Tony Abbott has
laid out a five-point plan for the Coalition to have a chance at the
"winnable" next election, including cutting back immigration and
scrapping the Human Rights Commission.
In a major speech
in Sydney at the launch of a new book, Making Australia Right, on Thursday
evening, Mr Abbott gave the clearest signal yet he believed the
Turnbull government is failing to cut through with voters, and that
the contest of ideas - and for the soul of the modern Liberal Party - between
the current and former prime minister has a long way to run.
Mr Abbott noted nearly
40 per cent of Australians didn't vote for the Coalition or Labor in the 2016
election: "It's easy to see why".
In a sign a return to
the leadership was on his radar, Mr Abbott set out ideas on
how to take the fight to Labor and win back Coalition voters thinking
of defecting to Pauline Hanson's One Nation.
"In short, why not say to the people of Australia:
we'll cut the RET [renewable energy target] to help with your power bills;
we'll cut immigration to make housing more affordable; we'll scrap the Human
Rights Commission to stop official bullying; we'll stop all new
spending to end ripping off our grandkids; and we'll reform the
Senate to have government, not gridlock?"
He said the next election was winnable for the Coalition,
however, "our challenge is to be worth voting for. It's to win back the
people who are giving up on us".
[my
highlighting]
So let’s look
at this jumble of potential three-word slogans being readied for the next Coalition federal
election campaign.
RET –renewable energy target
In 2014 the
Abbott Government ordered a review of RET. This review found that RET tends to lower wholesale
electricity prices and that the RET would have almost no impact on consumer
prices over the period 2015–2030.
Despite Abbott's downgrading of RET targets when he was prime minister, in 2017 the Turnbull Coalition Government (of which Abbott is a member) continues its support of these targets.
According to the Dept of Industry, Innovation and Science network costs are the biggest factor driving up the cost of electricity and a large part of these higher costs has been the need to replace or upgrade ageing power infrastructure, as most electricity
networks were built throughout the 1960s and 1970s.
Housing affordability
In December
2016 the Australian Bureau of Statistics
(ABS) recorded 11.3 million houses/units/flats purchased by investors for rent
or resale by individuals and a further 1.3 million for rent or resale by
others. [ABS 5609.0 Housing Finance]
The Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS)
put the matter bluntly in Fuel on the fire: negative gearing,
capital gains tax & housing affordability - The
tax system at both the federal and state level inflates housing costs,
undermines affordability, and distorts the operation of housing markets. Tax
settings are not the main reason for excessive growth in home prices, but they
are an important part of the problem. They inflate demand for existing
properties when the supply of new housing is insufficient to meet demand.
Ironically, many public policies that are claimed to improve affordability -
such as negative gearing arrangements, Capital Gains Tax breaks for investors,
and first home owner grants for purchasers – make the problem worse.
Competition between investor-developers recently saw $1.3 million added to the sale price of an older house at a Sydney metropolitan auction.
Although
population growth is a factor in competition for housing stock, nowhere in
reputable studies or reports can I find mention of immigration levels significantly
contributing to this competition. Which
is not surprising, given that natural population increase and increase through
migration do not occur uniformly within Australian states & territories and
natural increase will outstrip migration in some states and territories in a
given year.
Human Rights Commission
On 26
December 1976 the Fraser Coalition Government announced its intention to
establish a Human Rights Commission which
would provide
orderly and systematic procedures for the promotion of human rights and for ensuring that Australian laws were
maintained in conformity with the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights and in order that citizens
who felt they had been discriminated against under specific Commonwealth laws
such as laws relating to discrimination on
grounds of race or sex (but excluding laws in the employment area) would be able to have their complaints
examined.
Whilst ever
no Commonwealth statute exists which sets out the core rights of Australian
citizenship the federal parliament continues to fail to guarantee protection
against its own legislative or regulatory excesses.
The Human
Rights Commission is one of the few points at which ordinary citizens without considerable
financial means can seek redress of a wrong or harm done to them.
No new spending
Senate reform
Disagreement between the
Houses
If the House of Representatives passes any proposed law, and the Senate rejects
or fails to pass it, or passes it with amendments to which the House of
Representatives will not agree, and if after an interval of three months the
House of Representatives, in the same or the next session, again passes the
proposed law with or without any amendments which have been made, suggested, or
agreed to by the Senate, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or passes
it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree, the
Governor-General may dissolve the Senate and the House of Representatives
simultaneously. But such dissolution shall not take place within six months
before the date of the expiry of the House of Representatives by effluxion of
time.
If after such dissolution the House of Representatives again passes the
proposed law, with or without any amendments which have been made, suggested,
or agreed to by the Senate, and the Senate rejects or fails to pass it, or
passes it with amendments to which the House of Representatives will not agree,
the Governor-General may convene a joint sitting of the members of the Senate
and of the House of Representatives.
The members present at the joint sitting may deliberate and shall vote together
upon the proposed law as last proposed by the House of Representatives, and
upon amendments, if any, which have been made therein by one House and not
agreed to by the other, and any such amendments which are affirmed by an
absolute majority of the total number of the members of the Senate and House of
Representatives shall be taken to have been carried, and if the proposed law,
with the amendments, if any, so carried is affirmed by an absolute majority of
the total number of the members of the Senate and House of Representatives, it
shall be taken to have been duly passed by both Houses of the Parliament, and
shall be presented to the Governor-General for the Queen's assent.
Prospect of
successful right-wing reform of the Senate?
No comments:
Post a Comment