that the average annual flow of water in the Clarence River at Yamba is 5 billion litres.”
Gender bias takes many forms and the media perhaps more frequently reports on gendered income bias. Such as the longstanding pay gap between the average weekly full-time earnings of males and females, which predominately favours men. Currently Australia's national gender pay gap stands at 13.4 per cent. Or the end of working life disparity between the superannuation outcomes of men and women.
However, it has been apparent for many years now that the health professions, hospitals and governments carry a general societal bias against women into the healthcare sector and that bias barely rates a mention when governments establish terms of reference for parliamentary inquiries into aspects of health service delivery and outcomes.
The NSW Legislative Council Portfolio Committee No.2 - Health’s Terms of Reference for its current Inquiry Into Health Outcomes And Access To Health And Hospital Services In Rural, Regional And Remote New South Wales Health Outcomes And Access To Health And Hospital Services In Rural, Regional And Remote New South Wales is no exception to this lack of consideration of gender bias.
A bias which has the potential to disproportionally affect the health outcomes for females from low income families, those women who identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and women living in regional, rural and remote areas.
So these articles below are a timely reminder that the existence of gender bias is indicated in Australia and also of the global scale of such bias.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, “Cardiovascular disease in women”, report excerpt, July 2019:
1.1 A focus on women
Much of our knowledge of heart disease is based on research conducted primarily among men (McDonnell et al. 2018), which shapes our view of how cardiovascular disease impacts the Australian population. However, it is known that there are important differences between women and men in risk factors for CVD, in symptoms, and in treatment and outcomes.
Need for greater awareness
Many women are unaware of the risk that CVD presents to their health. Their knowledge about heart attack symptoms and CVD as a cause of death is less than optimal—in 2018, for example, only one-fifth (21%) of Australian women correctly perceived heart-related causes to be the leading cause of death (Bairey Merz et al. 2017; Flink et al. 2013; Heart Foundation 2018; Hoare et al. 2017).
2 Cardiovascular disease in women
Women presenting with CVD often have different symptoms than men. These symptoms may not be recognised as CVD, thus increasing the likelihood of a missed diagnosis.
Although men with heart attack typically describe chest pain or discomfort, women are more likely to have non-chest pain symptoms such as shortness of breath, weakness, fatigue and indigestion (Mehta et al. 2016; Wenger 2013), and frequently with worse consequences (Maas et al. 2011; McDonnell et al. 2018; Pagidipati & Peterson 2016).
Women generally present with CVD later in life than do men. Older women are also more likely to have other health conditions, making their CVD more complex to diagnose and treat, which in turn can lead to worse health outcomes (Bennett et al. 2017; Saeed et al. 2017).
Physicians are more likely to underestimate CVD risk in women, and this can influence their diagnosis and treatment (Wenger 2013). Research finds that younger women aged under 55 with acute coronary syndrome are more likely to be misdiagnosed and discharged from emergency departments than men (Bairey Merz et al. 2017; Saw et al. 2014).
Differences in treatment
A number of studies have identified disparities between women and men in CVD treatment and in outcomes. Women with acute coronary syndrome tend to receive fewer medications, are less likely to have their condition treated aggressively and have fewer invasive interventions (Kuhn et al. 2014, 2015, 2017; Pagidipati & Peterson 2016; Saeed et al. 2017).
Similarly, women with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI: a type of heart attack) are less likely to receive invasive management, revascularisation or preventive medication at discharge (Khan et al. 2018). Women with stroke are more likely to have a delay in care than men, and are less likely to receive aspirin, statins or thrombolytics (Raeisi-Giglou et al. 2017).
Healthier women
An increased recognition of gender differences in risk factors, presentation, treatment and outcomes will contribute to improving women’s cardiovascular health in Australia.
The Australian Government, the Heart Foundation, the Stroke Foundation and other key stakeholders contribute by building awareness among the public and health-care providers about the risks of CVD to women’s health.
Chronic conditions, including CVD, and preventative health are a priority for action in the National Women’s Health Strategy 2020–2030 (Department of Health 2018). The development and delivery of a national campaign to promote awareness of the different risks for and symptoms of CVD in women is a key action in the current strategy. The ongoing monitoring of the impact of CVD is an important component of policy and programme initiatives that focus on women’s health.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cardiovascular disease in Australian women — a snapshot of national statistics, June 2019:
”Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in women. Decades of grassroots campaigns have helped to raise awareness about the impact of cardiovascular disease in women, and positive changes affecting women and their health have gained momentum. Despite these efforts, there has been stagnation in the overall reduction of cardiovascular disease burden for women in the past decade. Cardiovascular disease in women remains understudied, under-recognised, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. This Commission summarises existing evidence and identifies knowledge gaps in research, prevention, treatment, and access to care for women. Recommendations from an international team of experts and leaders in the field have been generated with a clear focus to reduce the global burden of cardiovascular disease in women by 2030. This Commission represents the first effort of its kind to connect stakeholders, to ignite global awareness of sex-related and gender-related disparities in cardiovascular disease, and to provide a springboard for future research.” [THE LANCET COMMISSIONS, The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030, 16 May 2021]
The Lancet, 19 June 2021:
Ana Olga Mocumbi (May 2021) “Women's cardiovascular health: shifting towards equity and justice”
Cardiovascular disease in women is understudied, under-recognised, underdiagnosed, and undertreated globally, despite being the leading cause of death in women worldwide, as highlighted by a new Lancet Commission.1 Several misperceptions contribute to this neglect, notably, the persistent view that cardiovascular disease primarily affects men or only women in high-income countries and results from poor lifestyle choices. The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission1 identifies disparities in prevalence and outcomes of cardiovascular disease in women worldwide, delineates the substantial impact of socioeconomic deprivation in determining these differences, and proposes strategies to address these inequities, increase sex-related research, and support integration of care and strengthening of health systems.1
From 1990 to 2019 there have been large declines in cardiovascular disease age-standardised rates of death, disability-adjusted life-years, and years of life lost.2 There have been declines in age-standardised prevalence of coronary heart disease and stroke mortality rates in men and women in most parts of the world, with greater age-specific reductions in coronary heart disease in men than in women.3
Between 2010 and 2019, the age-standardised cardiovascular disease death rate increased or stagnated in many other parts of the world, including eastern Europe and countries in central, south, and east Asia.2 In a Canadian setting, the 30-day acute myocardial infarction mortality rates declined similarly for women and men from 2000 to 2009, but women younger than 55 years had an excess mortality risk compared with men of the same age.4 Under-representation of young people in clinical studies on cardiovascular disease, as well as worse risk profile due to comorbidities, might contribute to these slow improvements. Importantly, because of women's longer life expectancy, overall deaths from cardiovascular disease are higher in women than in men, and this excess number of cardiovascular disease deaths in women is likely to increase with population ageing. Moreover, the success in declining age-standardised cardiovascular disease mortality over the past decades has been limited to countries with a high Socio-demographic Index (SDI); some countries with a low SDI had the highest cardiovascular disease mortality rate shift from men to women.2
• View related content for this article
Poverty continues to affect a considerable proportion of the world's population, determining unique patterns of non-communicable diseases, including cardiovascular disease in young women.5 In countries with a low SDI, where premature cardiovascular disease mortality is largely driven by poverty, poor access to care, and underuse of interventions of proven efficacy, women face the coexistence of an increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease, a rise in metabolic risk factors, and endemic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, and schistosomiasis. Furthermore, specific risk factors and conditions affect women in countries with a low SDI. Chronic exposure to biomass fuel is common in rural Africa and Asia and contributes to the burden of acute coronary events and stroke,6 affecting predominantly women; this exposure could partly explain the high occurrence of and sex differences in isolated right heart failure in non-smokers in these places.6, 7 Similarly, in poor countries women younger than 40 years are increasingly affected by neglected or poverty-related conditions, such as rheumatic heart disease and endomyocardial fibrosis.8,9 Moreover, maternal mortality remains unacceptably high. About 295 000 women died during and after pregnancy and childbirth in 2017.10 94% of these deaths occurred in low-resource settings, where the maternal mortality ratio was 462 per 100 000 livebirths versus 11 per 100 000 livebirths in high-income countries.10 Since cardiovascular disease is the leading non-obstetric cause of maternal mortality worldwide,11 one should consider the role of disparity in fertility rates, incidence of peripartum cardiomyopathy, and pre-existing uncontrolled arterial hypertension8 as potential determinants of maternal mortality. Indeed, there are a considerable number of maternal deaths due to cardiovascular disease in low-income and middle-income countries.12 Unfortunately, even in the USA, where the maternal mortality ratio was 17·4 maternal deaths per 100 000 livebirths in 2018, the maternal mortality ratio was more than double among non-Hispanic Black women (37·1 per 100 000 livebirths), with more than half of these deaths and near deaths being preventable, and cardiovascular disease being the leading cause.13 Inadequate access to quality and affordable health care along with long-standing health disparities plays a role in this disparity; additionally, social determinants of health can increase the risk of gestational diabetes, peripartum cardiomyopathy, caesarean deliveries, and future cardiovascular disease in neglected communities.
To address the gaps highlighted by this Commission, current knowledge must be used to achieve health equity so that no one is disadvantaged from attaining their full health potential because of their social position or other socially determined circumstance. Reduction of disparities in clinical outcomes requires the prioritisation of high-impact solutions in under-resourced areas, involving tailored strategies for decentralised and integrated care, and support from global and regional partners to improve the availability of interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention and management. Front-line health workers with shared competences for cardio–obstetric care, digital health, and portable ultrasound should be used to deliver decentralised care, improve referral systems, and support surveillance of sex-related outcomes. Digital health provides opportunities to enhance the quality, efficiency, and safety of primary health care, as well as help address racial and ethnic disparities,14 but insufficient digital health competencies among front-line health workers are among the factors that hamper the adoption of digital tools and technologies.15 Finally, as emphasised in the Commission, peer-to-peer supporters and educators in local communities should be used to empower women in improving their ability to access, understand, appraise, and apply health information to promote good cardiovascular health.
In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, values of human dignity, solidarity, altruism, and social justice should guide our communities to ensure equitable share of wealth and leveraging of efforts towards the reduction of cardiovascular disease burden in women worldwide. The Commission's recommendations on additional funding for women's cardiovascular health programmes, prioritisation of integrated care programmes, including combined cardiac and obstetric care, and strengthening of the health systems accords with efforts to bridge the gap for the world's worst off.5 Such a shift in women's cardiovascular care would be a major step towards equity, social justice, and sustainable development.
I declare no competing interests.
References
1.Vogel B Acevedo M Appelman Y et al.
The Lancet women and cardiovascular disease Commission: reducing the global burden by 2030.
Lancet. 2021; (published online May 16.)
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00684-X
2.Roth GA Johnson C Abajobir A et al.
Global, regional, and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes, 1990 to 2015.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 1-25
3.Bots SH Peters SAE Woodward M
Sex differences in coronary heart disease and stroke mortality: a global assessment of the effect of ageing between 1980 and 2010.
BMJ Global Health. 2017; 2e000298
4.Izadnegahdar M Singer J Lee MK et al.
Do younger women fare worse? Sex differences in acute myocardial infarction hospitalization and early mortality rates over ten years.
J Womens Health. 2014; 23: 10-17
5.Bukhman G Mocumbi AO Atun R et al.
The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission: bridging a gap in universal health coverage for the poorest billion.
Lancet. 2020; 396: 991-1044
6.Bassig BA Dean Hosgood H Shu XO et al.
Ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality by specific coal type among non-smoking women with substantial indoor air pollution exposure in China.
Int J Epidemiol. 2020; 49: 56-68
7.Stewart S Mocumbi AO Carrington MJ Pretorius S Burton R Sliwa K
A not-so-rare form of heart failure in urban black Africans: pathways to right heart failure in the Heart of Soweto Study cohort.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2011; 13: 1070-1077
8.Mocumbi AO Sliwa K
Women's cardiovascular health in Africa.
Heart. 2012; 98: 450-455
9.Zühlke L Engel ME Karthikeyan G et al.
Characteristics, complications, and gaps in evidence-based interventions in rheumatic heart disease: the Global Rheumatic Heart Disease Registry (the REMEDY study).
Eur Heart J. 2015; 36 (122a): 1115
10.WHO
Maternal mortality, key facts.
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality
Date: 2019
11.Kassebaum NJ Barber RM Bhutta ZA et al.
Global, regional, and national levels of maternal mortality, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.
Lancet. 2016; 388: 1775-1812
12.Heemelaar S Petrus A Knight M van den Akker T
Maternal mortality due to cardiac disease in low- and middle-income countries.
Trop Med Int Health. 2020; 25: 673-686
13.Bond RM Gaither K Nasser SA et al.
Working agenda for Black mothers: a position paper from the Association of Black Cardiologists on solutions to Improving Black maternal health.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021; 14e007643
14.López L Green AR Tan-McGrory A et al.
Bridging the digital divide in health care: the role of health information technology in addressing racial and ethnic disparities.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011; 37: 437-445
15.Jimenez G Spinazze P Matchar D et al.
Digital health competencies for primary healthcare professionals: a scoping review.
Int J Med Inform. 2020; 143104260
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01017-5
Copyright
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
The Guardian, 19 June 2021:
On Thursday morning, shortly after the resources minister, Keith Pitt, finished his “net zero by 2050: not on your nelly” sortie on the ABC, the governor of the reserve bank, Philip Lowe, touched down in Queensland Nationals country.
Lowe went to Toowoomba to deliver a keynote address at the Australian Farm Institute conference. The speech was principally about household debt, house prices and whether Australians could ever expect a pay rise. But during the questions that followed the presentation, the RBA governor was asked about decarbonisation in the agriculture sector.
Lowe told the conference he was often up late, participating in the international meetings that central bank governors participate in “and a very frequent question that comes up in those meetings is ‘what is Australian business doing to decarbonise?’”.
It is worth letting Lowe explain. “Many international investors are very focused on this issue and it’s particularly important for the agricultural sector because up to 70% of agricultural output in Australia gets exported – so you are relying on overseas markets, and increasingly overseas investors are asking about the carbon content of production, and that is a trend that is only going to continue,” the central bank governor said.
“So agriculture has tremendous opportunities here, but we need to find ways to disclose to global investors and global customers the decarbonisation strategy and how successfully we are doing that.
“It is a really important issue and it’s going to become more important.”
Lowe inhabits a universe where climate change is real, the science is settled, and global capital has already made its choice.
If you inhabit that world, there’s very little grey area. You can see that transformation is coming. You can see countries are now in a race to prosper in what Scott Morrison now likes to call the “new energy economy”.
That race is only intensifying.
Over the past couple of months, the International Energy Agency has said fossil fuel expansion must end now if the planet is to address the climate crisis; there has been a G7 declaration (with Morrison in attendance) that public financing of unabated coal-fired power must stop this year and a pledge that net zero emissions must be achieved by 2050 “at the latest”; Joe Biden, Yoshihide Suga and Justin Trudeau have pledged much deeper cuts in emissions by 2030; and Boris Johnson says climate action is Britain’s top priority and the UK will deliver a 78% emissions cut by 2035 compared with 1990.
In which the Nationals defend the mining industry against a dreaded national “zero emissions” policy being established
The Guardian, 17 June 2021:
 |
| The resources minister, Keith Pitt, believes the National party would be ‘unsupportive’ of any commitment to net zero emissions. Photograph: Mick Tsikas/AAP |
The resources minister, Keith Pitt, has fired a warning shot at Scott Morrison, declaring he cannot adopt a policy of net zero emissions by 2050 without the backing of the Nationals.
Morrison has been trying to telegraph a pivot on climate policy since the election of Joe Biden as the US president, signalling Australia wants to achieve net zero as soon as possible and “preferably” by 2050.
The British prime minister, Boris Johnson, wants Australia to unveil more ambitious commitments before the UN’s climate change summit in Glasgow in November, and he maximised Morrison’s comments in London this week by saying Australia had already “declared for net zero”.
Morrison is facing pressure from metropolitan Liberals to make the mid-century commitment, as well as sustained pressure from his global peers to do more to reduce emissions sooner.
The Australian prime minister was at the G7 summit in Cornwall last weekend as leaders committed “to ambitious and accelerated efforts to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions as soon as possible and by 2050 at the latest, recognising the importance of significant action this decade”.
But a number of National party figures have been signalling for months they are not on board with Morrison’s climate change shift.
Pitt’s clear public warning shot on Thursday, in the wake of the G7 commitments and Johnson’s quip in London, is significant because the Queensland National is a member of the cabinet.
The resources minister said Australia’s climate policy – currently devoid of an official mid-century commitment – had not changed.
“We have not committed to net zero by 2050,” Pitt told the ABC. “That would require the agreement of the Nationals and that agreement has not been reached or sought.”
Asked for his own view, Pitt said: “It is all about the cost and who is paying.”
He said committing to net zero emissions by 2050 would “absolutely cause damage in regional communities” given those communities were reliant on export income from fossil fuels…….
