Monday, 3 October 2022

COVID-19 Pandemic State of Play Australia September-October 2022: in which three prominent medical professionals give their views


Below are statements made by Professor Brendan Crabb an infectious disease researcher at the Burnet Institute, Dr. Paul Kelly Chief Medical Officer for the Australian Government and an honorary professor at ANU Medical School and, Professor Steve Robson President of the Australian Medical Association.

Two of these men expressed medical opinions of the current status and possible progression of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. The third man expressed a political opinion on the situation.

I leave it North Coast Voices readers to decide for themselves which of these three is the man with a narrow political view of this pandemic......




ABC News, 30 September 2022:


Rules forcing people to isolate for five days if they test positive to COVID-19 will end from October 14 for everyone, with support for some workers to be able to continue isolation if needed.


States will determine how to implement the change, but national cabinet agreed to continue targeted financial support for casual workers in aged care, disability care, Aboriginal health care and hospital care.


Support payments for people infected with COVID-19 who are not in those sectors will also end from October 14, with payments that continue to be funded equally by the Commonwealth and individual states or territories.


Scrapping mandatory isolation marks the end of one of the last remaining pandemic restrictions.


COVID-19 deaths soaring in aged care


The vast majority of COVID-19 aged care deaths have occurred this year, but some worry we've started looking the other way.


Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly said he was asked to provide advice on whether isolation periods should be scrapped, and said he recognised there were low rates of COVID-19 transmission and high vaccination rates.


"It does not in any way suggest that the pandemic is finished," he said.


"We will almost certainly see future peaks of the virus into the future, as we have seen earlier in this year.


"However, at the moment, we have very low rates of … cases, hospitalisations, intensive care admissions, aged-care outbreaks and various other measures that we have been following very closely."…..


Professor Kelly's advice to national cabinet noted that "continued capacity to surge the response if required" remained a necessary consideration…...



The Sydney Morning Herald, 1 October 2022:


Australian Medical Association president Steve Robson warned that dropping the requirement for COVID patients to isolate for five days could potentially lead to new waves of infection.


Whenever there’s a new wave it has an enormous effect on hospital capacity,” Robson said. “If you are in a vulnerable place, just wear a mask. If you do get sick, try and minimise transmission by isolating.


And while this is going on, let’s rethink how we can organise better air circulation and ventilation.“


Robson also urged people to remain vigilant about vaccination. “People aren’t bothering to have boosters, we’ve got waning immunity in a big way,” he said.


He said that hospitalisations were currently low because so many people had COVID over the past few months – but that number would rise as people become reinfected.


The COVID numbers look artificially low because the government has made it harder to get a PCR, and no one gives a rat about RATs,” he said.


Robson, who was voted president of the medical body in August, earlier conceded that attitudes to the virus had shifted since the beginning of the pandemic, but said that any approach that involved ″⁣living with COVID″⁣ meant simultaneously increasing the capacity of health systems across the country……


Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation assistant secretary Lori-Anne Sharp said if more variants of the virus emerged, there would be extra pressure on hospitals…...


BACKGROUND


Globally, as of 6:20pm CEST, 30 September 2022, there have been a cumulative total of 614,385,693 confirmed cases of COVID-19, including 6,522,600 deaths, reported to the World Health Organisation (WHO). A total of 325,602 new confirmed cases and 1,668 COVID-19 deaths were reported to WHO in that same 24 hour reporting period.


In the Western Pacific Region which includes Australia on 28 September 2022 there were 92,674 new confirmed cases and 120 COVID-19 deaths. It should be noted that the Western Pacific Region is sometimes characterised by WHO as lagging in reporting COVID-19 infection data.


While in Australia the federal Dept. of Health’s latest report available on 30 September 2022 was for COVID-19 data as a cumulative infection count for 2022 only and a ‘trends’ count of 7 day averages as at 27 September 2022.


Leaving other sources to reveal Australia’s COVID-19 data for the 7 days up to 30 September 2022 as:


A total of 39,564 new confirmed COVID-19 cases including 282 deaths. A total of 1, 563 people in hospital with COVID-19 infection of which 46 were in intensive care units. The national infection rate stood at 0.94.

Included in this count over 7 days were 12,592 new confirmed cases in New South Wales including 82 COVID-19 deaths. As well as 1,057 people hospitalised with COVID-19 infection of which 24 were in intensive care units. [Prof. Adrian Esterman, Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of South Australia, writing as @profesterman]


As of 28 September 2022 a total of 16,161,728 individuals aged 5 to 90+ years had received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine in an Australian population of 25,890,773 people (Australian Bureau of Statistics March 2022). Only 4,879,507 individuals were fully vaccinated with four doses. Those numbers represents a mere 62.4% and 18.84% respectively of the total population. 

On 28 September 2022 people were being infected with COVID-19 and re-infected across the entire age range of the population.


It should be noted that from July-August 2020 onwards there have been reliable media reports that there is an ongoing and significant under reporting of COVID-19 infection in Australia and its state and territories.


An 8 September 2022 Public Statement by Australian Health Protection Principal Committee (AHPPC), the key decision-making committee for health emergencies. It is comprised of all state and territory Chief Health Officers and chaired by the Australian Chief Medical Officer:


The AHPPC notes the need for a proportionate approach to isolation for those with COVID-19 infections at this stage of the pandemic. The AHPPC further notes that while balancing a proportionate approach to isolation for all Australians, it is important to ensure the continued protection of those most vulnerable to severe illness from COVID-19 especially in settings where there is increased risk of outbreaks occuring.


Noting this, while COVID-19 cases with no symptoms after five days may leave isolation, the AHPPC strongly advises that these individuals should be excluded from attending high-risk settings (such as residential aged care facilities, disability care facilities and hospitals) until at least seven days following their positive test result and they remain symptom-free. This applies to both staff and visitors.


It remains important for people who continue to have respiratory symptoms after five days following a positive test to continue to isolate until symptoms have resolved.


For those who test positive to COVID-19, please refer to your state or territory website for information about the period of infectiousness, what symptom-free means, how to access antiviral treatment and the steps you can take to reduce the risk of infecting others.


No changes are recommended to the management of close contacts. Close contacts should continue to monitor for symptoms, avoid high-risk settings, wear a mask when outside the home, test for COVID-19 and stay at home should symptoms develop.


The AHPPC notes the importance of workplaces in using a workplace safety framework whilst implementing this transition, and reiterates the shared responsibility of all Australians in minimising the ongoing impact of COVID-19.


The AHPPC continues to reiterate the importance of other risk mitigating strategies to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on individuals and the community. This includes the following:


  • Ensure you are up to date with recommended vaccinations;

  • Stay home if you are unwell, and get tested;

  • Speak to your healthcare professional about eligibility for treatments should you become unwell with COVID-19;

  • Consider wearing a mask when outside your home and especially when in crowded, indoor environments such as public transport;

  • Keep indoor spaces well ventilated;

  • Practise good respiratory and hand hygiene.


NOTE: Concerning Dr. Paul Kelly's unsupported letter of advice to the Prime Minister, dated 29 September 2022.



Sunday, 2 October 2022

In the face of mounting evidence that Meta Platforms Inc (formerly Facebook Inc) is a bad actor on the global social media stage, it remains a puzzle as to why so many well-intentioned community groups still use the Facebook platform

 

Amnesty International, What’s New, 28 September 2022:


MYANMAR: FACEBOOK’S SYSTEMS PROMOTED VIOLENCE AGAINST ROHINGYA – META OWES REPARATIONS


Facebook owner Meta’s dangerous algorithms and reckless pursuit of profit substantially contributed to the

atrocities perpetrated by the Myanmar military against the Rohingya people in 2017, Amnesty International said in a new report published today.


The Social Atrocity: Meta and the right to remedy for the Rohingya, details how Meta knew or should have known that Facebook’s algorithmic systems were supercharging the spread of harmful anti-Rohingya content in Myanmar, but the company still failed to act.


In 2017, the Rohingya were killed, tortured, raped, and displaced in the thousands as part of the Myanmar security forces’ campaign of ethnic cleansing. In the months and years leading up to the atrocities, Facebook’s algorithms were intensifying a storm of hatred against the Rohingya which contributed to real-world violence,” said Agnès Callamard, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.


While the Myanmar military was committing crimes against humanity against the Rohingya, Meta was profiting from the echo chamber of hatred created by its hate-spiralling algorithms.

AGNÈS CALLAMARD, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL’S SECRETARY GENERAL


Meta must be held to account. The company now has a responsibility to provide reparations to all those who suffered the violent consequences of their reckless actions.”


Sawyeddollah, a 21-year-old Rohingya refugee, told Amnesty International: “I saw a lot of horrible things on Facebook. And I just thought that the people who posted that were bad… Then I realized that it is not only these people – the posters – but Facebook is also responsible. Facebook is helping them by not taking care of their platform.”


The Rohingya are a predominantly Muslim ethnic minority based in Myanmar’s northern Rakhine State. In August 2017, more than 700,000 Rohingya fled Rakhine when the Myanmar security forces launched a targeted campaign of widespread and systematic murder, rape and burning of homes. The violence followed decades of state-sponsored discrimination, persecution, and oppression against the Rohingya that amounts to apartheid.


An anti-Rohingya echo chamber


Meta uses engagement-based algorithmic systems to power Facebook’s news feed, ranking, recommendation and groups features, shaping what is seen on the platform. Meta profits when Facebook users stay on the platform as long as possible, by selling more targeted advertising. The display of inflammatory content – including that which advocates hatred, constituting incitement to violence, hostility and discrimination – is an effective way of keeping people on the platform longer. As such, the promotion and amplification of this type of content is key to the surveillance-based business model of Facebook.


In the months and years prior to the crackdown, Facebook in Myanmar had become an echo chamber of anti-Rohingya content. Actors linked to the Myanmar military and radical Buddhist nationalist groups flooded the platform with anti-Muslim content, posting disinformation claiming there was going to be an impending Muslim takeover, and portraying the Rohingya as “invaders”.


In one post that was shared more than 1,000 times, a Muslim human rights defender was pictured and described as a “national traitor”. The comments left on the post included threatening and racist messages, including ‘He is a Muslim. Muslims are dogs and need to be shot’, and ‘Don’t leave him alive. Remove his whole race. Time is ticking’.


Content inciting violence and discrimination went to the very top of Myanmar’s military and civilian leadership. Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, the leader of Myanmar’s military, posted on his Facebook page in 2017: “We openly declare that absolutely, our country has no Rohingya race.” He went on to seize power in a coup in February 2021.


In July 2022, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that it has jurisdiction to proceed with a case against the Myanmar government under the Genocide Convention based on Myanmar’s treatment of the Rohingya. Amnesty International welcomes this vital step towards holding the Myanmar government to account and continues to call for senior members of the Myanmar military to be brought to justice for their role in crimes against the Rohingya.


In 2014, Meta attempted to support an anti-hate initiative known as ‘Panzagar’ or ‘flower speech’ by creating a sticker pack for Facebook users to post in response to content which advocated violence or discrimination. The stickers bore messages such as, ‘Think before you share’ and ‘Don’t be the cause of violence’.


However, activists soon noticed that the stickers were having unintended consequences. Facebook’s algorithms interpreted the use of these stickers as a sign that people were enjoying a post and began promoting them. Instead of diminishing the number of people who saw a post advocating hatred, the stickers actually made the posts more visible.


The UN’s Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar ultimately concluded that the “role of social media [was] significant” in the atrocities in a country where “Facebook is the Internet”.


Mohamed Showife, a Rohingya activist, said: “The Rohingya just dream of living in the same way as other people in this world… but you, Facebook, you destroyed our dream.”


Facebook’s failure to act


The report details how Meta repeatedly failed to conduct appropriate human rights due diligence on its operations in Myanmar, despite its responsibility under international standards to do so.


Internal studies dating back to 2012 indicated that Meta knew its algorithms could result in serious real-world harms. In 2016, Meta’s own research clearly acknowledged that “our recommendation systems grow the problem” of extremism.


Meta received repeated communications and visits by local civil society activists between 2012 and 2017 when the company was warned that it risked contributing to extreme violence. In 2014, the Myanmar authorities even temporarily blocked Facebook because of the platform’s role in triggering an outbreak of ethnic violence in Mandalay. However, Meta repeatedly failed to heed the warnings, and also consistently failed to enforce its own policies on hate speech.


Amnesty International’s investigation includes analysis of new evidence from the ‘Facebook Papers’ – a cache of internal documents leaked by whistleblower Frances Haugen.


In one internal document dated August 2019, one Meta employee wrote: “We have evidence from a variety of sources that hate speech, divisive political speech, and misinformation on Facebook… are affecting societies around the world. We also have compelling evidence that our core product mechanics, such as virality, recommendations, and optimizing for engagement, are a significant part of why these types of speech flourish on the platform.”


Meta must pay’


Amnesty International is today launching a new campaign calling for Meta Platforms, Inc. to meet the Rohingya’s demands for remediation.


Today marks the first anniversary of the murder of prominent activist Mohib Ullah, chair of the Arakan Rohingya Society for Peace and Human Rights. Mohib was at the forefront of community efforts to hold Meta accountable.


Rohingya refugee groups have made direct requests to Meta to provide remedy by funding a USD $1 million education project in the refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. The funding request represents just 0.002% of Meta’s profits of $46.7 billion from 2021. In February 2021, Meta rejected the Rohingya community’s request, stating: “Facebook doesn’t directly engage in philanthropic activities.”


Showkutara, a 22-year-old Rohingya woman and youth activist, told Amnesty International: “Facebook must pay. If they do not, we will go to every court in the world. We will never give up in our struggle.”


There are at least three active complaints seeking remediation for the Rohingya from Meta. Civil legal proceedings were filed against the company in December 2021 in both the United Kingdom and the USA. Rohingya refugee youth groups have also filed an OECD case against Meta which is currently under consideration by the US’ OECD National Contact Point.


Meta has a responsibility under international human rights standards to remediate the terrible harm suffered by the Rohingya that they contributed to. The findings should raise the alarm that Meta risks contributing to further serious human rights abuses, unless it makes fundamental changes to its business model and algorithms,” said Agnès Callamard.


Urgent, wide-ranging reforms to their algorithmic systems to prevent abuses and increase transparency are desperately needed to ensure that Meta’s history with the Rohingya does not repeat itself elsewhere in the world, especially where ethnic violence is simmering.”


Ultimately, States must now help to protect human rights by introducing and enforcing effective legislation to rein in surveillance-based business models across the technology sector. Big Tech has proven itself incapable of doing so when it has such enormous profits at stake.”


On 20 May 2022, Amnesty International wrote to Meta regarding the company’s actions in relation to its business activities in Myanmar before and during the 2017 atrocities. Meta responded that it could not provide information concerning the period leading up to 2017 because the company is “currently engaged in litigation proceedings in relation to related matters”.


On 14 June 2022, Amnesty International again wrote to Meta regarding the relevant allegations contained in the report, and to give the company the opportunity to respond. Meta declined to comment.


BACKGROUND

Saturday, 1 October 2022

Enshrining a First Nations Voice in the Australian Constitution


https://youtu.be/5gF6DqYH6FE


"We, gathered at the 2017 National Constitutional Convention, coming from all points of the southern sky, make this statement from the heart": https://ulurustatemdev.wpengine.com/the-statement/view-the-statement/


Tweets of the Week

 

 

 

Cartoon of the Week


Cathy Wilcox



Thursday, 29 September 2022

At request of community Southern Cross University is conducting an online & paper survey on the effects of the February floods in NSW Northern Rivers

 

The Echo, 22 September 2022:


What were the effects of the February floods on you, your home, your property, your neighbours and your community? How could the response have been more effective and better assisted you and those around you to recover? 

Negotiating landslides in Wilsons Creek
to get home. Photo Sama Balson


A Southern Cross University (SCU) survey is seeking to understand these questions and gather information on what the most effective response and recovery efforts in relation to the floods and landslides of the 2022 floods were.


The survey project leader Dr Hanabeth Luke from SCU said that the purpose of the survey was to build an independent record of community recovery from the 2022 NSW Northern Rivers floods for people across the region.

 

Recent landslide damage. Photo supplied.

This survey was called for by the community, has been developed in partnership with our community hubs, and the results will be going back out to the community within a month of the survey closing,’ said Dr Luke…...


Anyone affected by the 2022 heavy rain and flood events across the NSW Northern Rivers region is encouraged to complete the Northern Rivers Flood Recovery Survey.


The anonymous survey will take approximately 20 minutes to complete.


Access the survey via this link.


Prefer a paper-based survey? Call 1800 317 503 or visit your local community hub or recovery centre.

Questions or concerns about the survey? Contact the researcher team by calling 1800 317 503 or send an email to hanabeth.luke@scu.edu.au